iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran & Turkey Agree To Uranium Swap In Nuclear Deal

Iran Turkey Uranium

ALI AKBAR DAREINI and GEORGE JAHN   05/17/10 07:16 PM ET   AP

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran agreed Monday to ship much of its low-enriched uranium abroad and then rolled out a new obstacle to nuclear compromise by insisting it would press ahead with higher enrichment – bringing it closer to being able to make atomic warheads.

The deal forged with Turkey and Brazil appeared to be another attempt to stave off U.N. sanctions – a doubtful endeavor judging by reactions from the United States and other Western powers.

The White House showed deep skepticism about the pact, warning it still allows Iran to keep enriching uranium toward the pursuit of a nuclear weapon.

"Given Iran's repeated failure to live up to its own commitments, and the need to address fundamental issues related to Iran's nuclear program, the United States and international community continue to have serious concerns," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said.

Still, by involving Turkey and Brazil, Iran ramped up the pressure on Washington over additional U.N. sanctions.

The deal moves these two influential Security Council members closer to Tehran and presents the U.S. and its Western allies with a bloc of developing nations that back Iran's right to pursue a nuclear program.

In announcing the accord, Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim and his Turkish counterpart, Ahmet Davutoglu, said Tehran has the right to "a full nuclear fuel cycle, including enrichment activities for peaceful purposes" and condemned any new sanctions against Iran.

Both countries are important for Washington – Brazil is South America's largest nation and has a dominant role on the continent, while Turkey, a key NATO ally and a traditional regional U.S. mainstay, has moved to develop an increasingly independent voice.

While they have no Security Council veto, both are skeptical of the U.S.-led drive for a fourth set of Security Council sanctions to punish Tehran's refusal to stop its enrichment activities.

And the Iranian maneuver could weaken growing resolve by Russia and China – which do have veto power – to support new sanctions.

Moscow and Beijing were responsible for watering down the language of previous anti-Iran sanctions but appeared to swing behind the U.S., Britain and France recently.

The deal announced Monday calls for Iran to ship 1,200 kilograms (2,640 pounds) of low-enriched uranium to Turkey, where it would be stored. In exchange, Iran would receive, within one year, higher-enriched fuel rods to be used in a U.S.-built medical research reactor.

The pact mirrors a swap proposed last October in which Iran would have shipped the same amount of low-enriched uranium to Russia in exchange for higher-enriched material for its research reactor. That deal fell apart over Tehran's insistence that the swap take place on Iranian soil.

On its face, the latest plan seems a significant concession, with Iran agreeing to ship its material to be stored in Turkey and wait up to a year for higher-enriched uranium from France and Russia.

However, Iran is believed to have much more nuclear material stockpiled now.

In October, swapping 1,200 kilograms (2,640 pounds) would have left Iran with less than the 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds) of material needed to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb.

Since then, Iran has continued to churn out low-enriched material and started enriching uranium to an even higher level – from 3.5 percent to near 20 percent. While Tehran insists it has no nuclear arms ambitions, it could produce weapons grade uranium much more quickly from the 20 percent level.

In March, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran's stockpile stood at around 2,100 kilograms (4,600 pounds). It has likely grown to an estimated 2,300 kilograms – about 5,000 pounds, or more than twice the amount needed to produce enough material for a bomb, according to David Albright of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security, which has tracked Iran for signs of covert proliferation.

From the West's point of view, that destroys much of the incentive for an agreement – and Iran's decision to continue its program to enrich to near 20 percent poses an even greater hurdle.

Western nations insisted Monday they remained on the sanctions track.

"Our position on Iran is unchanged," said Prime Minister David Cameron's spokesman, Steve Field. "Iran has an obligation to reassure the international community, and until it does so, we will continue to work with our international partners on a sanctions resolution in the United Nations Security Council."

French Foreign Ministry spokesman Bernard Valero agreed, saying the world was awaiting "credible answers from Iran" on its nuclear agenda.

For his part, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev cautiously welcomed the agreement but said it may fail to fully satisfy the international community. He alluded to Iran's intention to continue its higher-enrichment activities as a cause for concern.

Even as the agreement was announced, Iran said it would continue to enrich uranium to higher levels. "Of course, enrichment of uranium to 20 percent will continue inside Iran," Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast told the official news agency IRNA.

That stance is bound to feed international suspicions about a nuclear program Tehran has long insisted is peaceful since the original rationale for enriching to 20 percent was that foreign countries were refusing to provide the fuel rods needed for Iran's research reactor.

"There is no apparent civilian use for this material," the British Foreign Office said, adding that the decision to continue higher enrichment "underlines Iran's disregard for efforts to engage it in serious negotiation."

Monday's deal was announced after talks between Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Tehran.

If Iran does not receive the fuel rods within a year, Turkey will be required to "quickly and unconditionally" return the uranium to Iran, according to a joint declaration by the three nations. Iran feared that under the initial U.N. deal, if a swap fell through, its uranium stock could be seized permanently.

Erdogan said that once Iran received the fuel rods, Turkey will hand the Iranian low-enriched uranium to whatever country provided the fuel. Still the agreement did not specify that – an omission that could open the path to a possible claim by Tehran even if it receives fuel rods from abroad.

___

Jahn reported from Vienna. Associated Press writers Suzan Fraser in Ankara, Turkey, and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this report.

___

Online:

The agreement _

http://www.mfa.gov.tr/17-mayis-2010-tarihli-turkiye_-iran-brezilya-disisleri-bakanlari-ortak-deklarasyonu.tr.mfa

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran agreed Monday to ship much of its low-enriched uranium abroad and then rolled out a new obstacle to nuclear compromise by insisting it would press ahead with higher enrichmen...
TEHRAN, Iran — Iran agreed Monday to ship much of its low-enriched uranium abroad and then rolled out a new obstacle to nuclear compromise by insisting it would press ahead with higher enrichmen...
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 545
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zanubiyah
07:39 PM on 05/19/2010
Iran basiclly pulled the rug out from under the unflexable/Isreali, US stance.

If the US pushes the sanctions, Iran will pull out of the deal with the Turks and Brazilians.

The Obama/Netenyahu administration has put itself between the hammer and the anvil.

The Obama part lost it's whipping boy, and the Netenyahu part now cant use Iran to defelct from thier own nuclear programme...and bringing themselves as a nation into the same laws, and regulations as the rest of the world has to follow.

This shows too, that Iran isnt as 'isolated' as the western media wants Americans to think. The Iranians simply dont trust the Obama/Netenyahu administration' foriegn policy agenda, and looked for an honest broker...a willing partner to solve the conflict rather than a partner with an alternative agends.
10:03 AM on 05/19/2010
Again, this whole Iran issue is only being pushed by people whose loyalties are with Israel and it is to the detriment of America's interests. It is based on Israeli lies and purposeful distortions. What a shameful attempt at distortion on their part in order to lead the US into another proxy war based on nothing, for Israels benefit. The tail wagging the dog. There is really nothing in this whole Iran thing, it is a smoke screen. Iran has not broken a single article of the NPT, and there is no evidence behind anything essential they are being accused of. Just find out the actual facts by doing a little research. The war drums, fear mongering, racism, all the rest, and all the noise we are hearing is AIPAC/Israel lobby/ Israel firsters/ Israeli agitation-propaganda trying to get their way and have America fight a war for Israel which is not in the US interests...just like Iraq ( c.f. Office of Special Plans OSP). Remember Iraq and Iran were/are the 2 major foreign policy threats to Israel, not America. Reject and ignore all the propaganda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
streetmagik
You can't fight in here this is the war room!!
06:52 PM on 05/18/2010
They are going ahead with the sanctions anyway. Good. Obama is no punk, he is not going to be outfoxed so easily. Iran agrees to ship out 1200kg - since that offer was put on the table 6 months by the west ago Iran has enriched twice that much.

They will slowly give it to Turkey while at the same time enriching more then they give away - this way they maintain a stockpile and continue to develop and refine their industry - a trick really to play for time.

But Obama is the real deal, he does not fall so easily for tricks - when he says "Iran your not getting a bomb" he means it. If he has really kept Russia and China on board then he is also a very capable diplomat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zanubiyah
11:08 PM on 05/18/2010
All of that in the media is fluff.

You have to admit, your Sec Clinton got the rug pulled out of her arrogant rant.

Maybe that was what Iran was waiting on...the predictible arrogance of the Obama administration lead by Sec Clinton...to embarrass them.

Want salt with that hat?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
streetmagik
You can't fight in here this is the war room!!
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
04:36 PM on 05/18/2010
i am admittedly uninformed about something. how closely related/intertwined are brazil and venezuela?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:54 PM on 05/18/2010
“War against a foreign country only happens when the moneyed classes think they are going to profit from it.”
-George Orwell
05:33 PM on 05/18/2010
Nice.
Read Orwell and understand the world.
08:23 PM on 05/18/2010
Ah yes...and my favorite of them all, "Men sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-George Orwell
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:35 AM on 05/18/2010
US: Iran nuclear deal will not halt sanctions plan: http://rawstory.com/news/afp/US_Iran_nuclear_deal_will_not_halt__05172010.html

The US has let it be known that no matter what Iran does, the march to war is still on. I guess only we the people can stop this madness and hopefully, if it comes down to it, we will be out in force to make our voices known. Not that it helped with TARP or the endless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but one can always hope. :-)
08:57 AM on 05/18/2010
We cannot engage in a war with Iran. We do not have the capacity to so and pretending otherwise does not change that fact.
01:36 PM on 05/18/2010
Iran just exposed what it always believed was the real intention of the U.S. (I mean AIPAC), and some of the European countries. They knew all along that the nuclear issue was just a pretext and an excuse. The U.S. never had any real intention of negotiating in good faith with Iran. However, the best outcome of this is that Iran just broke the grip of the U.S. and a few former European colonialists that they are not the world. There is now a division within the members of the UN. Turkey, and Brazil and Lebanon will not back sanctions. China will water it down, and I am sure so will Russia. The U.S. demonstrated for all to see, that all of its talk smaks of double standards and hypocrisy. It is incapable of forcing Israel to take any measures with respect to signing the NPT or agreeing to a nuclear free zone Middle East, or negotiating a just and fair peace agreement with the Palestinians.

If the U.S. proceeds down this path - this will be the last chance for any negotiations with Iran - Iran will never trust the U.S. again. Good job Hillary!
04:04 AM on 05/18/2010
Why did HP bury this story under some random British Banknote story in the Int'l section? I mean either give the story the coverage and discussion it deserves or just don't cover it and stick to Linsay and Gosslin stories...thats your bread and butter anyway
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
03:29 AM on 05/18/2010
i have heard the neocon and others suggest we need to war with iran and it has been a drumbeat.

this time will the public have any say in the matter? will it be like the old days of vietnam when people took to the streets? not that the people matter.
chomsky and many others suggest we are intentionally made to be fearful, that we always need some kind of manufactured enemy to keep us all in line.
this seems to be another fear mongering situation to keep the military industrial complex alive?
08:47 AM on 05/18/2010
Not enough will take to the streets, Why? Because we have other Americans who fight our wars for us. Which is why i have always been in favor of a mandatory draft when a war is pursued. This would ensure that only an essential war is pursued......today, we just send volunteers to die in our stead. Such is the extent of our moral fiber today.
01:47 AM on 05/18/2010
This agreement, signed during G15 meeting in Tehran with two non-aligned member nations, empowers the non-aligned movement for the first time in its history. Thus creating a "third option" in this world of diplomacy and weakens western dominance. A genius move by Iran.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:41 AM on 05/18/2010
Sure ya right! a genius move. Kudos to Iran, Brazil, and Turkey. I don't understand why Isreal can have these things and not Iran. Iran have to defend itself too, right? I think its a dam shame for any country to have the capacity to blow up another civilization.(some macho inferiority bullcrap).
photo
yourbuffers
Question liberal orthodoxy, support liberty.
01:20 AM on 05/18/2010
just a stalling tactic used by iran. dont be naive.

full speed ahead on sanctions barry!
01:42 AM on 05/18/2010
good luck.
06:31 AM on 05/18/2010
And why is that? Do you have any clue what sanctions do the people of a country? Did you care about the 500,000 innocent children who died due to our sanctions placed on Iraq? Do you understand that sanctions are nothing but a pre-lude to war? Does this country need to continuously create enemies and isolate itself? Do you understand that Iran is within its rights to nuclear enrichment and under the agreement which guarantees the signatories to this agreement - the NPT - Iran is not in violation? Would you agree that we need a nuclear free zone Middle East? Do you agree to peaceful nuclear energy for all, nuclear weapons for none?
08:53 AM on 05/18/2010
Yeah, I always wanted to support Saddam Hussein. He was such a benevolent supreme leader. We probably should have been sending him UN aid. Also, it was a huge mistake to not let him retain the province of Kuwait.and the Holy Land of Saudi Arabia next. Sorry, our bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eileenflemingWAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
10:38 PM on 05/17/2010
Reuters quoted Ahmadinejad: "Following the signing of the nuclear fuel swap deal, it is time ... to enter talks with Iran based on honesty, justice and mutual respect."

The preamble to the NPT calls on nuclear weapons states to cease manufacturing of NW and to liquidate existing stockpiles.

Countries without nuclear weapons that signed the NPT, such as Iran, were promised full support in developing other nuclear technologies in exchange for renouncing nuclear weapons. The five nuclear powers that signed the NPT agreed to get rid of their nuclear weapons.

At the 1995 NPT conference, member states unanimously supported a resolution backing the idea of "a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons as well as other weapons of mass destruction."

At this years NPT Review, Egypt issued a paper calling for an international treaty conference by 2011 to launch negotiations between all states of the Middle East, for the establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle East.

The three undeclared nuclear powers- India, Pakistan and Israel-have all refused to sign the NPT, and thus are ‘exempt’ from international inspections.

But, in 1986, the world learned that Israel had already developed between 100-200 atomic bombs and had begun to develop neutron bombs and thermonuclear weapons, after Mordechai Vanunu, a lowly tech, provided two rolls of photographic proof...

"Reigniting the NPT" @
http://www.wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1715&Itemid=233
Peabodies
We are the Many. They are the Few.
10:02 PM on 05/17/2010
This diplomatic development, is, to me, a good thing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
09:50 PM on 05/17/2010
I'd been hoping that the US would take this opportunity to stop running its scam on UNSC sanctions, but it seems that it won't (not that I was expecting it to, but I had hoped).

So now the question becomes how long can it continue to run the scam until it blows up in their face, and how badly it blows up.

Will that blowup cause the US to turn its back on the UN? Probably (at least until it needs it again, but thatmight be when it is asking the UN to protect it)

Could that blowup take out the NPT? No, too many countries like it, but it is likely to shake up the power structure, and the nuclear weapon states and those outside the treaty will become the number one priority.

Could it take out the 5 thrones of the UNSC? Well, it is likely to get at least one of them pulled out from under its present occupant, and put under someone who comes from the southern side of the globe, but it could actually take out all 5 (at least partially, you may still have permament and rotating members, but I don't think there will still be vetoes, and the balance will also shift)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
streetmagik
You can't fight in here this is the war room!!
10:21 PM on 05/17/2010
gee those are some pretty deep questions.

You think the NPT is going to be run by the countries who don't already have the nuclear technology - that would be a neat trick - doubtful but you are allowed to dream Richard.

As to the US needing the UN's protection, from who? Iran? Are you kidding? I think you slightly exaggerate the threat Iran poses to the US on the diplomatic arena. You think your hero Ahmadienjad is going to turn the whole world against the US?

I think Obama and Clinton are a step too nimble for that.

Here is a question - Will the NPT be worth the paper it is written on if Iran starts a nuclear arms race in the middle east?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
12:17 AM on 05/18/2010
Point 1, I think the NPT is going to be run by those who have nuclear technology and not nuclear weapons (and there are more of those countries than ones with nuclear weapons)

Point 2, the US might need protection from unilateral sanctions being applied to it. You might want to consider what would be the effect if the US was cut off from the materials it needs for high tech items (you might want to look at what goes into the battery in your cellphone, the chips in your computer). It is not that Iran might turn the whole world against the US, it is that the US seems determined to to drive the majority of the world away from it (you do know that the NAM, which does in fact represent the majority of the world, is on the other side of this issue from the US, and knows that if they don't draw a line on the US habit of rewriting the rules whenever they please.

As for the NPT becoming worthless if Iran were to get the bomb, well, Israel seems to be the one who is likely to set off an arms race in the ME, and when everyone sees that facts don't matter, only the whims of the US, how much do you think the NPT is worth these days.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GCitizen
Global Citizen
12:26 AM on 05/18/2010
Israel has already started a nuclear arms race in the ME.
08:50 AM on 05/18/2010
Iran will attain production of nuclear weapons. The rest of your posits are then irrelevant.
08:05 PM on 05/17/2010
China in the catbird seat on Iran

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/LE06Ad01.html
07:46 PM on 05/17/2010
China is not going to allow further sanctions, especially after this step, nor are they going to sit idly by should Iran come under attack

The Iran chip in Sino-Saudi relations

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/LE18Ak01.html

At this point, China is the most resistant to adopting any form of crippling sanctions against Iran. In spite of Chinese President Hu Jintao's assurance to US President Barack Obama during their April 2010 discussions of China's commitment to "working together [with the United States] to ensure that Iran lives up to its international obligations," Beijing has yet to demonstrate a serious willingness to undermine its relationship with Iran by backing a US-led sanctions regime, let alone passively acquiescing to a US (or Israeli) invasion.

In fact, it appears that China is digging in to protect its vital interests in Iran. Incidentally, China reportedly opened a missile plant in Iran in March 2010, the latest in a series of expanding military ties between Beijing and Tehran. China also increased exports of gasoline to Iran in an effort to ease pressure on Tehran amid US efforts to target Iran's domestic gasoline industry through sanctions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
12:05 AM on 05/18/2010
very well said.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:59 AM on 05/18/2010
Kudos to China. China does exercise democracy, you see.
09:04 AM on 05/18/2010
Hail China! Beacon of Liberty to the World! I like their elections, very well run because they consistently produce the same results! That's good quality control!