iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Credit Card Fees: How Banks May Be STILL Gaming Your Payments

By CANDICE CHOI   05/18/10 03:25 PM ET   AP

Credit Card Fees

NEW YORK -- Credit card issuers are still playing "gotcha" with customers.

Landmark reforms this year were intended to stop billing practices that gouge unwitting consumers. Yet banks are hanging onto a tactic that ensures borrowers rack up as much as possible in interest charges.

The practice in question comes into play whenever portions of a cardholder's balance carry different interest rates. Cash advances, for example, can come with dramatically higher interest rates than purchases. At Bank of America, it's about 24 percent versus as low as 13 percent.

From the consumer's perspective, it makes more sense to pay down the higher interest rate balance first, because it rises at a faster pace.

Before the reforms went into effect, however, banks would apply any payments first to balances with the lowest rate. This ensured that the costlier balance kept fattening up for as long as possible.

The tactic was among those targeted by regulators. The new credit card law, which took effect in February, specifies that any payments above the minimum must first be applied to the balance with the higher interest rate.

The key phrase? "Above the minimum"

That means minimum payments can still be applied to the lower rate balances.

And that's exactly what the biggest credit card issuers are doing, including American Express, Capital One and Chase. Customers can't request that a payment be applied any differently.

Although it's legal, the practice undermines the spirit of the credit card reforms, notes Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of CardHub.com.

"Why should any part of a payment be applied in an unfair way, especially for people who can only afford to make the minimum payment?" said Papadimitriou.

The loophole was probably the result of regulatory compromise by lawmakers, said Ruth Susswein of Consumer Action. She said most customers don't realize that banks apply payments to their disadvantage, and are infuriated when they find out.

Bank of America, the country's largest bank, noted that the policy is clearly stated in its cardholder agreements and did not provide further explanation. The Charlotte, N.C. company earlier this year touted a new effort to build customer trust with more transparent policies.

American Express spokeswoman Desiree Fish also noted that the policy is standard industry practice, and is compliant with the reforms.

Minimum payments are usually about 2 percent to 4 percent of the balance, or a flat dollar amount. At Discover, for example, it's 2 percent of the balance or $40, whichever is greater.

At Discover, the cardholder agreement states that any payments up to the minimum will be applied "at our discretion, including in a manner most favorable or convenient for us."

Spokesman Matt Townson confirmed that meant payments go to the lowest interest rate balances first.

_____

If you have a consumer comment or question, please e-mail Candice Choi at cchoi(at)ap.org.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK -- Credit card issuers are still playing "gotcha" with customers. Landmark reforms this year were intended to stop billing practices that gouge unwitting consumers. Yet banks are hanging o...
NEW YORK -- Credit card issuers are still playing "gotcha" with customers. Landmark reforms this year were intended to stop billing practices that gouge unwitting consumers. Yet banks are hanging o...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:50 PM on 06/08/2010
Pay a dollar over the minimum so that they have to apply the payment to the higher interest credit. If they won't, then it's time to take them to court.
06:54 AM on 05/20/2010
I really don't use credit cards
photo
advocatusdiaboli
Social lib, Fiscal con, Life Member NRA, Veteran
12:13 PM on 05/19/2010
Gosh, big companies using lobby pressure to create loopholes in legislation to allow them to still maximize profits using the fine print in the overly verbose and deliberately obfuscated credit card issuer agreements all consumers sign but don't really understand the implications of? I'm shocked! Simply shocked I say!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
06:52 AM on 05/19/2010
Slightly off topic...

If you live in Wisconsin and are contemplating bankruptcy over credit card debt, there is another solution. File Chapter 128 Debt Amortization. For a small filing and trustee fee, you can order ANY unsecured debt to be amortized over a three year period without interest and penalties....it depends on how much you can afford to pay off in three years. The credit card companies have no choice, they have to take the plan whether they want to or not. There's no limit on how much or how many times you need to do this, and IT'S NOT A BANKRUPTCY.

Good law, and only in Wisconsin.
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
02:14 AM on 05/19/2010
Pay off the credit cards, chop 'em up and screw the banks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Social Construct
Go left, young man.
10:36 PM on 05/18/2010
Despite what political pundits from both sides of the aisle state, boycotts do work, if they are popular, concerted and motivated. A consumer credit boycott, although an inconvenience in the short run, would provide consumers with greater leverage for substantive changes in the consumer credit industry that favor their customers in the long run. Get some spine, and some power back, people!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
funkalicious
10:20 PM on 05/18/2010
The latest scam from Bank Of America is gaming the late payment fees and cooking the books. Here is how it works the new rules say you can pay on the day your bill is due no more messing around sending in a payment two weeks a head of time. So BOA charges a late fee of 39 dollars then credits your account back the next day. Even though your fee has been credited to your account it is not settled on the banks books for 60 days making BOA's bottom line look fat. Phantom earnings. This is bogus BS accounting legerdemain and it should be outlawed.
08:43 PM on 05/18/2010
Oh, that's not all!

Just TRY to pay your credit card bills a day or two before or ON the day they are due without being gouged!

If you pay by phone or online, you are charged a "bank processing fee" of around $10.

This is COMPLETE BS!

Also, the late payment fees are steep - $30 or so.

In other words, if your bill is due on the 15th, and you pay online, you have the choice of either paying a $10 "transaction fee" in order to pay "same day" (funny, every OTHER transaction seems to occur instantaneously without delay - such as when we BUY THINGS) OR you can try to avoid that and get dinged with a "late fee".

I just tried to pay a credit card and my choices were "same day" (it was due that day) or two days later (guaranteeing that it would be late).

Tip: DON'T USE CREDIT CARDS IF YOU CAN HELP IT. They are playing games with us. It's not about transparent lending, it's cat and mouse. Pay off your cards quickly, and then NEVER USE THEM AGAIN.

Oh, and go join a decent credit union. TODAY.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldwhitewomantoo
06:48 PM on 05/18/2010
The bottomline is ... don't run up credit balances & pay off your credit card debt monthly.

Hard to do, but worth the struggle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
etebol2003
06:39 PM on 05/18/2010
Stop living on credit cards. If you can't afford the $290 Gucci sunglasses, well, get the Ray Bans for $80 online. Is the only way to get the power back. Then again, no Gucci....no coochie. We are a consumist society, and we will do that until we bite our own tails.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Meah
01:23 AM on 05/19/2010
You have to use a credit card to buy Ray Bans online. $80. sunglasses ain't chickenfeed, you know.
photo
SamEllison
I feel so clean!
05:55 PM on 05/18/2010
They do the same thing with balance transfers too.
If you have a lower rate on the money you owe from a balance transfer than on your regular balance, they paid off some of the lower rate and left the higher rate regular balance to accrue more interest.
Solution(other than not carrying any balances) ; pay off the higher rate balance before you do the balance transfer, then don't use the card.
05:43 PM on 05/18/2010
If it's very hard to pay your cards bill, simply stop paying it, only after that the banks agree to lower apr and take really low payments.
05:38 PM on 05/18/2010
This is obvious to anyone. The law is pretty clear and originally gave an out to the credit card companies. IF you can afford it, this gives an incentive to pay as much off as possible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
04:08 PM on 05/18/2010
Ah, the bill is full of "loopholes" like this. I am absolutely sure it was intentially worded this way, aren't you? Our Congress certainly wouldn't want to deprive our financial institutions of their billions of profits, would they?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
03:40 PM on 05/18/2010
How many people nationwide would have to cut up their credit cards before this problem just sort of magically went away, permanently?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:22 AM on 05/19/2010
Well, here's one. We did just that. Paid off the balance, cut up the card, and closed the account. Message to bank: UP YOURS.

Felt positively giddy.