More

Hillary Clinton: Iran Proving It Deserves New Sanctions

MATTHEW LEE   05/14/10 04:36 PM ET   AP

Hillary Clinton Iran Sanctions

WASHINGTON — Iran will continue to defy demands to prove its nuclear program is peaceful unless it is hit with a new round of U.N. sanctions, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday.

Speaking at a news conference with new British Foreign Secretary William Hague, Clinton said negotiators from Germany and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council were making progress every day on a draft sanctions resolution.

She said Iran's intransigence on the nuclear issue is the strongest argument for a fourth round of sanctions. "We believe that the case is being made perhaps most effectively by the Iranians themselves," she said.

"Every step along the way has demonstrated clearly to the world that Iran is not participating in the international arena in the way that we had asked them to do and that they continued to pursue their nuclear program," Clinton told reporters.

"I believe that we will not get any serious response out of the Iranians until after the Security Council acts," she said.

Her comments came ahead of a weekend visit to Iran by Brazilian President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, who opposes sanctions and is trying to broker a compromise with the Iranian leadership.

She predicted that Silva's mediation effort would not succeed.

Brazil and Turkey, both elected members of the Security Council, are trying to bring Iran back to the table without the threat of sanctions. Turkey's president is scheduled to visit Iran next week.

Clinton said that Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, whose country was long opposed to sanctions but is now involved in helping craft a new resolution, had told Silva that his mission had no more than a one-in-three chance of success.

Medvedev and Silva met in Moscow on Friday ahead of the Brazilian leader's trip to Tehran. Commenting on Silva's trip, Medvedev said, "maybe it is the last chance before the adopting of known decisions in the Security Council."

Russia is one of the five veto-wielding permanent security council members, along with the U.S., France, Great Britain and China.

The Medvedev-Silva meeting "illustrated the hill that the Brazilians are attempting to climb," Clinton said.

Meanwhile, diplomats at the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna said Friday that Iran has set up new equipment that could let it produce more enriched uranium from a smaller amount of raw material.

The step could eventually make it easier for Iran to produce a nuclear bomb and is likely to give the U.S. more leverage with Russia and China in its push for sanctions.

Clinton spoke earlier this week with Chinese State Councilor Dai Bingguo. She said Friday that she believed China, the most resistant permanent council member to sanctions, was coming around.

"This is the highest priority not only of the United States but of many of our partners and allies," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — Iran will continue to defy demands to prove its nuclear program is peaceful unless it is hit with a new round of U.N. sanctions, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Frida...
WASHINGTON — Iran will continue to defy demands to prove its nuclear program is peaceful unless it is hit with a new round of U.N. sanctions, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Frida...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 608
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Khirad 11:01 AM on 05/15/2010
I suppose all past economic moves against Iran in the last 30 years were also "proof" of imminent war. {{{eyeroll}}} Get some perspective, that's all I ask - I could recommend several books. There was a time before the Iraq debacle, unless you argue that that has changed the game altogether for the future regarding neocons still in the State Dept and Pentagon, which would be an interesting discussion apart  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
08:01 PM on 05/19/2010
The author fails to mention that Iran has only enriched to 20% required for isotopes for medical treatment. It is widely known that the IAEA has cameras all over Nataz and sees everything they do. For further enrichment to take place it would take, some say, 3000-6000 more centrifuges would be required which they do not have. The USA has sattelites in the sky and watches every little thing that is going on in the way of new building. Seymour Hersh of the New Yorker says he has researched this continually and find that Iran is doing nothing of any concern. I find it somewhat odd that the author would put together an article of this kind without mentioning the fact that Israel has nukes (Vanunu) and has recently been told with a resolution/sanction from the IAEA that Israel must join the NPT and be inspected...The USA and Britain has already told Israel to just ignore this demand....huh
And last the author mentions aparthied in this piece and I find this, again,striking similar to the aformentioned because it is Israel that is now an apartheid country and ignores some 130 resolutions lodged against it for crimes against humanity.....more to come
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
04:05 AM on 07/11/2010
If there is one journalist in America who's word I will take at face value it is Seymour's. Time and time again he has in my opinion set the standard to which all journalists should aspire.
07:44 PM on 05/18/2010
Looks like Iran extended its hand but all they got is Hillary's clenched fist, or is it Israel's Netanyahu channeled thru Hillary?
12:04 AM on 05/19/2010
Comrade, this could answer your query. http://consciousmc.blogspot.com/
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
04:09 AM on 07/11/2010
Liberal propaganda rhetoric and no answers to be found there. Just finger pointing and a complete disregard for the complicity of the Democrats who simply puff up with indignation as the vote along with those they denounce.
06:25 PM on 05/17/2010
the problem is that American diplomacy still shows a knee-jerk reaction as demonstrated by Hillary and consorts. She is still under the influence of neocons left in the State dept from the previous administrations. It looks like she does not want the Brazilian-Turkish effort to succeed and she (the US) is tied to impose sanctions no matter what. They should probably listen to the likes of former sec of state Powell who has opined on Bloomberg that sanctions will not stop the Iranians to stop their peaceful nuclear program (we are not talking about a nuclear bomb), "only negotiation should be pursued" he added.
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
04:15 AM on 07/11/2010
No politician in America wishes to see Iran succeed. Any nation who has the audacity to throw off an American installed despotic dictator must be punished continuously until they fall compliant under US direction. As for being under the influence of the "neocons left in the State Dept" I disagree and think that the influence is the same influence it was when she lived in the White House herself. Those influencing factions do not change with subsequent administrations
02:44 PM on 05/17/2010
This obsession with Iran is pathololigal. They are no threat to the world. The most they could ever be is the lone power capable of responding to the only nuclear power in the Middle East.
This is neocon fearmongering that has wormed it's way deep into American government.
06:29 PM on 05/17/2010
Absolutely right larce 1948. Those policies can be trace to left-overs from the previous administration deeply ensconced inside the State department.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
11:22 AM on 05/17/2010
The USA puts sanctions on countries that are the boogieman of Israel. Its OK for the CIA/Britain to overthrow the Democratic Govt of Iran in 1953 and this which you never hear:
The aircraft, an Airbus A300B2 operated by Iran Air as IR655, was flying from Bandar Abbas, Iran, to Dubai, UAE, when it was destroyed by the U.S. Navy's guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes, killing all 290 passengers and crew aboard, including 66 children,[1] ranking it the seventh among the deadliest airliner fatalities.[2] anywhere in the world. Vincennes was traversing the Straits of Hormuz, inside Iranian territorial waters, at the time of the attack IR655 was within Iranian airspace.[3]

According to the US government, the crew mistakenly identified the Iranian Airbus A300 as an attacking F-14 Tomcat fighter. The Iranian government maintained that the Vincennes knowingly shot down the civilian aircraft. The event generated a great deal of controversy and criticism of the US. Some analysts have blamed US military commanders and the captain of the Vincennes for reckless and aggressive behavior in a tense and dangerous environment.[4][5]

In 1996, the United States and Iran reached "an agreement of Justice.[6] As part of the settlement, the United States agreed to pay US$61.8 million in compensation to the families of the Iranian victims. However, the United States has never admitted responsibility, nor apologized to Iran.[7]
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
04:24 AM on 07/11/2010
Oh come now. You cannot expect that an air defense cruiser that cost 4 billion dollars would be able to distinguish a Airbus from a Cessna. That is simply asking too much of the technology. (heavy sarcasm)

Can you even imagine the howls of outrage and demands for retribution if an Iranian vessel were to down an American airliner? But they are supposed to suck it up and do as we tell them? Although I do not believe they are pursuing nuclear weapons I wish for the sake of the Iranian people that they would. The sooner the better. That is the only thing that will give them any degree of security.

A friend of mine was operating in the area at this time and tells me the ship was know as "Robocruiser" for it's aggressive belligerent behavior and says that many fellow servicemen were horrified but not exactly surprised when this atrocity occurred.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:01 AM on 05/17/2010
please stop with the axis of evil speech,

and talk about peace.........you might find it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
11:15 AM on 05/17/2010
Talk about peace?? you sound like a sophmore in High School. do you even have a clue of the number of times Irans has thumbed its nose at reasonable resolutions from every side.. including the UN.

Iran wants the bomb and unfortunately will get it.. Obama has conceded it to them.. there is no will to eliminate this capability by force... so, unfortunately the world will be confronted by a nuclear Iran whose leadership dreams of a world wide arrmageden. Nuking Israel will do nicely to bring about this end

http://muslimcontrarian.blogspot.com/2006/06/getting-ready-for-armageddon.html
01:02 PM on 05/17/2010
Are you aware of American and England's dark history in the control of Iran? The Bush administration foreign policy did one thing. It told the world that if you can't defend yourself and we want something you have, we will invade you. Every country in the world should be in fear and doubt when dealing with the United States. We can only wonder at how hysterical our United States will become when oil hist $100 a barrel again.
04:02 PM on 05/17/2010
We're still waiting for some evidence of a weapons program.
04:58 AM on 05/17/2010
Comrades, does this remind you of the manure pile coming from DC before the warmongers destroyed Iraq?
05:42 AM on 05/17/2010
yes, it does yuri nahl . . . it is disgusting . . . they are marching to israel's drum beat yet again . . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
persianadvocate
12:14 AM on 05/17/2010
I didn't realize she was THIS in bed with Israel... wow....
05:43 AM on 05/17/2010
I did . . she was the only Democratic Senator to vote for kyl/lieberman . . and she voted for the illegal invasion of Iraq and never apologised . . they were the two main reasons I did not back her in her bid for the presidency . . and I really do not think she should be secretary of state . . she is too far in the israeli camp . . .
BubbaC33
Jimmy Buffett is the greatest American
09:46 AM on 05/17/2010
Ms. Clinton did not vote for the invasion of Iraq, that is a lie. She voted to give the president the authority to use that as a last resort if democracy failed to produce a positive outcome. Pres. Bush misused the legislation. She has explained this a number of times, perhaps you ought to do some reading before you make such specious charges.
You do realize that if the Soviet Union had not fallen the Arabs would still be client states. Israel has been and continues to be the only honest ally of the US in the entire region.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
11:03 AM on 05/17/2010
NEWSFLASH FOR HILLARY HATERS.. SHE TAKES HER MARHCING ORDERS FROM OBAMA!!

he appointed her and he could demand her resignation.. but not a PEEP!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
12:01 AM on 05/17/2010
Secretary of State Mrs.Clinton is not making the case for the United Nation to impose sanction on Iran. She merely making a case for Israel.
06:49 AM on 05/17/2010
I think hilary should resign as secretary of state and become the israeli pr woman at large
BubbaC33
Jimmy Buffett is the greatest American
09:47 AM on 05/17/2010
Your posting starts with an false statement. You write "I think" and it is clear you have not.
11:47 PM on 05/16/2010
Hillary=Zio nist
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alimostofi
Astrologer, Commentator
05:29 PM on 05/16/2010
Hillary Clinton. If you seriously want to stop the Ayatollahs from wiping out Iran's ancient culture, and spreading their desire to prepare the world for their Armageddon, then target the US companies that are trading with the Ayatollahs and the US. It is very easy to tell HSBC bank, "make a choice, US or Ayatollahs?". You do not need to do go through the convoluted way you are now.

Secondly, the people of Iran have managed to stop a lot of the Islamification of Iran. Much of that resistance has not been reported by the US media. Now wouldn't it be nice if we had more of the non-violent movements' achievements for the past 31 years, reported in the media, and by yourself. I am not talking about the people who are part of this regime and pretend to be the opposition, I am talking about people who put Iranian culture first.

Read and address the right sources for the new Iran. Water the roots that bring lasting peace for all. Remember it was the Iranian culture that gave birth to concepts like Human Rights some 2500 years ago.
05:03 AM on 05/17/2010
Remember, Comrade, when the most important political event in Iran in 30 years, the middle class rioting in the streets was put on the back burner then forgotten so we could watch the tragic death and interesting nuggets about Michael Jackson's death.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
11:07 AM on 05/17/2010
What a bunch of gibberish

First its the Ayatollahs that want to preserve the ancient traditions of Islam including the mysogyny of Shira law

Second - most Iranians do want a more Western culture and they tried to speak up, were imprisoned, tortured and murdered by the maniacal theocratic thugs WHILE OBAMA SAT BY AND SAID AND DID NOTHING!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
11:26 AM on 05/17/2010
patches....you say Obama sat by and did nothing....It is not know just how many secret torture prisons the US has but they seem to be popping up lately....I would say Obama is very busy keeping up with the Bush program...just listen to this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr68Ih7HGA0
02:01 PM on 05/17/2010
Comrade, you must have missed the part where in 1953 or so the CIA orchestrated a coup in Iran , overthrew a democratically elected popular leader, installed the "Shah of Iran" a murdering , torturing butcher, who sucked up to his sponsors in the US and Britain, and allowed them to pillage the Iranian oil again, just like before. This led to the revolution in 1978 or so. And to what exists now. The CIA staged a coup which overthrew a democratically elected government. Keep repeating that . Then all you have to do is fill in the continent. or country. Like south America, Asia, post war Italy. etc. etc. You can find this stuff yourself unless you are completely brainwashed.
03:32 PM on 05/16/2010
What sanctions are involved exactly anyway? There is a notable lack of clarity as to what this entails, and then the question of what would be effective.
Action of this kind must ensure that it is the government and powerful elite (including its clerics) in Iran which feels the pinch, not the public at large which has enough problems already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
11:08 AM on 05/17/2010
Actually your are wrong.. The sanctions, unforunately, must hurt the general public to the point of insurrection because, not matter what ,the elite will never feel the pinch.
11:42 AM on 05/17/2010
Actually I am right. Insurrection has already been going on for some time (admittedly on an intermittent basis - as after last year's elections), and has led to some noticeably barbaric responses without achieving a great deal. Inflicting further misery on the miserable rarely works, and in a police state like Iran, any insurrection is liable to be crushed, eventually as the authorities have the armaments that matter and the means to use them.
I agree though that the elite does not seem to feel the pinch.
Sanctions eventually put a non-violent end to apartheid in South Africa, but that took some 20+ years. I am not sure in the current scheme of things that the Iranians have 20 years to wait. I would need to be convinced that any sanctions can provide a viable result fairly quickly. At the moment, as I stated before, it is not even clear what these sanctions would be, never mind whether they will be effective.
01:52 PM on 05/17/2010
Comrade ,it entails having a whole generation of malnourished ,starving children. Lack of medical supplies. Lack of parts needed for civilized life, so the US can do to Iran what it did to Iraq. Just google till you find what really happened in Iraq with the sanctions. The US played its revolting little games, keeping essential medical supplies out of Iraq. Hurting babies, the average Joe in the street. Not hurting Saddam. When a reporter asked Madelyn Albright "what about these hundreds of thousands of children hurt by these sanctions?" She had some disgusting Nazi reply like "That's the price you have to pay for freedom" some ridiculous crap like that. The United Nations called it "genocide".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MARYHOBE
At last! Finally!
02:13 PM on 05/16/2010
We must take our time and measure our actions well on this one because the stakes are very high. It is also important to figure out what is happening inside Iran that would lead their leadership to embark on such a course. And finally that all this reflection and inquiry not be an excuse for inaction. The internal conflicts in Iran are the main reason for the Iranian rulers decisions in their march toward disaster. Because of the Iranian middle class great patriotism, nationalism and Shia preoccupation with persecution, they feel they can turn the West's concerns into support for their rejected policies. Again, this should not be the reason to not do anything, but rather tell us the way to pursue resolution of this problem. Nobody wants to see the cradle of civilization turned into a desert!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
03:28 PM on 05/16/2010
You do realise that the Iranian nuclear program is so popular amongst every demographic in Iran that even those opposed to the system want to see it continue, and not even Mousavi would come out and say he wanted Iran to give up its rights under the NPT to having the full nuclear energy cycle under their control (with IAEA inspections).

Every time the US gives in to its paranoia and makes an effort to get Iran punished for standing by its rights, it actually gives whoever is in power a boost in support when they tell the Americans (and whoever they can cajole/threaten into going along with them) NO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
persianadvocate
01:41 PM on 05/16/2010
What reason does China have to just "come around"? Israel's pandering? Clinton's pandering for Israel?

lol
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mixpiklix
11:26 AM on 05/16/2010
there has been war going on in that part of the world for centuries there is a mind set of hatred and mistrust that's has been going on forever between islam and everybody else ,now all of a sudden it's all Hillary Clinton's fault be real She didn't start it and Hillary or anybody else is going to stop it. Hell the people of islam hate each other as well . I don't know if I'm a Hillary fan or not but to blame her for the world's problems is way over the top of rationality or to think she can solve them all how stupid
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
03:37 PM on 05/16/2010
I wonder, are you an innocent victim of propaganditist, or someone who is deliberately trying to spread the disease that claimed so many lives over the centuries. (when you add up the deaths of the majority of the wars, the various ethnic cleansing campaigns, including the ones that have been granted special titles, and racially based slavery, you get quite a death toll)