More

UK Election 2010 Results In Hung Parliament: Latest News, Video

Huffington Post    
First Posted: 07/06/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:25 PM ET

Follow the latest news on our HuffPost UK election Twitter page.

12:00 PM ET -- Cleggmania postmortem. The Lib Dems surge never materialized, which begs the question of what, in the end, went wrong. The Times of London lays the blame on the charismatic party leader himself.

There were two blunders here. Mr Clegg appeared to break the cardinal rule, which he cited himself on many occasions, not to take the electorate's decision for granted. Labour, as we know in the cold light of the morning after polling day, did not come third.


But perhaps more importantly, this flurry of speculation meant that television clips of the Lib Dem leader were dominated by him talking about process, about horse-trading, about politics. For three or four days, voters saw him no longer articulating vision or speaking about policy, but talking like any other politician.

11:50 AM ET -- What is Cameron's next move. Here's how Alex Massie of the Spectator sees it:

Cameron is putting the ball in Clegg's court. Electoral reform is not, no matter what people may claim, a pressing issue. If Cameron offers Clegg a real deal can the Lib Dems really refuse it? The purity of opposition is all well and good but if you're given the chance of power can a serious party really refuse it, even if it demands a number of compromises, some of them unpalatable?

The Guardian's Tom Clark offers what he sees as the 4 choices facing Cameron. With regards to Clegg:

If he decides the mood of the moment calls for more than a political game of chicken, then it is time to get down to serious business in those conversations with Clegg.


At a minimum, this would involve granting the Liberals (or failing that the unionists) explicit concessions. For example, he could pledge Clegg cash for his xpupil premium scheme in return for a Liberal pledge to provide the minimal support the government needs to survive that is acquiesced in Commons motions which are about confidence and supply.

11:30 AM ET -- What was Brown up to in his speech. The Guardian's Anne Perkins parses out his strategy:

His principal objective is to find a way of making his offer to Nick Clegg look irresistible to Lib Dems, and reasonable to the rest of us (see stability and continuity, above). He suggested there was all the time in the world for David Cameron and the Lib Dem leader to see where they had common ground and if there was scope for a minority or even a coalition government.


But the longer David Cameron is politely barred from Downing Street, the more such momentum as he has from winning the most votes and the most seats ebbs away.

9:55 AM ET -- Cameron's offer to Lib Dems. The Conservative leader just made a "big, open and comprehensive" public offer to the Liberal Dems to form a coalition, though he hedged on a full embrace of election reform, which is central to the Lib Dems' demands. Guardian breaks down the major points of his speech.

9:40 AM ET -- Brown defiant. Speaking at 10 Downing Street this morning, Brown defied calls to step aside, saying that the Conservatives had the right to make a deal with the Lib Dems first, but that if that failed to materialize, he was ready to talk coalition. Brown signaled his willingness to woo the Lib Dems by promising ""far-reaching political reform." while also acknowledging that he understand Clegg's support for the Conservatives taking the first crack at forming a government.

The question for all the political parties now is whether a parliamentary majority can be established that reflects what you, the electorate, have told us," Brown said.

UPDATE: Here's the video:


05.07 -- 8:30 AM ET -- The latest numbers and news. Good morning UK election readers. So, it ended in a hung parliament. To get up to speed, David Cameron will attempt to form a Tory government, having received tentative backing from Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats, who called on the Conservative leader to do so. Needless to say, such support, however provisional, does not bode well for Gordon Brown. Both Brown and Cameron are expected to speaking within the next few hours. According to Sky News, Brown will not be resigning when he speaks on TV shortly.

As for the current results, with 633 out of 650 seats accounted for, the Conservatives have 299 seats to Labour's 253.

11:40 PM ET -- The two key headlines of the night so far. Beyond the results of the exit polls, the two big headlines to night have been Brown suggesting that he may attempt to form a coalition government , and Cameron's declaration that, with his party headed for a big gain in seats, "the Labour government has lost its mandate to govern our country."

That's all for tonight on this blog, but we'll be back early tomorrow to catch up on the latest developments. If you want to keep reading through the night, the Guardian, Times of London or the BBC are all great options. You can watch live video of the election coverage courtesy of the BBC on HuffPost here.

Thanks for reading.

11:30 PM ET -- Where they stand currently. As of now, with 376 of 650 seats declared, Conservatives have 182 seats, Labour 143, and the Lib Dems 28, according to the BBC.

11:20 PM ET -- A quick recap of the day's events.. AP has a video report for those looking to catch up on what's happened.


11:15 PM ET -- What happened to Cleggmania. The Guardian's Allegra Stratton reports that the party has acknowledged their failure to capitalize on the surge in popularity of their leader Nick Clegg.

10:15 PM ET -- Video of Brown's speech. Here are some of his remarks after he managed to retain his seat.



9:10 PM ET -- Voter frustration revealed. As mentioned earlier, there have been a number of reports of voters furious about being turned away from the polls. The anger over this has become one of the key story lines of the election night coverage. This video from the Guardian, shot by reporter Aidan Jones, shows police being called to voting station in East London after as many as 150 people were unable to vote.


8:45 PM ET -- Shock: Brown retains his seat. The Prime Minister has retained his seat for Labour, but the celebration was muted according to the Journal's Iain Martin, who is live blogging about election night. "Brown seemed incredibly downbeat and looked like a beaten man," Marin wrote in reference to his acceptance speech.

7:35 PM ET -- Chaos at the polls. Sky News reports that the British electoral commission has said it will investigate reports that voters were turned away at polling stations. As Robert Mackey over at the New York Times' election live blog notes, one of the possible explanations for this is that parts of the country were struck by a surge in voting. "If there has been a rise in turnout, it is easy to see why that might have been a surprise to some officials," Mackey writes.

7:25 PM ET -- Tory talking points. The Guardian's Andrew Sparrow, who is manning the live blog over there, has received what he describes as "the Tory 'line to take' for the evening," which he cautions is "pure spin." Here it is:

- if exit poll figs are correct, this is an utter rejection of Labour; Labour have lost this election;

- let's be clear: this is an excellent result for the Conservatives;

- it's a historic result - the most seats gained by Conservatives in any election since 1931 - more than Mrs Thatcher in 1979;

- it's the biggest swing to Conservatives since 1931;

- as David Cameron has said, we will do what we can to provide stable government;

- if this poll is correct, it would provide a basis to govern.

- Labour can't possibly expect to continue in government after this humiliating rejection.

- Having lost 100 seats, they are insulting the voters to suggest otherwise.

7:15 PM ET -- FiveThirtyEight.com on the results. Everyone's favorite polling analysis site is live blogging the election results. Not surprisingly, they're skeptical of what's been reported so far.

7:00 PM ET -- Labour secretary Alan Johnson on Brown. "Let's see how it pans out, Gordon will know whether he should stay on or not. "I think Gordon deserves the dignity to look at these things and make up his own mind."

6:50 PM ET -- Campbell defends Brown. Famous Blair spin master Alastair Campbell has defended the beleaguered Prime Minister's efforts in the campaign in spite of the exit poll results. Via ITV:


6:45 PM ET -- What a hung parliament means for the market? The Telegraph's Jeremy Warner explains why the market may not take the exit poll outcome well, assuming the result holds.

Governing as a minority is notoriously difficult. Tough, decisive action becomes harder, compromise and horsetrading the order of the day. In such circumstances, there is bound to be scepticism about the new Government's ability to implement the necessary degree of deficit reduction.

6:30 PM ET -- Trust the exit polls? Alex Barker of the FT says we should be wary of them. He gives 7 reasons. Here are two of them:

The experts have to work around duff information There's no data on voting at individual polling stations. The census is nine years out of date. Local election ward returns are a flawed guide to voting patterns for a general election.


One in six voters refuse to respond to an exit poll It's a mind your own business answer. And no one knows if these people disproportionately vote for one party.

6:25 PM ET -- Schwarzenegger sends his congrats. As the governor explained on Twitter: "Just called @davidcameron to congratulate him on victory. We know the Conservatives had a great day."

6:10 PM ET -- Exit poll revised. Nothing major, but a slight adjustment to the numbers, the BBC reports. It's now 305 for the Conservatives, and 61 for the Lib Dems.

5:50 PM ET -- Cameron reacts to exit poll. Sky News just tweeted the following quote from the Tory leader: 'This is a decisive rejection of Labour. We can govern with this result.'

5:30 PM ET - Exit poll is in. The exit poll for the 2010 General Election in Great Britain is pointing toward a hung parliament, with Conservatives as the largest party. The exit poll was conducted for the BBC, Sky News and ITV. Polls closed at 10 p.m. in the UK.

Here is the exit poll:

Conservatives: 307 seats

Labour: 255

Liberal Democrats: 59

Others: 29

Some more context on these figures, from the AP:

Two scenarios could arise - Brown could resign if he feels the results have signaled he has lost his mandate to rule, or he could try to stay on as leader and seek a deal in which smaller parties would support him.


Even combined, Labour and the Liberal Democrats would not have the 326 seats needed to form a majority in a coalition - which had been a widely discussed possibility.

The results may yet change. Projecting elections based on exit polls is inherently risky - particularly in an exceptionally close election like this one. Polls are based on samples - in this case 18,000 respondents - and always have some margin of error.

Thousands have also already cast postal ballots but those results don't factor into the exit polls. About 12 percent cast postal ballots in 2005.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Follow the latest news on our HuffPost UK election Twitter page. 12:00 PM ET -- Cleggmania postmortem. The Lib Dems surge never materialized, which begs the question of what, in the end, went wrong...
Follow the latest news on our HuffPost UK election Twitter page. 12:00 PM ET -- Cleggmania postmortem. The Lib Dems surge never materialized, which begs the question of what, in the end, went wrong...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angelneptustar
Tory, movie and sports fan.
10:41 AM on 05/08/2010
http://cyberboris.wordpress.com/2010/05/07/boris-gets-teeth-into-meaty-metaphor/

Our unique and hugely popular Mayor of London is interviewed regarding his views on a coalition government. (video link above) As usual, he reduces the interviewer to helpless laughter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A dean89
08:18 AM on 05/08/2010
Gordon Brown should meet the Queen to unravel this inconclusive election. As for Cameron, he should make his first move by meeting the Qyeen to seek permission forming a new government despite no majority gained by the Tory's.
04:24 PM on 05/07/2010
I knew there would be "voting irregularities" just like here in 2000 and 2004 when Bush literally stole the elections.
02:42 PM on 05/07/2010
An interesting election just got interestinger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
02:28 PM on 05/07/2010
This is great news for GB!! Gordon Brown tried desperately to avoid being voted out, but the smell of his sellout to GS and Chase/JPMorgan finally sealed the deal with the voters. Long-time members who had 'interesting' personal finances got sent home because voters finally said enough. Blood is in the air.

President Obama, Members of Congress, I know you already have very nice exit strategies in place. I suggest you 'tweak' them now.

As a former Obama voter, one of many, I'm looking for some bright, ambitious young politician to be the first Third Party President. He/She will have my vote for sure. The evil I don't know is now vastly preferably to the evil I've seen. Your amazingly public grab for the gold instead of fulfilling any of your promises, and the gleeful joining in by both parties makes that a real possibility.
01:53 PM on 05/07/2010
Warmongering did this to Labour party.

It did the same to Spain. It did it to Clinton against Obama. It will do it Sarkozy!

People of the world are tired of misery, wars and Zionists' control of global financial system and politicians in all countries.
12:29 PM on 05/07/2010
I think the main result of this absurd travesty of an election will be to really make it clear to the people of the world that the British still haven't been able to replace their medieval aristocracy with a modern functioning democracy. And, of course, the devastating blow to the global economy at the prospect of a return to Thatcherite economics. The stock markets are already reeling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
06:21 PM on 05/07/2010
You're assuming that New Labour ever moved away from Thatcherite economics. (If so, I never noticed that.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
06:27 PM on 05/07/2010
"Where I come 37% of the vote does not win you government."

Of course, in the previous election Labour won a majority with 35% of the vote!
photo
Aussieposter
And so it begins
06:09 AM on 05/08/2010
Where I come from, Australia, you can sometimes manage to sneak into government with 48 or 49%. Usually its over 50%. A share of the votes in the 30's won't cut it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angelneptustar
Tory, movie and sports fan.
10:36 AM on 05/08/2010
Your US voting system is so much better than ours. We need reform, a redrawing of the boundaries at the very least.
12:25 PM on 05/07/2010
Seems to be even more obvious in the UK ho wthe conservatives serve the big money interests. I believe the world is growing to hate these people, knowing they're corrupt and ned to be removed from power. But it will never happen fast enough.
08:56 AM on 05/07/2010
Do you think now is the opportunity to get a new and fairer voting system? Should we work together to demand, whatever the end result of this election, that our outdated voting system is fixed? Join a community of like minded people and vote on the matter at, http://labs.38degrees.org.uk/content/election-what-next
07:51 AM on 05/07/2010
Likely bleak future is a minority conservative government, silver lining is that it won't last long. They can't make a majority coalition without promising electoral reform. Nor can they offer electoral reform without dooming themselves to political oblivion - the UK is a centre left majority nation, and without the first past the post system they have limited possibilities of forming a centre right majority government.
photo
Aussieposter
And so it begins
05:29 AM on 05/07/2010
The big news out of the U.K. is that nobody won. The Conservatives will fall short of a parliamentary majority and will once again prove that they have little understanding of democracy insisting that they have the right to govern. They will try and convince us that because they are the largest party in Parliament, that they have won the election. Where I come 37% of the vote does not win you government.

There are still more votes to be counted but it looks like the distribution of votes will look something like this

Conservative 37%
Labour 29%
Liberal Dem. 22%

Should Gordon Brown be successful in creating a coalition with the Liberal Democrats the resulting government would have the support of 51% of the vote. The conservatives will try and tell you that this was a perversion of the process, that somehow they were robbed.
photo
JakeMontero
Independent thinking
07:25 AM on 05/07/2010
the fact that Conservatives gained the most votes eats at you... but think at it this way - it is preparing you for Nov in the states. good day.
photo
Aussieposter
And so it begins
10:12 AM on 05/07/2010
Two points

1. The British conservative party share of votes in the U.K. Election is 37%. This means that 63% of the British voting public voted for someone else.

2. You did notice my name. Aussieposter. November in the states is of interest to me as a internationalist but I do live in Australia.
photo
mslovey
I love hard...i just can't help it. #Obama2012
08:39 AM on 05/07/2010
Great point...Its very suprising that after all the hype about David Cameron and the campaign aganist Brown one would have expected the Tories to make a clear win, but that did not happen. Cameron can surely be compared to Bush Jr and his party made a copy of Bush's manifesto and that was not about to fly with the British Public!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angelneptustar
Tory, movie and sports fan.
01:16 AM on 05/07/2010
One question being asked in the UK is "what happened to Nick Clegg?"

http://cyberboris.wordpress.com/2010/05/07/cleggy-flies-too-near-the-sun/

He flew too near the Sun and he got burned.
04:38 AM on 05/07/2010
I'm actually very surprised by the Lib Dem result - Labour are the party everyone has frankly had enough of, Tories are the party with questionable policy substance and a history which doesn't show them in the best light. To me the Lib Dems had credible policies, strong ideals and generally were the correct choice for the"change" that they all shouted about...at the same time I can't stop thinking that they are still the best of a bad bunch.

I'm glad the Green Party gained a place and they will be the party to watch in the future, especially considering the results found here: http://voteforpolicies.org.uk/ . They are far from the "hippies" that people think they are and seem to have a very clear agenda, a good set of policies and an intelligence that sets them apart. They just need some time to grow stronger and gain some experience.
photo
JakeMontero
Independent thinking
07:26 AM on 05/07/2010
Labour supported open immigration - out of touch and the results prove it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angelneptustar
Tory, movie and sports fan.
09:53 AM on 05/08/2010
The Times, The Telegraph and many other British newspapers all came to the same conclusion. The voters liked clegg, but hated his policies.

He is a fanatical Europhile, who blocked a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. On the one hand he preaches that he represents "the new politics" giving more power to the people, and tells them "The future is yours! More power is yours! Shape the future as youchoose!" And then does something totally undemocratic like blocking a vital referendum.

He preached against corruption to Cameron and Brown, blaming them for it as though he was outside of it all, but drew lavish expenses as an MEP, which he admits he fiddled. He says it is wrong for MEPs to make huge profits on houses bought as second homes by the nation, but kept £360K profit on his own MEP house.

http://cyberboris.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/cleggie-is-harvey-two-face/

He wants to cancel Trident. He also wants to grant an amnesty to thousands of illegal immigrants. Then he would like to legalise heroin, brothels and have cannabis cafes all over the country.
And so it goes on.

In the end, the people saw through his rhetoric and realised he is just a hypocrite with a lot of daft ideas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
06:31 PM on 05/07/2010
Many voters lost their nerve and ended up voting Labour to keep the Tories from getting in (or voting Tory to keep Labour from getting back in).
11:29 PM on 05/06/2010
If Labour can't pull something out of their arse I do hope the exit polls are correct; anything but a Tory majority!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angelneptustar
Tory, movie and sports fan.
01:17 AM on 05/07/2010
Everyone who loves Britain is praying for a solid Tory victory. The Lib Dems challenge has fizzled out. http://cyberboris.wordpress.com/2010/05/07/cleggy-flies-too-near-the-sun/
03:53 AM on 05/07/2010
No they are not.
Engchina
04:26 AM on 05/07/2010
eerrrm no they aren't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:57 PM on 05/06/2010
does this mean brown retains pm???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angelneptustar
Tory, movie and sports fan.
10:32 AM on 05/08/2010
No, because he doesn't have enough seats to govern. He needs 326 sets. Tories got 306 seats, Labour got 258 seats and Lib Dems got 57 seats. But Cameron got a lot more than Labour. A coalition with the Lib Dems would give Cameron enough seats to govern, but he is negotiating with Clegg because Cameron will not sell out to Europe, which is what Clegg wants, nor will he compromise over core tory policies.

Cameron is negotiating to link with the Lib Dems, but if he does, he intends to call another election in 12 months. If Cameron and Clegg cannot find a way to work together, Clegg could go to Labour. But he loathes Brown and would insist Brown quit, and he might refuse. also, Brown is so hated in Britain now, that if Clegg enabled him to stay as PM, the Leb Dems would lose huge support in the country.
09:26 PM on 05/06/2010
"8:45 PM ET -- Shock: Brown retains his seat."

Not shocking at all. His seat was really never in play.