More

Oil Spill Gulf Of Mexico 2010: Coast Guard Considers Lighting Oil On Fire

CAIN BURDEAU AND BRETT MARTEL   04/29/10 12:45 AM ET   AP

NEW ORLEANS — A new oil leak was discovered at the site in the Gulf of Mexico where a drilling rig exploded and sank, and experts now estimate that five times more has been spilling into the water a day than previously believed, the Coast Guard said late Wednesday.

However, an official from BP PLC, which leases the rig, said he did not believe the newly discovered leak has increased the amount of oil spilling into the water beyond earlier estimates. Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry disagreed with his statement at a news conference and said she was relying on a new estimate from the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration.

She said NOAA experts now estimate that 5,000 barrels a day of oil are spilling into the gulf. Officials had estimated the leak for days at 1,000 barrels a day.

The news came hours after crews tried a test burn on the massive spill to try to slow it from reaching the U.S. shoreline.

Doug Suttle, chief operating officer for BP, said he thinks the estimate of 1,000 barrels a day is accurate. He showed a diagram showing where the leaks are and said the newly discovered leak is upstream from the previous leaks.

"Due to its location, we do not believe this changes the amount currently believed to be released," he said.

When asked again, Landry stuck to the NOAA estimate and said it was based on aerial surveys, study of the trajectory of the oil slick and other factors.

The Secretary of Homeland Security has briefed President Barack Obama on this new information and the government has offered to have the Department of Defense help contain the spill and protect the shoreline and wildlife, she said.

"It has become clear after several unsuccessful attempts to determine the cause" that agencies must supplement what's being done by the company, she said.

Crews late Wednesday afternoon started a test burn on the massive spill, which Landry noted was successful. Rig operator BP PLC had planned to continue the oil fires after the test, but as night fell, no more were lit. The burns were not expected to be done at night. No details about when more fires would be lit were mentioned during the late night news conference.

Crews planned to use hand-held flares to set fire to sections of the massive spill. Crews turned to the plan after failing to stop a 1,000-barrel-a-day leak at the spot where a deepwater oil platform exploded and sank.

A 500-foot boom was to be used to corral several thousand gallons of the thickest oil on the surface, which will then be towed to a more remote area, set on fire, and allowed to burn for about an hour.

They had estimated about 42,000 gallons of oil a day was leaking into the Gulf from the blown-out well drilled by the Deepwater Horizon oil rig. Eleven workers are missing and presumed dead. That would be closer to 210,000 gallons a day with the new estimates. The cause of the explosion has not been determined.

Greg Pollock, head of the oil spill division of the Texas General Land Office, which is providing equipment for crews in the Gulf, said he is not aware of a similar burn ever being done off the U.S. coast. The last time crews with his agency used fire booms to burn oil was a 1995 spill on the San Jacinto River.

"When you can get oil ignited, it is an absolutely effective way of getting rid of a huge percentage of the oil," he said. "I can't overstate how important it is to get the oil off the surface of the water."

The oil has the consistency of thick roofing tar.

When the flames go out, Pollock said, the material that is left resembles a hardened ball of tar that can be removed from the water with nets or skimmers.

"I would say there is little threat to the environment because it won't coat an animal, and because all the volatiles have been consumed if it gets on a shore it can be simply picked up," he said.

Authorities also said they expect minimal impact on sea turtles and marine mammals in the burn area.

A graphic posted by the Coast Guard and the industry task force fighting the slick showed it covering an area about 100 miles long and 45 miles across at its widest point.

"It's premature to say this is catastrophic. I will say this is very serious," said Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry.

From the air, the thickest parts of the spill resembled rust-colored tentacles of various thickness. The air was thick with the acrid smell of petroleum.

Amid several of the thicker streaks, four gray whales could be seen swimming in the oil. It was not clear if the whales were in danger.

More than two dozen vessels moved about in the heart of the slick pulling oil-sopping booms.

Earlier Wednesday, Louisiana State Wildlife and Fisheries Secretary Robert Barham told lawmakers that federal government projections show a "high probability" oil could reach the Pass a Loutre wildlife area Friday night, Breton Sound on Saturday and the Chandeleur Islands on Sunday.

As the task force worked far offshore, local officials prepared for the worst in case the oil reaches land.

In Plaquemines Parish, a sliver of Louisiana that juts into the Gulf and is home to Pass a Loutre, officials hoped to deploy a fleet of volunteers in fishing boats to spread booms that could block oil from entering inlets.

"We've got oystermen and shrimpers who know this water better than anyone," said Plaquemines Paris President Billy Nungesser. "Hopefully the Coast Guard will embrace the idea."

But there was anxiety that the Gulf Coast was not prepared for the onslaught of oil.

"Our ability to deal with this would be like us having a foot of snow falling in Biloxi tomorrow," said Vincent Creel, a spokesman for the city government in Biloxi, Miss. "We don't have snow plows, and we're not equipped to deal with this."

The parish's emergency manager planned to meet in Houma on Thursday with a Coast Guard official to discuss whether volunteers can help, Nungesser said.

"We don't want to just sit by and hope this (oil) doesn't come ashore," Nungesser said.

The decision to burn some of the oil came after crews operating submersible robots failed to activate a shut-off device that would halt the flow of oil on the sea bottom 5,000 feet below.

BP says work will begin as early as Thursday to drill a relief well to relieve pressure at the blowout site, but that could take months.

Another option is a dome-like device to cover oil rising to the surface and pump it to container vessels, but that will take two weeks to put in place, BP said.

Winds and currents in the Gulf have helped crews in recent days as they try to contain the leak. The immediate threat to sandy beaches in coastal Alabama and Mississippi has eased. But the spill has moved steadily toward the mouth of the Mississippi River and the wetland areas east of the river, home to hundreds of species of wildlife and near some rich oyster grounds.

The cost of the disaster continues to rise and could easily top $1 billion.

Industry officials say replacing the Deepwater Horizon, owned by Transocean Ltd. and operated by BP, would cost up to $700 million. BP has said its costs for containing the spill are running at $6 million a day. The company said it will spend $100 million to drill the relief well. The Coast Guard has not yet reported its expenses.

___

Associated Press writers Janet McConnaughey, Michael Kunzelman in New Orleans, Melinda Deslatte in Baton Rouge and Holbrook Mohr in Jackson, Miss., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS — A new oil leak was discovered at the site in the Gulf of Mexico where a drilling rig exploded and sank, and experts now estimate that five times more has been spilling into the wat...
NEW ORLEANS — A new oil leak was discovered at the site in the Gulf of Mexico where a drilling rig exploded and sank, and experts now estimate that five times more has been spilling into the wat...
Filed by Katherine Goldstein  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 303
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
10:46 PM on 05/22/2010
I think people are not doing enough to clean up the spill. I also think that the media has been very quiet on this subject. I am doing a report on this and can't seem to find enough information on this. I am also looking for a detailed explanation on what has been created to help fix the problem. Any Help???????
11:13 AM on 05/22/2010
lets see, the pipe is steel, and welders are common and they know how to weld steel, and u can weld under water, so y not just put a temporary cap on the pipe, clean up the mess, rebuild a sturcture to reopen the oil line and go from there problem solved, its cheap, easy and highly effective, maybe i should run for president lol vote for me sthrn
06:52 PM on 05/20/2010
If the oil spill pipe is made of steel or iorn why don't they just crimp it and fold the end of the pipe if anything it will at least slow it down, this is dumb it's been going on for 30 days! just crimp it...
09:58 PM on 04/30/2010
Who Dat said they gonna stop this oil spill! I wish there was a way we could mop up all this oil in to a big ole bucket and dump it over all the million dollar homes that the BP execs live in, so they can experience whats about to happen to the great southern states of this country.
09:20 AM on 04/29/2010
What is needed is a deep sea diaper, able to be changed when saturated, over the source of the spill.
Al Schrader
Some overnight ideas take decades
01:58 PM on 04/29/2010
They need to use skimmer ships that I invented. They simply skim the water surface & save the oil which then goes to the refineries & made into gasoline....alfredschrader@aol.com
Al Schrader
Some overnight ideas take decades
01:58 PM on 04/29/2010
Made into gasoline
04:19 PM on 04/30/2010
I like that beyond-the-box thinking. Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hkochii
Why do I even care?
09:07 AM on 04/29/2010
part 2

I hope a solution comes along before the coasts of Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, And Texas become tar coated waste lands. The Exxon Valdez spill was bad but not as bad as the spill in the gulf can become. The oil from the Valdez didn't have wave and weather forces driving it as the oil slick approaching the gulf coast has. The Exxon oil in Alaska coated more rocks than sand. Some of the oil that came ashore in Alaska was washed off the rocks and collected, It won't be possible to wash the thick crude oil off the sands of some of the most beautiful beaches in America and Mexico. The sand will need to be removed, disposed of and replaced.

Anyone who is currently unemployed should go to the gulf coast and wait for the oil to arrive. I have a feeling BP will be hiring a lot of people to help clean up this disaster. A disaster which they had assured everyone could never happen.
12:32 PM on 04/29/2010
there a jobs program
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hkochii
Why do I even care?
09:04 AM on 04/29/2010
Now BP Oil is asking for help in trying to figure out how to stop the oil from leaking from the bottom of the ocean. They have stated they don't care who gets credit for fixing the problem as long as it gets fixed.

I thought the oil industry had assured everyone that the technology existed to not only prevent a leaking well in the deep ocean but also had the necessary techniques and equipment to prevent or stop a leak should the initial safe guards fail. Apparently the oil indusrty flat out lied to the regulating agencies about these safety measures in order to get permission to drill in the deep ocean. I'm guessing they believed if a problem such as the one being experienced in the gulf ever happened they would figure out a way to correct it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:18 PM on 04/29/2010
They need to drill another well to relieve the pressure. Problem is is will take more than 2 months to do it. That is how long they said, but I would not count on that any more than their initial analysis that no oil was leaking. 4 weeks till hurricane season begins & this could become very interesting if one hits before any fix is completed. Off shore drilling may lose its luster, just as Hope & Change have.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
booker52
avid reader
08:50 AM on 04/29/2010
Lighting the oil on fire just doesn't sound any better then having it make landfall. Toxic smoke going up into the air???
photo
LeFlaneur
does nuance.
03:46 PM on 04/29/2010
Well, that's what would have been done with it eventually anyway ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
08:43 AM on 04/29/2010
Dirty rotten no good f*(&^&*^&g oil industry. This disaster is simply going to intensify. Sickening. It is going to be leaking right through the storm season. Imagine what that will create.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DSteel
Mile-High, Most of the time
04:34 AM on 04/29/2010
Wow, just read 5 times more oil has been and continues to spill. 5000 barrels a day!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36800673/ns/us_news-environment

This is huge, and should not be buried halfway down the green page.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:12 AM on 04/29/2010
What the future may hold, that they haven't spoken of: Google
Indonesian Gas Well Blowout
if you haven't already.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:59 AM on 04/29/2010
I think Rachel Madow on MSNBC said burning it will actually make something thicker and harder to get rid of.

BP and related firms that own this mess should be hit with a big fine and ALL costs, from putting out the fire to estimated environmental damage. I have no problem with oil rigs if they are handled properly and safely, and this one clearly was not. It was not a giant wave or some other act of nature, it was human error.
photo
WoodyCPM
Now what?
08:22 AM on 04/29/2010
It may prove to have been human error, regardless, this ought to drive home the reality that human beings are incapable of devising a fail proof, 100% guaranteed anything. It's a marker of our hubris and arrogance, not to mention, conniving manipulation of the public to believe that it is possible. The Titanic was unsinkable. As you've pointed at, at the very least, there's the forgetful, distracted, sleepy headed, hungover, whatever, human being to consider as a reason for the disaster. It's only a matter of time before there is some unforeseen and inexplicable failure of a nuclear bomb system that will send millions to an early grave. We are victims of our own cleverness. So is the rest of the planet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:24 PM on 04/29/2010
Actually, it may have been a simple case of probability over error. The technology is not perfect. They have said a disaster like this could happen every 40-50 years. Now, when Obama has stated screw the environment, it happens & he owns it. lol What a lucky & charismatic fellow. I am glad he is a clone of W. & not this stoooopid of his own volition. Unless you wish he had actually led us the way he promised instead of morphing into W. lolrof@Obama
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bleedingheart9
one small step for man...
02:27 AM on 04/29/2010
Leaks and leaking links leaking more than previously disclosed leaking/s/ers...

Wait, is this a G. W. bush story or what?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
polishlogician
No sugar tonight in my tea..
01:29 AM on 04/29/2010
I live ON the lake on the South Shore of new orleans; this is the biggest BFD deal in the country right now...wind farms? being going on for 12 years; immigration reform? 30 years; biggest spill since Exxon, last week....and it's still spilling about a million and a half barrels a week (if you can believe the latest rounded-number estimate)....
photo
WoodyCPM
Now what?
08:26 AM on 04/29/2010
And why have we not found solutions to any of these long tortured problems? Because the solutions require a curtailing, a redirection or end to the economic interests of wealthy people. In every instance.
01:14 AM on 04/29/2010
Oil should be left in the ground where it belongs. BP and others were saying last year that there are almost never spills. And with this one, at first, they said there was no spill. But there it is. It isn't just the wildlife at risk here, either. The fishing industry. New Orleans tourism. Gulf Coast tourism. And what about the air quality? Asthma? What else? Maybe this bad result will be enough to push the 'drillers' into the corner and increase alternatives. Too bad New Orleans and the gulf coast once again get to show us the effects of terrible political decisions. The media has been strangely quiet on this. Why?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:28 PM on 04/29/2010
Because Rupert Murdoch & his ilk were allowed to buy the "liberal media" 25 years ago & make faux the standard all follow.