More

U.S., China Resume Human-Rights Talks For First Time In Two Years

FOSTER KLUG   05/13/10 06:23 PM ET   AP

Us China Human Rights

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration faces a delicate balancing act in human rights talks with China that began Thursday: It looks to pressure China to improve its treatment of its citizens while not angering a country that is crucial to U.S. international interests.

The two-day meeting in Washington also gives the U.S. administration a chance to answer criticism that it ignores rights abuses while pushing for Chinese support on Iranian and North Korean nuclear standoffs, climate change and other difficult issues.

This may be a difficult time, however, for the United States to take a tough position in the private meeting. The talks, which have resumed after two years, come ahead of a major gathering of top-level U.S. and Chinese officials this month in Beijing that will focus on the countries' intertwined economic and security interests.

"We hope they do more than talk," Sharon Hom, executive director of the advocacy group Human Rights in China, said about this week's meeting. "The U.S. side must send a credible, serious human rights message."

Disagreements over human rights have for years been irritants in U.S.-China relations. This week's talks come as the countries try to repair ties after a rough period. President Barack Obama infuriated China by recently announcing a $6.4 billion arms sale to Taiwan, the self-ruled island claimed by Beijing as its own, and by meeting with the Dalai Lama, the exiled Tibetan Buddhist leader China calls a separatist.

The head of the administration's efforts, Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights Michael Posner, said in an interview ahead of the talks that the United States would not shy away from raising difficult issues.

"The challenge is to find a way to communicate those differences respectfully but directly," Posner said.

He said human rights could not "just be isolated to a few days of discussion every other year, every year; it's part of the broader relationship."

No specific details were released from the first day of talks. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters that the sides were having "candid and in-depth discussions" about rule of law, freedom of religion and expression, labor rights and other issues. Crowley said Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg addressed the participants Thursday. The Chinese side is headed by Director General for International Organizations Chen Xu.

The United States regularly criticizes China for abusing its dissidents, the lawyers who try to defend them and average citizens looking for free access to information. In response, China has said that the United States is rife with crime, poverty, homelessness and racial discrimination.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu, speaking of the talks during a regularly scheduled press briefing Thursday in Beijing, said, "I believe that dialogue is better than confrontation."

Activists have been unhappy with the Obama administration's approach to China's rights record since Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on a trip to China in early 2009, said human rights issues should not interfere with improving U.S.-China ties.

Hom said the United States should use the rights dialogue to raise the cases of imprisoned dissidents and, when the talks are finished, both sides should lay out what was discussed and set up benchmarks for ways to get results.

U.S. officials have said they expect to talk about religious freedom, attacks on the legal profession, China's strict Internet controls and individual cases such as Liu Xiaobo, an author-dissident serving an 11-year prison sentence on subversion charges.

Wang Baodong, spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, said China considers the dialogue a useful way to "increase mutual understanding in this important area."

But Wang said that while the cases of Liu and other dissidents might be raised at the meeting, they are "matters of judicial sovereignty, and we believe that any country should handle such cases in accordance with domestic laws."

"No one has been punished just because of his expressions of mind," Wang said.

Posner said officials are determined to get results from the meeting, "not just how do we have a couple days of talks. ... We're very much focused on the next steps coming out of it."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration faces a delicate balancing act in human rights talks with China that began Thursday: It looks to pressure China to improve its treatment of its citizens whi...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration faces a delicate balancing act in human rights talks with China that began Thursday: It looks to pressure China to improve its treatment of its citizens whi...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:10 PM on 06/08/2010
Perhaps they will discuss the recent slaughter of civilians in Yemen by a US drone?
04:07 PM on 06/08/2010
Guess the diplomats just want a nice diner and some travel.
The USA is torturing people and neglecting their own as they give away the taxpayers money to foreign countries rich enough to make war and provide health care for all their citizens.
What a sad farce.
dblohangel
Rebel with a cause and an attitude!
03:25 PM on 05/18/2010
These talks with the Chinese will be very, very interesting. I imagine them like this....
China: We have more people so we're probably leading in all areas of abuse.
U.S.: That may be so on a national level, however we are number one around the
world for abuse of human rights in our country and within the sovereign boarders of other nations.
02:20 AM on 05/15/2010
Good. They can have a good talk about the Arizona situation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:17 AM on 05/14/2010
This AP report says activists have been unhappy with the Obama administration's approach on China since SoS Clinton in 2009 said human rights are less important than economic interests. Like Bush and Bill Clinton, Obama does not stand up to China. The issue is complicated by Hillary Clinton and her hypocrisy.

Hillary has long claimed "I went to Beijing in 1995 and stood up to the Chinese government on human rights and women’s rights." Like "bullets in Bosnia", and "peace in Northern Ireland," it is a huge exaggeration, typically self-aggrandizing embellishment. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/20/clinton-vs-obama-take-2-in-iowa/

The truth: Hillary made a famous speech on "women's rights as human rights" while First Lady at a UN conference in Beijing in 1995. http://gos.sbc.edu/c/clinton.html. In 2009, with the resonance of a US Secretary of State, however, speaking to power, Hillary subordinated human rights to economic interests, demoralizing thousands of Chinese democratic reformers.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/23/AR2009022302412.html

Her supporters claim, she did not mean it, simply "misspoke in the moment." The truth: Hillary the opportunist takes all sides on every issue based on self interest, not courage, principle or commitment. The Iraq war, escalation in Afghanistan, and subordination human/women's rights to economic greed...where is the self-proclaimed champion of women and children when it matters?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
12:49 AM on 05/14/2010
What gives us the moral authority to lecture China on human rights when Obama authorized killing an American citizen--by drone attack--because of a whim the CIA had.

Is this really the America I grew up in? Or did I somehow get sucked into the mirror world where everyone has a mustache and goatee, and everyone is evil?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/world/14awlaki.html