More

Health Care Reform Will Cost More, Cover More: Health And Human Services Department

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   04/23/10 06:58 AM ET   AP

Health Care Cost
George Martin, left, and Walt Stoelting argue over health care reform during a rally outside the district office of Rep. Joe Donnelly, D-Granger, in downtown South Bend, Ind., Thursday, March 18, 2010. (AP Photo/South Bend Tribune, Marcus Marter)

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health care overhaul law is getting a mixed verdict in the first comprehensive look by neutral experts: More Americans will be covered, but costs are also going up.

Economic experts at the Health and Human Services Department concluded in a report issued Thursday that the health care remake will achieve Obama's aim of expanding health insurance – adding 34 million to the coverage rolls.

But the analysis also found that the law falls short of the president's twin goal of controlling runaway costs, raising projected spending by about 1 percent over 10 years. That increase could get bigger, since Medicare cuts in the law may be unrealistic and unsustainable, the report warned.

It's a worrisome assessment for Democrats.

In particular, concerns about Medicare could become a major political liability in the midterm elections. The report projected that Medicare cuts could drive about 15 percent of hospitals and other institutional providers into the red, "possibly jeopardizing access" to care for seniors.

The report from Medicare's Office of the Actuary carried a disclaimer saying it does not represent the official position of the Obama administration. White House officials have repeatedly complained that such analyses have been too pessimistic and lowball the law's potential to achieve savings.

The report acknowledged that some of the cost-control measures in the bill – Medicare cuts, a tax on high-cost insurance and a commission to seek ongoing Medicare savings – could help reduce the rate of cost increases beyond 2020. But it held out little hope for progress in the first decade.

"During 2010-2019, however, these effects would be outweighed by the increased costs associated with the expansions of health insurance coverage," wrote Richard S. Foster, Medicare's chief actuary. "Also, the longer-term viability of the Medicare ... reductions is doubtful." Foster's office is responsible for long-range costs estimates.

Republicans said the findings validate their concerns about Obama's 10-year, nearly $1 trillion plan to remake the nation's health care system.

"A trillion dollars gets spent, and it's no surprise – health care costs are going to go up," said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., a leading Republican on health care issues. Camp added that he's concerned the Medicare cuts will undermine care for seniors.

In a statement, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius sought to highlight some positive findings for seniors. For example, the report concluded that Medicare monthly premiums would be lower than otherwise expected, due to the spending reductions.

"The Affordable Care Act will improve the health care system for all Americans, and we will continue our work to quickly and carefully implement the new law," the statement said.

Passed by a divided Congress after a year of bitter partisan debate, the law would create new health insurance markets for individuals and small businesses. Starting in 2014, most Americans would be required to carry health insurance except in cases of financial hardship. Tax credits would help many middle-class households pay their premiums, while Medicaid would pick up more low-income people. Insurers would be required to accept all applicants, regardless of their health.

The U.S. spends $2.5 trillion a year on health care, far more per person than any other developed nation, and for results that aren't clearly better when compared to more frugal countries. At the outset of the health care debate last year, Obama held out the hope that by bending the cost curve down, the U.S. could cover all its citizens for about what the nation would spend absent any changes.

The report found that the president's law missed the mark, although not by much. The overhaul will increase national health care spending by $311 billion from 2010-2019, or nine-tenths of 1 percent. To put that in perspective, total health care spending during the decade is estimated to surpass $35 trillion.

Administration officials argue the increase is a bargain price for guaranteeing coverage to 95 percent of Americans. They also point out that the law will decrease the federal deficit by $143 billion over the 10-year period.

The report's most sober assessments concerned Medicare.

In addition to flagging provider cuts as potentially unsustainable, the report projected that reductions in payments to private Medicare Advantage plans would trigger an exodus from the popular alternative. Enrollment would plummet by about 50 percent. Seniors leaving the private plans would still have health insurance under traditional Medicare, but many might face higher out-of-pocket costs.

In another flashing yellow light, the report warned that a new voluntary long-term care insurance program created under the law faces "a very serious risk" of insolvency.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health care overhaul law is getting a mixed verdict in the first comprehensive look by neutral experts: More Americans will be covered, but costs are also g...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health care overhaul law is getting a mixed verdict in the first comprehensive look by neutral experts: More Americans will be covered, but costs are also g...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,498
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Hoodoo X 09:04 AM on 04/23/2010
devondx I'm a Fan of devondx I'm a fan of this user 21 fans permalink

these are states that get the MOST back per U.S. federal tax dollar paid....
the entire list of states is the same pattern.....
total communists
(SNIP)
-------------

The chatters on here post these numbers are fairly frequently, probably without ever investigating the methodology.
 Read More...
02:42 PM on 04/26/2010
The "Reply" button does NOT work
01:12 PM on 04/26/2010
As someone who works for an affordable health insurance company, I wish folks would give this legislation time to mature and see how effective it is before damning it.
01:40 PM on 04/24/2010
What exactly is George Martin shown in the picture above objecting to? How many decades has he been receiving Social Security and Medicare? He looks to easily be in his mid 80's, which means he's far surpassed anything he contributed, especially when you consider that he wouldn't have been taxed for Medicare until his mid-40's. Glad he can use money he receives from "socialist" government programs to protest "socialist" government programs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
middleoftheroad
01:31 PM on 04/24/2010
This was not a healthcare reform bill, it was a health care expansion bill. Big difference!
lldem1
life long democrat or long lost? hard to tell
11:33 PM on 04/24/2010
it was neither, it was a health insurance reform bill. health insurance reform is not health care reform.
09:39 AM on 04/24/2010
----Didn't Obama promise us our health care cost would go down $2,000 a year per family? Ooops! Just another lie........It doesn't make any difference as we are first going to DE-FUND Obamacare and then we are going to REPEAL it.......................................................................................................................
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:18 AM on 04/24/2010
What you title as "verdicts" are in fact opinions. Prophecyzing the future is allways difficult but misteriously remains on of the preferred excercises in human stupidity which has become epidemic since the advent of the internet. I would like to mention some of these glorious recent prophecies:

the global recession no one could see until the day after it happened
the doomed health care bill
and tons of others (from all political walks to be fair)

Politics and business are increasingly akin to astrology. In my view this is a collective cultural regression back to the Middle Ages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
"We don't believe you!" Alright, alright.
11:19 PM on 04/23/2010
Am I the only one that sees this as a good thing? I wish the report had been worse. We'll wise up and develop a single payer system eventually. Everyone in one pool and do away with VA, Medicare, Medicaid, all of it. 1 plan is much more affordable. Our industries can be more competitive globally(except for the insurance industry which doesn't break my heart at all). We won't have a choice soon. The fact that the "fiscal conservatives" haven't figured this out yet proves they aren't fiscal or conservative. They certainly aren't both.
12:02 AM on 04/24/2010
One pool run by the government?? Oh yea, that's gonna work :(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
"We don't believe you!" Alright, alright.
12:12 AM on 04/24/2010
Yes, like the VA and Medicare. If you don't like those, please have your congressperson to issue a bill where all of the senior citizens in the TEAliban opt out. I really don't like the decision as to whether an insurance company pays my claim or not to be dependent on said insurance company's bottom line. You may feel that way now but just wait until you get sick. Illness is the true equalizer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mummblemouth
12:16 AM on 04/24/2010
Yeah, because America could never hope to achieve what the rest of the rest of the civilized world has. Tool.
03:11 AM on 04/24/2010
You obviously haven't a clue as to reality. True if you're going to have a government run health care PAYMENT system, then lump them all together and eliminate the bureaucracies, but to suggest the insurance industry somehow deserves to be punished shows your ignorance regarding their value in society AND to government, and shows just how easily you and no doubt others can be sucked in to the whole class warfare tactics. Pitiful.
11:50 AM on 04/24/2010
Well stated...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
"We don't believe you!" Alright, alright.
12:48 PM on 04/24/2010
I guess it's the hundreds of letters I had to mail when I worked at an insurance company's legal department where they rescinded policies or refused to pay claims to cancer patients. That must be it. If any industry should be punished for their business practices it should be insurance companies. Eloquent comeback, though.
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
09:04 PM on 04/23/2010
A less than 1% increase in health care costs results in coverage for an additional 11% of Americans.

That's a 12 to 1 return on our investment.

If I found out that I could increase the returns on my investments by 12% by increasing my portfolio by 1%, I'd do it, and any of you that claims that you wouldn't are bald faced liers.
09:55 PM on 04/23/2010
$950 billion to insure 32 million for 6 years.

That is $19,792 to insure a family of 4. Private insurance is less than that. That would be a BETTER return on our investment.

What happened to th $50 billion plan that Obama ran on? This plan costs 19 times more than promised. If we adopted that plan it would be a 0.05% increase in health care costs to cover the additional Americans. 228% return. If you found out that you could increase the returns on your investments by 228% by increasing my portfolio by 1%, would you do it or was that a bait and switch Obama plan?
10:09 PM on 04/23/2010
Spin much? Children are already covered under Schip the cost is for adults maybe married maybe not with pre-existing conditions or not but $4948 per adult is less than medicare for all.
10:20 PM on 04/23/2010
In addition, you seemed to forget the tens of millions Americans that would receive graduated help paying for health care for their families capping at $88,000 year for a family of four. A remedial math class is in order or maybe a truth in lending class.
09:41 AM on 04/24/2010
Didn't you buy yourself a new calculator yet?
08:48 PM on 04/28/2010
I own one and, unlike you, I know how use and do use it.
08:54 PM on 04/23/2010
"...Medicare cuts in the law may be unrealistic and unsustainable, the report warned."

"Medicare cuts could drive about 15 percent of hospitals and other institutional providers into the red, "possibly jeopardizing access" to care for seniors."

"...the report projected that reductions in payments to private Medicare Advantage plans would trigger an exodus from the popular alternative. Enrollment would plummet by about 50 percent. Seniors leaving the private plans would still have health insurance under traditional Medicare, but many might face higher out-of-pocket costs."

"the report warned that a new voluntary long-term care insurance program created under the law faces "a very serious risk" of insolvency."

Maybe we should have spent more time looking over this bill.....
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
09:07 PM on 04/23/2010
The key word is 'may'.
07:15 PM on 04/24/2010
When dealing with government's ability to efficiently run anything, I'll take the bet. It'll cost WAY more than advertised. Name one single program. ANY program the government runs, that is under budget.

http://www.CitizenConservative.com
09:23 PM on 04/23/2010
You could read the Healthcare Bill until the end times and still not find what you're looking for. Because cost cutting was passed as part of the stimulus package. No forms to fill out, no doctor's office workers to check on coverage, no insurance workers to call to check for coverage because it will be all automated through Healthcare IT and it's already happening.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
VietVet67
I wore the uni for this?
08:47 PM on 04/23/2010
Not to worry about paying for health care:

http://lowdenplan.com/
07:08 PM on 04/23/2010
--It doesn't make any difference as we are going to first DE-FUND it, and then work to REPEAL Obamacare.....................................................................................................................................................
07:31 PM on 04/23/2010
I really wish that were true, but I honestly believe that the republicans will cave in again, just like they did on the prescription bill.
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
07:39 PM on 04/23/2010
They didn't "cave" on the prescription bill, they actively supported it.

They were the majority in 2003.

For the votes, don'cha know.
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
07:00 PM on 04/23/2010
Let's see, 311 billion over ten years.

There are 165 million tax payers in the US.

That amounts to about 2 dollars a year per tax payer.

What we get...34 million additional people covered. That alone is about a 10 to 1 return on our investment.

In addition, we won't be denied coverage for preexisting conditions, or be dropped or have our premiums increased when we get sick.

Sounds like a hell of a deal. I'll take it.
07:14 PM on 04/23/2010
---You need to buy a new calculator. $31.1 Billion per year paid by 165 million taxpayers, is $188.48.

And that 10 to 1 "return" is pure fantasy...... FIRST we are going to de-fund Obamacare,,,and then we are going to repeal this unconstitutional bill.
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
07:24 PM on 04/23/2010
I know. Had to recalculate it.

$188.48 per year is still a bargain IMO.

And repealing the bill is pure fantasy. Even if repubs regain majorities in the house and senate.

Nothing but empty 'tough talk'.

Won't happen.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we gro
08:23 PM on 04/23/2010
The bill is not unconstitutional - read the constitution!
07:28 PM on 04/23/2010
Not only is your math bad, but you forgot that over 40% of those 165 Million Workers, not Taxpayers, do not pay any taxes at all. Are you prepared to help cover the disparity with the significant loss of income used to feed, cloth, and house you and your family?
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
07:31 PM on 04/23/2010
There are 165 million taxPAYERS in this country.

Provide a link that disputes that number.
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
07:36 PM on 04/23/2010
And lets not forget, 311 billion over 10 years is LESS THAN 1% increase in costs.

Meanwhile 34 million additional Americans will have coverage.

Still a bargain.
05:39 PM on 04/23/2010
It's good to see Hugh Hefner fighting for Health care reform. He knows more than anyone about the medicare benefits.
photo
MIKEBC
Old school Roosevelt democrat
03:35 PM on 04/23/2010
Jesus cared for the poor and sick, why can't republicans?
07:49 PM on 04/23/2010
God helps he who helps himself...
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
07:52 PM on 04/23/2010
Then Jesus was wrong?
07:52 PM on 04/23/2010
It is really not the poor and sick, it is about the lazy and incompetent that really irks all of us...
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
09:16 PM on 04/23/2010
I get it.

People who get cancer and are dropped by their insuance companys are lazy and incompetent.

People who have to drop their insurance because their rates are increased to the point that they can't afford it are lazy and incompetent.

People who can't get insurance because of preexisting conditions are lazy and incompetent.

I GET IT !!! I've seen the light .

And the light is greed.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we gro
02:54 PM on 04/23/2010
It amazes me just how many people read this article - and missed the main point.

"The report found that the president's law missed the mark, although not by much. The overhaul will increase national health care spending by $311 billion from 2010-2019, or nine-tenths of 1 percent. To put that in perspective, total health care spending during the decade is estimated to surpass $35 trillion."