iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Neil Armstrong BLASTS Obama's 'Devastating' Space Plan

Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/14/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:10 PM ET

Astronaut

Former astronauts Neil Armstrong, James Lovell, and Eugene Cernan slammed President Barack Obama's proposed changes to the US space program, describing the Obama's move to cancel NASA's return to the moon as "devastating."

The statement, which the three astronauts sent to NBC and the Associated Press, warned Obama's plan "destines our nation to become one of second- or even third-rate stature."

"Without the skill and experience that actual spacecraft operation provides, the USA is far too likely to be on a long downhill slide to mediocrity," the letter reads. "America must decide if it wishes to remain a leader in space. If it does, we should institute a program which will give us the very best chance of achieving that goal."

Their outspoken critique comes shortly before Obama's scheduled visit to the Kennedy Space Center this Thursday, where he is to outline his vision for the US's space program.

Read the full letter below (via Politico):


"The United States entered into the challenge of space exploration under President Eisenhower's first term, however, it was the Soviet Union who excelled in those early years," the letter begins."Under the bold vision of Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon, and with the overwhelming approval of the American people, we rapidly closed the gap in the final third of the 20th century, and became the world leader in space exploration. ...


"When President Obama recently released his budget for NASA, he proposed a slight increase in total funding, substantial research and technology development, an extension of the International Space Station operation until 2020, long range planning for a new but undefined heavy lift rocket and significant funding for the development of commercial access to low earth orbit.

"Although some of these proposals have merit, the accompanying decision to cancel the Constellation program, its Ares 1 and Ares V rockets, and the Orion spacecraft, is devastating.

"America's only path to low Earth orbit and the International Space Station will now be subject to an agreement with Russia to purchase space on their Soyuz (at a price of over 50 million dollars per seat with significant increases expected in the near future) until we have the capacity to provide transportation for ourselves. The availability of a commercial transport to orbit as envisioned in the President's proposal cannot be predicted with any certainty, but is likely to take substantially longer and be more expensive than we would hope.


"It appears that we will have wasted our current ten plus billion dollar investment in Constellation and, equally importantly, we will have lost the many years required to recreate the equivalent of what we will have discarded.


For The United States, the leading space faring nation for nearly half a century, to be without carriage to low Earth orbit and with no human exploration capability to go beyond Earth orbit for an indeterminate time into the future, destines our nation to become one of second or even third rate stature. While the President's plan envisages humans traveling away from Earth and perhaps toward Mars at some time in the future, the lack of developed rockets and spacecraft will assure that ability will not be available for many years.


Without the skill and experience that actual spacecraft operation provides, the USA is far too likely to be on a long downhill slide to mediocrity. America must decide if it wishes to remain a leader in space. If it does, we should institute a program which will give us the very best chance of achieving that goal.

Neil Armstrong

Commander, Apollo 11

James Lovell

Commander, Apollo 13

Eugene Cernan

Commander, Apollo 17

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Former astronauts Neil Armstrong, James Lovell, and Eugene Cernan slammed President Barack Obama's proposed changes to the US space program, describing the Obama's move to cancel NASA's return to the ...
Former astronauts Neil Armstrong, James Lovell, and Eugene Cernan slammed President Barack Obama's proposed changes to the US space program, describing the Obama's move to cancel NASA's return to the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 543
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
05:39 AM on 04/18/2010
Inner space!

Exploring the vast wonderland that lies between our ears,
will benefit man exponentially more than competitive
corporate exploration and rifling of outer space.

Outer space exploration and theft consumes the funding,
that could have been used to develop the beautiful gifts
of our inner worlds. Worlds that corporations have yet to completely possess.

Highly developed inner gifts, would allow us to virtually walk among the stars,
without ever leaving the planet. We would leave no filthy footprints;
of colonies, garbage dumps, and space junk.

We would return from exploring our own minds,
with peace, beauty, and harmony; overflowing.

We could walk upon this earth; with the understandings
of Christs, Buddhas, and Lao Tzus.

What profit could corporations derive, if there were only barefoot Profits,
walking empty handed, about the universe?

Corporatocracy, is implemented by the elite, for the elite.
The momentum of our mass psychosis is used to draw true wealth and power
from US captive inmates, for those impaneled to wield it.

We really mean nothing to them.

They watch us struggling, uselessly as sperm in a condom, to meet their demands.

Corporations competing for profit, think like HAL: Salvation is illogical.
Corporations possess no soul. Hideous becomes our new normal.

The creed of Corporatocracy:
From each, everything that any secret strategy may optimally extricate.
To each, only minimal compliance with hard fought court judgments.
05:39 AM on 04/18/2010
Inner space!

The same corporations deal with an ever-changing parade
of government employees and elected officials, that eventually leave or retire.

Corporations possess the experience and strategies to win,
and elicit favors from the novice replacement people.

We are being groomed, to become isolated, fearful, individual, weaklings;
unable to oppose any fate corporations may choose for us.

We are afraid to walk away from their deal, because we have been tought
that we have nowhere else to go. [for entertainment, as an example]

The way to our inner space has been almost completely obscured
by our participation in their amusements. We are being convinced
that personally, we have nothing interesting to offer ourselves,
no inner space left to explore.

Yes you do, just use your imaginations.

Well then, try putting some money and effort into it!

The battle to defeat the creul alien inside, is way too scary and uncertain,
for men that are only comfortable and brave enough to go after imaginary
aliens; way out in space.

Man's inner demons demand the exhilaration of inglorious slaughter,
in fixed, sucker rip off, battles with inferiors; and usually to elevate
some fraudulent Corporatocracy sponsored cause.

Our destruction of the natural environment will end,
here on this dying planet, as we create our own hideous extinction.
Our love of power, strife, and conquest, [at the expense of everything else]
will not spread throughout the galaxies.

The Universe will be left in peace; quiet, and darkness. . . once again.
07:06 AM on 04/16/2010
It would indeed be a shame to squander or space-exploring pre-eminence,
but we are left with few choices, as we are left with not very much money.

That being said, Boeing & Lockheed will no doubt benefit handsomely from
whatever funding is left, and perhaps the Rutans and Musks will do ok also.
Competition is no doubt good. Also, getting some Armageddon-type experience
visiting asteroids is not such a bad idea, and far less risky/expensive than Mars.
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
09:57 PM on 04/15/2010
That's one giant leap for teabagkind....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaulLev
author, New New Media
08:06 PM on 04/15/2010
Here are my further thoughts in strong agreement with Armstrong, Lovell, and Cernan http://paullevinson.blogspot.com/2010/04/armstrong-lovell-and-cernan-are-right.html
07:35 PM on 04/15/2010
Here's the problem...no one today is excited about science. How did we get this way? Well, our schools teach more about interpersonal skills than the core subjects. The only reason we all live on this continent (except for the natives) is because of our forefathers' drive to explore new places and territory. We are born with this desire (think of a pre-school age kid that gets into all sorts of trouble and makes all sorts of messes exploring the world around him). But somewhere along the path of public education, that desire is ripped from the hearts of most young people these days.

Why would we want to go back to the moon? Because it's there. Why should we go to Mars? To see if we can.

The reason we have computers, satellites, and thousands of other things is because we decided to go to the moon. As a kid, I would look to the heavens at night and dream of someday going out there. Today, even as an adult, I hope for the day that I could visit the moon or space.

And really, we've been pumping money into more social programs. Look where we are now. Everyone is looking for their government check.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grf67
03:43 PM on 04/15/2010
What would we gain by going back to the moon? This is a good place to cut the budget.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
05:07 PM on 04/15/2010
We need a moon base so we can start getting all those alien artifacts buried there.
07:57 PM on 04/15/2010
We have to go back because we are humans and not monkeys -- despite what the oligarchs think.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keepemhonest
02:18 PM on 04/15/2010
HAHAHA

And the teabaggers want tax cuts but they don't want to cut NASA
02:57 PM on 04/15/2010
x2.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
desertdweller
Left of Left of Center-Left
02:08 PM on 04/15/2010
Armstrong cannot be trusted. Everyone knows that when Buzz Aldrin was having a drink of "Tang," Armstrong ran out the door ahead of him and was first to step on the Moon's surface. Well, at least according to George Costanza.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Nelson Montana
Artist, Author, Composer
01:58 PM on 04/15/2010
The problem with the space program is that it hit a wall. It became obvious that anything beyond landing on the moon is far beyond our technology.

It would be great if we could afford further exploration, but right now, we need to examine efficacious use of funds that are more "down to earth."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
fireW
Don't believe everything you think.
02:17 PM on 04/15/2010
Landing on the moon (again) is currently beyond our technology, as a great deal of the Apollo-era technology is, in fact, lost. For example, we couldn't build a heavy LV now (e.g. Saturn V or even 1-b) if our lives depended on it as the specs & blueprints have been LOST by the original manufacturers. As far as other posters here making the ridiculous claim that we should "let private industry" do all that "going into space" stuff because it will somehow make it cheaper; this is nonsense.

No one in private industry is capable of doing it yet, & is years /guzillions of dollars away from doing it (if they ever will). Ask Rutan (who spent years moaning about NASA) how smooth he was after his rocket fuel facility exploded (killing at least 1 person). Having said that, private industry has long been involved as various DoD corporations have been making space hardware for decades.

So let's all keep pretending that private industry will spend big $ & years re-inventing the wheel, only to turn around and give it to NASA on the cheap. Moreover, privatization was already tried on a wholesale level in the early-mid '90s under Dan Goldin, resulting in a 50-100% cost increase on both hardware, launch readiness, & operations. The public ignorance of the realities of space ops is rivaled only by it's naivete.
08:06 PM on 04/15/2010
C'mon. When JFK declared the space program policy, we didn't yet have the technology to go to the moon. But you see, JFK knew that humans are creative beings and that we would be able to discover the needed technologies. And we did. And I'm sure that if we decide to go to Mars, we would invent everything needed for that.

That "down to earth" mantra originates from the oppressive oligarchy. It's time to break free from such mental shackles.
photo
millertime
Sometimes facts hurt...
01:44 PM on 04/15/2010
What is so significant about not returning to the moon? If they don't have any bigger plans than returning to the moon? We went there 40 years ago for Goodness sake, and don't have anything else to get from there....Sorry, but the moon communities just aren't going to happen....And, the last time I checked, we are still light years ahead of the rest of the world in space exploration....it would be like saying that if we stop making F--22's, that our Air Force all of a sudden becomes second rate...its just silly. I would much rather see this money go toward more useful science....
08:15 PM on 04/15/2010
To facilitate further exploration in our solar system the moon will be very, very useful. It can be industrialized. We can assemble spacecraft there. There's loads of Helium-3 on the surface of the moon that can be used for fusion-powered space flight.

Krafft Ericke once said something like "If God had wanted man to become a spacefaring species, he would have given man a moon".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
12:34 PM on 04/15/2010
I'll bet anything these guys supported Reagan. I haven't heard them speak out against tax cuts for the rich. I haven't heard them speak out against offshoring and outsourcing. NAFTA? I haven't heard them speak against any of the governments moves to de-industrialize the US.

These guys are upset about the wrong thing and way too late.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Tao-Chan
Making you feel smug & superior since 1949
11:53 AM on 04/15/2010
Go find something else to piss away billions of dollars on instead of space.
May I suggest investing it in solar panel and wind generator factories?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
12:35 PM on 04/15/2010
Only if they are made in the USA.
08:21 PM on 04/15/2010
Merry-go-rounds and solar panels are absolutely ridiculous.

What do you think of Obama's pissing away trillions of taxpayer dollars to Wall Street?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skellen
11:45 AM on 04/15/2010
I disagree with Armstrong. With enough Gov't help the private sector could do great things for the future of space, and I think certainly would be very innovative.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
12:36 PM on 04/15/2010
And once we find a way to make space travel cheap that means anyone will be able to launch a "payload"...anywhere. Am I the only one who sees why this is a bad idea?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Artamentous
Workplace Democracy!
11:08 AM on 04/15/2010
Our countries infrastructure is falling apart.

Can we really afford the luxury of billions of dollars to return to the moon.
08:22 PM on 04/15/2010
That's minor compared to what the Wall Street casinos are getting from the taxpayers. The space program is meant to be good for you. Wall Street casinos are not good for you.