iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

US Has 5,113 Nuclear Warheads, Pentagon Reveals

ANNE GEARAN   05/ 4/10 12:13 AM ET   AP

Pentagon

WASHINGTON — The United States has 5,113 nuclear warheads in its stockpile and "several thousand" more retired warheads awaiting the junkpile, the Pentagon said Monday in an unprecedented accounting of a secretive arsenal born in the Cold War and now shrinking rapidly.

The Obama administration disclosed the size of its atomic stockpile going back to 1962 as part of a campaign to get other nuclear nations to be more forthcoming, and to improve its bargaining position against the prospect of a nuclear Iran.

"We think it is in our national security interest to be as transparent as we can be about the nuclear program of the United States," Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told reporters at the United Nations, where she addressed a conference on containing the spread of atomic weapons.

The U.S. has previously regarded such details as top secret.

The figure includes both "strategic," or long-range weapons, and those intended for use at shorter range.

The Pentagon said the stockpile of 5,113 as of September 2009 represents a 75 percent reduction since 1989.

A rough count of deployed and reserve warheads has been known for years, so the Pentagon figures do not tell nuclear experts much they don't already know.

Hans Kristensen, director of Nuclear Information Project, Federation of American Scientists in Washington, said his organization had already put the number at around 5,100 by reviewing budget estimates and other documents.

The import of the announcement is the precedent it sets, Kristensen said.

"The important part is that the U.S. is no longer going to keep other countries in the dark," he said.

Clinton said the disclosure of numbers the general public has never seen "builds confidence" that the Obama administration is serious about stopping the spread of atomic weapons and reducing their numbers.

But the administration is not revealing everything.

The Pentagon figure released Monday includes deployed weapons, which are those more or less ready to launch, and reserve weapons. It does not include thousands of warheads that have been disabled or all but dismantled. Those weapons could, in theory, be reconstituted, or their nuclear material repurposed.

Estimates of the total U.S. arsenal range from slightly more than 8,000 to above 9,000, but the Pentagon will not give a precise number.

Whether to reveal the full total, including those thousands of nearly dead warheads, was debated within the Obama administration. Keeping those weapons out of the figure released Monday represented a partial concession to intelligence agency officials and others who argued national security could be harmed by laying the entire nuclear arsenal bare.

A senior defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the overall total is still classified, did not dispute the rough estimates developed by independent analysts.

Exposure of once-classified totals for U.S. deployed and reserve nuclear weapons is intended to nudge nations such as China, which has revealed little about its nuclear stockpile.

"You can't get anywhere toward disarmament unless you're going to be transparent about how many weapons you have," said Sharon Squassoni, a nuclear policy analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Russia and the United States have previously disclosed the size of their stockpiles of deployed strategic weapons, and France and Britain have released similar information. All have signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which is the subject of the U.N. review that began Monday.

The U.S. revelations are calculated to improve Washington's bargaining power with Iran's allies and friends for the drive to head off what the West charges is a covert Iranian program to build a bomb.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahamadinejad spoke ahead of Clinton at the conference, denouncing U.S. efforts to pressure his regime to abandon its nuclear program.

The U.N. conference will try to close loopholes in the internationally recognized rules against the spread of weapons technology.

Independent analysts estimate the total world stockpile of nuclear warheads at more than 22,000.

The Federation of American Scientists estimates that nearly 8,000 of those warheads are operational, with about 2,000 U.S. and Russian warheads ready for use on short notice.

The United States and Russia burnished their credentials for insisting that other countries forgo atomic weapons by agreeing last month to a new strategic arms reduction treaty.

The New START treaty sets a limit of 1,550 deployed strategic nuclear warheads for each side, down from 2,200 under a 2002 deal. The pact re-establishes anti-cheating procedures that provide the most comprehensive and substantial arms control agreement since the original 1991 START treaty.

___

Eds: Associated Press writers Anne Flaherty and Robert Burns in Washington and Matthew Lee at the United Nations contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — The United States has 5,113 nuclear warheads in its stockpile and "several thousand" more retired warheads awaiting the junkpile, the Pentagon said Monday in an unprecedented accoun...
WASHINGTON — The United States has 5,113 nuclear warheads in its stockpile and "several thousand" more retired warheads awaiting the junkpile, the Pentagon said Monday in an unprecedented accoun...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 457
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
10:14 AM on 05/04/2010
I recommend the documentary movie "Sputnik Mania" to understand how we got here.

If you didn't live through the Cuban Missile Crisis, it will give you an idea of the paranoia we experienced, and how it was put on us by the government. For example, our "duck and cover drills" were to convince the Soviets that we were willing to fight a nuclear war. Our government scared the crap out of us kids, to scare the Soviets.

The movie is enlightening and scary. Cold War fans, don't miss it :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StarDagger
The Welfare of the People is the Supreme Law
03:48 PM on 05/04/2010
Every year on the day Robert Kennedy defused the Cuban Missile Crisis we should take a moment to reflect.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
10:03 AM on 05/04/2010
Not sure what you can do with 5000 that you can't do with 4000.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dennis
No matter how cynical I get I can't keep up.
09:50 AM on 05/04/2010
Only 5113? Good grief, that's barely enough to render the planet uninhabitable. Just another proof that Dems are soft on defense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
09:48 AM on 05/04/2010
I am going to take this information and sell it to the Russians. Oh, wait a second!
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
11:05 AM on 05/04/2010
They knew, and we know how many they have.
We tell each other, it's part of old arms pacts. They just didn't tell us before.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
11:22 AM on 05/04/2010
You mean they did not tell us during the Cold War. Yes, it makes sense.
photo
VeryGrood
only class worse than micro-bio was molecular-bio
09:43 AM on 05/04/2010
I always thought that the general consensus that we have enough to wipe out all civilization 100+ times was a good enough count. There is no difference between have 5,113 and having 1,000. Even with 1,000 warheads... nobody can eliminate our second strike capabilities or our ability to end civilization.

Dear White House;
Please get back to me when that count is somewhere under 200.
Regards;
VeryGrood
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StarDagger
The Welfare of the People is the Supreme Law
03:50 PM on 05/04/2010
Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize because he wants the number to be at 0. He also worked tirelessly as a Senator in bipartisan efforts to lower the number of nuclear weapons.
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
09:36 AM on 05/04/2010
Transparent about nuclear warheads, but NOT transparent by his administration working hard to make sure the fed does not get audited Hmmm?????
09:31 AM on 05/04/2010
Now let's count lsrael's hundreds of nucIear weapons. lran has no nuclear arms. lsrael has hundreds of nucIear weapons. The US should push for UN sanctions against lsraeI for it's illegal nucIear arsenal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aceinthehole1970
09:36 AM on 05/04/2010
Israel has not signed the NNPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty), Iran has. Therefore, Israel does not have to say if they have Nuclear Weapons or how many.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
semantics shamantics
10:32 AM on 05/04/2010
Therefore Israel needs to sign the NNPT immediately or else the whole thing is just a rich nations club farce
09:28 AM on 05/04/2010
Dr. Strangelove Final Scene

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gb0mxcpPOU
09:27 AM on 05/04/2010
lran has no nuclear arms. lsrael has hundreds of nucIear weapons. The US should push for UN sanctions against lsraeI.
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
09:37 AM on 05/04/2010
proof that Israel has "hundreds of nuclear weapons"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxygen
love is like oxygen
09:45 AM on 05/04/2010
great idea eagle and I would add a mathematical formula for the size of the country and how many nuclear explosives per every certain meter or whatever they have - would be interesting - and telling of alot of things!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mauiloa
Dedicated to fighting the bullies of the Right.
09:19 AM on 05/04/2010
And we're supposed to believe that number, WHY??
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
09:37 AM on 05/04/2010
Because Capt. Transparency said so!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madbunny
Prison Guard - FireFighter - now a School Teacher
11:34 AM on 05/04/2010
You read the article right?

The number has been available in 'rough' terms for years, decades.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eileenflemingWAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
09:18 AM on 05/04/2010
The most brutal act of state terrorism happened when the US nuked Hiroshima and two hundred thousand lives were vaporized within twenty minutes and then we did it again to Nagasaki!

"Any country, which manufactures and stocks nuclear weapons, is first of all endangering its own citizens. This is why the citizens must confront their government and warn it that it has no right to expose them to this danger. Because, in effect, the citizens are being held hostage by their own government, just as if they have been hijacked and deprived of their freedom and threatened…when governments develop nuclear weapons without the consent of their citizens - and this is true in most cases - they are violating the basic rights of their citizens, the basic right not to live under constant threat of annihilation…Is any government qualified and authorized to produce such weapons?"- Mordechai Vanunu, whistle blower of Israel's WMD program.

http://wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1354&Itemid=222
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aceinthehole1970
09:38 AM on 05/04/2010
Yeah, it would have been better to continue "fire-bombing" the entire country. Study your history, the bombs dropped saved more lives as the Emperor of Japan was "terrified" Tokyo was next.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
10:02 AM on 05/04/2010
We'd pretty much already fire-bombed Tokyo to ashes, so I'm not sure what he thought we might do to Tokyo beyond spreading the ashes around a bit.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
11:09 AM on 05/04/2010
Just because an act of terrorism achieves its objectives, doesn't mean it isn't terrorism.

What if 9/11 had caused the US to pull out of the Middle East and remove sanctions on Iraq, thereby saving tens of thousands of lives (at least)? Then would you argue it wasn't a terrorist act?
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
09:42 AM on 05/04/2010
What do you consider the Rape of Nanking? Was that state terrorism?

Just be thankful that Japan did not build atomic bombs before the US.

Would you rather the US had invaded the home islands? Go learn about the battle of Okinowa and get a little taste of what would have happened.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
America free
06:49 AM on 05/04/2010
not enough

Peace though Superior Fire Power
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
09:44 AM on 05/04/2010
Yes, that always works.

Tom may have said it even better:

The best way to ensure peace, is to prepare for war.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
10:03 AM on 05/04/2010
The Soviets had superior firepower. Look what it did for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
machineiv
10:18 AM on 05/04/2010
And don't forget Rome's massive military.
OverseasVet
stuck in a 3rd world country called texas
06:35 AM on 05/04/2010
Why do we need more than 10? 3? Is 5,000 more threatening than 1? The logic behind the race to build more of these global killers escapes me, especially knowing that we all suffer if one is used.
06:51 AM on 05/04/2010
Yes, 5,000 is more threatening than one. Russia spans 9 time zones - would 1 neutralize a threat? Once we used our 1 in the doomsday scenario, then what?

Is 5,000 the optimal number - I have no idea, but theres a big difference between 1 and 2 let alone 5,000.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eileenflemingWAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
09:22 AM on 05/04/2010
The logic escapes you because nukes are NOT a means to security and peace but are all about violence and destruction.

"You cannot talk like sane men around a peace table while the atomic bomb itself is ticking beneath it. Do not treat the atomic bomb as a weapon of offense; do not treat it as an instrument of the police. Treat the bomb for what it is: the visible insanity of a civilization that has ceased...to obey the laws of life."- Lewis Mumford, 1946

On Armistice Day, 1948 General Omar Nelson Bradley warned, "We live in a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants, in a world that has achieved brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. We have solved the mystery of the atom and forgotten the lessons of the Sermon on The Mount. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about dying than we know about living."
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
09:48 AM on 05/04/2010
The purpose of the nuclear weapons in the United States is a deterrent effect. It has worked. That is indisputable.

I have no problem with the US being the only superpower.

The best way to ensure peace is to prepare for war.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:09 AM on 05/04/2010
Lets see, thats 5113 more that Iran have so why the walkout at the UN today? Hillary did threaten their use a few weeks back, shall i get the footage?
photo
yoyodyne666
Just here to spool you up.
05:52 AM on 05/04/2010
Would you ...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
09:08 AM on 05/04/2010
We are waiting.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:47 AM on 05/04/2010
I here many hypocrite western leaders in the UN walk out on Iran speech today. Hard hearing the truth eh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrizzlyBowman
Undergrad Psych Student
05:38 AM on 05/04/2010
They forgot to bring Imodium. Hearing about explosives made it unbearable.