iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

JPMorgan Earnings 1Q 2010: Bank's Earnings Rise 57 Percent On Huge Trading Gains

STEVENSON JACOBS   04/14/10 04:28 PM ET   AP

Jpmorgan Earnings

NEW YORK — JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a $3.3 billion first-quarter profit on big gains in the financial markets even as the Obama administration pressed for limits on banks' trading of risky but lucrative investments.

The company's earnings report Wednesday also had some good news on the economy: The bank is seeing the clearest signs yet of recovery. The dollar amount of its loans in or near default fell during the quarter from the final three months of 2009.

JPMorgan Chase, the first of the big banks to report earnings for the January-March period, easily beat expectations as its earnings rose 57 pecent from $2.1 billion a year earlier. The company again added to its reserves for failed loans during the quarter, but its investment banking division and other businesses enabled it to more than overcome the ongoing weakness in lending.

JPMorgan Chase has been one of the strongest banks as it weathered the financial crisis and recession, so its performance shouldn't be taken as a sign of how well other banks did during the quarter. Many financial companies don't have such big investment banking operations, which includes trading of stocks and bonds and allowed JPMorgan, the nation's largest bank by assets, to overcome its loan losses.

Yet JPMorgan's reliance on trading of risky assets is also problematic. The Obama administration and Congress are seeking to revive Depression-era limits on commercial banks' trading activities as part of a broader reform of the financial system following the near-collapse of the banking system in 2008.

The proposed reforms, which President Barack Obama discussed with legislators Wednesday, would restrict commercial banks from trading on their own accounts, what's known as proprietary trading. The rules would also limit banks' ability to trade complex financial products known as derivatives. Derivatives are used to hedge risk or speculate on the future value of assets. They were also widely blamed for helping trigger the financial meltdown.

During a conference call with analysts, CEO Jamie Dimon said his bank made "very little" from proprietary trading but declined to give specifics. Regarding the proposed crackdown on derivatives, he estimated it could reduce trading revenue anywhere from "several hundred million to a couple billion dollars" depending upon the details.

"It will be a negative," Dimon said of the proposed legislation.

Banking analyst Nancy Bush of NAB Research said JPMorgan's strong results despite ongoing consumer loan losses raise questions about how banks will make money if they're restricted from trading in financial markets.

"What this shows is that Jamie's universal bank model is working at a time when Washington wants to take it apart," Bush said.

Given the uncertainty, other analysts questioned how long JPMorgan's trading winning streak can last.

"We believe the blockbuster trading results could prove unsustainable," CreditSights analyst David Hendler said in research note, citing the potential for higher interest rates and pending regulatory legislation.

Dimon offered a more upbeat assessment on the future than he has in the past, saying the economy still faces challenges but is showing "clear and broad-based improvements."

"We believe these improvements will continue and are hopeful they will gather momentum, resulting in a strong recovery," he said.

JPMorgan Chase said its nonperforming loans, those that are in default or close to being in default, totaled $2.7 billion, up $946 million from a year earlier but a $763 million improvement from the final three months of 2009.

"We continued to see delinquencies stabilize, and in some cases improve, in our credit portfolios," Dimon said. "Ultimately, the health of these portfolios will track the health of the economy."

JPMorgan earned 74 cents per share, easily topping analysts' expectations of 64 cents. Total revenue rose 5 percent to $28.2 billion for the quarter, surpassing forecasts.

Investors were pleased with the report. They bid JPMorgan Chase stock up 4.23 percent to $47.81 in afternoon trading and also sent other financial stocks higher.

Investment banking, especially bond trading, generated the bulk of JPMorgan's profits. The bank said that division earned $2.5 billion, up 50 percent from a year earlier.

While credit losses continued to weigh on the bank's performance, they were less of a drag than in the past. JPMorgan set aside $7 billion for loan losses in the quarter, down 30 percent from a year ago.

JPMorgan said it lost $1.3 billion on its real estate portfolios, slightly more than the $1.1 billion it lost the previous year. Signaling that it expects further credit weakness, the bank set aside $3.3 billion for real estate loan losses, up from $3.1 billion a year earlier.

The bank's losses in its credit card business fell to $303 million, while provision for future credit card losses also dropped to $3.5 billion.

JPMorgan has performed better than other large competitors in part because of its relatively light exposure to troubled subprime mortgages and commercial real estate. It was also among the first banks to repay government bailout money. JPMorgan last year paid back all of the $25 billion it had received at the height of the credit crisis in 2008.

Its relatively stronger foundation than its competitors, which report results in the coming days, helped set JPMorgan up for a quarter that is likely to be among the best in the industry, according to analyst estimates. Bank of America Corp. is scheduled to report earnings on Friday, followed by Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley the following week.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:05 AM on 04/15/2010
Let me explain. Imagine a fully loaded jet, with many passengers carrying luggage weighing many times their allowance. Imagine flying the plane is highly profitable, and the engines are overdue for service. Imagine the pilots know the plane is too heavy, and the airline knows the engines are out of service. Imagine a really big storm on the radar. Now imagine that the company can choose to fly and make money or stay on the ground for safety and lighten the plane. Greed wins: the plane takes off and crashes down range, killing half the passengers and crew. How does airline J.P Morgan Chase the Money respond? Blame the dead for carrying too much luggage. Blame the pilot for crashing. Blame the4 FAA for not stopping the flight. Demand that the survivors pay the burial costs for the dead. Demand that the survivors buy a new airplane to replace the one that crashed. Give all airine CEOs a raise because they got someone else to pay. Triple air fares. Proceed with business as usual. Get it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:25 PM on 04/14/2010
It ... all ... just ... sounds ... too ... good ... to ... be ... true ... ... ... doesn't ... it ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wassilij
shamanlight
06:03 PM on 04/14/2010
GET YOUR MONEY OUT OF THE BIG BANKS NOW!!!!......AND INTO YOUR LOCAL CREDIT UNIONS NOW......THE SECOND WAVE IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER....YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!! DON"T BE HIT TWICE.!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:26 PM on 04/14/2010
You thinkthe CU's are free of bad mortgages and other non-performing loans?
Hahahahahahahahahah...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wassilij
shamanlight
06:44 PM on 04/14/2010
Well Blinky..How about CU 101
A credit union (CU) is a financial institution that often provides just as many similar services as your local bank. The main difference is that generally banks are for-profit institutions, while CUs are owned by its members.

As a not-for-profit the CU does not have profitability as its top priority. Banks on the other hand (especially large ones) are primarily focused on profits. The CU is obligated to use the “profit” to pay back the members or go back into the organization to make it better in some way.

What does this mean for you and I? Lower (or no) fees and better rates. Credit unions still may charge fees for services to generate income, but the difference is the CUs are striving to generate just enough income to meet their expenses, whereas banks may try to make as much profit as they can without losing the customer.
04:03 PM on 04/14/2010
Who would have thought JP: Morgan could score that kind of return selling our souls to the devil? Ain't that something.
02:58 PM on 04/14/2010
so THAT is where all the Trillions of American Taxpayer money went!

Darkpools for High Frequency trading between the TOO BIG TO FAILS to give the IMAGE of a economy

while the 'RICH" will NEVER GET POOR!

Some RIGGED SYSTEM
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
12:57 PM on 04/14/2010
Dimon said his bank is in very, very, very good shape. Add one more "very" and it's going to topple over and the cash is just going to fall out of the vaults. It pays quite well to be in the right club. And, it didn't hurt to get $20B+ from poor old Wamu.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
04:16 PM on 04/14/2010
You'd think Dimon would have learned something from poor, old, criminal Wamu.

But the thieves just keep on comin'!
12:40 PM on 04/14/2010
They have exclusive access to borrow billions from Government at 0.25%, they then lend the same money back to Government at 4%.

Billions of dollars directly stolen from the pockets of tax payers.

How can ANYONE defend this or think that it is "wealth creation"?
12:28 PM on 04/14/2010
If you cant make profit with billions of free money from the tax payer then you never will. Isn't it amazing that a bank can make a huge profit in the middle of the worst recession since the great depression? I wonder how?

No mention of their $90 trillion in derivatives that will destroy them if someone sneezes at the wrong time.

The Government has truly failed. The entire public and private financial system has been taken over by a handful of people. The people Obama has employed are not working for the President or Americans, they are traitors, they work to give more money and power to a few big banks and a few people in them.

America has been totally captured by a handful of bankers.

Goldman Sachs now owns and runs America.

All the money free money printing has gone to make banks rich and to help the manipulate the stock market higher and higher.....of course the Trillions and trillions the govt keeps printing will hit a brick wall one day and the whole country will disappear.

The only thing that can save America from these people is another world war.

The top 100 executives of every major bank should be thrown in jail and the banks nationalised and bought back for the benefit of the country and not a handful of executives who want more power and money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
12:57 PM on 04/14/2010
HEAR! HEAR! (fanned)
02:32 PM on 04/14/2010
Also we must not neglect to mention that Exxon-mobil made 30 billion dollar profit and payed no US taxes. How can we stop the insanity coming out of Wash.
07:09 PM on 04/14/2010
Page 54 of the 2009 10-K, Exxon paid $74 BILLION in taxes last year
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
11:31 AM on 04/14/2010
I would suggest that our law enforcers get busy a.s.a.p. discovering what Ponzi scheme JP Morgan is currently running to "profit" so greatly during such a time.

I will make this prediction right here for all posterity and let's just wait and see if I'm not proven right:

I predict that we will soon discover that JP Morgan & Chase execs are running a criminal scam.

Like all the other banksters.
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
12:29 PM on 04/14/2010
I will second that, but add that when the news breaks and becomes public it will be met with a collective yawn by the public who will at the same time wonder why our society has so many problems and can't seem to get on track (the exception being the tea baggers who will not blame the bankers at all for stealing but completely blame pres. obama).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
03:56 PM on 04/14/2010
Ain't it the truth? But I don't blame Americans. We've been lied to and propagandized so much it's like being a diabetic on a steady diet of coca-cola and sugar pops.

The obfuscation and sleight of hand exhibited by our government of bankers for the bankers is as intentional as are their actions.
07:09 PM on 04/14/2010
If you read their 8-K and the transcript carefully they made their money from trading revenue. This trading is the only reason they can continue to provide "banking" in the traditional sense since that arm of the business LOST money both in the first quarter and last year. Acting as market makers on transactions. That's not a criminal scam.
08:53 PM on 04/14/2010
Exactly.

A well diversified business that is making money in trading while "conventional" banking is experiencing losses.
11:09 AM on 04/14/2010
Can anybody explain to me the insanity that is coming out of Wash and Bernake. Last year all or most of the inverstment firms were given bank status. So why is jp morgan up. When you can get money from the government at .25% than invest or buy other assets for returns from 4% on up why would they not be making money. And all of this under the pretext of "creating jobs". Join Goooh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1p
10:47 AM on 04/14/2010
The question for these institutions is whether the defaults in home loans were declared falsely or even caused by policies designed to give credence to the big lie and to provide them with yet another source of windfall profits by picking up homes that are sold in foreclosure at a fraction of the original loan amount. The ONLY people who actually lost money are the investors who advanced the real money into a pool that was used to fund mortgage closings (and also used to fund absurd profits on fees, yield spread premiums etc.) and the homeowners who advanced their homes as collateral on loan products that were sold to them under false pretenses. Both the mortgage backed securities and the loans were sham financial transactions.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
01:14 PM on 04/14/2010
I agree, it's a sham. Essentially all of these sub-prime mortgages were supported by the home buyer with PMI payments, the banks really didn't lose anything on the mortgage foreclosure. But, the banks lost tons of money when they speculated on the market and created derviatives based on these mortgages.

The poor home buyer gets hit twice. Paying extra insurance along with interest and then accused of causing the whole financial mess. It is all a sham.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:18 AM on 04/14/2010
Maybe this is why they are so resistant to the new principle write down plan from Obama for residential real estate; if you can keep the housing market in distress, it's a lot harder to raise federal interest rates, and a lot easier to make a ton of money with essentially free fed funds to throw the bones with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DebtNavigation
Attorney and Author
09:50 AM on 04/14/2010
Reggie Middleton of boombustblog has copiously covered the enormity of the risk bomb that JPM is sitting on. The profits are paper, the risk is real, and the bank is still, well let Reggie tell it: http://boombustblog.com/20090121766/Re-JP-Morgan-when-I-say-insolvent-I-really-mean-insolvent.html

The "too big to fail" banks (JPM the biggest among them) have sabotaged any and all efforts at meaningful mortgage reform (along the lines of FDR's successful HOLC program) in favor of their short-term interests, and are only now belatedly realizing that principal reduction is needed.

It's time Americans took a chainsaw to the roots of the TBTFs ... and eliminated all those in Congress who are beholden to them.

In Mexico in the mid-'90s Wall Street engineered a currency coup that tripled the debt owed by small businesses and family farms and also allowed for them to be massively ratejacked on top of it. Mexicans consequently formed the "el Barzon" movement and pushed back Wall Street and deposed their ruling party of 60+ years. In this country YouTube phenom Ann Minch has already declared the debtors' revolt and begun going after them http://www.revoltstartsnow.com

If you've been pushed under, you can read every other page of my book for free: http://www.scribd.com/doc/25443175/Debt-Hope-Down-and-Dirty-Survival-Strategies-Evaluation-Version-Complete
09:33 AM on 04/14/2010
Of course, one may scour the article in vain for the little known fact that JP Morgan did not request nor did it want a TARP injection (what the press refers to as a "bailout") and that it paid the Treasury interest on that money as well as issuing the Government warrants and that the injection has been repaid in full. The first full quarter of the HuffPo's campaign to neuter the so called TBTF banks is over with JPM being the first to report. Hmmm, judging from the fact that JPM blew the socks off of estimates, perhaps it is time for the HuffPo to present an article describing the success, or lack thereof, of its campaign to entice readers to deposit their money in smaller, and perhaps at risk, banks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Papa Swamp
Apex predator, ocean freak.
09:47 AM on 04/14/2010
It still has access to free money (or close to free 0.25%). Most businesses do not. JPMorgan isn't alone of course and HP does love to pick on the big names, but the taxpayer is footing the cheap money bill, yet the cost of servicing our debt continues to rise.

The banks are getting a free ride and making a fortune in the process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1p
10:49 AM on 04/14/2010
Chase will never have my money. I would rather store it under my mattress (risking theft) rather than outright handing it over to thieves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lordmi
09:22 AM on 04/14/2010
Not so , really.
it raises mostly on fees, that increased.