iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bubble Of Methane Triggered Gulf Oil Rig Blast

First Posted: 07/08/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:25 PM ET

Gulf Oil Methane Bubble

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO (Associated Press) - The deadly blowout of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP's internal investigation.

While the cause of the explosion is still under investigation, the sequence of events described in the interviews provides the most detailed account of the April 20 blast that killed 11 workers and touched off the underwater gusher that has poured more than 3 million gallons of crude into the Gulf.

Portions of the interviews, two written and one taped, were described in detail to an Associated Press reporter by Robert Bea, a University of California Berkeley engineering professor who serves on a National Academy of Engineering panel on oil pipeline safety and worked for BP PLC as a risk assessment consultant during the 1990s. He received them from industry friends seeking his expert opinion.

A group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record, according to the transcripts. Meanwhile, far below, the rig was being converted from an exploration well to a production well.

Based on the interviews, Bea believes that the workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well. Then they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the sea floor. A chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat and a gas bubble which destroyed the seal.

Deep beneath the seafloor, methane is in a slushy, crystalline form. Deep sea oil drillers often encounter pockets of methane crystals as they dig into the earth.

As the bubble rose up the drill column from the high-pressure environs of the deep to the less pressurized shallows, it intensified and grew, breaking through various safety barriers, Bea said.

"A small bubble becomes a really big bubble," Bea said. "So the expanding bubble becomes like a cannon shooting the gas into your face."

Up on the rig, the first thing workers noticed was the sea water in the drill column suddenly shooting back at them, rocketing 240 feet in the air, he said. Then, gas surfaced. Then oil.

"What we had learned when I worked as a drill rig laborer was swoosh, boom, run," Bea said. "The swoosh is the gas, boom is the explosion and run is what you better be doing."

The gas flooded into an adjoining room with exposed ignition sources, he said.

"That's where the first explosion happened," said Bea, who worked for Shell Oil in the 1960s during the last big northern Gulf of Mexico oil well blowout. "The mud room was next to the quarters where the party was. Then there was a series of explosions that subsequently ignited the oil that was coming from below."

According to one interview transcript, a gas cloud covered the rig, causing giant engines on the drill floor to run too fast and explode. The engines blew off the rig and set "everything on fire," the account said. Another explosion below blew more equipment overboard.

BP spokesman John Curry would not comment Friday night on whether methane gas or the series of events described in the internal documents caused the accident.

"Clearly, what happened on the Deepwater Horizon was a tragic accident," said Curry, who is based at an oil spill command center in Robert, La. "We anticipate all the facts will come out in a full investigation."

The BP executives were injured but survived, according to one account. Nine rig crew on the rig floor and two engineers died.

"The furniture and walls trapped some and broke some bones but they managed to get in the life boats with assistance from others," said the transcript.

The reports made Bea, the 73-year-old industry veteran, cry.

"It sure as hell is painful," he said. "Tears of frustration and anger."

On Friday, a BP-chartered vessel lowered a 100-ton concrete-and-steel vault onto the ruptured well, an important step in a delicate and unprecedented attempt to stop most of the gushing crude fouling the sea.

"We are essentially taking a four-story building and lowering it 5,000 feet and setting it on the head of a pin," BP spokesman Bill Salvin told The Associated Press.

Underwater robots guided the 40-foot-tall box into place in a slow-moving drama. Now that the contraption is on the seafloor, workers will need at least 12 hours to let it settle and make sure it's stable before the robots can hook up a pipe and hose that will funnel the oil up to a tanker.

"It appears to be going exactly as we hoped," Salvin said on Friday afternoon, shortly after the four-story device hit the seafloor. "Still lots of challenges ahead, but this is very good progress."

By Sunday, the box the size of a house could be capturing up to 85 percent of the oil.

The task became increasingly urgent as toxic oil crept deeper into the bays and marshes of the Mississippi Delta.

A sheen of oil began arriving on land last week, and crews have been laying booms, spraying chemical dispersants and setting fire to the slick to try to keep it from coming ashore. But now the thicker, stickier goo -- arrayed in vivid, brick-colored ribbons -- is drawing ever closer to Louisiana's coastal communities.

There are still untold risks and unknowns with the containment box: The approach has never been tried at such depths, where the water pressure is enough to crush a submarine, and any wrong move could damage the leaking pipe and make the problem worse. The seafloor is pitch black and the water murky, though lights on the robots illuminate the area where they are working.

If the box works, another one will be dropped onto a second, smaller leak at the bottom of the Gulf.

At the same time, crews are drilling sideways into the well in hopes of plugging it up with mud and concrete, and they are working on other ways to cap it.

Investigators looking into the cause of the explosion have been focusing on the so-called blowout preventer. Federal regulators told The Associated Press Friday that they are going to examine whether these last-resort cutoff valves on offshore oil wells are reliable.

Blowouts are infrequent, because well holes are blocked by piping and pumped-in materials like synthetic mud, cement and even sea water. The pipes are plugged with cement, so fluid and gas can't typically push up inside the pipes.

Instead, a typical blowout surges up a channel around the piping. The narrow space between the well walls and the piping is usually filled with cement, so there is no pathway for a blowout. But if the cement or broken piping leaves enough space, a surge can rise to the surface.

There, at the wellhead of exploratory wells, sits the massive steel contraption known as a blowout preventer. It can snuff a blowout by squeezing rubber seals tightly around the pipes with up to 1 million pounds of force. If the seals fail, the blowout preventer deploys a last line of defense: a set of rams that can slice right through the pipes and cap the blowout.

Deepwater Horizon was also equipped with an automated backup system called a Deadman. It should have activated the blowout preventer even if workers could not.

Based on the interviews with rig workers, none of those safeguards worked.

___

Associated Press writers Cain Burdeau, Vicki Smith and Ray Henry in Louisiana, Jeff Donn in Boston, Michael Graczyk in Houston and Noaki Schwartz in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO (Associated Press) - The deadly blowout of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expa...
ON THE GULF OF MEXICO (Associated Press) - The deadly blowout of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expa...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (41 total)
06:41 AM on 05/12/2010
In the Gulf of Mexico, an equivalent of 2 Exxon Valdez's worth of oil is leaked through the NATURAL PROCESS every year. Pumping oil out decreases the pressure and thus the natural oil leak rate into the oceans (this has been observed off the California coast). NASA observed this fact in 2000:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/view.php?id=20863

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/01/000127082228.htm
ScienceDaily (Jan. 27, 2000) — Twice an Exxon Valdez spill worth of oil seeps into the Gulf of Mexico every year, according to a new study that will be presented January 27 at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Antonio, Texas.

How come Greenpeace did not protest against Evil Nature for this crime? How long has wicked Mother Nature been leaking demon OIL into the Gulf of Mexico? 100 years? 1000 years?

2009 oil slicks (natural cause)
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=36873

As much as the oil blowout is tragic, it seems most of the HuffPost audience (at least all the liberals/progressives/environuts) is all wee-wee'd up.

Calm down. I will change your diapers (after donning the gas mask), wipe the snot off your noses, and give you your medication. There. There.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wassilij
shamanlight
05:37 AM on 05/12/2010
Whats needed is a corporate death penalty.......If any corporation like BP or Halburton causes a disaster to occur.....The entire corporation including all assets are dismantled and all assets liquidated to pay for the cleanup and economic losses felt by those whose livelihoods they have destroyed.........making it RETROACTIVE!!!.......NO more Halburton...or BP or whatever CORPORATIONS were involved!!!
Not a single one of these Rat B@stards could man up and take responsibility for this disaster that has ruined the entire southern coast of the US...How much longer are WE the people going to allow these CORPORATIONS to destroy our life support system?.......DESTROY THESE CORPORATIONS....Starting NOW !!....No second chances....no 75 mile limit BS,,,,
If this was the policy from the beginning....Safety measures and plans ABC and D would be in place.....the only plan they had was called GREED
.......One coast down ......Two to Go.....Are you willing to take that risk? Make them pay...with a CORPORATE DEATH PENALTY!!!....RETROACTIVE!!
06:34 AM on 05/12/2010
Government has caused many disasters. So Death to Government!
03:40 PM on 05/11/2010
Scientists repeatedly warned of Methane Hydrates on the ocean floor. They are very unstable and recently found in abundance in high concentrations throughout the lower depths of the Gulf. Not only did the hydrates play a significant role in the disaster, but also prevented the dome from stopping the leak.
In short, the methane is housed in "cages" of ice that are stable below a certain depth where temperatures are low and pressures are high. The hydrates are highly unstable. Any substantial disturbance results in the release of methane to the surface. These are also thought to be the culprit in the Bermuda Triangle.
11:19 AM on 05/11/2010
Boat out the oil is very series. It need to clear this problem quickly

Thank you for sharing the information

http://www.1bedroomfurnitureking.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paladine
03:07 PM on 05/10/2010
So, a huge amount of methane was released causing the blowout. Is there still a large release of methane occuring? My guess is yes. And does methane absorb the color red? Yes...is the slick red in appearence? Yes. Could methane gas be the reason for the nauseousness, and headaches reported in the area? Was it not the dispersants?

There is a large pocket of methane hydrate in the Gulf...google, you'll see. Did they drill into that large pocket? How much is there? There have been much exploration for hydrates around the world and in the Gulf by BP. Is that what they were really after? And what about risk of explosion or a oxygen-depriving gas mist on shore? Did the rig that fell damage the seabed any further? They want to place the containment box so gingerly...yet, the rig crashed.

I have and have seen many questions around this...I wish the media would start exploring them.
02:33 PM on 05/10/2010
If, on average, annual clean-up and penalty costs from the Gov't (if any) are less than the cost of adequate safety/environmental protocols, what level of spending do you think oil companies will dedicate to safety? Mining companies? Power companies?

Don't forget that cutting back on safety/environmental initiatives provides savings across all company sites. Dealing with a disaster might be expensive, but not THAT expensive considering it's only one location, and it only happens (say) a few times a decade. Plus, the majority of the "price" is paid by those whose environment is destroyed, health endangered, or livelihood snatched away.

At the end of the day, companies have very strong financial incentives to actually enforce _less_ than the bare minimum environmental health & safety regulations required by the Gov't. _Less_ because enforcement often hovers between poor and laughable, violations are often punished only by "warnings", and fees are tiny compared to corporate operating revenue.

This is the case in the American mining industry, oil industry, and many varieties of manufacturing industries. We're borrowing against our children's environmental future at loan-shark rates.
11:32 AM on 05/10/2010
Yes, this clearly was nothing but a completely unforeseeable freak accident. Who would ever imagine that you could hit methane while drilling for oil?

A firing squad is too good for these mfrs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:40 AM on 05/10/2010
BP's CEO's yearly salary= >$5 million

Cost of the back-up onsite containment device that would have adverted the spill= $500,000

Environmental and economic devastation of the Gulf region= priceless
10:19 PM on 05/09/2010
Obama's Interior Dept, under Salazar, exempted BP's project from a required environmental impact study in April of 2009. If the study had been done, as required, the project would not have been approved.


Last Wednesday, on Keith Olbermann, environmentalists called for Int Dept Secy Salazar to step down:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/vp/36976376# 36976376
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PotomacOracle
The Solution:debt free credit clearing systems
09:33 PM on 05/09/2010
Here's what "planners' have known for a long time.

Read it and weep.

http://www.im-jus-sayin.com/methaneoilwells.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Listopad
08:22 PM on 05/09/2010
capping this hole will take some doing, considering that now it will be that much harder after several days have passed. Still, I am not hopefull that even an accident this widespread will trigger any significant change for big oil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:57 PM on 05/09/2010
Last year’s Montara Spill* in the Timor Sea near Australia and the Deepwater Horizon Spill in the Gulf of Mexico have one thing in common: HALLIBURTON.

Montara water depth 250 feet......Deepwater Horizon water depth 5,000 feet
Montara 17-85,000 gallons/day...Deepwater Horizon 210,000 gallons/day
Montara 160+ miles from coast...Deepwater Horizon 40 miles from coast
Montara leaked 10 weeks............Deepwater Horizon ??? weeks
Montara deaths - none................Deepwater Horizon - 11 deaths

Why was Halliburton allowed near this BP rig?

* The Australian government was scheduled to release its investigatory report on the Montara Spill the end of last month, but now has delayed its publication. Why? I find the timing more than suspect.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/03/us/03montara.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montara_oil_spill
06:09 PM on 05/09/2010
BP has a history of safety failures
PROFIT: Corporate culture called putting earnings over maintenance, environment.

http://www.adn.com/2010/05/08/1269786/bp-has-a-history-of-safety-faults.html

"Over the past two decades, BP subsidiaries have been convicted three times of environmental crimes, including two felonies. It remains on probation in Alaska and Texas."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:22 PM on 05/09/2010
Halliburton was cementing the well just 20 hours before the explosion. Coincidence or connection?

“Halliburton has been accused of performing a poor cement job in the case of a major blowout in the Timor Sea off Australia last August. An investigation is underway.”

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-oil-spill-investigation-20100501,0,2641014.story

“Last year, Halliburton was also implicated for its cementing work prior to a massive blowout off the coast of Australia, where a rig caught on fire and spewed hundreds of thousands of gallons into the sea for ten weeks.

In that incident, workers apparently failed to properly pump cement into the well, according to Elmer Danenberger, former head of regulatory affairs for the U.S. Minerals Management Service, who testified to an Australian commission probing that accident.

"The problem with the cementing job was one of the root causes in the Australian blowout," Danenberger told Huffington Post, adding that the rig crew didn't pick up on indications of an influx of fluids coming back in after they cemented the casing. "The crew didn't pick up on them and didn't take action."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/30/halliburton-may-be-culpri_n_558481.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paladine
03:13 PM on 05/10/2010
I've read the heating of the the cement, the curing, can ignite methane hydrate. It's explosive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:35 PM on 05/09/2010
i was thinking if this can happen just once, no nation should be doing off shore drilling. i really don't think the spill is going to end until the well is empty. and now with an indonisian earth quake, and the ones Hatti had, i also worry about what will happen when a quake damages an oil rig with in its area of impact. this is pretty scarry stuff.
05:25 PM on 05/09/2010
The oldest wild well I know of happened in the late 1800s, and the well drillers were able to tame it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:06 PM on 05/09/2010
a land well is far different than off-shore. with a land well, we basically are on the ocean floor (without the water). right now in the gulf we are 50 miles out, which limits resources that can brought to the scene, and the ground is a mile away, and no divers can go to the source. that is far different than a land well gone wild.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:07 PM on 05/09/2010
thank you for the info, i had no idea wells went back to the 1800's, that was interesting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PotomacOracle
The Solution:debt free credit clearing systems
09:54 PM on 05/09/2010
You want scary stuff? Read this and check out the methane hydrate map: http://www.im-jus-sayin.com/methaneoilwells.htm

Where are the potential seepages of methane? Continental Shelfs, where fossil fuel freaks do their drill baby drill. They use lots of fresh water which is required to form CH4 and with other chemicals pressurize the wells.

The FFFers leave the H20 down there of course and it becomes, with CO2, the ch4 sludge and ice clogging the recent Gulf Dome experiment.

Importantly, CH4 cannot be formed in sea water, only fresh water. So all the CH4 down there has been created by the fossil fuel freaks.... drilling baby.drilling.