More

Study: Many Employee Workloads Increased Since 2007, Most Benefits Stayed Same

DAVE CARPENTER   04/12/10 10:21 AM ET   AP

Office

CHICAGO — If it seems like you're working harder than you used to, it's probably not your imagination.

Many companies have increased employees' workloads and put a higher priority on productivity since the recession began, according to a MetLife Inc. study released Monday.

The study found that employers have mostly held the line on core benefits, such as life insurance, and matching workers' 401(k) plan contributions despite the worst economic turbulence in decades. Only 18 percent of surveyed companies with more than 1,000 employees reduced any benefits from late 2008 to late 2009, while 19 percent reduced or suspended 401(k) matches.

Retaining those benefits comes at a price for many employees, however; they're being asked to do more to justify their benefits.

MetLife's annual study on employee benefits trends found that 40 percent of employees surveyed said their workload had increased in the past 12 months. Employers did not dispute that, with 36 percent saying productivity improved as they put a higher priority on getting more out of their workers.

The focus on productivity was the highest in the eight years of the survey, with 84 percent of employers describing it as a very important objective, up from 79 percent a year earlier.

Bill Raczko, senior vice president of MetLife's U.S. business, credited companies for avoiding the temptation to cut employee benefits in the face of bottom-line pressures.

"Employers' concern never turned into panic and they retained their long-term view on benefits," he said.

Despite the heavier workload, workers indicated more satisfaction with their benefits than at any time since 2007. A total of 42 percent of employees said they were highly satisfied with their benefits, compared with 37 percent a year earlier.

The study found a strong correlation between benefits satisfaction and job satisfaction, MetLife noted.

"Employees have come to increasingly value their benefits packages, and they really are precious in a recession," said Raczko.

What's more, financial concerns have continued to weigh on workers. About two-thirds of employees surveyed, or 68 percent, said they were affected in the past 12 months by increased feelings of job insecurity, a decrease in the quality of their work or being distracted at work because of financial worries.

MetLife said 45 percent of employees surveyed said they live paycheck to paycheck, an increase from 37 percent in 2006.

However, employees' overall concerns about financial security have subsided to pre-recession levels or below after soaring in the 2008 survey.

On retirement issues, 52 percent of employees said they were behind where they hoped to be in saving for retirement, up from 47 percent in 2007. Only one in four respondents said they felt they were on track to save enough for retirement.

Many have a solution in mind: working longer. Fully 59 percent of employees surveyed said they now plan to work past age 65, up from 53 percent a year ago.

The study by New York-based insurer MetLife, was based on separate surveys of employers and employees in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Both sets of interviews were conducted by Gfk Custom Research North America. More than 1,500 interviews were conducted with benefits decision-makers at companies with two or more employees, and more than 1,300 interviews were conducted with full-time employees age 21 and over at companies with a minimum of two employees.

The study has a statistical margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent.

___

On the Net:

http://www.metlife.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
CHICAGO — If it seems like you're working harder than you used to, it's probably not your imagination. Many companies have increased employees' workloads and put a higher priority on productivi...
CHICAGO — If it seems like you're working harder than you used to, it's probably not your imagination. Many companies have increased employees' workloads and put a higher priority on productivi...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:52 AM on 04/14/2010
To drive more money to the top, it's got to come from somewhere...

Suck it up, slave. Plenty are waiting to take your place.
photo
Theatrixnyc
Remember John Lennon:Power To The People!
12:11 PM on 04/14/2010
And this is the continuing reality for anyone working in corp. America.
03:56 AM on 04/14/2010
For the last 35 years I have been following the economic development in the USA. It always has amazed me how little benefit the average American has earned from the enormous growth in productivity in thís time span.

In Germany the workforce got a share of the rise, and I think the productivity rise in the USA went into the pockets of the owners and employers. I think there is absolutely no reason for the employees not to participate in the growth of wealth. The result is a win-win for both sides. You have a motivated workforce, healthier employees and when times get rough a better standing to weather the storm.
01:17 AM on 04/14/2010
If the US adopts European poicies and taxes etc., employees in the US will be paid European salaries (half of the US), will have higher cost of living (by 30% at least) and a lot more government in their lives with virtually unlimited powers.

The bailout of the banks and the big sharks proves that we are on this path.

Bailouts are the "norm" in Europe. We call them "nationalizations".

America as we know it is over for good and defeated. Americans end up with less money, less property, less freedoms, more taxes, more government intervention, less choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
08:24 AM on 04/14/2010
Oh please....the high taxes paid in those countries provide health care, day care, paid vacations, maternity and paternity leave, college, eldercare, education and so much more than we can imagine....and that actually means more money in the worker's pockets...everybody wins.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booki
04:43 PM on 04/13/2010
my mother used to refer to the Peter Principle, or was it the Dick Principle....
i know i could google it. ....any one know what it was?
or is this it?
01:05 PM on 04/13/2010
Is it just me, or does this entire situation summarize to, "Suck it unions, corporations win and nobody cares"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
08:22 AM on 04/14/2010
I said the same thing.
photo
uvymopka
The voice of truth, in a sea of Loons
09:56 AM on 04/13/2010
The facts is that Bush's recession was better than Obama's recovery.
05:08 PM on 04/13/2010
How about making sense...a bit more than a year in office is hardly enough time to really make a difference.
09:52 AM on 04/14/2010
A better suggestion would be to be accurate. At worst, nothing's changed - we just swapped out someone who actively loved corporate abuse of people to someone who doesn't act like they love it.

In fact, we're even seeing attempts to fix some of the problems which have been screwing the economy up in the first place - something we would never see under Bush, because Bush is one of the individuals who worked to create all those problems.

If we're lucky, Obama might get some small measure of success, and with some government oversight capitalism will suck less.
06:04 AM on 04/13/2010
This is news? The reality is that companies will find any way possible to drive profits and heaven for bid if ou are not a skilled laborer. Anyways, I acquired some companies in a bid to get control of my own life. I was not simple as it was right before the recession. So I blog about it. I hope it helps ou find your way.
http://insightersguidetobusinessacquisitions.wordpress.com
12:38 AM on 04/13/2010
Just did a little research (for what it is worth). Apparently the most prosperous decades in recent American history were the 50's, 80's, and 90's

In the 50's the average executive earned 34 times as much as the average worker.
In the 80's it was 33 times the average worker.
In the 90's it was 55 times. From the mid 40's to the mid 80's it held at the 25-35 level.

By the year 2000 it was 119 times average workers pay.

Looks to me like either average workers pay has to go up by a factor of 4, or average executive pay has to fall by 3/4 to get back to historical norms.

I wonder which one (if any) it will be?
11:53 AM on 04/14/2010
Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoSandwiches
12:22 AM on 04/13/2010
try fewer benefits that cost more, plus a 15% paycut.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcd8822
10:13 PM on 04/12/2010
I thought that was the name of the game...........more work, same benefits at first, now less benefits. Benefits are looked upon as too much overhead.
10:10 PM on 04/12/2010
This bad trend started under the last administration, they tried to restore despotism in the workplace, embracing the mentality that, "hey buddy, you're lucky to have a job, if you complain you're outta here"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowfiron
08:15 PM on 04/12/2010
Is this a surprise?? See the rightwingnuts blaming the victim!! I though the whole reason for recession was to drive wages and benefits down. Who does not know this??
Unions with some help of elected politicians are supposed to soften the blow a bit. But with teabaggers and Republicans along with weak and timid Democrats that could never happen. No even the Great Goddess of communism Nancy Pelosi could not hold that "natural correction of the markets" off.
Sorry.
07:19 PM on 04/12/2010
Yes. And, salaries dropped, jobs liquidated like a fire sale with the work load heaped on those scared they will be fired next!! Where do we sign up for this?

Bill Myers
VDOAKTV
4-12-10
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HJS2010
06:51 PM on 04/12/2010
The employees will have there great bailout. When the leave companies in droves for others paying more.
02:36 PM on 04/12/2010
During high unemployment, corporations always take advantage of workers, knowing that workers are less likely to quit because it is harder to find another job.
photo
FoonTheElder
Always choosing between the lesser of two evils
04:37 PM on 04/12/2010
They do a good job of taking advantage of employees during periods of low unemployment. During most of the 90s, we supposedly have all-time low unemployment, but wages went nowhere.