More

James Cameron: 3-D Will Be Standard For All Formats

SANGWON YOON   05/13/10 10:10 AM ET   AP

South Korea James Cameron

SEOUL, South Korea — "Avatar" director James Cameron said Thursday that 3-D will replace 2-D as the standard, mainstream format for film, television and online content in less than 25 years.

Viewers will soon not only enjoy films in 3-D theaters but all forms of entertainment, including sports and music shows on TVs and laptops, Cameron said at a technology forum in Seoul.

Cameron directed the 3-D epic "Avatar," which won three Oscars and is the highest grossing film in history, with $2.7 billion in worldwide ticket sales to date. He has also directed other blockbuster films such as "Titanic" and "Terminator."

"Avatar" has proved that 3-D technology is not just a fad but a revolution changing how the audience chooses to consume media and entertainment content, the 56-year-old director said in a speech to the Seoul Digital Forum, an annual technology and media gathering.

"Quite simply, where they had a choice, the audience was selecting for the best possible way to see the movie," he said. "And they saw 3-D as the premium viewing experience."

Cameron likened what he called the "3-D renaissance" to the advent of sound and color in motion pictures. But he said full adoption of the enhanced format will require less time than the 25 years it took for color movies to become standard.

Pointing to the popularity of 3-D films, Cameron envisions the film, technology and consumer electronics industries rapidly moving toward mass adoption of the enhanced format.

That could come as soon as "in a couple of years," but "definitely less than the 25 years it took color movies," he told reporters at a press conference after the speech.

Television makers Samsung Electronics Co. and Panasonic Corp. started selling 3-D TVs this year in hopes of riding one of the next big waves in consumer electronics.

Movie studios Universal and Disney have released 3-D films on Blu-ray, such as "Coraline" and "The Polar Express." Discovery Communications and ESPN previously announced they will launch their own 3-D cable television networks, with ESPN first broadcasting World Cup soccer in 3-D next month.

The biggest hurdle to rapid mainstream adoption of 3-D is not technological shortcomings, but the lack of 3-D content to watch, Cameron said.

"If you play all the 3-D movies in existence on your fancy new 3-D TV, it will keep you entertained for about 3 days," he said. "This content gap is the biggest hurdle for the rapid adoption of 3D TV."

Asked about the prospects for Internet streaming of 3-D movies, Cameron said he was upbeat.

"3-D laptops are already here," Cameron said. "I've already seen some very good ones."

Cameron also said he intends to personally dedicate himself to helping the industry adopt 3-D without creating a consumer backlash.

That will include continuing to create quality 3-D content, like a sequel to "Avatar," which he estimated will take about 3 years to make – 18 months less than it took the first.

The release date will be announced in a few months, he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

SEOUL, South Korea — "Avatar" director James Cameron said Thursday that 3-D will replace 2-D as the standard, mainstream format for film, television and online content in less than 25 years. Vi...
SEOUL, South Korea — "Avatar" director James Cameron said Thursday that 3-D will replace 2-D as the standard, mainstream format for film, television and online content in less than 25 years. Vi...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 73
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Adrienne Williams
07:28 PM on 06/18/2010
I still don't think every film should be in 3D -- grant it, I saw this film in both formats, and in this case, I liked it in 3D but that crap film 'Alice in Wonderland' did not need to be in 3D! Rubbish!
07:19 AM on 05/14/2010
I think his movie 'Avatar' is definitely an original artistic achievement, but saying evveryone is going to be an artist that ends up drawing like Rembrandt is maybe wishful thinking.
06:29 AM on 05/14/2010
I much prefer to watch Avatar in 2D.Those 3D glasses make everything dark and if you look around the theatre everyone looks like I'm sitting in a Blues Brothers remake. I much prefer my dvd version of Avatar because it is brighter and crisper. I really don't think that those floating jellyfish things were worth the extra $5 I paid to see Avatar in 3D.

Don't give back the 3D glasses at the end of the movie. They aren't washed properly. Several people I know say theirs were resealed into plastic bags with finger prints still on them from the previous patron. Unhygienic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Bee
A robot in disguise
03:30 AM on 05/14/2010
thats the dumbest garbage ive ever heard, and i read political news all the time. how is an indie filmmaker on a shoestring budget ever going to afford a 3D camera? and who ever said 3D is the next step for filmmaking technology. 3D has been around since the 50s, and in all that time it became the standard for anything, and his furry film isnt going to change that.
01:21 AM on 05/14/2010
I don't want to watch everything in 3-D.
photo
JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin
Where's Mr. Darcy?
12:23 AM on 05/14/2010
I remember reading that after Cinemascope became popular in the 50's, MGM foolishly re-released Gone with the Wind in a scope format, distorting the image and making it look like complete crap.

If Hollywood repeats itself and starts 3Ding every frickin' movie they can get their hands on, God help them. It will be a financial as well as an artistic disaster.
photo
JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin
Where's Mr. Darcy?
12:21 AM on 05/14/2010
Ironically, I liked Avatar. It was beautiful to look at, but I think the same effect could have been achieved in 2D. I saw it in 3D, but lifted my glasses occasionally to see if there was a huge difference. There wasn't.

It wouldn't surprise me if Cameron had tons of cash invested in 3D technology, hence the "3D is God" mantra.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DWGRadio
11:12 PM on 05/13/2010
Evidently plot, characterization and artistic merit are no longer important.
10:37 PM on 05/13/2010
What kind of lack of imagination does it take for people to be so vehemently confident that 3D will never be a ubiquitous form of entertainment?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:03 PM on 05/13/2010
Billshut
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Womanvoter4Obama
Opting out of badges=good decision
08:23 PM on 05/13/2010
I actually turned down seeing a movie today BECAUSE it was in 3D. The headaches I get watching movies that way aren't worth it and the fact I was asked to pay more FOR the headache made me say hell naw! I will not be doing anymore 3D movies. Avatar was the last one. He got his money from me that time but I will not be putting myself through that unnecessary headache again ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAVROS1
07:36 PM on 05/13/2010
If you plan is to kill entertainment media, that should do it.

3D is the biggest waste of time and money. I will not go to another 3d movie.
07:14 PM on 05/13/2010
Not unless computers become 3D, James.

The personal computer will be (and has even begun) to be the format replacing TV, theaters, and music stores.

I suspect within the next 20 years TV will be gone as shows will be accessible solely on the web, and theaters will become a novelty. Music CDs will also see their last days, too.
07:09 PM on 05/13/2010
I really hope he is wrong. I have NO desire to see anything in 3-D. Ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1p
06:45 PM on 05/13/2010
No way. I have heard too many people complain about eye strain after a movie like Avatar, being 3 hours. I went to the 2D version because I can't stand 3D movies for that reason.