iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Elena Kagan's Goldman Sachs Ties Brought Up Again

First Posted: 07/07/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:25 PM ET

Elena Kagan

Just days before the president is expected to announce his choice for the Supreme Court, the perceived front-runner for that post is being plagued by a story that actually broke in March 2009.

On Friday, a slew of inquiries was made to the White House and Justice Department about a minor post Solicitor General Elena Kagan once held at Goldman Sachs, the investment bank under fire over controversial mortgage securities transactions. Kagan served on a Goldman advisory council between 2005 and 2008, with the task of providing expert "analysis and advice to Goldman Sachs and its clients." For her work she earned a $10,000 stipend.

This was actually old news. Kagan disclosed this information during her first confirmation hearings for the post of Solicitor General. On March 24, 2009, the New York Times mentioned the position and payment in an article on whether White House employees should be allowed to keep the bonuses they earned from their time in private industry.

In mid-April 2010, Goldman was charged by the SEC with fraud in its dealing with the subprime mortgage market and immediately became a toxic name within the political world. With Kagan ascending to the short list of potential Supreme Court nominees shortly thereafter, USA Today revisited the matter on April 27 -- albeit in a much different context than the Times.

Since then, however, the issue has remained largely on the back burner. That is until Friday, when White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was asked about the Goldman connection during a briefing with reporters. Gibbs stressed that the panel "had absolutely nothing to do with decisions Goldman is being investigated for" and stressed that her position with the bank would have "no" impact on her potential nomination.

The Justice Department, likewise, downplayed the findings in statements issued to inquiring reporters. "This advisory group was comprised of leaders from various sectors including academia, the media, business, and other industry," said spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler. "They met once a year for a daylong conference organized around public policy matters. The group was not involved in making any investment decisions for the company."

But concern nevertheless mounted in the progressive community (already skittish on Kagan's credentials) that the connection could be used to harm her during confirmation hearings -- should she be nominated.

While the work Kagan did for Goldman remains largely brief or unknown, the Huffington Post was passed along two reports that the advisory council completed in 2005 and 2008 (posted below). The findings touch on the broad risks that the world economy faced and contain the type of insight expected from a largely formal panel. In terms of content, they came up a bit short, failing to mention credit bubbles in major economies (such as the U.S. housing market) as a looming problem.

Considering how many actual economists missed the housing bubble in real time, it would be difficult to hold Kagan to a higher standard -- though Goldman was already betting against the housing market by the time the latter report was published. The issue for progressives, however, isn't her lack of long-term market salience. But rather the ties -- however small -- to a firm that is now a black mark on Wall Street and a pariah in Congress. Already, a variety of right-wing blogs have picked up on the findings. And the concern is that Goldman represents the type of superficial connection that could cause political damage.

"I just don't understand why the Administration would want to makes themselves and their nominee vulnerable to the opposition at a time when American skepticism of Wall Street is at an all time high," said a prominent progressive strategist speaking on the condition of anonymity. "This is like handing the Republicans the mantle of populism just for trying to oppose Kagen's confirmation."


HERE ARE THE TWO GOLDMAN DOCUMENTS

June 2008


kagangoldman2

September 2005


kagangoldman1

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Just days before the president is expected to announce his choice for the Supreme Court, the perceived front-runner for that post is being plagued by a story that actually broke in March 2009. On F...
Just days before the president is expected to announce his choice for the Supreme Court, the perceived front-runner for that post is being plagued by a story that actually broke in March 2009. On F...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 557
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:42 PM on 05/20/2010
So Goldman wants a seat on the Supreme Court. Is there anything we can do to stop this?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
helenwheels
SEDAGIVE?!?
04:40 PM on 06/28/2010
The corporations already bought up the rest of them anyway.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
10:22 PM on 05/10/2010
Let's see, Goldman Sachs leader premier banker entity, former sachs people embedded in the executive branch as advisors, policy makers, big contributers to bought and paid for Congressman and Senators in legislative branch. What's left? Let's see the judicial branch, but apparently not for long. Goldman Sachs advisor on the Supreme court, maybe time to grab your A**. Do you see eomething wrong here? Forget right, left, liberal conservative, dem or rep, think reality. We are being distracted, we are being concentrated on (watching) the bouncing ball, when it stops we will be shocked that it is too late.
11:06 AM on 05/11/2010
Yep! There doesn't seem to be much that can be done about it. Although some primary voters and others have started just voting against ALL incumbents. That is one way to at least give it a try to clean it up!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:09 PM on 05/11/2010
Wouldn't it be amazing if someone who wasn't connected to Goldman-Sachs was nominated?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
09:39 PM on 05/10/2010
Kagan served on a Goldman advisory council between 2005 and 2008, with the task of providing expert "analysis and advice to Goldman Sachs and its clients."

The Virginia Governor's THESIS was MINIMIZED and GOOD WHAT HE HAS SHOWN AMERICA -- Exactly the Biases he wrote earlier!

You can NOT help but be involved with G0LDMAN'S Daily Propaganda and NOT BE Warped by it! This must be checked out FULLY!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:10 PM on 05/11/2010
so, she was advising during the time when the market went off the rails? what was her stance on what was going on?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:44 PM on 05/20/2010
She advised Goldman how to cheat clients out of their money and not get prosecuted. What esle would a lwyer do at Goldman?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:24 PM on 05/10/2010
Why is geography and regional representation never brought up in the Supreme Court nomination process?

The western US is known for being more independent and populist politically, yet this is not represented on the court.

Of the nine current Justices only two were born west of the Mississippi and none of them went to law school out west. Is the curriculum and instruction at all western US law schools inferior to institutions in the East? or just the connections?

Currently, the Midwest has two Justices, one is retiring and it looks like his replacement will be someone from New York who went to Harvard.

Also, why are there no Americans of asian descent on the Supreme Court? Has one ever been nominated? and no atheists? and why is not one protestant christian on the court in a country where protestantism is the majority faith?

John Roberts- b. Indiana, went to Harvard law.

John Paul Stevens- b. Illinois, went to U. of Chicago BA and Northwestern Law.

Antonin Scalia- b. New Jersey, went to Georgetown BA and Harvard Law.

Anthony Kennedy- b. California, went to Stanford BA, the London School of Economics and Harvard Law

Clarence Thomas- b. Georgia, went to Holy Cross(Mass.) BA, Yale law.

Ruth Ginsburg- b. New York, went to Cornell BA, Columbia law.

Stephen Breyer- b. California, went to Stanford BA, Harvard law.

Samuel Alito- b. New Jersey, went to Princeton BA, Yale law.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
11:01 PM on 05/10/2010
Let's not make race an issue, I have Asian, Black, Cacasion freinds all good people. Color and origen are incidential to charactor,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:45 PM on 05/11/2010
I am talking about culture.

I agree race does not affect charecter.

However, culture and life experiences shape our individual worldview. A devout Roman Catholic white man who went to Harvard law and an atheist asian-american woman who went to UCLA law do not see the world through the same exact prism, even if both are brillant constitutional scholars and have identical work resumes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:46 PM on 05/11/2010
justices are not robots and the law is subject to interpretation. if it wasn't there wouldn't be any minority decsions.
07:09 PM on 05/10/2010
Goldman Sachs' former General Counsel and Senior Director, Robert Katz, also worked with Supreme Court Justice-Designate Kagan on "fundraising" for Harvard University Law School and as a member of the Harvard Law School Dean's Advisory Board Executive Commitee. In addition, Goldman Sachs Senior Director wrote a January 22, 2009 letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee which recommended that Kagan be appointed to the Solicitor General post. See following link for more info on Kagan's professional relationship to Goldman Sachs' former General Counsel:
http://wherechangeobama.blogspot.com/2010/05/goldman-sachs-senior-partner.html
06:26 PM on 05/10/2010
What a bad joke this country has become. Thank you so much, two-party system. I don't even care about her Goldman Sachs history...that's not the real issue.

How many judges with qualifications are out there, in big city courtrooms and country courthouses, who have the minimum qualifications for a court appointment? And yet we get "Caligula's Horse" again, just a few years after Emperor Bush tried it with Harriet Miers. Kagan is no more qualified for the Supreme Court than the woman at the barber shop who cuts my hair. Less qualified, in my opinion, actually--my barber is a common, humble person in touch with working people at the grassroots.

Disgusting. But typical of the Demopublicans. When the GOP plows them under this November, I'll laugh long and loud.
11:39 AM on 05/10/2010
The judge Goldman will love. What change? Empathy for the little guy ?
08:56 AM on 05/10/2010
New rule - if you have ever worked at or for goldman sacks you CANNOT hold an appointed government position.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
sunshine14
07:26 AM on 05/10/2010
repubs GOP are in bed with Goldman?. Even do not want to put regulations laws on Goldman and voted no no no to bring debate to the floor Who has ties with who? Please. All congress repubs GOP have gotten $$$$ from all the lobbyist of Goldman. Please
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
10:34 PM on 05/10/2010
Wake up before it's too late, we need you. Do you know people who beleive that professional wrestling is real? Well if you do and still beleive that these bad actors are aren't putting on a show for us don't laugh at the people who beleive that wrestling is real. Reps and Dems are playing people for fools, don't be one of them. They are either prisoners of or lackies of the bankster system, we are the audience watching the show and hopefully will realize the facts before we are too far gone to redeem ourselves and our children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FWDpost
07:08 AM on 05/10/2010
Republican Lindsey Graham happily supports Elena Kagan. They are reportedly planning a closet organizer infomercial to supplement their government income.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
10:54 PM on 05/10/2010
A good observation. Graham has shown his loyalty to the System like others who we would better off without. There isn't a dimes worth of difference between him and Dodd. Or maybe Plastic Joe and anything for the vote McCain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Rozgonyi
Writer and traveler
05:45 AM on 05/10/2010
I'm not that concerned about this connection. For any politician or high-level nominee for these positions, the candidates are relatively old, have moved in a lot of circles, and are bound to have made some associations in their very long and upwardly-mobile careers that in hindsight they would like to erase. I still say she's a decent pick.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
11:08 PM on 05/10/2010
Why do we not seek out people like justice William O Douglas? He said "The constitution is not an instrument for the governemt to restrain the people, it is an instrumnt for the people to restrain the government" God help us if we don't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:17 AM on 05/10/2010
Boy...people really don't like Jewish broads.
02:06 AM on 05/10/2010
The bigger problem is BHO and MO are posturing to be on the BOD of Goldman Sachs!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 AM on 05/10/2010
Why is geography and regional representation never brought up in the Supreme Court nomination process?

The western US is known for being more libertarian politically, yet this is not represented on the court.

Of the nine current Justices only two were born west of the Mississippi and none of them went to law school out west. Is the curriculum and instruction at all western US law schools inferior to institutions in the East? or just the connections?

The Midwest has two Justices and one is retiring and it looks like his replacement will be someone from New York city who went to Harvard.

Also, why are there no Americans of asian descent on the Supreme Court? Has one ever been nominated? and why is there only one protestant christian one the court in a country where protestants are the majority faith?

John Roberts- b. Indiana, went to Harvard law.

John Paul Stevens- b. Illinois, went to U. of Chicago BA and Northwestern Law.

Antonin Scalia- b. New Jersey, went to Georgetown BA and Harvard Law.

Anthony Kennedy- b. California, went to Stanford BA, the London School of Economics and Harvard Law

Clarence Thomas- b. Georgia, went to Holy Cross(Mass.) BA, Yale law.

Ruth Ginsburg- b. New York, went to Cornell BA, Columbia law.

Stephen Breyer- b. California, went to Stanford BA, Harvard law.

Samuel Alito- b. New Jersey, went to Princeton BA, Yale law.

Sonia Sotomayor- b. New York, went to Princeton BA, Yale law.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:37 PM on 05/10/2010
Excellent point. Some people suspect that there is a kind of "conspiracy" going on, a fraternity of Yale and Harvard graduates who took over the gov back in the 18th century and have since keept a grip over the gov. along with graduates of a couple of other universities like Georgetwon and Columbia.

Without hard evidence I can't support the idea of a conspiracy but I do find it troubling that so many of our presidents, political leaders and economic leaders, all matured in such a closed environment, irrelevant of political leanings. It does not bode well for democracy if all our political and business leaders are "matured" and "indoctrinated" with the same mindset.
08:55 PM on 05/09/2010
I'm still waiting for the change in government that I was promised during the Obama election campaign. Waiting......waiting...... waiting...... waiting..........