More

Senator Schumer Asks FTC To REGULATE Facebook, Social Networks

CRISTIAN SALAZAR   04/26/10 12:17 PM ET   AP

Ftc Facebook

NEW YORK — Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has said the online social network's latest features would make it easier for other websites to share connections and to personalize their content for its millions of users, but a U.S. senator thinks they could do harm.

Sen. Charles Schumer said Sunday he has written to the Federal Trade Commission expressing his concern about the new Facebook features and has called on the agency to craft guidelines for how social networking websites can use and share personal information about their users.

In his letter, Schumer wrote that changes to Facebook's privacy policies "have limited the ability of users to control the information they share and keep private."

"These changes can adversely affect users and, currently, there is little guidance on what social networking sites can and cannot do and how disclosure is provided," he wrote in the letter, dated Sunday.

Schumer, D-N.Y., said the problem applies to other social networking sites as well. He offered to introduce legislation if the FTC, whose missions include policing anticompetitive business practices and protecting consumers, felt it needed additional authority to create such guidelines.

Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes said the company was "surprised" by the senator's comments and looked forward to "sitting down with him and his staff to clarify."

He said the new products and features, announced on April 21, were designed to "enhance personalization and promote social activity across the Web."

"None of these changes removed or reduced people's control over their information, and several offered even greater controls," he said in an e-mailed statement.

Among the new features were plug-ins allowing partner sites to add to their pages "like" buttons, which users can click to automatically notify their friends of their approval. For instance, a user visiting a movie site can click on a "like" button to mark a preference for a film, which then appears on that user's Facebook profile.

Another feature is described on the site as controlling "how select partners can personalize their features" with public information about the user.

Noyes called this a "small pilot program" with three "respected partners," and he said it is aimed at providing "additional personalization on their sites."

"These partners were carefully chosen, reviewed, and are contractually required to respect users' privacy preferences," he wrote.

But Facebook has sometimes blundered when it comes to the privacy of its users. In 2007, it introduced a tool called Beacon, which automatically broadcast users' activities on other websites on Facebook. After protests from its users, Facebook first agreed to let people opt out of the feature, then removed it entirely.

In announcing the latest features at a Web and software conference, Zuckerberg tried to emphasize that Facebook's new tools wouldn't intrude on users' privacy. He said he expects the new tools to generate revenue for other websites and to give Facebook a better understanding of its users' interests.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

NEW YORK — Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has said the online social network's latest features would make it easier for other websites to share connections and to personalize their content for its m...
NEW YORK — Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has said the online social network's latest features would make it easier for other websites to share connections and to personalize their content for its m...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
nanjemoy
first, check your satire-o-meter.
09:30 AM on 04/27/2010
Go get 'em Chuck. I love FB, but my privacy is really important to me outside of what friends I share things with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CharlottesvilleVA
08:52 AM on 04/27/2010
In his letter, Schumer wrote that changes to Facebook's privacy policies "have limited the ability of users to control the information they share and keep private."

In other words, in his letter, Schumer revealed to all that he is mostly ignorant about social networking in general and Facebook's privacy controls in particular.
08:28 AM on 04/27/2010
I would rather he focus his efforts on getting back the billions in corporate welfare given to Exxon. Simply put, there are more serious problems
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lordcron
Get on my Left if you know you ain't Right!
05:26 AM on 04/27/2010
Classmates dot com must be paying him to go after Facebook. LOL! Facebook after all is everything Classmates wishes it could be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepimartinez
03:53 AM on 04/27/2010
This is simple... don't post your cell number, your address, any incredibly personal information, or any pictures you wouldn't want your family or your boss to see and you'll be fine.

If you're that worried, use a nickname and let your friends know its you in your message to them.
11:10 PM on 04/26/2010
Just what we need. Another clueless senator wanting to regulate something about which he knows nothing and understands less.
11:01 PM on 04/26/2010
Senator Schumer would make better use of his time in seeking to regulate Fox News and to reign in the entire Murdoch empire which is a threat to American Democracy. Schumer should reintroduce the Fairness Doctrine, prevent News organizations from operating as propaganda machines for political parties and make corporations which trade as News companies to start acting like proper news comapnies.
11:11 PM on 04/26/2010
Sure, why not, who even needs the Constitution anymore? I say we just adopt Cuba's Constitution and be done with it.
12:24 AM on 04/27/2010
This isn't a free speech issue. Most people in fact do not have the same type of 'free speech' that networks have. They lease the airwaves, which technically belong to the public SO that means they have an obligation to said public to not be what Fox so obviously is, a mouthpiece for a political party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bllnsinchnge
peace, markets, freedom
04:59 AM on 04/27/2010
Regulating the Press, final answer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidWyld
Professor of Management
10:47 PM on 04/26/2010
I gotta say that with the bang-up job the feds have done with regulating the banks, Wall Street, airlines, offshore gambling, etc., we can trust them to regulate social networks. Besides, to regulate something, you need to have predictability in order to set appropriate regulations. And we know, since the advent of the Internet, technology and our use of it changes so slowly, you can predict things 1000% correct years in advance, right (any caveman could do it!)?

Hands-off, I say, and most of the Web 2.0 generation (and those who remember Web 1.0 and even the pre-Web days) will concur!

David http://wyld-business.blogspot.com/
11:12 PM on 04/26/2010
The government could actually figure out a way to crash the entire internet, they're so stupid.
01:13 AM on 04/27/2010
They can pass all the regulatory laws they want. We know they'll just watch porn on their government computers all day anyway.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan99
10:20 PM on 04/26/2010
Yes, let's regulate fb. We'll leave the banks alone to reign supreme.

Ahem. Check that. I'm sure trying to regulate social networks can actually protect people and I know elected officials can work on regulating more than one thing at a time... I'm just outraged that repubs can get away without explaining themselves in blocking bank regulatory reform. WTF. They are blatantly protecting the dark lords that profit from unregulated and under-regulated banking practices that benefits few and costs many. We need to DEMAND they answer us - why? why? why? ... and... how do you sleep at night?!
01:15 AM on 04/27/2010
Maybe because "bank reform" is a heaping pile of garbage written by Goldman Sachs, which essentially nationalizes the banking industry?
08:11 PM on 04/26/2010
social networking sites have become giant psychological field studies circumventing ethical guidelines and oversight -- informed consent is not required

agree with senator schumer
08:12 PM on 04/26/2010
http://www.apa.org/ethics/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mjeffn
Freedom's just another word 4 nothing left to lose
11:36 PM on 04/26/2010
me too - fanned
07:38 PM on 04/26/2010
Schumer says his name in Yiddish means "Guardian" of Israel... good for him... but the last time I looked he was supposed to be a guardian of American rights and freedoms in the United States Senate... if he feels this strongly about being a "guardian" for Israel, then perhaps he should run for the Knesset?" His firey speech and pledge to them is in this clip (last 1-minute segment).

Part III at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb8lU8hJ_Nw&feature=related (his pledge at the last 1-minute segment)
01:16 AM on 04/27/2010
Excellent. More progressive anti-semitism.
08:30 AM on 04/27/2010
The topic is Facebook, not Senator Schumer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrColdheart
can't resist urge to not label self
07:11 PM on 04/26/2010
Politicians being behind on technology is very historic. (Washington refused to switch to push button phones for a decade after the rest of America because they were use to telling an operator and they were afraid of phone numbers)

His knowledge of this issue comes to doubt when you factor in should all other social websites be regulated and if he has a genuine issue over questionable content from other sources being displayed on Facebook does he have an example of such content not being regulated?

Plus there's a possibility he's creating an issue for him to run a platform from if his seat isn't secure this November, I don't know this for a fact, it's just a theory I'm throwing out there
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DWGRadio
05:34 PM on 04/26/2010
I suppose I agree with Schumer's sentiment, but ultimately it comes down to users. Do not post anything online you don't want anyone to see. This I believe falls under the Duh! category in the common sense pie chart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
07:36 PM on 04/26/2010
Ditto and seconded. I have a blank facebook page. If I want something public, I'll blog it. For issues involving family and friends, I have email and skype and a special encryption program for key clients and staff. If it's confidential, I use a nifty device called a landline.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fringebenefit
03:15 PM on 04/26/2010
I Guess if people will keep it clean then the big bad commission would not be getting involve
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
darkstar528
03:13 PM on 04/26/2010
If you post something you wouldn't want your kids or grandparents seeing, you're get what you deserve and if you don't like it, start your own site so you can control it...When in someone else's sandbox you have to play by their rules...