iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Oil Rig, Deepwater Horizon, Leaking Into Gulf Of Mexico

CAIN BURDEAU   04/24/10 11:27 PM ET   AP

Louisiana Oil Rig

NEW ORLEANS — The Coast Guard discovered Saturday that oil is leaking from the damaged well that fed a massive rig that exploded this week off Louisiana's coast, while bad weather halted efforts to clean up the mess that threatens the area's fragile marine ecosystem.

For days, the Coast Guard has said no oil appeared to be escaping from the well head on the ocean floor. Rear Adm. Mary Landry said the leak was a new discovery but could have begun when the rig sank on Thursday, two days after the initial explosion.

"We thought what we were dealing with as of yesterday was a surface residual (oil) from the mobile offshore drilling unit," Landry said. "In addition to that is oil emanating from the well. It is a big change from yesterday ... This is a very serious spill, absolutely."

Coast Guard and company officials estimate that as much as 1,000 barrels – or 42,000 gallons – of oil is leaking each day after studying information from remotely operated vehicles and the size of the oil slick surrounding the blast site. The rainbow-colored sheen of oil stretched 20 miles by 20 miles on Saturday – about 25 times larger than it appeared to be a day earlier, Landry said.

By comparison, Exxon Valdez spilled 11 million gallons in Alaska's Prince William Sound in 1989 – the worst oil spill in U.S. history.

BP PLC, which leased the rig and is taking the lead in the cleanup, and the government have been using the remotely operated vehicles to try to stop the leak by closing valves on the well deep underwater. If that doesn't work, the company could drill what's called an intervention well to control the oil flow. But the intervention drilling could take months.

"Over the next several days, we should determine which method is the best one to follow," said Doug Suttles, chief operating officer for BP Exploration and Production. "A huge number of engineers from ourselves, working with (the government) and across the industry are putting together the best technology and know-how to solve this problem."

Complicating efforts to stop the leak is well head's depth at 5,000 feet underwater, said Lars Herbst, the regional director for the Minerals Management Service. Leaks have been fixed at similar depths before, but the process is difficult, he said.

The bad weather rolled in Friday, bringing with it strong wind, clouds and rain that interrupted efforts to contain the oil spill. Coast Guard Petty Officer John Edwards said he was uncertain when weather conditions would improve enough for the cleanup to resume. So far, crews have retrieved about 1,052 barrels of oily water, he said.

The sunken rig may have as much as 700,000 gallons of diesel on board, and an undetermined amount of oil has spilled from the rig itself. Suttles said the rig was "intact and secure" on the seabed about 1,300 feet from the well site.

BP said it has activated an extensive oil spill response, including the remotely operated vehicles, 700 workers, four airplanes and 32 vessels to mop up the spill. The Marine Spill Response Corp., an energy industry cleanup consortium, also brought equipment.

The 11 missing workers came from Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi. Neither the Coast Guard nor their employers have released their names, though several of their families have come forward.

Karl Kleppinger Sr., whose 38-year-old son, Karl, was one of the missing workers, said he doesn't blame the Coast Guard for calling off the search.

"Given the magnitude of the explosion and the fire, I don't see where you would be able to find anything," said Kleppinger, of Zachary, La.

The other 115 crew members made it off the platform; several were hurt but only one remained hospitalized. The most seriously injured worker was expected to be released within about 10 days.

Federal officials had already been working on new safety rules for offshore drilling before Tuesday's blast.

The U.S. Minerals and Management Service is developing regulations aimed at preventing human error, which it identified as a factor in many of the more than 1,400 offshore oil drilling accidents between 2001 and 2007. An MMS review published last year found 41 deaths and 302 injuries during that period.

The cause of Tuesday's blast hasn't been determined.

The Deepwater Horizon was the site of a 2005 fire found to have been caused by human error. An MMS investigation determined that a crane operator on the rig had become distracted while refueling the crane, allowing diesel fuel to overflow. Records show the fire was quickly contained, but caused $60,000 in damage to the crane.

Environmentalists said the rig explosion and oil spill should push the nation to develop new energy sources.

"This should be a wake-up call," said David Helvarg, the president of the Blue Frontier Campaign, a marine conservation group, and author of "Rescue Warriors: The U.S. Coast Guard, America's Forgotten Heroes."

"I would rather risk a 'wind spill' than an oil spill offshore," he said, ruefully pointing out that the source of wind-powered energy can't sully the environment.

___

Associated Press Writer Noaki Schwartz reported from Los Angeles. Associated Press Writers Jason Dearen in San Francisco, Mike Kunzelman, Kevin McGill and Alan Sayre in Louisiana contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS — The Coast Guard discovered Saturday that oil is leaking from the damaged well that fed a massive rig that exploded this week off Louisiana's coast, while bad weather halted efforts...
NEW ORLEANS — The Coast Guard discovered Saturday that oil is leaking from the damaged well that fed a massive rig that exploded this week off Louisiana's coast, while bad weather halted efforts...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,888
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (56 total)
11:56 AM on 05/04/2010
Industrial wind plants do not displace one drop of oil because we do not use oil to generate electricity on the grid. It is too expensive. Oil and gas are used in portable, emergency and off-grid applications. The wind industry is shamelessly exploiting a real environmental disaster to squeeze even more tax subsidies out of each of us. They are already by har the moste heavily subsidized energy sector. The other half-truth propounded by the wind industry is that electricity from wind plants reduces carbon emissions. Two things are wrong with this assertion. First, there is no evidence whatsoever to back it up. Second, every watt produced by a wind plant must be backed up by an instantly available watt from a traditional (usually coal-fired) plant. Otherwise, when the wind suddenly quits, there would be widespread blackouts.
Harnessing the wind for electricity looks like a great idea until you study the facts.
For information about where we get our eletcricity, see

The US DOE/EIA Strategic Plan:

http://www.cfo.doe.gov/strategicplan/energysecurity.htm
12:00 AM on 04/29/2010
The environmental impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig sinking into the Gulf of Mexico will be felt for years to come. The financial impact is already being felt.

As it sunk, the rig began spilling tens of thousands of gallons of oil into the water per day. Nearly a half-million gallons have already spilled and the toll could be worse than that of the Valdez accident.

Fears are that oil from the well on the sea floor will begin making its way to the surface. Just 41 miles from the coast, the rig is situated so that this incident has brought a lot of business to a halt on the seas, and for those who depend on the Gulf along the shores. As the slick spreads across the Gulf, more and more business is impacted each day. This delay is likely to total in the millions of dollars until the site is cleaned.

And clearly, the impact of sea life in the Gulf is immediate and could be felt for years. Those waters serve as home to numerous fish species and shellfish like shrimp, mussels and oysters we find at markets. Not only is it next to impossible to farm these animals under such conditions, the water quality is sure to be jeopardized by the massive oil spill.

Please read this site for more information on the environmental and economic damages this explosion, fire and spill have caused: http://www.oil-rig-explosions.com/
03:01 PM on 04/26/2010
If we drilled on the mainland, this wouldn't happen.

Right, environmental zealots and "progressives"?
12:57 PM on 04/26/2010
From factcheck.org from 2008

Obama says he doesn't take money from oil companies. We say that's a little too slick.

Summary

In a new ad, Obama says, "I don’t take money from oil companies."

Technically, that's true, since a law that has been on the books for more than a century prohibits corporations from giving money directly to any federal candidate. But that doesn’t distinguish Obama from his rivals in the race.

We find the statement misleading:

Obama has accepted more than $213,000 from individuals who work for companies in the oil and gas industry and their spouses.

Two of Obama's bundlers are top executives at oil companies and are listed on his Web site as raising between $50,000 and $100,000 for the presidential hopeful
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
03:34 AM on 04/30/2010
As someone who voted for Obama, am really sick of the khraph. He also lied about taking money from lobbyists during the primaries. Progressives outed him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightenedgirl
the truth will set you free
12:12 PM on 04/26/2010
How's that Drill Baby Drill thing workin' out for ya?
12:58 PM on 04/26/2010
you do know that its OBAMA that is now the one pushing for drilling off our coasts now - dont you?

hows THAT idea working out for ya?
03:39 AM on 04/27/2010
car accidents happen too........have you stopped driving a car?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
03:36 AM on 04/30/2010
Well, Laura Bush certainly didn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
12:07 PM on 04/26/2010
A thought provoking article especially when the world is much worried about climate change and ecology such mishap do come as shocking news.
The worst is yet not over, just imagine the spill is on and is covering areas of vital importance and unguarded too . What happens if some lunatic sets fire has the oil company considered guarding that aspect? The world surface is already in turmoil would Oil Company be more cautious while
Drilling in deep water and keep the water surface safe from disaster.

People responsible should not work with such devastating source to the entire region and the neighboring country's water in normal fashion. This particular incident needs repairing work in lightening speed if not multiple serious side effect will surface and at that time there will be no time to regret the delay.

If months are required than one can take for granted that it will affect the ecological balance and inflict severe blow to marine lives.

The expert on the security matters opined the flow of the oil spilled water should be kept under watch to avert any untoward incident taking place.
11:38 AM on 04/26/2010
They say if they don't get it cap off in the next couple of days it could take 2 months to drill and cap it off,than the whole gulf will be a oil slick,why not get a large TANKER and suck the oil direct from the wellhead into the tanker, just an idea.
11:59 AM on 04/26/2010
Apparently they have a plan similar to this but the well is 5,000 ft below the surface so its a bit more complicated. I hope the ROV can shut it off. Feeling very sad for the 11 workers who are presumed dead.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ThomasMc
Christian morality is an oxymoron.
10:47 AM on 04/26/2010
Sarah Palin must be SO proud!
11:02 AM on 04/26/2010
so tell me why would you say that ......now is she in control of British petroleum
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitar63
11:27 AM on 04/26/2010
Drill, baby, drill.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:40 PM on 04/29/2010
Her husband Todd, worked for BP from 1989 until recently.
01:00 PM on 04/26/2010
Palin is a TV host and inconsequential except to media fools and obsessed Obots..

the question is Obama must be soo proud of his recent announcement to open our coasts to offshore drilling huh?

He says this spill wont change his mind on this - the question is why doesnt it change your mind on Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChumpChicken
08:22 AM on 04/26/2010
this is what happens when we "drill baby drill"
01:02 PM on 04/26/2010
I cant believe how dim people are her (oh, wait - yes I can)

its OBAMA that is opening our coasts to offshore drilling - not Palin.

Buy a clue pal!
02:14 AM on 04/26/2010
From factcheck.org from 2008

Obama says he doesn't take money from oil companies. We say that's a little too slick.

Summary

In a new ad, Obama says, "I don’t take money from oil companies."

Technically, that's true, since a law that has been on the books for more than a century prohibits corporations from giving money directly to any federal candidate. But that doesn’t distinguish Obama from his rivals in the race.

We find the statement misleading:

Obama has accepted more than $213,000 from individualsho work for companies in the oil and gas industry and their spouses.

Two of Obama's bundlers are top executives at oil companies and are listed on his Web site as raising between $50,000 and $100,000 for the presidential hopeful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightenedgirl
the truth will set you free
12:15 PM on 04/26/2010
Every Politician takes money from everyone. Anyone who wants to donate to a campaign can. It is what the politician does with the bought influence. The Republicans roll over and ask how high they can jump to the highest bidder. Big difference.
01:03 PM on 04/26/2010
thats right!

amnd look Obama now supports offshore drilling and clean coal!

what a surprise - he took record dollars from these industries...just like he did from big pharm and big insurance and big banks - and look at all the billions hes given them!

Obama knows how to stay bought!
02:13 AM on 04/26/2010
From factcheck.org from 2008

Obama says he doesn't take money from oil companies. We say that's a little too slick.

Summary

In a new ad, Obama says, "I don’t take money from oil companies."

Technically, that's true, since a law that has been on the books for more than a century prohibits corporations from giving money directly to any federal candidate. But that doesn’t distinguish Obama from his rivals in the race.

We find the statement misleading:

Obama has accepted more than $213,000 from individuals who work for companies in the oil and gas industry and their spouses.

Two of Obama's bundlers are top executives at oil companies and are listed on his Web site as raising between $50,000 and $100,000 for the presidential hopeful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:55 AM on 04/26/2010
You've posted this three times now! That's called spamming.

$213,000 dollars from oil companies or individuals who work for oil companies out of the $700 to $800 Million dollars that is currently needed to conduct a Presidential election campaign is really not even a drop in the bucket and certainly not worth posting three times so stop the spam and go away.

If you want to take private money out of political campaigns, start working at the Federal and state level for public campaigns.

The courts are a good place to start, especially if you live in Texas or other states in the South where Judges are elected and have to beg corporations for money and be beholden to them after the election is over!
12:55 PM on 04/26/2010
we could also start by not electing fakes who base their whole campaign (I wont take money from lobbyists) on a lie.

Maybe that would be more effective hoss.
12:46 AM on 04/26/2010
just like with 9/11 we the taxpayer will foot the bill for insurance claims and default swaps on transocean and BP-we are the ones who always foot the bill for big business
12:43 AM on 04/26/2010
spill baby spill-good time to open up our coasts to more catastrophe's ...whaddya say???????????
01:04 PM on 04/26/2010
Obama is the one opening our coasts to drilling smart guy - why not try to learn about things before you spout off?

huh?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
brahdog
hello walls
11:33 PM on 04/25/2010
i'm waiting for conspiracy theories about green liberal sabotage

"listen all of y'all this is sabotage!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
11:45 PM on 04/25/2010
naa!

That would require someone who knew what they were doing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
brahdog
hello walls
11:59 PM on 04/25/2010
so there's no oil spilling into the environment? you cons really do have a contrary relationship with reality.
11:18 PM on 04/25/2010
When you do things like oil drilling, accidents sometimes happen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPETERB
12:23 AM on 04/26/2010
If the "accidents" happened in one's backyard or at one's beach house property one would much less likely to let others take the profits while you take the risk.