More

Gulf Oil Spill: Human Health May Be Endangered

JOHN FLESHER   05/ 7/10 01:57 PM ET   AP

Gulf Oil Spill Human Health
Oil washes ashore with the waves onto New Harbor Island, La., Thursday, May 6, 2010. Oil giant BP PLC's oil rig exploded April 20, in the Gulf of Mexico killing 11 workers. It sank two days later, and oil is still pouring into the Gulf. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

NEW ORLEANS — With a huge and unpredictable oil slick drifting in the Gulf of Mexico, state and federal authorities are preparing to deal with a variety of hazards to human health if and when the full brunt of the toxic mess washes ashore.

The list of potential threats runs from minor nuisances such as runny noses and headaches to nausea. While waiting to see how bad things will get, public health agencies are monitoring air quality, drinking water supplies and seafood processing plants and advising people to take precautions.

"We don't know how long this spill will last or how much oil we'll be dealing with, so there's a lot of unknowns," said Dr. Jimmy Guidry, Louisiana's state health director. "But we're going to make things as safe as humanly possible."

Oil has been spewing into the Gulf at a rate of at least 200,000 gallons a day since an offshore drilling rig exploded on April 20, killing 11 people. Little if any has reached land thus far, but shifts in wind speed and direction could propel the slick toward populated areas.

In a possible hint of things to come, a foul stench drifted over parts of southwestern Louisiana last week. The oil probably was the culprit, said Alan Levine, secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, whose office heard about dozens of complaints – even from state legislators in New Orleans, some 130 miles from the leaky undersea well.

"Their eyes were burning, they felt nauseated, they were smelling it," Levine said.

Farther up the coast at Shell Beach, marina operator and commercial fisherman Robert Campo said the smell gave him a headache as he collected oysters 20 miles offshore. "It was rotten," he said.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has began round-the-clock air monitoring in Gulf coastal areas and posting online hourly readings for ozone and tiny particles such as soot. Both can cause respiratory problems and are particuarly aggravating for people with chronic conditions such as asthma.

Crude oil emits volatile organic compounds that react with nitrogen oxides to produce ozone. Fires being set by the Coast Guard to burn off oil on the water's surface would produce sooty, acrid smoke.

"We don't know what the impacts are going to be yet," said Dave Bary, an EPA spokesman in Dallas. "We don't know in what direction this oil will go."

The potential for unhealthy air quality depends on a variety of factors, particularly the speed and direction of winds that could disperse fumes and determine where they go, said Jonathan Ward, an environmental toxicology professor at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston.

With the leaky Gulf well some 50 miles offshore, Ward said much of the oil vapor likely wouldn't reach land, although the potential for air pollution from the slick will remain as long as the leak continues.

Public health agencies in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi advised people near the coast who experience nausea, headaches or other smell-related ailments to stay inside, turn on air conditioners and avoid exerting themselves outdoors.

In addition to air pollution, officials also were guarding against health problems from tainted drinking water and seafood.

Some communities, including New Orleans, get their supplies from the Mississippi River. Its southerly currents will prevent oil from drifting upstream to city intake pipes, and the Coast Guard is making sure that any ships with oil-coated hulls are scrubbed down before proceeding up the river, Guidry said.

Even so, the state health department has ordered testing of municipal water systems near the Gulf for signs of oil.

"It's next to impossible that a high amount would get in," Guidry said. "Even if some got through, more than likely the treatment system would eliminate it."

The department this week began taking samples at seafood processing plants. Officials have ordered a temporary moratorium on fishing in federal waters from the Mississippi River to the Florida Panhandle, but sampling will provide benchmarks enabling scientists to track any increases in contaminant levels once fishing is allowed to resume.

Louisiana health officials said they believe fish, shrimp and other Gulf delicacies already on the market are safe.

"If we see increases in hydrocarbons or other contaminants, we'd stop the flow of seafood," Levine said.

Oil has compounds that have been linked to cancer. But they break down in the body and are excreted, so there's little chance of getting cancer from tainted seafood even if people ate it for many years, said LuAnn White, director of Tulane Universisty's Center for Applied Environmental Public Health.

The telltale smell likely would deter consumers from eating oily seafood, White said, but if people did eat it, they might get gastrointestinal sickness.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is working with epidemiologists in the Gulf states to develop studies of health repercussions from the oil spill, Guidry said.

Yet another hazard is direct contact with oil-saturated water – particularly for cleanup crews and volunteers involved in animal rescue operations.

When the container ship Cosco Busan hit a bridge and released 53,000 gallons of highly toxic bunker fuel into San Francisco Bay in November 2007, officials managing the cleanup ordered volunteers to wear protective suits, gloves and masks that later were discarded at a hazardous waste dump. Some oil fouled beaches, which were closed to prevent danger to the public.

People working around the Gulf spill should be equipped with respirator devices and wear heavy-duty gloves and protective clothing to guard against painful skin rashes, said Gina Solomon, an associate professor at the University of California-San Francisco medical school and a senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council who has treated patients exposed to oil fumes.

"The workers absolutely need to be protected," Solomon said.

___

Associated Press Writer Jason Dearen contributed to this story from San Francisco.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS — With a huge and unpredictable oil slick drifting in the Gulf of Mexico, state and federal authorities are preparing to deal with a variety of hazards to human health if and when th...
NEW ORLEANS — With a huge and unpredictable oil slick drifting in the Gulf of Mexico, state and federal authorities are preparing to deal with a variety of hazards to human health if and when th...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 161
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
05:54 PM on 05/10/2010
http://www.lvrj.com/news/exxon-valdez-oil-risks-spur-warning-for-gulf-cleanup-crews-93258964.html

Workers who are cleaning up the oil in the Gulf, need to be aware of the chemicals that will be used for the cleaning.
My name is Merle Savage; a female general foreman during the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill beach cleanup in 1989. I am one of the 11,000+ cleanup workers who is suffering from health issues from that toxic cleanup, without compensation from Exxon.
Dr. Riki Ott visited me in 2007 to explain about the toxic spraying on the beaches. She also informed me that Exxon's medical records and the reports that surfaced in litigation brought by sick workers in 1994, had been sealed from the public, making it impossible to hold Exxon responsible for their actions. http://www.rikiott.com
Exxon developed the toxic spraying; OSHA, the Coast Guard, and the state of Alaska authorized the procedure; VECO and other Exxon contractors implemented it. Beach crews breathed in crude oil that splashed off the rocks and into the air -- the toxic exposure turned into chronic breathing conditions and central nervous system problems, along with other massive health issues. Some of the illnesses include neurological impairment, chronic respiratory disease, leukemia, lymphoma, brain tumors, liver damage, and blood disease.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5632208859935499100
http://www.silenceinthesound.com/stories.shtml
http://www.silenceinthesound.com/gallery.shtml
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rmship
08:02 AM on 05/09/2010
The oil we seek is under enourmous pressure from land mass. We extract oil, land mass shifts.

Land mass shifts, earthquakes, volcanos, tital waves, smokey air, inhospitable enviorment. The usual species ending stuff. But hey Fords got F150's on sale. I'm headed out.......

my reply...Thanks
12:43 PM on 05/08/2010
In the Gulf of Mexico, an equivalent of 2 Exxon Valdez's worth of oils is leaked through the NATURAL PROCESS every year. Pumping oil releases the pressure and decrease the natural oil leak into the oceans (this has been observed off the California coast). NASA observed this fact in 2000:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/view.php?id=20863

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/01/000127082228.htm
ScienceDaily (Jan. 27, 2000) — Twice an Exxon Valdez spill worth of oil seeps into the Gulf of Mexico every year, according to a new study that will be presented January 27 at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Antonio, Texas.

How come Greenpeace did not protest against Evil Nature for this crime? How long has wicked Mother Nature been leaking demon OIL into the Gulf of Mexico? 100 years? 1000 years?

2009 oil slicks (natural cause)
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=36873

As much as the oil blowout is tragic, its seems most of the HuffPost audience (at least all the liberals/progressives) is all wee-weed up.
02:33 AM on 05/09/2010
So you are saying this is no big deal. Actually you are asserting this is all so natural it is probably a good thing. Mother nature now works for BP and Halliburton. Good to know.

And all of the animals covered in this oil? I guess they just need to suck it up.

Have another beer and kick the dog.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gordon Soderberg
The Green Veteran
02:58 PM on 05/09/2010
However the leaks you describe are very small and are not coming from a single source, The impact of two Exxon tankers leaking over a year from small leaks across millions of square miles the ocean would not effect anything. That is not the case here. We are faced with an Exxon tanker spill ever few days and all from the same location. So you pathetic reasoning dose not hold water. But a hell of a try for a moron.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paradigmm
Be the change you want to see!
08:55 PM on 05/07/2010
When the water is filled with oil, the air is filled with carbon dioxide and the earth is covered with garbage and can no longer grow our food will the banks print more money and buy it all back? Will governments bring back to life all those who died securing resources under the guise of fighting for terror? Will corporations stop raping this planet for nothing more than monetary gain? Changing our social structure is no longer a matter of want too, WE HAVE TOO!


http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:42 PM on 05/07/2010
There is no may, it WILL.
Man messed up big time.
Too many ecosystems around the world are going to suffer from this mess too.
06:25 PM on 05/07/2010
It seems a obvious to me that this will effect human health. I sometimes feel a little yucky just pumping gas (and it isn't just because gas went up 10 cents a gallon since the last time I filled up).
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Starling5
Not an Earthling...
05:38 PM on 05/07/2010
I hope that the Great Human Mass Extinction completes itself very fast.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Southrnbelle
OBAMA 2012!!!
03:30 PM on 05/07/2010
When will they ever learn?
03:06 PM on 05/07/2010
Haliburton Terrorism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Javaline
03:04 PM on 05/07/2010
"We don't know what the impacts are going to be yet," said Dave Bary, an EPA spokesman in Dallas. "We don't know in what direction this oil will go."

This is about the lamest excuse for a comment I've ever read. With all the facts available over the years about the kind of damage that occurs when crude oil is spewed out like this you should have a better response than this. I got news for you Dave - the impacts are going to be behemoth. To the environment, to our health, to the economy. The earth is already very sick because of our interference with the natural order - this is like pouring acid on your mother's head.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
02:18 PM on 05/07/2010
Why do Conservatives support this? Why do Conservatives not value the health, welfare, and safety of American lives?

Money
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
02:23 PM on 05/07/2010
Or is it just plain old hate for the country and their countrymen?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:36 PM on 05/07/2010
The worst of ALL reasons! They sold out any shred of integrity and compassion for fiat $!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
02:50 PM on 05/07/2010
But most Conservative followers are not wealthy... There is real hatred for their country and countrymen being exposed as a result of this BP made disaster.
01:41 PM on 05/07/2010
Ya Think?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PWM
Eisenhower Rep. The 1% started class warfare.
01:09 PM on 05/07/2010
There is no May - it is WILL.
12:30 PM on 05/07/2010
MAY affect human health?!

It will DEFINITELY affect human health! And many humans liveliehoods as well.

And yes the media is most definitely burying this story or at least minimizing the most devestating enviromental disaster in history in order to deflect as much criticism as possible from the oil industry.
photo
Rudderman
Warren for Senate.
12:38 PM on 05/07/2010
Exactly...nailed on every point. Fanned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearthinker16
reads, investigates and thinks before making stupi
12:25 PM on 05/07/2010
I do not believe it as Rush saids it is nothing bad. Maybe it should wash up on his lawn, all of it.
12:30 PM on 05/07/2010
I say we put it in a tanker and put his beloved car in it............
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
02:12 PM on 05/07/2010
Conservatives get off at the idea that Americans will/would be sick or harmed. They make jokes about it in public.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
05:04 PM on 05/07/2010
Heck, each American who dies prematurely will not be collecting SS unlike the rich people who collect SS forever.....