More

Judge Rules California Can Raid Local Funds To Balance State Budget

California Local Funds

JUDY LIN   05/ 4/10 04:49 PM ET   AP

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday won the right to raid local redevelopment funds to help close California's budget deficit, but the court ruling provides only a ray of good news in an otherwise bleak fiscal outlook.

Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Lloyd Connelly ruled that the state can take more than $2 billion from local redevelopment funds and transfer the money to school operations. Local governments objected to diverting the money, which generally is used to promote public works projects and rehabilitate downtowns.

"We dodged a bullet," said Schwarzenegger's spokesman, Aaron McLear. "This would have added $2 billion to our deficit."

During budget negotiations last year, Schwarzenegger and lawmakers agreed to use the money from redevelopment funds for schools in those districts as a way to make up for declining general fund revenue.

Local governments argued that shifting that money was unconstitutional and would prevent redevelopment agencies from moving ahead on projects that create jobs at time of high unemployment. California's unemployment rate is at 12.6 percent.

In his decision, Connelly wrote that the state could use the money to help support schools located within redevelopment agency boundaries because it served a public purpose.

The California Redevelopment Association, the leading plaintiff in the case, was deciding whether to appeal.

"We strongly disagree with Judge Connelly's ruling, which effectively says the Legislature has unlimited discretion to redirect local redevelopment funds to any purpose it wishes," said John Shirey, executive director of the association, in a written statement. "The Legislature needs to deal with its budget problems by making hard decisions using its own limited resources – not by taking away local government funds."

Had Connelly approved the local governments' request for an injunction, it would have created an even bigger problem for Schwarzenegger as he prepares to release his revised budget later this month. California is projecting a deficit of roughly $20 billion in the fiscal year that starts in July.

State income tax collections took an unexpected drop last month after four months of steady improvement. The controller's office reported personal income taxes in April were down about $3 billion, or 30 percent, from administration projections. April is a critical month because it's when most Californians pay their taxes.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday won the right to raid local redevelopment funds to help close California's budget deficit, but the court ruling provides only a ray of ...
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday won the right to raid local redevelopment funds to help close California's budget deficit, but the court ruling provides only a ray of ...
Filed by Billy Silverman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:30 PM on 05/05/2010
Gringo rule of California isn't working.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
09:18 PM on 05/04/2010
So, the judge rules that the state can steal money from the cities who in turn can steal money from the taxpayers. Actually more efficient because they cut out the middle men (legislature) who would have taken their cut off the top. The judge allowed the state to slow its rate of self destruction but will it make any difference?
10:06 PM on 05/04/2010
After WW II, the State legislature passed enabling legislation which permitted cities to set up Community Redevelopment Agencies. L.A. for example created CRA/LA in 1947. Properties which CRA took over or bought ceased to pay property taxes and instead paid an equal amount of money to CRA ("incremental property tax revenue").

It is weird how the country adopted centralized planning right after WW II in the midst of anti-Communist hysteria. Perhaps that was due to the fact that the wealthy developers knew that they were diverting tax dollars away from the public needs into their own pockets. It kind of makes one think that this Wall Street Government overlap isn't such a new idea.

All the judge did was allow money that should have been public money be used by the schools which traditionally had been supported by local tax dollars.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:00 PM on 05/04/2010
judging by that pic of AHHnold he looks like he could use a little fiber in his diet
08:33 AM on 05/05/2010
Bet he could still kick your ass ,though
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
08:18 PM on 05/04/2010
What? NO way, I wouldn't mind if it wasn't for the 2/3 majority rule that lets Republicans have the last say on where to spend the money.
08:25 PM on 05/04/2010
What does a judge's ruling have to do with the legislature?
08:34 AM on 05/05/2010
I think you're misinformed-perhaps deliberately. I believe it's a rule on new taxes,not spending.Would you clarify this?
08:16 PM on 05/04/2010
Few people know about the CRA. Los Angeles' CRA has $304.4 M surplus while the City itself has a $212 M Deficit. CRA/LA is a creation of the City of L.A., but the city council refused to tell people that CRA $304.4 M surplus while telling voters that the City had this alleged deficit.

CRA gets its money by buying properties and giving millions to developers to build something and the property goes off the property tax rolls. Instead the property tax is paid to CRA which uses the income to buy more properties, give millions more to developers to build something large unwanted and unproductive. Then CRA taxes the property taxes and buy more properties and this has been happening for decades. That's why CRA took in $217.8 M in property taxes in 2009 and the City pretended it had a $212 M deficit.

The City of LA could have stopped this nonsense any time in the last 6 decades, but it chose not perpetuate the system. Why? CRA gives $ to developers and developers give $ to councilmembers. As one cynic puts it, "If developers didn't get tax money from CRA to give to the politicos, then they'd have to bribe city hall with their own money."
08:19 PM on 05/04/2010
errata: City of LA "chose not to correct this problem but instead to perpetuate the system."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:00 PM on 05/04/2010
I trust local government more than Sacramento, to many republicans up there.
08:37 AM on 05/05/2010
I agree with you. My reasoning is cities like LA,SF are doing well. Their budgets are balanced,their local public employees pensions are well funded and local services ar first rate.Of course ,that's in the Bizarro world,but denial can be a fun thing .For a while.Perhaps,it would help if you repeated this 5 times every morning;"Reality.What a concept."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Watchingitall
06:38 PM on 05/04/2010
Dateline: Sacramento.
Legislature: Sacramento
Governor: Sacramento
Welcome to the LA page where anything west of the Rockies apparently happens in LA.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
The Truth Seeker
In the end we will rise together or fall together.
08:06 PM on 05/04/2010
I know right?

They should at least rename the section "California"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabela
like animals better than people.
06:36 PM on 05/04/2010
Lord, what a mess we are in. And we are probably going to get Meg as our governor. God help us all. I wanted Gavin Newsom but at least I can vote for him for Lt. Governor.
06:58 PM on 05/04/2010
If Meg gets in, we're even more screwed than we are already.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:01 PM on 05/04/2010
not if it's meg ryan
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bksrmgk
06:16 PM on 05/04/2010
Talk about stealing from Peter to pay Paul. Yes, it may balance the "state" budget but guess what. The cities from whom they steal are part of the same state.

I love living in California but, dear heaven, are we in a mess. It won't solve everything, but we certainly can't afford to elect another "corporate" governor; i.e, Meg.
08:20 PM on 05/04/2010
Californians need to learn how CRA systematic transfers property taxes into slush funds for developers. By the time the money ends up in CRA coffers, it is no longer available for taxpayer use.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
08:37 PM on 05/04/2010
What California needs is more voters who have a clue. People are all ready to bitch and complain but they know nothing about the case. The money will go from the local CRA's to the local school districts. One reason L.A., for example, pretends to be BK is that over a billion dollars of tax dollars go to the CRA and not into public funds. Thus, LA has not had enough money to repair its water mains for decades and almost every day a water main bursts.

Sine California is lat in education in a nation that is last in education in the industrialized world, it is no wonder that the voters don't know jack about the CRA and how it is gobbling up their tax dollars. Instead these ignoramuses complaint when the Governor returns some of the money to the school districts where in belonged in the first place.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:37 PM on 05/04/2010
If they could raid local funds in the other 49 states, that would really be something.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CreativeKitty
05:20 PM on 05/04/2010
corporate capitalism: Governors raid the state programs that are there for the poor, sick, and handicapped, to try to make up for the bank-sters of wall street almost destroying every states economy. And then, to keep the people distracted, blame the Mexicans for everything, while the corporations continue to ship more and more of our jobs overseas
08:23 PM on 05/04/2010
Dear CreativeKitty

CRA does nothing to help the poor, sick or handicapped. It is a city agency which accumulates money which it gives to developers who then destroy the city.
04:51 PM on 05/04/2010
Blundering Buffoon. If the useless politicians had the political courage to make the necessary spending cuts we wouldn't need to raid local funds to close the budget gap!

I love California but I HATE the people in charge. Useless Democrats in the State Senate / Assembly defending their social programs even when they bankrupt the state, & a useless RINO Governor who tries to please everyone but succeeds in pleasing no one.

UGH. November can't come soon enough!
08:24 PM on 05/04/2010
The money goes back to the local school districts. CRA/LA's money will go to the Los Angeles Unified school District.