More

Dick Fuld: Former Lehman CEO To Claim 'No Recollection' Of Accounting Fraud

ALAN ZIBEL and JEANNINE AVERSA   04/19/10 07:09 PM ET   AP

Dick Fuld Lehman Recollection

WASHINGTON — The former chief executive of Lehman Brothers said he has "absolutely no recollection whatsoever" about an accounting maneuver that a bankruptcy examiner says the company used to mask its perilous financial condition.

Richard Fuld, Lehman's former CEO, said he does not recall seeing any documents related to the so-called Repo 105 accounting gimmick, according to testimony prepared for a House hearing Tuesday.

The report "distorted the relevant facts" and that the accounting complied with standard practices, Fuld said in the prepared remarks.

"The result is that Lehman and its people have been unfairly vilified," Fuld said.

Last month, an examiner appointed by the bankruptcy court to investigate the Lehman debacle issued a 2,200-page report. It found that the firm masked $50 billion in debt by using the so-called Repo 105 accounting maneuver

The examiner, Anton Valukas, discovered that Lehman put together complex transactions that allowed the firm to sell "toxic" securities _mainly those made up of mortgages – at the end of a quarter. That wiped them off its balance sheet, avoiding the scrutiny of regulators and shareholders. Then the bank quickly repurchased them – hence the term "Repo."

Since the report came out, interest has grown on Capitol Hill among lawmakers seeking to find out if the accounting gimmick was widely used by Wall Street firms to hide their debt. Tuesday's hearing is the latest attempt to probe the matter and comes as the Obama administration is urging passage of a sweeping financial regulatory overhaul.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will testify at the hearing that Lehman's collapse highlights why the Obama administration's proposal to reform the financial system is needed.

"Lehman's disorderly bankruptcy was profoundly disruptive," Geithner said, according to excerpts of his prepared remarks. "It magnified the dimensions of the financial crisis, requiring a greater commitment of government resources than might otherwise have been required."

The chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary Schapiro, also is scheduled to testify. She will say that after Lehman's rival, Bear Stearns, nearly collapsed two years ago in a government-managed sale, the SEC had little ability to prevent Lehman from going under.

She did, however, concede that the SEC "did not do enough" to oversee the five largest investment banks, even though it had authority over them since 2004. That oversight program, she said, was "insufficiently resourced, staffed, and managed from its inception."

Lawmakers are also likely to question Schapiro about the SEC's case against Goldman Sachs. The agency filed civil charges Friday against the venerable Wall Street firm, claiming the bank misled investors about mortgage-linked securities.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, also scheduled to testify, said the central bank wasn't aware that Lehman used the accounting move. And even if the Fed did know it was doing so, it wouldn't have changed the Fed's view that the company was in bad financial shape, according to Bernanke's prepared remarks.

Although the Securities and Exchange Commission was Lehman's chief regulator, the Fed began to monitor the firm after trouble surfaced in the financial industry.

Two Fed employees were placed at Lehman to keep tabs of the company's cash position and its general financial condition, Bernanke explained. Beyond information gathering, the employees had no authority to regulate Lehman's disclosures, capital standards, risk-management practices or other business activity, Bernanke pointed out.

The Fed and other government agencies were unable to engineer a private-sector rescue of the failing firm or come up with some other solution. Lehman was forced to declare bankruptcy – the biggest in U.S. history – in the fall of 2008. That threw financial markets in the United States and around the globe into crisis.

Bernanke said the case underscores the need for Congress to pass a sweeping financial overhaul. That legislation includes a mechanism to allow the government to safely wind down ailing financial companies whose collapse could take down the entire financial system and the broader economy.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The former chief executive of Lehman Brothers said he has "absolutely no recollection whatsoever" about an accounting maneuver that a bankruptcy examiner says the company used to ma...
WASHINGTON — The former chief executive of Lehman Brothers said he has "absolutely no recollection whatsoever" about an accounting maneuver that a bankruptcy examiner says the company used to ma...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
10:33 AM on 04/21/2010
Gee, who needs laws to protect these TBTFs when all they really have to do is tell the paid-for politicians to just don't staff the oversight, inspectors, auditors and regulator parts of agencies. One of the many things I've noticed throughout the last three decades has been the dismissals and gutting of those responsible for actually enforcing the few regulations that were left in place.
Over and over again this plan worked flawlessly as a strategy. How many federal jobs were abolished to "save money"? We now see it really had nothing to do with the budget or spending. Having problems with the IRS, just abolish the auditors. Having problems with various federal Departments, appoint an industry "captain" to lead the agency to neutralize their original purpose. OSHA or FDA problems? Get rid of inspectors but keep a few for looks but keep them overworked and overwhelmed. That has been business as usual for the past thirty years, and guess what, it worked great for industry, not so much for workers and America.
09:17 PM on 04/20/2010
?
?
Is it a lie to lie telling Congress you can't remember what lie you lied about the last time you were before Congress?
?
?


Michael LittleBig
Cleveland Ohio
photo
IfIonlyknew
Politics is Hollywood for ugly people.
04:28 PM on 04/21/2010
That's what Martha should have done.
08:17 PM on 04/20/2010
This all sounds so familiar. Replace Fuld with Ken Lay and Lehman with Enron and you have almost identical scenarios.

As Yogi Berra would say, it's deja vu all over again.
07:46 PM on 04/20/2010
Maybe the Republicans are right. Maybe sometimes torture is the only way to draw out the truth???
photo
hrc04
put on your pants and go home.
06:15 PM on 04/20/2010
That's ok, Dick...i'm sure there are plenty of people who do have recollections of said fraud. And hopefully they'll recollect it in the witness stand at your trial.
06:03 PM on 04/20/2010
These guys are smart. They know every weakness of their businesses. For Fuld to claim that he had no knowledge of a (fraudulent) accounting device that was key to his profits shows that he he is not exhibiting candor. That's legalese for "he is lying."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Aggressive Progressive
My Karma ran over your Dogma.
04:53 PM on 04/20/2010
So if a middle eastern terrorist was being interogated and claimed that he "had no recollection", what do you think they would do to him at Gitmo?

If a black man being held under suspicion of stealing a car claimed that he "had no recollection", what do you think they would do down at the police station?

So here is a guy who has done unmeasurable damage to people's lives but he gets a pass?
04:51 PM on 04/20/2010
He's certain the report "distorts the relevant facts" - which he can't remember. Amazing.
04:46 PM on 04/20/2010
If his mental faculties are that faulty, what talents does he bring to the table that make him worth his obscene bonuses?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MidRoaderTurnedLeft
04:37 PM on 04/20/2010
Maybe he and Alberto Gonzales went to the same school. Gonzales used that line 40+ times before a Senate Committee in 2007.

Now don't go calling me a racist because I've pointed this out about Gonzales. Conservapedia notes that he has been the victim of "liberal hate speech:"

"Alberto Gonzales, the first Hispanic U.S. Attorney General, was consistently mocked on liberal websites as "Alberto 'Speedy' Gonzales" during his tenure. Speedy Gonzales is a reference to a disparaging stereotypical cartoon character of Hispanics that Hollywood attempted to popularize in the 1950s and 60s. Upon his retirement, NBC News anchor Matt Lauer called Gonzales "a piñata" for the Democrats."


This is so shockingly hateful that it's the only entry listed under liberal hate speech against hispanics. What could be a more hateful comment, really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
10:45 AM on 04/21/2010
Of course, all the "hate speech" had nothing to do with Gonzales' total incompetence, did it? Birds of a feather flock together and the entire Bush Administration was was stocked to overflowing with incompetents and sociopaths. Alberto Gonzales did not represent his race and did more to hurt his representation of his race than drug dealers, his was willful incompetence! And by the way, Speedy Gonzales was a hero in the cartoons I watched as a child.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MidRoaderTurnedLeft
11:00 AM on 04/21/2010
Comparing Alberto to Speedy is an insult to Speedy.
photo
lynjs
Take each day as it comes. Tomorrow isn't promise
04:02 PM on 04/20/2010
How stupid does he think we are? I just hope no one is around him upon his judgment day. Guilt by association isn't a good thing. I'd fess up if I were close to this guy. Glad I'm not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NeoConsAreFinished
Fight the Ah mer I cun talibanned
03:09 PM on 04/20/2010
The Reagan defense...............
03:56 PM on 04/20/2010
Exactly. The old "I don't recall" defense which worked so well for Reagan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
10:46 AM on 04/21/2010
the Teflon President....
02:23 PM on 04/20/2010
Well of course no 'No Recollection' , it worked very well for the ex-administration officials.
02:39 PM on 04/20/2010
Yeah. They're either making stuff up or can't remember anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
10:47 AM on 04/21/2010
or slept through staff meetings...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurical
Trolls suck!
01:27 PM on 04/20/2010
Certain buzzwords jump off the page when uttered. How many instances that a person doesn't "recall" some form of malfeascance. When you hear that word it's such a legal cop out to not perjure yourself. Whenever I hear someone recount their "recollection" I feel what follows will be a lie.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
VietVet67
I wore the uni for this?
01:23 PM on 04/20/2010
Ask him how much his bonuses were and how many houses and cars he owns. Think he knows?