More

BP Caps 1 Of 3 Leaks, But Oil Flow Won't Be Reduced

First Posted: 07/05/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:20 PM ET

Gulf Oil Spill

NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- The Coast Guard says BP PLC has managed to cap one of three leaks at a deepwater oil well, but the work is not expected to reduce the overall flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

Coast Guard Petty Officer 1st Class David Mosley says the work Tuesday night should reduce the number of leak points that need to be fixed on the ocean floor. BP officials have said that fewer leaks will make it easier to drop a containment box on the breach.

The well has been spewing at least 210,000 gallons per day since an April 20 explosion at a rig 50 miles off Louisiana.

Meanwhile, the best short-term solution to bottling up a disastrous oil spill threatening sealife and livelihoods along the coast should be headed out to sea Wednesday in the form of a specially built giant concrete-and-steel box designed to siphon the oil away.

At about midday, a barge will haul the 100-ton contraption 50 miles offshore to a spot where a mile-deep gusher from a blown-out undersea well has been spewing at least 210,000 gallons of crude a day into the Gulf for two weeks. BP spokesman John Curry said it would be deployed on the seabed by Thursday.

It's the latest idea engineers from oil giant BP PLC are trying after an oil rig the company was operating exploded April 20, killing 11 workers. It sank two days later.

BP is in charge of the cleanup and President Barack Obama and many others have said the company also is responsible for the costs.

BP capped one of three leaks at the well Tuesday night, a step that will not cut the flow of oil but that BP has said will make it easier to help with the gusher.

Meanwhile, the effort to protect Louisiana coastal wetlands was expected to pick up.

In Plaquemines Parish, near the southern tip of Louisiana, officials loaded absorbent boom shortly after dawn to take out to the mouth of the Mississippi River. The barge will be used as a distribution point for local fishermen to lay the boom around sensitive marshes.

At a nearby marina, local shrimpers planned to use their boats to put down boom as part of a program BP is running.

Lionel Bryant, a U.S. Coast Guard spokesman, said officials planned to send out about 80 vessels from Biloxi and Pascagoula, Miss., and Orange Beach, Ala., primarily to handle booming. Bryant said two Coast Guard cutters would also conduct offshore skimming operations. Crews in Mississippi are picking up debris from beaches to make cleanup easier if oil comes ashore.

In all, about 7,900 people are working to protect the shoreline and wildlife, and some 170 boats are also helping with the cleanup.

A rainbow sheen of oil has reached land in parts of Louisiana, but forecasts showed the oil wasn't expected to come ashore for at least a couple more days.

"It's a gift of a little bit of time. I'm not resting," U.S. Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry said.

In their worst-case scenario, BP executives told members of a congressional committee that up to 2.5 million gallons a day could spill if the leaks worsened, though it would be more like 1.7 million gallons. In an exploration plan filed with the government in February 2009, BP said it could handle a "worst-case scenario" it described as a leak of 6.8 million gallons per day from an uncontrolled blowout.

Containment boxes have never been tried at this depth - about 5,000 feet - because of the extreme water pressure. If all goes well, the contraption could be fired up early next week to start funneling the oil into a tanker.

"We don't know for sure" whether the equipment will work, BP spokesman Bill Salvin said. "What we do know is that we have done extensive engineering and modeling and we believe this gives us the best chance to contain the oil, and that's very important to us."

The seas calmed Tuesday, allowing more conventional methods to contain the spill to get back on track as businesses and residents kept an eye on the ocean currents, wondering when the sheen washing ashore in places might turn into a heavier coating of oil. Crews put out more containment equipment and repaired some booms damaged in rough weather over the weekend. They also hoped to again try to burn some of the oil on the water's surface, possibly Wednesday.

Chemical dispersants piped 5,000 feet to the main leak have significantly reduced the amount of oil coming to the surface, BP said.

From the air Tuesday, the site of the Deepwater Horizon explosion looked similar to a week ago except for the appearance of a massive rig brought in to drill a relief well to shut off the spewing oil. That will take months.

People along the Gulf Coast have spent weeks living with uncertainty, wondering where and when the huge slick might come ashore, ruining their beaches - and their livelihoods.

The anxiety is so acute that some are seeing and smelling oil where there is none. And even though the dead turtles and jellyfish washing ashore along the Gulf of Mexico are clean, and scientists have yet to determine what killed them, many are just sure the flow of crude unleashed by the explosion at BP's Deepwater Horizon is the culprit.

The rig was owned by Transocean Ltd. Some of the 115 surviving workers who were aboard when it exploded are suing that company and BP PLC. In lawsuits filed Tuesday, three workers say they were kept floating at sea for more than 10 hours while the rig burned uncontrollably. They are seeking damages.

Guy Cantwell, a spokesman for rig owner Transocean Ltd., defended the company's response, saying 115 workers did get off alive. Two wrongful death suits also have been filed.

While officials worked on cleanup, the long wait took its toll on nerves and incomes.

In Gulf Shores, Ala., the real estate firm Brett/Robinson Vacations sent a note to those renting vacation properties that they would not be penalized for any spill-related cancellations, but urged them not to jump the gun.

"There are many questions and many `what ifs' regarding this event," the message read. "Because changes come about hourly and 30 days is a long way away, we are asking you to wait before canceling your vacation, especially those of you who are scheduled to arrive more than 30 days from today."

There are legitimate concerns, experts say. A second bird found in the slick, a brown pelican, is recovering at a bird rescue center in Louisiana. National Wildlife Federation president and CEO Larry Schweiger says there's no way to know how many birds have been oiled because the slick is so big and so far offshore.

Perdido Key, a barrier island between Pensacola and the Alabama state line with sugar-white sand studded with condominiums, likely would be the first place in Florida affect by the oil spill. Perdido - Spanish for "Lost" - got a sniff Tuesday morning of what may be in store.

"You could smell the smell of it, real heavy petroleum base," said Steve Owensby, 54, a maintenance man at the Flora-Bama Lounge abutting the state line on the Florida side.

The air cleared later, but Owensby's 28-year-old daughter, Stephanie, who tends bar at the lounge, said some visitors have complained of feeling ill from the fumes.

"It's very sad because I grew up out here," she said. "I remember growing up seeing the white beaches my whole life. Every day I've been going to the beach ... a lot of people are out watching and crying."

---

Associated Press writers Harry R. Weber, Kevin McGill in New Orleans, Ray Henry in Robert, La., Sarah Larimer in Mobile, Ala., Jennifer N. Kay in Fort Walton Beach, Fla., Bill Kaczor in Perdido Key, Fla., Holbrook Mohr in Venice, La., and Cain Burdeau who flew over the site contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- The Coast Guard says BP PLC has managed to cap one of three leaks at a deepwater oil well, but the work is not expected to reduce the overall flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. ...
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- The Coast Guard says BP PLC has managed to cap one of three leaks at a deepwater oil well, but the work is not expected to reduce the overall flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. ...
Filed by Nico Pitney  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,132
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1worldaddy
family man w/3 daughters
01:42 AM on 05/06/2010
Irrefutable evidence that Our cumulative sleepy uninformed asses should have made certain that Mr Ralph Nader be the POTUS! His work is the reason our cars have seat belts and airbags!
His calls to strengthen oil industry regulation have fallen on our deaf ears for decades!
No actual pressure test wells, no accustic shutoff etc. etc. all 3 companies in a rush to the black gold that will produce 1/2 million gallons per day for 10 to 15 years, Now we face a real risk of an ocean floor crevice and 1 BILLION GALLONS of oil killing our equatorial waters!
My gut aches as I recall my SHOCK when POTUS Obama announced his economic adviser as Larry Summers (the Markets regulate themselves jack ass) and Sec of Treasury as Geithner (the ex Goldman Sachs employee) I then saw Obamas Clintonian colors: throw promises and caution to the wind (tell the folks what they wanna hear and play the game on the hill)
Nader is the only guy in Washington who has the solutions and the guts to fight for them!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
09:30 AM on 05/06/2010
Fanned. Nader would have been a much better president, and I've voted for him each time, even if the American Public, didn't.
11:43 PM on 05/19/2010
Nader has always stood his ground. Not like other so called progressive dems that eventually caved into the the corporations. The lesser of evils is now so evil that America is drowning in its own oil greed.
09:45 PM on 05/05/2010
"BP said the half-tonne valve had been installed on the end of a broken drill pipe last night using remote-controlled subsea robots. The robots first cut the end of the pipe to leave a clean end and the valve was then placed in position on the seabed."

So the ROVs can cut the riser pipe and install a 1000lb valve at 5000ft at the riser's end and stop that leak, while ignoring the other 2. In preparation for the iron casket coming down on Friday? These actions allow this well to "produce" oil while the second drill's sunk, though. Pinching off the riser would not.

With BP's $5.6 billion dollar 1st qtr profit, you'd think double-redundant blow-out valves at 1/2 million dollars wouldn't break the bank. And a couple million on a heavy-duty ROV with pipe-crushing capabilities might be a prudent idea, too.

Prepare To Howl:
"Tony Hayward, BP’s chief executive, claimed “Let’s be very clear,” he said of the slick. “The reason it’s not getting to the beaches is because we’re containing it."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7116995.ece
Somebody needs to smite this guy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cinnamonape
08:59 PM on 05/05/2010
"Chemical dispersants piped 5,000 feet to the main leak have significantly reduced the amount of oil coming to the surface, BP said."

What is "significant"...10%, 15%, 50%, 1%???

Statistically measurable?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cinnamonape
08:56 PM on 05/05/2010
What scuzzes. The other two leaks were in parts of the line that were not even receiving oil from the wellhead. To make any sort of" victory statement" about these other two minor leaks (now seepages, really) while ignoring the geyser of oil coming out of the wellhead is absurd.
09:54 PM on 05/05/2010
On the one hand I guess capping the pipe's end might be necessary since that metal coffin they're sinking on Friday may not have covered the main geyser and the other holes. On the other hand, those robots were able to cut the line and install that valve today. Why couldn't they cut above all the leaks and install that valve? Oil pressure problems? If this lowered contraption works BP will be collecting oil from this well while the second shaft's drilled. . .
06:12 PM on 05/05/2010
Want to help? Please note and keep track of every statement by BP that they are using something new, untried, brainstormed, improvised, newly gotten from other companies, or calls for help from the industry, to reduce or stop the oil from flowing, or to facilitate clean-up, as it establishes that these weren't a part of the preparation to handle a worst case spill represented to our government in Feb of 2009. The admission for example that the cap/dome going out today has never been tried at such a deep ocean depth before. (BP knew the depth in the planning stages.) The chemical dispersants at such depth had never been tried either.

Will a reporter(s) or a blogger(s) take on the task of coallating all these admissions online, including who, what, where, When and how, where published. For example: Does anyone know when the engineering feasibility for designing, using the dome at this 5000 ft depth took place? When were contracts for dispersants first established and for what quantities of dispersant? Dates, limited amounts of any advanced preparation in place, for everything tried become important information to make BP fully liable.

Huffpost, how about seting up a blog for this purpose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
06:00 PM on 05/05/2010
Madness: How it could have been prevented: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/05/madness-bp-left-off-second-emergency-cutoff.php
BP Left Off A SECOND Emergency Shut Off!
Climate Progress cuts through the reporting of the New York Times to remind us that in addition to the $500,000 acoustic cut-off switch, that could of prevented this all but was left off in an effort to save money, apparently there was another safety measure, allegedly also left off as a cost-saving measure, that could have been employed by BP:

Another worker familiar with the rig told the lawyers that the company had chosen not to install a deep-water valve that would have been placed about 200 feet under the sea floor. Much like blowout preventers, devices that are meant to seal leaks, this valve could have served as a cutoff of last resort in explosions, the lawyers said.

"The company took their chances in not having the valve so they could save money," said Mike Papantonio, one of the lawyers representing the shrimpers and fishermen"
09:42 PM on 05/05/2010
Its called Subsurface Safety Valves (SSSV) and most rigs nowadays come equipped with such a device. Not having one on this rig was just asking for trouble to happen.
10:47 PM on 05/05/2010
Thanks, Valsan. Now I have something else to google. It's a pity U.S. regulations are so nonexistant or unenforced. The oil industry is going to pay dearly for this one.
10:01 PM on 05/05/2010
These multiple fail-safes are not required by regulations/law. I hadn't heard about the subterranean shut-off valve.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
09:07 AM on 05/06/2010
And they lobbied to loosen the regulations, and VP Cheney helped them..
05:35 PM on 05/05/2010
To all local and regional reporters.

BP laying boom and quoting it by the foot is very disingeuous. Will reporters please divide by 5,280 feet and report number of miles of coast protected compared to number of miles of actual coast threatened in a given region. It will far bettter convey the lack of adequate preparation by BP and help with defeating the $75 million cap on economic damages. And real coast line isn't a straight line. You can have many times the actual water line than the staight line mileage of a region! The shoreline of an island is it's circumfrence, not its diameter. Also it isn't only coast line that is fouled, even boat hulls and rigging and nets get fouled.

2. Please look for specific examples of BP being unprepared to deal with the oil spew in your area and get names, contact info, and details. A press record of those details will greatly faciliate later investigation for court to recover damages for your local citizens.
12:48 AM on 05/15/2010
You are so right -- and I have been converting that on my website and my radio show on a regular basis. To date, about 200 or so miles of coast have been "boomed" -- compared to some 1,100 miles that needs protection.
05:16 PM on 05/05/2010
Isn't PB representation in Feb 2009 to our government that it could handle a worst case spill of 6.8 million gallons per day, legally fraud? Obviously by their response to date they couldn't. The safety mechanisms were not stored in place to use immediately. (And booms only good in calm water clearly hasn't been sufficient.) Is this grounds for overturning the $75 million dollar cap to economic damages? Please will someone dig deeply into this information. If BP got a permission to continue exploration or drilling because of this representation it could be hugely important.
04:38 PM on 05/05/2010
"Breaking"

There has been a major "wind spill" in the gulf that will drive the oil to land sooner than expected. Rumors are flying on the right wing blogs that it is Obama's fault. Stay tuned to Rush and Hannity for further details.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:16 PM on 05/05/2010
They're just frightened they'll have to spend more to fill up their SUVs as a result.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokachyna
Ready for the zombie apocalypse...if it comes.
04:26 PM on 05/05/2010
This is really devastating.
04:22 PM on 05/05/2010
cheney energy task force says 500,000 too much for shut off valves

http://guttertruth.blogspot.com/2010/05/crime-scene.html
photo
NatteringNabob
Don't make me go all Wisconsin on you!
03:58 PM on 05/05/2010
Anyone know why the Minerals Management Service (the division of the Interior Department responsible for offshore drilling) had a change of heart between 2000 and 2003 on the crucial issue of requiring a remote control switch for offshore rigs?

Tr0lls?
photo
Cunningham
I intend to live forever, or die trying. GrouchoM
04:11 PM on 05/05/2010
Cheney
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tc399
Your personal Eschatologist.
04:19 PM on 05/05/2010
Sure. The Bush Administration. The Bush family was only in Texas because they were in the oil business. They killed the safety requirements for oil and coal..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:42 PM on 05/05/2010
Yeah, just wait till the flow increases even more. Why are we listening to BP at all?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DimBulb2
03:52 PM on 05/05/2010
any better ideas?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
pfrogger
03:55 PM on 05/05/2010
better idea? seriously?
BP already lied about the initial amount of spill and rate of spill.
if you want to listen to to a proven liar, about the very same subject, then go right ahead.
the rest of us will get our information from someplace else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:04 PM on 05/05/2010
I'm asking what kind of credibility and reliability does a company have that wouldn't install a fail-safe system costing half a million? Should we pretend that they are an ally in this effort for any other reason than minimizing their culpability and penalty? You might as well ask yourself the same question as regards the present efforts. Aren't there any other deep-sea drilling experts (I use that word advisedly) around that we can hire?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DimBulb2
03:37 PM on 05/05/2010
for all the tr0lls posting that the president should resign
Here is an address for you:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

I dont think he spends his time reading your posts on HP
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lore Splitt
03:22 PM on 05/05/2010
It wouldn't stop the flow of oil, it would just act like someone putting their finger on the end of a hose, just makes it flow out faster where it can.

Possibilities of containing an underwater leak should have already been considered back when it was being started. They should be keeping up to date with possible ways of containing at these depths and running tests on the ideas. Sure- this would be the first time they'd actually be used, however, it shouldn't be a scramble to come up with plans. They should have had theories of these kinds already up, ready to be attempted in a real life situation, and should have been able to be tried within a day or 2- 3 the latest as part of an emergency response team.

Ill prepared, everyone should have realized this was a remote possibility, and with something like this, no matter how improbable a situation is, as long as it's not actually impossible- a back up of backups should always be in place.
photo
Cunningham
I intend to live forever, or die trying. GrouchoM
04:01 PM on 05/05/2010
It's cheaper for BP to cut corners on everything and then pay damages. What's a fifty million dollar fine when you make over 5 billion dollars in one quarter? Pocket change.
10:12 PM on 05/05/2010
Multiple fail-safes are not required by regulations/law. This is another of those regulatory capture situations heaped on top of anti-regulatory ideology. Spending a couple million on a heavy-duty ROV with pipe-crushing capabilities might be a prudent idea, as well as requiring the strictest blow-out prevention measures currently in use, which the U.S. does not require.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lore Splitt
12:32 AM on 05/06/2010
Eh, my comment didn't have to do with what was required by law or not... though- it should be a law. But, I find it disheartening that looking out for the well being of employees, even if not caring about the environment- has to be spelled out by laws, and not just be an automatic.