More

Mary Glasspool, First Openly Gay Female Bishop, Ordained By Episcopal Church

05/16/10 12:07 AM ET   AP

Mary Glasspool Ordained

LONG BEACH, Calif. — Seven years after the Episcopal Church caused an uproar by consecrating its first openly gay bishop, it has done the same thing again – only this time with a woman.

The Rev. Canon Mary Glasspool, of Baltimore, was ordained and consecrated on Saturday, making her the second openly gay bishop in church history and one of the first two female bishops in the Diocese of Los Angeles' 114-year history.

She was installed at Long Beach Arena before 3,000 people, who burst into applause at the end, church spokesman Bob Williams said.

Just before the ceremony began, a man stood, shouted about the need to repent and held up a sign that read "Do not be deceived, homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God."

After he was escorted out, a young boy in the same section rose holding a Bible and shouted similar slogans. Security guards also led him out.

The Rev. Canon Diane M. Jardine Bruce, of San Clemente, Calif., was also ordained Saturday.

The two women were elected last December to serve as assistant bishops in the diocese's six-county territory but conservative Episcopalians had urged the church not to ordain Glasspool. The decision to do so highlights a continued Episcopal commitment to accepting same-sex relationships despite enormous pressure from other Anglicans.

Bishop Jon Bruno, who gave a sermon at the ceremony, said he once opposed ordaining women, but now would be happily serving alongside two.

Bruno defended the church's inclusive policies.

"The world's transformed only if we turn to each and every one of our brothers and sisters and see the face of Christ superimposed on them," he told the audience. "The ones we disagree with most are the ones we're obligated to share our lives and teach the most."

The Episcopal Church, which is the Anglican body in the United States, caused turmoil in the church in 2003 by consecrating the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire.

Breakaway Episcopal conservatives have formed a rival church, the Anglican Church in North America.

Several overseas Anglicans have been pressuring Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, spiritual leader of the world's 77 million Anglicans, to officially recognize the new conservative entity.

In 2004, Anglican leaders asked the Episcopal Church for a moratorium on electing another gay bishop while they tried to prevent a permanent break in the fellowship.

Since the request was made, some Episcopal gay priests have been nominated for bishop, but none was elected before Glasspool. In July 2009, the Episcopal General Convention, the U.S. church's top policy making body, affirmed that gay and lesbian priests were eligible to become bishops.

Glasspool and Bruce, who leaves her post as pastor of St. Clement's Episcopal Church in San Clemente, will also be the 16th and 17th women to be elected bishops since the first, Barbara Harris, was selected for such a post in Massachusetts in 1988.

Harris was one of seven bishops who helped consecrate Glasspool at Saturday's ceremony.

Glasspool, 56, an adviser, or canon, for eight years to the Diocese of Maryland's bishop, said in an essay on the Los Angeles diocese Web site that she had an "intense struggle" while in college with her sexuality and the call to become a priest.

She did not speak Saturday, but told a gathering of media Friday that the church's willingness to ordain women and gays shows a commitment that goes beyond mere inclusive language.

"We are being the church we say we are," Glasspool said. "We're not just saying it, we're doing it and there's something very powerful about that."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

LONG BEACH, Calif. — Seven years after the Episcopal Church caused an uproar by consecrating its first openly gay bishop, it has done the same thing again – only this time with a woman. T...
LONG BEACH, Calif. — Seven years after the Episcopal Church caused an uproar by consecrating its first openly gay bishop, it has done the same thing again – only this time with a woman. T...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,384
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Gaylord P Farqua 10:42 AM on 05/16/2010
How can so many narrow minded and sexually repressive prudes get so mad at folks with happy faces and, in this photo great head gear, who like to call themselves gay. They must be "ungay" or unhappy. As long as any individual does not cross any lines and do sexual harm to others their consensual behavior should be left alone. The crusaders for sexual purity or, in many cases voluntary celibacy because no  Read More...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:53 AM on 05/29/2010
i wonder how many people (especially of other faiths) have an issue with her ordaination because they don't believe in female priests, and not because she is a lesbian. i find the catholic church puzzeling. was it not a woman who first carried the blood and body of christ (for 9 months!)? why is it then that women can't be priests and give the body and blood of christ to their congragation?
photo
ez duz it
οὐκ ἔστιν θεός
11:16 PM on 05/25/2010
Alfern Webb:

This is in response to your comment to the post at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/15/mary-glasspool-lesbian-bishop_n_577648.html?show_comment_id=47347056#comment_47347056 :

Anyone who uses words “vitriolic,” “proclivities” and “flaunt” while concurrently invoking a “more humble upbringing” than mine is playing an unconvincing ingénue.

BTW, “conversate” was an excessively obvious touch.

Skip your BS, Alfern Webb.

I said “Talmudic tradition…never puts an anti-Gay spin on the townspeople in the story.” You found that “funny.” To a Jew, nothing is funny about Talmud.

Talmud did not condemn the s*xual practices of the residents of Sodom in Genesis 19. Period!

You say that “Talmud was written by … Priests.”

Your statement does not represent Talmud. Talmud was not written by priests, at all.

Do you really want to conflate pedophilia with homosexuality?

Before you answer, consider the FBI and CDC statistics confirm that an excess of 85% of reported pedophilia cases are perpetrated by heterosexual men on female children. And over 90% of these man-on-female child rapes are committed against family members.

You say you “don't bash homosexuality” or “try to condemn or evangelize anyone that’s Gay.” Please….

Enough of your homophobic crap! Really!
02:20 AM on 05/25/2010
This sounds like the perfect church for those who wish to give the appearance of spirituality while continuing to live sinful lives.

We call them hypocrites. Lots of them in every church, in every living room, behind every keyboard...
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
08:59 AM on 05/25/2010
Looks like you got lost, Snottynose. This is HuffPost, not Rentboy.com.
12:49 AM on 05/25/2010
The Episcopalian church is taking more and more steps in the right direction!
I am a Christian. However, I consider myself to be fairly open-minded. The Bible is up for interpretation and I'm not going to argue with someone throwing verses at me.

Yet, I would like to ask the opposition: Why would God create someone to be gay/lesbian if he thought it was a sin?
Why would God want to stop someone from preaching God's Word?
Why would God create two different, yet equal genders and then subdue one of them?
How does intolerance towards women and homosexuals reflect the loving tolerance of God?
02:10 AM on 05/25/2010
If God created homosexuals, why did He then deem the act so heinous He gave it the immediate sentence of death?
God isn't looking for more preachers, He's looking for people to repent of their sins, which are defined by Him.
02:23 PM on 05/25/2010
May I ask, where in the bible does it say that God created Homosexuals? Homosexuality has always been a sin in Gods eyes. (see Sodom & Gomorrah, 1 Cor 6:9-11, Rom 1:26,27) Same as fornication, adultery and idolatry to name a few.

The bible is only up for interpretation when it's convenient to fit an agenda. This reasoning is the reason why the Bible isn't being consulted because people think you can serve God but have your own personal spin to it.

God stop creating humans. He created the first human pair and they created off spring thereafter. As stated in the Genesis account, he stop creating things. So after Adam and Eve disobeyed God, they introduced sin and death to all humans thereafter.

God is not responsible for person "choosing" to be gay/ lesbian. Its their choice.
photo
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul
11:53 PM on 05/25/2010
Oh yeah, and you would never have your own personal spin.
photo
ez duz it
οὐκ ἔστιν θεός
12:14 AM on 05/26/2010
May I ask, where in the Bible does it say that God did not create Homosexuals?

As you say, "The bible is only up for interpretation when it's convenient to fit an agenda."

It's quite clear that your agenda is to use the Bible to condemn Gay people.

Genesis 19 is not a condemnation of homosexuality. See: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/15/mary-glasspool-lesbian-bishop_n_577648.html?show_comment_id=47347056#comment_47347056.

The Christians who condemn gays in Romans 1 condemn themselves in Romans 2.

If you knew Biblical Greek, 1 Corinthians 6:9 does not condemn Gay people.

A Gay person has as much choice in "choosing" to be Gay as a heterosexual has a choice in being heterosexual. Prove, otherwise.
11:08 AM on 05/24/2010
I guess they ignore these 2 scriptures:

1 Timothy 1:11,12: "Let a woman learn in silence with full submissiveness.I do not permit a woman to teach, or to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence"

Romans 1:26,27: "That is why God gave them up to disgraceful sexual appetites, for both their females changed the natural use of themselves into one contrary to nature; and likewise even the males left the natural use of the female and became violently inflamed in their lust toward one another, males with males, working what is obscene and receiving in themselves the full recompense, which was due for their error.

God loves his creation. However, God has limits and these scriptures show that he does not condone what this Church is doing.
photo
Angel1999
Microbiologist & Historian
10:45 PM on 05/24/2010
Luckily for us our laws and constitution are based on secular law not biblical law. I really couldn't care less what Paul says about homosexuality. For those of us who are not Christian I reject your imposition of religious law on me. I follow my own religious persuasion and it has no rules against homosexuality. But I hope you'll believe that I have no intention of trying to get Congress to pass laws that require you to have sex with someone of the same gender.
02:11 AM on 05/25/2010
The subject is a church condoning sin, which is a Bozo no-no. The secular argument-- embraced by this church, seemingly--is that sin is relative. Not so, bozo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
12:03 AM on 05/27/2010
Bravo! And faved.

Meanwhile from elsewhere:

> you are judging the these issues from the standpoint of a "civilized" Westerner looking at the "backwards" Africans.

That may very well be, but my point in providing the link was that many Africans view things in similar terms. And viewing the world from my perch as someone with English ancestry, I can honestly say, "Thank God for Italian missionaries and the Norman French!"

> If the Europeans had never come, these people would have continued living their lives just as they had before. Most tribal cultures (African, American, Asian, Australian) were completely unaware of how bad off they were until Europeans came to tell them how bad off they were.

That's always a dangerous road to start down. The same argument was made against abolitionists, who were "stirring up" the slaves who were "content" until those troublemakers showed up. And few people in India would trade their British-inspired democratic system for the rule of warlords and rajahs that existed before.

The one country in Africa that completely escaped colonialism (except for a blink of an eye under Mussolini) was Ethiopia, and nobody looking at Ethiopia today would say that the country's virtually uninterrupted history of self-government prepared it for anything of value to its own people.
KennebunkportIndependent
Back in my day, we had NINE planets.
02:35 PM on 05/25/2010
I just quoted the Timothy verse to my wife. Does anybody know how the convertible sofabed works???
11:07 PM on 05/23/2010
And what does this church believe happened to Lot's people? Love to hear their views on that chapter of history.
photo
Angel1999
Microbiologist & Historian
10:47 PM on 05/24/2010
Lot's people were destroyed, according to the biblical story, for violating the rules of hospitality, which were far more important in that period than they are now. The city people attempted violence against guests who had claimed guest right, and that was a killing offense. The interpretation that this had something to do with sex, was something that was added much later in the Church's history.
02:13 AM on 05/25/2010
Gee, I don't recall any admonitions in scripture about imposing the death sentence for the great sin of inhospitality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shatner99
05:54 PM on 05/23/2010
hurray for Donald Sutherland.
02:53 AM on 05/22/2010
When a church condones sin, then that church has left Christ and gone after the world. And a church without Jesus isn't worthy of attending.
12:34 PM on 05/22/2010
Yep, that's why I left the Southern Baptists. Condoning greed, selfishness, usury and a host of other financial sins in the name of convenience is antithetical to the teachings of Jesus Christ. I'll stick with a truly Christian church, the Episcopal Church, rather than cling to the kind of faith that's not only let the money-changers back into the temple, but given them the keys to the pastor's office.
photo
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul
05:29 PM on 05/22/2010
Excellent.
KennebunkportIndependent
Back in my day, we had NINE planets.
02:37 PM on 05/25/2010
Fanned!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:24 PM on 05/22/2010
That's why the Catholics aren't considered a Christian Church anymore! Oh wait... pedophiles are ok but gays are evil. I forgot.
photo
JJovana
Live & let live
09:19 PM on 05/21/2010
Great day for women and gays. When will you silly Bible thumpers realize that God did not write your precious tool-for-hate-that-only-satisfies-your-own-agenda? Jesus would b**ch smack you if he "comes" again and sees the horses**t that people preach in his name.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josephRoehl
RainbowHumanityRising, 600 million
05:55 AM on 05/21/2010
Jesus was gay or bisexual. There's little doubt that the story of the rich young man who spent the night with Jesus was a story of love. God so loved the world and diversity that He made samesex pairbonds in most higher species that have flourished for millions of years before that so-called absolute-truth-as-dogma collection of diverse stories brought humans into dogma-slavery under the control of priest-warrior-kings. The bible also promotes slavery and the exploitation of every bit of the earth and these male-patriarchist master scrolls keep women as men's property as well as children. If God spoke to certain prophets for 2000 years, then God is gay because He's still teaching new truth, just as the Bible claimants enforced cods that kept women from being taught to read, nor slaves, and said the Sun went around the Earth...but such is the history of nonsenses that are easily disproved by science today.
02:54 AM on 05/22/2010
Matthew 19 gives an interesting view of gay marriage.
photo
Angel1999
Microbiologist & Historian
10:48 PM on 05/24/2010
Luckily for us our laws and constitution are based on secular law not biblical law. I really couldn't care less what the Bible says about homosexuality. For those of us who are not Christian I reject your imposition of religious law on me. I follow my own religious persuasion and it has no rules against homosexuality. But I hope you'll believe that I have no intention of trying to get Congress to pass laws that require you to have sex with someone of the same gender.
photo
Angel1999
Microbiologist & Historian
11:15 PM on 05/24/2010
Also, that was specifically addressing divorce, not gay marriage. I think you're overinterpreting that verse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josephRoehl
RainbowHumanityRising, 600 million
05:54 AM on 05/21/2010
For God so loved the world that "According to the US Biblical scholar, Morton Smith, of Columbia University, a fragment of manuscript he found at the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem in 1958, showed that the full text of St. Mark chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the Bible) includes the passage:

"And the youth, looking upon him (Jesus), loved him and beseeched that he might remain with him. And going out of the tomb, they went into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days, Jesus instructed him and, at evening, the youth came to him wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".



http://www.petertatchell.net/religion/jesus.htm
KennebunkportIndependent
Back in my day, we had NINE planets.
05:51 PM on 05/22/2010
Ah, Archbishop Peter Tatchell. Man on a mission with a big agenda.....
09:27 AM on 05/19/2010
too many grand-standers in the episcopal church. walk into an episcopal church on any given sunday and there at least five or six people up on the alter at any given time. hey - how about just one person on the alter performing mass. the alter isnt a stage "just to be seen" on.
photo
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul
06:56 PM on 05/19/2010
It's not to say you must like or agree w/ the liturgical worship service. Certainly what you perceive as "grand standing" could be the very formal services you have attended. It can be very formal w/ vestments, music and incense (high church). It simply may not be your cup of tea. An Episcopal service can also be very informal and w/ contemporary music (low church). It can be a mixture which is called broad church. Most services have a dance like quality to it and learning the rhythm of it all may take time, but it is rich in the visual and nuanced w/ its language. The service nurtures the senses and envelops the participants w/ a sense of the divine. But if all you see is a stage "just to be seen" than perhaps you haven't given much study to it nor does it appear that you care to do so. It obviously isn't for you. I certainly don't go bashing other worship styles. BTW, I've never seen an "alter" at a service, but I have seen an"altar".
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
11:40 PM on 05/20/2010
Of course the altar is a stage and to be seen on it conveys great power. Why else would priests be on equal social footing as doctors and lawyers. That stage gives great power to the ignorant and so they flock to it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:50 AM on 05/18/2010
The English word "bishop" comes from the Greek word "episkopos", an over-seer.
If the term had originated a few centuries later, Latin would probably be used, and a bishop would be a "supervisor." Somehow "supervisor" doesn't sound quite so churchy.

Of course, a bishop is really the same thing as a presbyter, which means an old dude.
( Well, sort of.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
01:36 AM on 05/18/2010
What is " Openly Gay" ? or it is when you think nobody don't know your secret but YOU.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
09:41 AM on 05/18/2010
why don't you google the term and perhaps you'll become more informed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
11:12 AM on 05/18/2010
I did Google it, it said up Catholic Priest.
12:52 AM on 05/18/2010
Invasion of the cone-heads! Male or female, religious leaders are myth-makers, try to control individual freedom and appropriate wealth, and are anti-rationale. And, they are accountable for many historic wars.
photo
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul
06:24 AM on 05/18/2010
Yeah, that last Episcopal uprising was a doozy. As I erroneously recall, those cone-head hats were very handy when engaged in combat. They made awesome sword-like weapons that pierce the very souls of those who oppose them. Beware, those Episcopalians are not a peaceable bunch!
10:30 AM on 05/18/2010
We are pretty crazy. Look out, we'll hymn you to death! Also, potlucks.