iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Sidney Thomas Interviews With Obama For Supreme Court Nomination

BEN FELLER   04/30/10 12:43 AM ET   AP

Sidney Thomas Supreme Court

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Thursday interviewed federal appeals court Judge Sidney Thomas of Montana for an opening on the Supreme Court, a person familiar with the conversation told The Associated Press.

The roughly hour-long session at the White House was the first known formal interview that Obama has conducted for the upcoming vacancy on the high court. It is not clear whether Obama has interviewed other candidates in person.

Vice President Joe Biden also interviewed Thomas at the White House in a separate meeting Thursday, said the person familiar with the conversations, who spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss Obama's private deliberations.

The White House had no comment.

A message left with Thomas' chambers in Billings was not immediately returned.

The personal time Obama devoted to Thomas suggests that the federal judge, well respected within legal circles but hardly a familiar name in Washington, is under a higher level of consideration by the president.

The news of his interview by the president and vice president works to the White House's advantage in signaling that Obama is giving a hard review to a candidate who comes from outside the Washington Beltway and does not neatly fit into conventional wisdom.

The court is dominated by justices with ties to the Northeast and the Ivy League; Thomas' career is rooted in the West – he lives in Billings, Mont., and got his bachelor's degree from Montana State University and his law degree from the University of Montana.

The 56-year-old judge serves on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the largest of the nation's appellate courts. He was nominated to that job in July 1995 by President Bill Clinton and confirmed by the Senate with no controversy.

The San Francisco-based appeals court on which he serves has a liberal reputation, but attorneys who know Thomas describe him as independent and a straight-shooter.

Obama is choosing a nominee to replace Justice John Paul Stevens, who is retiring this summer.

Obama's pick is not expected to upend the court's balance of power – four on the left, four on the right, one in the middle. Stevens, the retiring justice, is the leader of the court's liberals.

Thomas' name has been on Obama's known list of court contenders for more than two weeks. But the predictably intense speculation about whom Obama will pick has centered on other names – chiefly Solicitor General Elena Kagan and federal appeals court judges Diane Wood and Merrick Garland.

Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs said earlier this week that Obama would be talking to candidates this week, but the White House has declined to characterize those conversations.

The president has been considering about 10 people as potential nominees.

Among the others are federal appeals court judge Ann Williams, former Georgia Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow.

Obama is expected to choose his nominee within a couple of weeks.

He already went through the formal interview process last year with three of the current top contenders – Wood, Kagan and Napolitano – before nominating Sonia Sotomayor in May 2009 to replace Justice David Souter.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Thursday interviewed federal appeals court Judge Sidney Thomas of Montana for an opening on the Supreme Court, a person familiar with the conversation told...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Thursday interviewed federal appeals court Judge Sidney Thomas of Montana for an opening on the Supreme Court, a person familiar with the conversation told...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 385
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
11:00 PM on 05/04/2010
"Obama's pick is not expected to upend the court's balance of power – four on the left, four on the right, one in the middle."

More accurate description--four on the far right, one on the right, four in the middle.
12:48 PM on 04/30/2010
Absent in this entire discussion is an analysis of the cases that Thomas has decided and how they indicate his judicial philosophies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:57 AM on 04/30/2010
Good to hear that the pool of candidates is being expanded beyond NYC. Judge Thomas seems like an excellent pick as are federal appeals court judge Ann Williams, Leah Ward Sears, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, Secretary Janet Napolitano.

Consideration of Solicitor General Elena Kagan and Merrick Garland would be a reward to Emanuel, Summers and the rich NY Democratic contributors who destroyed the country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:56 AM on 04/30/2010
Good to hear that the pool of candidates is being expanded beyond NYC. Judge Thomas seems like an excellent pick as are federal appeals court judge Ann Williams, Leah Ward Sears, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm andSecretary Janet Napolitano.

Consideration of Solicitor General Elena Kagan and Merrick Garland is be a reward to Emanuel, Summers and the rich NY Democratic contributors who destroyed the country and cynically feel they can ride the wave of public opinion and keep the loot .
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Pennsanic
Be nice to the US or we'll bring you democracy too
11:07 AM on 04/30/2010
Not Napolitano. She was entirely too tolerant of that awful Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
09:24 AM on 04/30/2010
"...one in the middle"?? Did I miss something? There is no one in the middle. There are 5 conservative judges.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
09:17 AM on 04/30/2010
Why should a nominee’s religion be more important than anything else? Is the religion of a justice a predictor of their policies? The Catholicism of former Justice Brennan and Justice Scalia did not prevent the former from being one of the most liberal justices in the Court’s recent history and the latter from being one of the most conservative. Nor did it stop them from having different views on the death penalty or the right to abortion.

None of this is to say that a Protestant should specifically not be nominated. But Ben-Meir admits that he doesn’t “believe that the absence of a Protestant judge should, or would, have a meaningful impact on the Court’s operation.” If this is so, perhaps the president should pay attention first to those criteria which will affect that operation.

There are two senators for each state; there needn’t be one justice for every demographic in the United States. There should be no seat reserved for a Protestant, just as there shouldn’t be for any other group: Judicial ability should trump any demographic considerations. If the best candidate happens to a Protestant, by all means, let he or she be nominated, but whether he or she happens to be a Catholic, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic or Athiest should not be a primary concern.
09:12 AM on 04/30/2010
Biden's first question: "So, do you think health care is a big f-n' deal?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:59 AM on 04/30/2010
I don't think being a Supreme Court Justice is a very hard job. You have an unlimited amount of Harvard and Yale School Clerks working for you. As long as you always use the phrase " A reasonable person would" in your arguments, you are covered. Most decisions are political anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:55 AM on 04/30/2010
I didn't know Sigmund Freud was a candidate.
08:41 AM on 04/30/2010
Someone younger please. And liberal. VERY to the left.
09:10 AM on 04/30/2010
Fat chance on 2 and 3.
08:31 AM on 04/30/2010
The notion that the 9th Circuit is liberal is a myth according to legal scholars and critics that have studied their decisions over time. More often it's the opposite. Badly decided cases would be a better description. Thjis guy is not a liberal and replacing Stevens with him will not be a good thing for the Court.
08:29 AM on 04/30/2010
I want him to say "Up yours!" to the radical-right and nominate Mario Cuomo or Howard Dean.
08:38 AM on 04/30/2010
I don't favor it, but to nominate Bill Clinton would make the radical-right have a collective stroke!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
09:02 AM on 04/30/2010
People like Clinton are used to being the Main Act. He makes millions being the star. I don't think people like that would be willing to take a salary cut so they could be part of a 9 member team with only a minority voice. That's why Jon Corzine in NJ quit the US Senate to become Governor. Its good to be King.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
09:43 AM on 04/30/2010
Hi JazzyJake: Best idea of the day. Looking forward to more of
your posts. Take care & you are ((Fanned))
08:15 AM on 04/30/2010
Personally, I'm hoping for someone a little younger. With the chance for an Asian, or Afr.Amer. Female, & as I said already, YOUNGER!!!
08:29 AM on 04/30/2010
Sounds like a personal add on Craigs list. lol
08:35 AM on 04/30/2010
Yeah, it would be nice to have a Justice who knew, for example, that you don't have to print-out an email and mail it to someone. Jeez!
09:11 AM on 04/30/2010
Who are you referring to?
08:06 AM on 04/30/2010
Hey has anyone seen the community organizer's transcripts and standardized test scores? I didn't think so.
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
08:09 AM on 04/30/2010
What in Gods name are you crying about now? Standardized scores?? whose standardized scores?? The Presidents?? Yours? Mine? WTF are you talking about???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kmcv
08:15 AM on 04/30/2010
i have a beagle, i have known many beagles, you, rightwingbeagle, are no beagle!
08:17 AM on 04/30/2010
LMAO!!! FAVED!!(Already a fan.)

Man, that was awsome!!
07:58 AM on 04/30/2010
Scary. Would you trust your children alone with him?
photo
VivaldiPickpocket
"Bringing news to its sneeze."
08:17 AM on 04/30/2010
Unless Snoopy came along, I wouldn't trust my blind parakeet with you.
08:30 AM on 04/30/2010
Righty, you are on fire today. lol
Fav.