iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Elena Kagan Gay Rumors: Should We Even Ask About Supreme Court Nominee's Sexuality?

Elena Kagan

MARTHA IRVINE   05/17/10 12:19 PM ET   AP

She plays softball. Huge hint, right?

She's 50, single and has a short haircut. Yup, definitely a lesbian.

Or is she? And if so (though that appears to be a big "if"), so what? Should it matter?

These are questions that have circulated about Elena Kagan for a while. But since President Barack Obama introduced her as his next nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court a week ago, the speculation has never been greater – or the handling of it more awkward.

It's a sign that, in a nation where gayness is as mainstream as ever, sexual orientation is still a delicate topic for anyone in America, across the spectrum of beliefs and politics.

"Even the leadership of the Democratic party is still uncomfortable handling the issue," says Kenneth Sherrill, a political scientist at New York's Hunter College who specializes in the politics of gay and lesbian rights.

"They don't know how to handle the question with a 'So what if she is?'"

And should we even be asking, anyway?

Polls, after all, show that Americans are increasingly accepting of lesbians and gay men. Popular TV shows like "Modern Family" often have gay characters and plotlines. And these days, it's common for people to say they have a family member or friend who's gay.

Yet this also is a country where, for gay public officials, coming out is still often a big deal. And while many Americans are generally more accepting of gay men and lesbians, only 39 percent of adults support the legalization of same-sex marriage, according to a recent poll from the Pew Research Center.

Those are tough issues to ignore when you're talking about the highest court in the land, which may well end up tackling the issue of same-sex marriage at the federal level.

"In a perfect world, we would not be talking about this. However, it is understandable that, at this time, it would be a risk for a Supreme Court nominee to be perceived as a homosexual," says Mark Osler, a professor at Baylor Law School in Waco, Texas, who has argued cases before the Supreme Court.

"It would appear, at least from the Obama administration's reaction, that they don't think the country's ready for that conversation," he says. "And they may well be right."

The irony in all of this is that Kagan may very well be straight.

A White House official told The Associated Press on Friday that Kagan said she was not a lesbian after media reports on the issue first surfaced while Obama was contemplating his choices for the court. The official would provide the statement only on condition of anonymity.

Eliot Spitzer, who attended Princeton with Kagan and who resigned as New York governor over a prostitution scandal, told Politico: "I did not go out with her, but other guys did."

The recent days' eruption of conversation, though, isn't the first. On April 15, four weeks before Obama nominated Kagan, the White House rebuked CBS News for publishing an online column by a Republican blogger who wrote that Kagan could become the "first openly gay justice."

White House spokesman Ben LaBolt publicly criticized the item, saying it made "false charges," a term that upset those who thought the word "charges" made it sound like there would be something wrong if Kagan were a lesbian. LaBolt later said he was referring to the blogger's suggestions that Obama had an ulterior political motive: to please gay rights activists important to his campaign operation.

Then came the announcement last Monday that Kagan was the president's choice. By day's end, "Elena Kagan personal life" was among the top searches on Google, an indication that the public was curious about more than just her stance on the issues.

Some say that posing the sexual orientation question is just another way to undercut powerful women who are routinely held to a different standard for everything from the way they dress to the way they wear their hair, or even their emotions.

"No man (who's nominated for the Supreme Court) would be asked this question," insists Birute Regine, author of the book "Iron Butterflies: Women Transforming Themselves and The World."

Back in 1990, when now retired Justice David Souter was confirmed, his "bachelor" status was noted but his sexual orientation was never questioned, at least not publicly. Gay rumors did, however, regularly circulate about former Attorney General Janet Reno and about Donna Shalala, the former head of the U.S. Health and Human Services.

Shalala responded to claims that she was a lesbian that came not from conservatives, but from a gay organization whose aim was to "out" public officials. "Have I lived an alternative lifestyle? The answer is no," she said in an interview with The Capital Times newspaper in Madison, Wis., in 1993, when she was a nominee for her federal post.

Though no male Supreme Court nominee has faced these questions – nor have the women on the high court, who have all been married – the fact is that male public figures, whether politicians, celebrities or sports figures, regularly deal with speculation about their sexual orientation, too.

Rumors that New York Mets catcher Mike Piazza was gay were so persistent, for instance, that he had a press conference in 2002 to make it clear that he was straight. At the time, he said that players would accept an openly gay teammate. "In this day and age, it's irrelevant," he said. "I don't think it would be a problem at all."

It would seem that it's about as "irrelevant" today, though few believe a similar news conference from Kagan is likely.

Even without one, though, this isn't a question members of the mainstream media usually ask. And some think that's the way it should've stayed.

"The press needs to be grown-ups themselves and decide that there is no reason to write about this aspect of a person's private life," says James Gomes, director of the politically oriented Mosakowski Institute of Public Enterprise at Clark University in Worcester, Mass. The media, he says, "should be more dignified."

Regardless, many bloggers from a wide spectrum of viewpoints continue to call for Kagan to declare her sexual orientation.

"It's time we got over the myth that what a public servant does in his private life is of no consequence," wrote Bryan Fischer, who blogs for the conservative American Family Association and doesn't think a lesbian should hold such a powerful post.

Some gay bloggers, meanwhile, implied that Kagan should make a public statement out of respect for herself and the gay community.

"In a free society in the 21st century, it is not illegitimate to ask," wrote Andrew Sullivan, a gay blogger for The Atlantic. "And it is cowardly not to tell."

___

AP reporters Charles Babington and Julie Pace in Washington contributed to this report.

___

Martha Irvine is an AP national writer. She can be reached at mirvine(at)ap.org or via http://twitter.com/irvineap

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
She plays softball. Huge hint, right? She's 50, single and has a short haircut. Yup, definitely a lesbian.
She plays softball. Huge hint, right? She's 50, single and has a short haircut. Yup, definitely a lesbian.
Filed by Michael Falcone  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 707
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
12:51 AM on 05/18/2010
No.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
highflag
11:42 PM on 05/17/2010
If Ms. Kagan is a lesbian, then it's her choice whether to share that with the public, or not. She's the only one with "rights" in this scenario. We, the public have absolutely no "right" to know.

What would we do with the information, if we had it? Are we seriously contemplating, in 2010, disqualifying someone from holding a public office (or seat, in this case) because of their sexual orientation?

Apparently the current "some of my best friends are gay" attitude is just talk. When faced with an opportunity to display our new, evolved status, we still fail the test.

Archie Bunker would be so proud...
11:08 PM on 05/17/2010
I have to laugh at the spokesman from the American Family Association. Some of the people who belong to such associations that promote traditional family values are some of the most opinionated, nosiest, cynical, close-minded people we have in this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1kant2
10:50 PM on 05/17/2010
YES!!!!! Yes we have a right to know whether or not she is gay! That is of course assuming that you want to live in a country were racism and bigotry is allowed and defended. That is of course if you want to live in a country where your job employment opportunities are are determined based on whether you are white enough, masculine enough, pretty enough, whether you will fall in line and behave like a good fundamentalist. I say this because the only people who seem to care about whether or not she is gay are old, white men who think that everyone in the country should be just like them, or at least wish they were. There is a name for this and it is called prejudice. Now you, yes you reading the comment, gets to decide if you are going to continue to enable this crap in the country or if you are finally going to take a stand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
10:49 PM on 05/17/2010
No no no no no no no no no mo no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
10:23 PM on 05/17/2010
NO
photo
FalstaffsMind
"This isn't right, this isn't even wrong." - Pauli
10:08 PM on 05/17/2010
No. It's utterly immaterial to their work on the bench.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcabowers
People are more important than money
09:57 PM on 05/17/2010
. . We need to strive to be a society in which the sexuality of any nominee for any office is basically an uninteresting and irrelevant question.
photo
ryker88
Only the pure in heart can make a good soup.
10:18 PM on 05/17/2010
Absolutely!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:48 PM on 05/17/2010
This question is silly. It's half a question. Now, if you're asking should we ask to get it on the record, the answer to the question, whether you like it or not, is yes. If you're asking should we ask so that it could be used as some absolute disqualifying factor, then the answer is no. As a firm believer in knowing what you're getting, we should and be required to know. Just like a credit check is performed on applicants for certain types of fiduciary/security positions entrusted with a company's assets, there should be full disclosure for those applicants/nominees entrusted with our most precious assets.... our laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LonosCurse
Some may never live, but the crazy never die
09:22 PM on 05/17/2010
It doesn't matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EbonBear
opinionated hairy man
09:08 PM on 05/17/2010
None of our business. There are legitimate reasons to be uncomfortable with Kagan's nomination but this isn't one of them.
photo
jukesgrrl
Hands off SS, Medicare & Medicaid
08:47 PM on 05/17/2010
I find it impossible to believe that we haven't ALREADY had a homosexual Justice. And, yet, the Republic has survived. Not. An. Issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LonosCurse
Some may never live, but the crazy never die
09:18 PM on 05/17/2010
Preseident James Buchanan was gay.
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
02:35 AM on 05/18/2010
Maybe. Maybe Lincoln, too.
08:02 PM on 05/17/2010
This is a side issue and a distraction. The really important questions are her support of Bush's indefinite unconstitutional detention policy and her sparse background. She wrote very little for an academic, has no judicial experience and has been a poor advocate as Solicitor General. See May 7th piece at
http://ofthisandthat.org/LettertoPresident.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
texastrixie
I invented the internet.
07:55 PM on 05/17/2010
Next we're going to asking someone who is married questions about the frequency of their lovelife. If you're not married and cheating, who cares?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trying this again
07:39 PM on 05/17/2010
Should we care? As long as she does her job to the best of her ability, whose business is it of ours?