More

Obama's Endorsements Fail Democrats

CHARLES BABINGTON   05/19/10 05:17 PM ET   AP

Obama Specter

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama may end up playing a rather hands-off role in this fall's elections, a surprising turn for a political phenomenon who excited millions of voters just two years ago.

Recent elections have tarnished Obama's luster a bit, and Democratic candidates are likely to be selective in seeking his help.

Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania became the fourth Democrat in seven months to lose a high-profile race despite the president's active involvement. Specter's career-ending loss raises questions of whether Obama can transfer even small portions of the political charm that catapulted him to the White House.

Campaign strategists said Wednesday that many congressional Democrats seeking re-election this year will probably tap Obama to raise money, record ads for black radio stations and perhaps highlight a key issue or two. But some, and perhaps many, will not seek presidential visits, and they will emphasize their own roles on issues such as job-creation.

Obama remains generally popular, especially when compared to Congress or Republican leaders, said Jim Margolis, a Democratic consultant who worked on the president's 2008 campaign. However, he said, "what we've seen in many states is that his popularity doesn't necessarily translate into specific support for a particular candidate."

That's the case for all presidents, Margolis said, especially in midterm elections. "Where you get the pop is when you have someone at the top of the ticket" who can generate excitement and voter turnout for down-ballot candidates, he said.

That may be true. But it's still a letdown for fans who saw Obama as a charismatic president.

In previous months, Obama's endorsements and campaign appearances weren't enough to save then-Gov. Jon Corzine's re-election bid in New Jersey, Creigh Deeds' run for governor in Virginia or Martha Coakley's campaign in Massachusetts to keep the late Edward M. Kennedy's Senate seat in Democratic hands.

In fairness, Deeds was an underdog all along, and Corzine brought many problems on himself. But the Coakley loss to Republican Scott Brown was excruciating.

Also embarrassing was Rep. Joe Sestak's victory over Specter in Tuesday's Democratic primary in Pennsylvania. Sestak portrayed himself and his supporters as being more faithful to the Democratic Party than Specter and his backers, including the president, Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell and other high-ranking party officials.

Creating another headache for Obama, Sen. Blanche Lincoln was forced into a runoff in Arkansas' Democratic primary. Obama supports her bid for a third term, but he is not as closely associated with her campaign as he was with Specter's.

Obama's poor endorsement record thus far could hurt his legislative agenda if Democratic lawmakers decide they need some distance from him as they seek re-election in an anti-incumbent, anti-establishment climate. Conversely, it might embolden Republican lawmakers and candidates who oppose him.

"We're licking our chops at running against President Obama," said Rand Paul, a tea party favorite who won Kentucky's Republican primary for retiring GOP Sen. Jim Bunning's seat.

Other Republicans are less sure. They are still absorbing their party's loss in a special election to fill the Pennsylvania House seat long held by Democrat John Murtha in a district that Republican John McCain won against Obama.

Tuesday's loser, Republican Tim Burns, campaigned largely on national issues, whereas Democrat Mark Critz focused more on using a House seat to steer jobs to the district.

Tim Kaine, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, said in a speech Wednesday that Burns "ran against the president, as much as his opponent, and pledged to repeal health insurance reform. He lost by a significant margin."

GOP officials, however, noted that Critz opposed Obama's new health care law as well as gun control and abortion rights.

Scores of congressional Democrats must defend their votes this fall for the health legislation, a bank bailout bill, an economic stimulus and other issues under attack by conservatives and some centrists. Because such issues are largely associated with Obama, those Democrats may be wiser to accept whatever help the president can offer, and not bother with overt efforts to distance themselves from him, campaign advisers said.

In Nevada, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is locked in a fierce re-election battle. Margolis, who works for Reid's campaign, said Obama has made two campaign appearances for the senator and "I'd not be surprised to see him again."

But in Nevada and all other states, Margolis said, voters will focus on the candidates and their issues, and Obama will be a minor factor at the most.

"I don't look at any race and see it as a referendum on the president," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama may end up playing a rather hands-off role in this fall's elections, a surprising turn for a political phenomenon who excited millions of voters just two year...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama may end up playing a rather hands-off role in this fall's elections, a surprising turn for a political phenomenon who excited millions of voters just two year...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,684
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (57 total)
  1 of 9  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
weebils 11:21 AM on 05/19/2010
Is this article a joke? Seriously, they wonder why readers are no longer paying to read this drivel. The president played this exactly right. He is already having to battle members of his own party and this writer expected him to publicly embarrass them by not endorsing them? The same people he had to drag to vote for anything even close to his agenda. Frankly, I have never ever seen so many members of a  Read More...
photo
DrBlunt
Telling it like it is....
04:52 AM on 05/21/2010
G ang

O f

P ee Peas!
photo
repuglycon
Desert Bird
12:51 PM on 05/20/2010
Obama's endorsements have dropped in value because everyone is realizing he's a pragmatist and not an idealist. He'll take a deal that his supporters wouldn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bettyann Frederick
12:17 PM on 05/20/2010
And by the way, Obama did not go to Specter to change his party in order to get the backing he needed, Specter WENT to Obama to save his ass to be re-elected because he knew he would not be able to run against Toomey.

Obama's coattails are just fine, thank you very much.
03:38 PM on 05/20/2010
What you say about Spector is true. But what about Coakley? She ran a terrible campaign, and Obama, showing his arrogance, thought all he had to do was show up and all would be OK. How did that work out?

To say Obama's coattails are fine is a little of his succes in winning people over. He is a nice guy, a great family man, but his ability to lead this country is lacking. The Coakley situation shows that. I don't care what his people told him, he went, he made the final decision to go and IT WAS A DISASTER!! She lost the seat that was sat in by a democrat for over 40 years!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bettyann Frederick
12:14 PM on 05/20/2010
What a stupid headline. Seriously, anyone who knows anything about Pennsylvania politics knows that Biden and Obama threw Specter under the bus because they knew he was not electable by the people of Pennsylvania as a DEMOCRAT. Really, we voted against him for all of the years he was a proud member of the GOP, why now did anyone think we would vote for him??? This election said nothing to or about Obama. But it had everything to do with the people of Pennsylvania telling a Republican in Democratic clothing to go away, we were not interested in what he was selling. Also, if there was a "referendum" on Obama, Jack Murtha's seat in Western PA would have easily gone to the GOP candidate - it did not. It was retained by a Democrat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
webandgraphics
12:03 PM on 05/20/2010
Spector is living proof that the 2 party system is just a tool to divide citizens...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
enlightenedgirl
the truth will set you free
11:49 AM on 05/20/2010
You know that Specter went to Obama and said I will vote with you ONLY if you support me in the elections. And that goes for all of the Democratic establishment, endorse me or I won't vote your way.

They did, but the voters could see right through him. This is all about Specter being a Republican for 30 years, nothing else. He had no trust from the public as a Dem. You can't wash off 30 years of Republican.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
11:48 AM on 05/20/2010
Let's be fair neither is Sarah Palin's endorsement!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
webandgraphics
12:01 PM on 05/20/2010
lol true, but she isnt running the country, she has no real power.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
12:05 PM on 05/20/2010
Sh don't tell the tea baggers they think she is the best since sliced bread and hope Ruppert Murdock doesn't read this blog Sarah is his ace in the hole for him running the country!
03:39 PM on 05/20/2010
How did we get to SP?? Wow, this blog cannot get enough SP!!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
03:58 PM on 05/20/2010
Really nothing only that she made a statement that the run in PA 12th district would be won by the Republican and of course she lost! Sorry i brought it up ok i'm not sorry!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:37 AM on 05/20/2010
Oh, stop. That half-hearted "endorsement" meant nothing. Specter made a huge error in switching parties at the end of his career, especially when he said it was only so he could get elected.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
enlightenedgirl
the truth will set you free
11:49 AM on 05/20/2010
Ditto!
03:41 PM on 05/20/2010
Coakley??
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
11:24 AM on 05/20/2010
Obama is trying to help the wrong candidates in my opinion. In my view these blue dogs have not earned his help as they are not trying hard enough to advance the Presidents agenda. But in the long shot that one of these candidates do win, the Pres now has a debt to hold over their head.

Sooner or later we will see him get involved with a candidate that will be good for the country and it will make a difference.
11:08 AM on 05/20/2010
It would seem that Mr Obama's famously long coattails have all but disappeared.

No surprises here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cbates
10:34 AM on 05/20/2010
Come on. The President had to support Spector in that he did flip to democrat which gave him 60 votes to at least get his agenda started in 2009. It is what politics is in this country. The people of PA understand and gave the President what he wanted by electing the correct person going forward. Specter has had a good ride and now it is time for him to hang them up. Congratulation Senator Specter on your career!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ApolloniaCreed
10:00 AM on 05/20/2010
...a little abductive reasoning to start my morning. Thanx!
09:50 AM on 05/20/2010
Standing alongside Mexico President while throwing Arizona under the bus probably won't help. Is there no accountability on either Calderon or Obama's part? Apparently not.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
enlightenedgirl
the truth will set you free
11:53 AM on 05/20/2010
Don't you think the President should fix this border problem with Calderon by his side? It sounds like the first place to start to me.
12:30 PM on 05/20/2010
Now we are going to take advice from Mexico about immigration? Fine. Maybe we should adopt the same policies as Mexico. Is President Obama out of his mind? He has abandoned the state of Arizona and instead finds an ally in Calderon? Why doesn't he question Calderon on Mexico's immigration policies? Is there anything that is NOT the fault of the US?? Yesterday was a referendum.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jazz41
09:44 AM on 05/20/2010
Many of these politicians have been around for way too long and need to retire. Don't think it matters whether Obama says anything in their favor or not. People just want to have a change, which is good.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
09:08 AM on 05/20/2010
GOP starting to overplay its hand (and showing a little white sheet in the process.)

You can't nationalize local elections when the economy is in the toilet. Ironically, the poor economy is what may SAVE Dems because people want to know what they will do locally to fix the situation. They couldn't care less about the president or Washington DC.

GOP, by making it about abstract states rights or other constitutional issues, or how many times the AG says the words "radical islam" will look out of touch with the problems people face now.

So, please Rand Paul and RNC, go after the guy NOT running for office in 2010 while your opponents tell nervous citizens how they will keep cops on the streets and teachers in the classrooms.

And Dems need to remind voters that if their Republican opponent is so interested in what BO is doing, well then they should drop out now and wait to run in 2012 when HE is up for re-election.
09:24 AM on 05/20/2010
No, no. The 2006 mid terms were about GWB. The 2010 mid terms are about Obama. That is the way it is, and it will never change. Spin it any way you want, but these elections do reflect on the Pres, who ever it may be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
margoharris
I used to be Snow White but I drifted.
09:40 AM on 05/20/2010
Just because you regressives want it to be doesn't mean it will be. All politics is local and I hope the dullards on your side forget that and attack the President. LOL please do!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
09:46 AM on 05/20/2010
sticky29

In 2006 the economy was better so people had the luxury of focusing on broader issues, like two wars going south at the same time. We were also much closer to 9/11 back then and national security ranked higher with the voters than it does now, and national security and war are, well, national issues.

I didn't say you can't nationalize local elections. I said you can't nationalize local elections when the economy was in the toilet.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
enlightenedgirl
the truth will set you free
11:59 AM on 05/20/2010
First of all when you refer to the President as BO you sound like a third grader.

Second of all, the Dem establishment backed Specter for his votes. He turned, they promised, but the people didn't trust him any longer. They are the one who put him in office. Like I said before, you can't wash off 30 years of Republican, no matter who backs you.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
12:38 PM on 05/20/2010
You must be new here. You only have 250 words in a comment. Using abbreviations helps to avoid hitting that limit. Is GOP also juvenile for referring to Republicans?

You write in your style and I'll write in mine.

That's how grown ups do it. K?