More

'Don't Ask Don't Tell' Repeal: Gates Warns Congress To Wait

ANNE FLAHERTY   05/ 1/10 12:59 AM ET   AP

Dadt Gates

WASHINGTON — Senior Pentagon leaders on Friday warned Congress not to tamper with the ban on gays serving openly in the military until they can come up with a plan for dealing with potential opposition in the ranks.

In a strongly worded letter obtained by The Associated Press, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen told the House Armed Services Committee that forcing policy changes on the military before it's ready would be a mistake.

"Our military must be afforded the opportunity to inform us of their concerns, insights and suggestions if we are to carry out this change successfully," Gates and Mullen wrote to the panel's chairman, Missouri Democrat Ike Skelton.

Gay rights advocates want an immediate freeze on military firings of openly gay service members, and some senior Democratic senators have said they want to offer such a bill. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Friday said the Obama administration should suspend enforcement of the law until the Defense Department completes its study and Congress can act to change it.

But other lawmakers, including Skelton, have said they are uneasy about lifting the ban and don't want to act before the force is ready.

The letter provides Skelton and other unsettled Democrats political cover not to press the issue until after this year's midterm elections. Earlier this week, Skelton asked Gates in a letter to outline his views as the House committee prepares the 2011 defense authorization bill.

President Barack Obama has said the 1993 law, known as "don't ask, don't tell," unfairly punishes patriotic Americans and asked Congress to repeal it.

In a statement released late Friday, White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said Obama's commitment to repealing the law remains "unequivocal" and that Obama "is committed to getting this done both soon and right."

Gates says he supports lifting the ban but wants to survey the troops first on how it should be done. He has ordered a study by Dec. 1 that will look at whether housing arrangements would have to be altered and gay partners would be allowed military benefits.

If Congress acts before then, "it would send a very damaging message to our men and women in uniform that in essence their views, concerns and perspectives do not matter," he and Mullen wrote to Skelton.

The letter prompted immediate protests from gay rights groups.

Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said that if Congress doesn't act this year it would send the message to gay troops that "the impact on them and their families does not matter to the military leadership, including their commander in chief."

Defense officials hope the protracted timeline will also help troops adjust to the idea of serving with openly gay colleagues before they have to accept the change.

Sen. Carl Levin, the Michigan Democrat who heads the Senate Armed Services Committee, is expected to propose in the 2011 defense authorization bill a moratorium on gay firings in the military.

In the House, Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Pa., is considered the most likely to offer the legislation.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Senior Pentagon leaders on Friday warned Congress not to tamper with the ban on gays serving openly in the military until they can come up with a plan for dealing with potential opp...
WASHINGTON — Senior Pentagon leaders on Friday warned Congress not to tamper with the ban on gays serving openly in the military until they can come up with a plan for dealing with potential opp...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,840
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
keepemhonest 10:57 AM on 05/02/2010
TO: Root4cubs

You wrote: "I find NO CREDIBLE justification to lift the ban."

ME to YOU: HAHAHAHA ... how about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Do those 2 documents carry enough credibility for you?

How about these federal laws that prohibit discrimination upon hiring?

- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), which prohibits  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
99% -Don't do what they tell you !
04:24 AM on 05/09/2010
"Gay rights advocates want an immediate freeze on military firings of openly gay service members, and some senior Democratic senators have said they want to offer such a bill. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Friday said the Obama administration should suspend enforcement of the law until the Defense Department completes its study and Congress can act to change it."

And if this is not done, the Obama administration is doing exactely to gays what they did to homeowners; wait until the problem solves itself by having them all leave !!!!
08:04 PM on 05/16/2010
The Obama administration is just going to continue to do what theyre best at. Sitting around with their party members and telling each other how cool they are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
99% -Don't do what they tell you !
04:20 AM on 05/09/2010
How about investigating if military men and women want to serve with Hispanics, Blacks, Whites, Republicans, Democrats, etc?

Are you fvcking nuts?
They do not want to do this. It's becoming more clear by the day.
04:21 PM on 05/10/2010
The behavior of some of this President's Men is abominable. If our Commander-in-Chief continues to assert, at this point, that his hands are tied, that it is up to Congress to act to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell, it will cost him whatever claim to integrity remains for his presidency. He stands to lose credibility with allies as well as adversaries in the international arena if he maintains silence as Secretary of State Gates and Chairman of Joint Chiefs Mullen actively sabotage his fulfillment of an already overdue promise to persecuted Service Members and to all Americans. Is this the moral leadership Obama pledged to restore to the United States when we elected him? I, for one, regret my vote.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Morgan378
02:07 AM on 05/09/2010
Well it wasn't until DADT that there even were gays in the military - right? From the War of Independence to The Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam with all the drafts in there too - there was not one man or woman glad a man or woman was refilling the musket or putting a shell in their mortar with the enemy coming up over the next hill? Would they rather wait until a straight soldier came along? Do they really prefer to think about what kind of sex the person saving their lives has? Hmmm. I just don't remember being THAT concerned with it myself. Maybe we haven't learned anything from introducing blacks into the military. Maybe gays need have their own units first. Just seems like a colossal waste of time when we think back into the Nation's Collective Memory and see that all the fear was about nothing and maybe those that couldn't handle it are the one's who should be thrown out.
01:01 AM on 05/09/2010
Wait for what? It's a stall tactic; it's discrimination plain and simple. The Israelis admit gays and their military is every bit as capable as America's. It's time to retire these old brain-dead military f@rts, Gates included.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
esp2001
03:04 AM on 05/08/2010
When is it going to become clear that this policy is a form of discrimination where one's personal characteristics are used as a basis for dismissal, and where people have to live in fear that someone will discover their secret. It is a persecution of a group of people that should not be acceptable in a society that has respect for human rights and civil liberties. Waiting is not going to change anything. Doing something can change everything, and we just may be surprised how tolerant and accepting people are. Or perhaps there should be universal policy that prohibits all, gay and straight, from talking about their sexuality?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Reilly
09:05 PM on 05/02/2010
They divided the sexes, to prevent any sexual tension that could happen. And if you take the stresses that someone in combat experiances, they can fall back on to primal urges. Sex is a primal war, and its not a good time, when your life in on the line.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
esp2001
03:08 AM on 05/08/2010
Do you think that little of people? A bunch of fornicating deviants who cannot control themselves? And do you truly believe that a silly policy impacts primal urges if they are as strong as you imply?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kyo Hanakara
Science & Rationality
06:17 PM on 05/02/2010
And when will they be ready?
2064? christian asses are running the military it will never happen if we wait for them,
Obama needs to push this through like everything else cause the other side are bunch of political degenerates !
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PresidentRobertBooth
04:16 PM on 05/02/2010
So they are going to ask soldiers whether serving with openly gay comrades is OK?

And if they say "no", then DADT will remain?


I suppose if soldiers had a problem serving with black soliders too then black people should be barred from military service as well.

It's the same line of logic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GayGrandpa
11:13 AM on 05/02/2010
It reminds me of Lincoln's generals, stall stall stall.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
keepemhonest
10:57 AM on 05/02/2010
TO: Root4cubs

You wrote: "I find NO CREDIBLE justification to lift the ban."

ME to YOU: HAHAHAHA ... how about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Do those 2 documents carry enough credibility for you?

How about these federal laws that prohibit discrimination upon hiring?

- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;

- Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), which prohibits employment discrimination based on genetic information about an applicant, employee, or former employee; and

- the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which, among other things, provides monetary damages in cases of intentional employment discrimination.

Do any of those Federal Laws have enough credibility for you?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
keepemhonest
10:48 AM on 05/02/2010
Did "W" or ChainE "survey" our men/women/gays/straights in the military BEFORE they had intel manipulated & falsified?

Did "W" or ChainE "survey" our men/women/gays/straights in the military BEFORE they invaded a country to get their dirty hands on oil fields?
12:50 AM on 05/02/2010
Uhm Mr. Gates, we just decided to put women in submarines, and I'm not aware of anyone canvassing the military on what they thought first. So your hesitation must be for some other reason.

Gee, I wonder what that could be?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alberto Kang
10:32 PM on 05/01/2010
I still do not understand why the White House does not use the new "Dont ask, Just Tell" policy, it would solve so many problems.
09:49 PM on 05/01/2010
"it would send a very damaging message to our men and women in uniform that in essence their views, concerns and perspectives do not matter," boo hoo hoo
Oh, it's just fine and dandy when our men and women in uniform who happen to be gay...that in essence their views, concerns and perspectives do not matter...but that all the hetero and a higher caste can't bare to accept people they have worked for decades with. Well TOO BAD.
Congress should tell the Military, too late fellas, rights are rights and we ALL have them, even OMG gays. Right the wrong and get on with it, we aren't taking this BS anymore. Period. EQUAL rights for all. DUH!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
keepemhonest
10:49 AM on 05/02/2010
SPOT ON!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SpaceboySD
"Free To Be You And Me" Is My Bible
09:15 PM on 05/01/2010
This is your brain on DADT:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haHXgFU7qNI

Any Questions?