More

School Snapped Photos Of Students 'Half-Dressed,' In Bed Via Webcams, Lawyer Says

MARYCLAIRE DALE   04/20/10 09:24 AM ET   AP

School Webcam Spying

PHILADELPHIA — A suburban school district secretly captured at least 56,000 webcam photographs and screen shots from laptops issued to high school students, its lawyer acknowledged Monday.

"It's clear there were students who were likely captured in their homes," said lawyer Henry Hockeimer, who represents the Lower Merion School District.

None of the images, captured by a tracking program to find missing computers, appeared to be salacious or inappropriate, he said. The district said it remotely activated the tracking software to find 80 missing laptops in the past two years.

The Philadelphia Inquirer first reported Monday on the large number of images recovered from school servers by forensic computer experts, who were hired after student Blake Robbins filed suit over the tracking practice.

Robbins still doesn't know why the district deployed the software tracking program on his computer, as he had not reported it lost or stolen, his lawyer said.

The FBI has opened a criminal investigation into possible wiretap violations by the district, and U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, of Pennsylvania, has introduced a bill to include webcam surveillance under the federal wiretap statute.

The district photographed Robbins 400 times during a 15-day period last fall, sometimes as he slept in bed or was half-dressed, according to his lawyer, Mark Haltzman. Other times, the district captured screen shots of instant messages or video chats the Harriton High School sophomore had with friends, he said.

"Not only was Blake Robbins being spied upon, but every one of the people he was IM chatting with were spied upon," said Haltzman, whose lawsuit alleges wiretap and privacy violations. "They captured pictures of people that have nothing to do with Harriton. It could be his cousin from Connecticut."

About 38,000 of the images were taken over several months from six computers the school said were stolen from a locker room.

The tracking program took images every 15 minutes, usually capturing the webcam photo of the user and a screen shot at the same time. The program was sometimes turned on for weeks or months at a time, Hockeimer said.

"There were no written policies or procedures governing the circumstances surrounding activating the program and the circumstances regarding turning off the activations," Hockeimer said.

Robbins was one of about 20 students who had not paid the $55 insurance fee required to take the laptops home but was the only one tracked, Haltzman said.

The depositions taken to date have provided contradictory testimony about the reasons for tracking Robbins' laptop. One of the two people authorized to activate the program, technology coordinator Carol Cafiero, invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to answer questions at the deposition, Haltzman said.

About 10 school officials had the right to request an activation, Hockeimer disclosed Monday.

The tracking program helped police identify a suspect not affiliated with the school in the locker room theft, Hockeimer said. The affluent Montgomery County district distributes the Macintosh notebook computers to all 2,300 students at its two high schools, Hockeimer said.

As part of the lawsuit, a federal judge this week is set to begin a confidential process of showing parents the images that were captured of their children.

The school district expects to release a written report on an internal investigation in the next few weeks, Hockeimer said. School board President David Ebby has pledged the report will contain "all the facts – good and bad."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 193
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
08:10 AM on 04/22/2010
I repair computers. I have recently started getting notebook computers for repair and virus clean-out with the webcams covered with electrical tape.
09:12 PM on 04/21/2010
Think... Company Laptop.

Not necessarily video but they all have a microphone.
08:10 AM on 04/22/2010
Good point.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
07:30 AM on 04/21/2010
Wait a minute, I'm lost. If the intent is to find a missing laptop, then you take a picture of the student....seems you confront the student the next day at school. Why keep making pictures for months? You don't need 38,000 pictures to find 6 devices. Or 400 photos of one kid over a two week period. Make one, tell the kid you are on to them, and get the machine back.

Anything more is inexcusable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMSmith
07:55 PM on 04/21/2010
NO. Even that is inexcusable.
It's video breaking and entering and stealing an image. No warrant. No need.
AND that's the worst way to find a lost computer.
ANYone who knew about this program, or took part in it - without reporting it to authorities - should be fired NOW. For two reasons: One, they broke the law. Two, they are too criminally STUPID to be involved in teaching our children.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
01:05 AM on 04/21/2010
Heads will begin to roll as soon as parents see naked teenage breasts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:16 AM on 04/21/2010
This just gets batter and better !!!!

Pretty soon the FBI is going to pull up in front of the school with a search warrant and load every computer in the school into the truck so they can be forensically analyzed.

Of course in the mean time the school will have to try to run without any computers - what a nice nightmare for them.

Then there will be the very well publicized "perp walk" of a significant number of the staff and teachers and maybe even the school board. The next day there will not be enough teachers and management to run the schools.

Then many will plead or be found guilty and will have to register as sex offenders meaning they can NEVER work with children again.

I hope everyone connected with running the school has really good personal lawyers, they are going to need them before this is all over.

The smartest ones will already be having their lawyer talking to the FBI and prosecutors to get off with a wrist slap in exchange for hanging others. The key thing to avoid is the sex offender registry, which is the kiss of death. Jail time without having to register might actually be an OK thing.

If I were working for that school, I would be moving to another job as quickly as possible to minimize the personal damage this is going to cause.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rusane
My micro-bio is empty, cold and jaded.
11:41 PM on 04/20/2010
Is it possible for a the webcam on a macbook to be active without the LED being lit (barring a hardware failure)?
12:17 AM on 04/21/2010
It’s hard to know.

Based on the distance between the lens and LED, at least on my Dell, my guess is that they are in a singly housed assembly. Whether it’s possible to enable one without the other is anyone’s guess short of having access to a detailed electronic schematic of unit (pin out) along with additional descriptive documentation. Have you tried Apple FAQs?
photo
f0rTyLeGz
Everything is falling.
11:11 PM on 04/20/2010
I wish HuffPo headline writers wouldn't compete with DrudgeReport in the titillating headlines category. In this story they actually are incorrect because "the lawyer" Henry Hockeimer did not say "STUDENTS." The lawyer said that his client Blake Robbins was photographed, "sometimes as he slept in bed or was half-dressed." But the HuffPo headline, "School Snapped Photos Of Students 'Half-Dressed,' In Bed Via Webcams, Lawyer Says," is NOT what the lawyer said. HuffPo writers have made it sound like many students (girls???!!) were photographed halfnaked and sleeping. This is not true!

And why does everyone miss this sentence? "None of the images, captured by a tracking program to find missing computers, appeared to be salacious or inappropriate, he said." The investigators intention was to recover missing and stolen computers. No one was interested in taking salacious or inappropriate photos.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rusane
My micro-bio is empty, cold and jaded.
11:39 PM on 04/20/2010
Note the lack of quotation marks around the all of the headline except "Half Dressed". That would be your clue it's paraphrased and not a quote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
10:48 PM on 04/20/2010
Something tells me that 56,000 shots of half-clad teenagers is something the school district will find it a little difficult to explain away.
photo
f0rTyLeGz
Everything is falling.
11:14 PM on 04/20/2010
Read the story again, and not just the breathless paranoid lying headline.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicalchoice
logic is as logic does
02:20 PM on 04/21/2010
yah, it says 58,000 pictures were taken and only 38,000 came from the stolen devices. That mean 20,000 unauthorized images were taken and the school is LIEING when they say that NO unauthorized pictures were taken. They get sued now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:42 PM on 04/20/2010
There are technologies that allow an LCD screen to double as a camera lens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madbunny
Prison Guard - FireFighter - now a School Teacher
08:45 PM on 04/20/2010
Maybe if you're paranoid, or stoned.
Sorry, but LCD doesn't work that way. There 'are' technologies that allow you to embed cameras in screens so that they are not visible, but you can't make a screen a camera the way you can make a speaker a microphone.
photo
Badbowler
My micro-bio is half full.
08:17 PM on 04/20/2010
Maybe the official peeper will have a web cam in their prison cell and we can all watch them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lastnightinbed
lastnightinbed.com
07:40 PM on 04/20/2010
UGGG the thought of creepy administrators watching you at home is enough to make you want to get home schooled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicalchoice
logic is as logic does
02:22 PM on 04/21/2010
not to mention the low grad rates, jail house mentality of teachers and administrators or the "parents are the enemy" school mottos.
photo
bridgeman
Jesus was a Jazz fan
07:32 PM on 04/20/2010
Who cares about the half dressed students...id you catch the HOT Sunburst Gibson Les Paul ...now that was smokin!
06:45 PM on 04/20/2010
These are teenagers. I gaurantee that more was seen than them being half undressed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:08 PM on 04/20/2010
flogging molly/treading the golden path? Most definitely, they're young maturing adults. And you won't hear it strongly implied either, because they don't want to be buried under the jail. They're just trying to avoid being fired at this point. When it comes out that the school was doing it's own kiddie-porn "investigation" that's when the parents will pull out the pitchforks and torches and pitbull lawyers.
06:24 PM on 04/20/2010
I am under the impression that the story broke because a teacher, or other school employee, said something to a student about which they could not have known unless they had been in the student's house. So, clearly the images were being reviewed and inappropriately used for more than finding missing computers.

The sad part about all of this is that there will come a time when parents will sell their children out.

Assume the district is guilty - who is going to pay? The parents, the property owners, the tax payers, are going to pay either by increased taxes or reduced school programs. So the parents, in order to keep their taxes from going up, will settle for a pittance or maybe as little as an appology and a promise. In so doing they will effectively be pimping their kids and teaching them the lesson that money is the only thing that matters.
06:44 PM on 04/20/2010
It is true, that if the lawyers sue for millions it will just cost everyone in the district money in raised taxes or cut programs. But what damages did this child actually incur?In my mind nothing. Why should his family receive money? For what? I want to see those who were responsible prosecuted and punished to the full extent of the law. If those responsible are appropriately punished, how is that pimping out kids?

Ultimately what is important is that we come up with safeguards for this type of situation. This is new territory for us all. For example, in this case, if the camera could only have been activated by the student supplying a password themselves because their laptop was stolen or missing, and a written log of all times pictures are taken is made public for review by the parent's association, we might not of had this problem. This case is important for the whole country in helping us establish privacy policies for the private use of company, government, or school owned equipment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madbunny
Prison Guard - FireFighter - now a School Teacher
07:55 PM on 04/20/2010
Fanned for a rare and reasonable perspective.
It's too easy for the pitchfork and firebrand crowd to overlook that if justice is done, then the end result isn't a lot of money in some kids hands, and the entire staff of the school on a sex offenders list and out of their lifes work, but a proper review and understanding of how technology should be handled by institutions such as a school.

Those who acted innapropriately should face penalties, but the end result should be an improvement in our students environtment and lessons learned, not just chopped off heads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
08:09 PM on 04/20/2010
No one can't to decide if a family receive money or not?
Up to the judge or a jury!
photo
ljmck
Stand Up, Show Up, Speak Up
06:58 PM on 04/20/2010
Can they sue just the people who were actually hands-on violating student's privacy? Attack their personal wealth? Does it have to be the school and the district? I don't know -- I'm asking...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madbunny
Prison Guard - FireFighter - now a School Teacher
08:07 PM on 04/20/2010
They can sue anybody, but it's simpler to sue the administration that is responsible for letting and advocating the policies that caused this to happen. eg: "the school"

In truth, suing the school, or the school district is more likely to result in a policy change that fixes things, rather than jail time and bankrupcy for the few who were directly involved.

In my ideal world, the district would work and find a way to fix this with out costing the taxpayers tons of money, and the parents would be satisfied that appropriate safeguards were instated.
06:20 PM on 04/20/2010
It's very easy for law enforcement, the government, a corporation or any citizen to download a program onto your laptop that does the same thing. Always keep a piece of paper taped over your camera lens. The law needs to be revamped to protect privacy. We are going downhill on this one so far. Thesame goes for smart phones by the way and audio as well as video.
07:08 PM on 04/20/2010
Agreed and fanned.

Hopefully laws classifying this sort of spying as criminal activity with stiff penalties and civil liability. It should make for a booming private security evaluation industry, kind of like antivirus; maybe it could be called bug-sweeper or something like that.