EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Chicago Cigarette Tax: Study Shows 75% Of Chicagoans Buy Cigarettes Out Of City

Cigarette

First Posted: 5/20/10 Updated: 5/25/11

A cigarette tax increase is one source of revenue that legislators often see as win-win: either people will choose to keep smoking and pay an extra premium for it, or they'll quit smoking and get healthier. Lawmakers have proposed a $1-a-pack tax increase to help resolve Illinois' budget crisis.

But opponents of the tax worry that smokers will just cross state lines, or buy on the internet, to avoid paying higher taxes. And a new study suggests that a majority of Chicagoans are doing just that.

According to the University of Illinois at Chicago, 75 percent of sampled cigarette packs found on the streets of Chicago come from out of the city, costing roughly $120 million a year in revenues.

Teams of researchers, led by David Merriman, the head of UIC's economics department, collected littered cigarette packs from 100 neighborhoods in Chicago and the surrounding areas. They found that three-quarters of the discarded packs didn't have a Chicago tax stamp on them.

When the packs were collected in July 2007, state and local taxes on a pack of cigarettes in Chicago totaled $4.05. They were only $1.37 outside of Cook County. This made Chicagoans 60 percent more likely than their collar-county counterparts to shirk cigarette taxes.

Merriman acknowledged that the problem of tax avoidance was primarily a Chicago issue, but did not fail to see its public policy implications.

"This research suggests that an increase of $1 per pack in Illinois, as recently proposed, would drive more Chicago residents to buy their cigarettes in Indiana, but would be likely to have a relatively small effect in the rest of the state," Merriman said.

The fear of sending business to Indiana may poke a hole in the ambitions of state lawmakers hoping to create a budget for the coming fiscal year. With Gov. Pat Quinn's controversial plan to increase income taxes unlikely to come to fruition, the state is at a loss for new revenues. And cuts to public services like education have been met with vocal opposition.

Legislators have repeatedly argued that a new cigarette tax would help stave off some of those education cuts. But with the General Assembly already on recess and no resolution in sight to the budget mess, this new report may only serve to impede consensus in an increasingly fractious legislature.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

A cigarette tax increase is one source of revenue that legislators often see as win-win: either people will choose to keep smoking and pay an extra premium for it, or they'll quit smoking and get heal...
A cigarette tax increase is one source of revenue that legislators often see as win-win: either people will choose to keep smoking and pay an extra premium for it, or they'll quit smoking and get heal...
Filed by Will Guzzardi  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:24 AM on 07/11/2010
I can't see paying the outragious taxes on cigarettes­. My wife smokes and I bought her an electronic cigarette and she loves it and so does my pocket book. Here in Wa. state a pack of smokes will cost you about 8 bucks. An e-cig will save you tons of cash. Check out www.greens­moke.com. They are the best electric cigarette on the market.
08:35 AM on 05/27/2010
It was really thoughtful of Blago to give seniors free rides out of Cook County.
11:07 PM on 05/24/2010
This is by no means a big surprise! The taxes in Illinois are ridiculous for just about everything­, including cigarettes­, gas, even bottled water! Growing up in the city, it was almost an article of faith to go to Indiana for cheaper gas and, when both of my parents smoked, cigarettes­. Seeing as how I paid $2.54/gall­on for gas today in Indiana versus $3.20/gall­on and higher in my area of the city, I go to Indiana for gas and groceries religiousl­y and have never considered chopping off my right arm as payment for the same goods in the city that are grossly overtaxed and overpriced­!
07:45 AM on 05/21/2010
I was able to quit smoking cigarettes after many years, thank God, but I drove out of Cook County for years to buy smokes and the gas was cheaper, too. Frankly, I wouldn't mind paying the taxes if it were apparent that the money wouldn't be squandered by a totally corrupt system. Sin taxes and the lottery are designed to exploit the less educated and the poor and working class people for the benefit of others. In Chicago and Cook County, the government is confronted with having to provide services to an enormous number of people who pay no taxes. And yet, Daley's brother was key in the enactment of NAFTA, which has done more to shift capital out of the county and state than any tax that his brothers have come up with in the city and County. If they really wanted to raise a lot of money with a minimum impact, they would assess a nickel fee on each futures contract and every 100 options or stock shares traded in the city. The futres contracts already have around 30 cents of fees going to the National Futureses Assn for "self regulation­." A tax of this nature would not be on middle class and would be easy to collect. It would also raise a huge amount of money as the Exchanges in Chicago dwarf Vegas in cash flow. Such a tax would be assessed on the well to do. So, obviously, it's not going to happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crookedcountyillinois
Professional Illinois Government "Watchdog" and No
09:30 PM on 05/20/2010
Duh...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
04:06 PM on 05/21/2010
Exactly.
07:10 PM on 05/20/2010
I live in Washington­. Cigs are $7 a pack. Go to Oregon their $2 cheaper. Go figure.
2 from 7 = 5. Hello! Remember, something is better than nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atrax70
05:31 PM on 05/20/2010
I don't know why smokers complain in the place. In NYC I could go too 2 different bodegas in a 1 block radius and pay 3 different prices, the highest was $10.00 at a newsstand and I move too Illinois 2 1/2 hours ssw of Chicago and I'm paying $5.39 for a pack of Marlboro's which were $4.89. From what my father tells me the state of Illinois is so corrupt and broke they'll figure out ways just to make money off it's residents. Where I'm at the city is so broke they started charging a water run off fee to help pay for the 70 million it's costing the city repair the sewers because the Feds came in and busted them for running water and sewage in the same pipes. Next thing you know they're gonna bring back the wheel tax sticker.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChicagoSuz
Writer/Teacher/Actor/Activist
10:02 PM on 05/20/2010
Where did you find cigs for $5.39? They're $11 at 7-11! Cheapest place I've found is $8.25. Do tell...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
topkatnc
Give a stray cat or dog a chance .
08:58 AM on 05/21/2010
Here in NC. you can purchase a certain brand for 3.37 a pack ...can get five of those for 15.00 and some change ... but it is always cheaper here .... I just can't imagine pay 11.00 for a pack ...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:43 PM on 05/20/2010
I am shocked that people would travel out of Chicago just to avoid taxes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChicagoSuz
Writer/Teacher/Actor/Activist
10:02 PM on 05/20/2010
see above
04:36 PM on 05/20/2010
The conclusion is highly spurious. The study proves Chicago residents buy packs outside the city, not outside the state, making the quote from Merriman quite confusing.
12:09 PM on 05/21/2010
If you know anything about the geography of the Chicago area you wouldn't be so confused also if you wernt so stupid
04:12 PM on 05/20/2010
Speaking as a friend of many smokers and as a "sinner" that drinks and has a cigar now and then, this is precisely why "sin taxes" are often not very well conceived. Even though I'm a pretty staunch liberal, this type of plan always goes awry. When you pick on smokers, drinkers and people that eat crap the inevitable outcome is they'll turn to some other means to attain vice. You'll lose revenue and find yourself back at square one. Additional­ly, when Dems can't even get the minimum wage up to something liveable, or stop offshoring our jobs, it's a little hard for the poor, working class folks (the smokers, drinkers and crap eaters) to swallow that they also have to be charged up the yin yang for the few things that take the edge their otherwise frustratin­g economic statuses. Get the price of wages up, shut down NAFTA and GAT, make college educations affordable and get the cost of healthy foods down--and you'll get people to pay into these things without suffering at the polls. It's a trade off. People who are seeing their tax dollars go to lining pockets of IL pols, BP and Wall Street running roughshod over the country, the top 1% controllin­g 80% of the wealth, and the government doing nothing about it aren't going to buy that these taxes are necessary. They'll just be pi$$ed and let the Dems know it with their turnout.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsalspach
love people, use things, never the reverse
01:53 AM on 05/21/2010
Being an expatriate from IL to AZ it appalls me that we (smokers) were saddled with the last ungodly tax to pay for the SCHIP program and now AZ says it doesn't have enough money to continue the program anyway. Are my cigarette taxes going to decrease? Not in a million years. At least in Chicago you can go to other places in the state to get them cheaper. My sister goes to a neighborin­g county. In AZ you are stuck with the cost and they track internet sales and hit you with a fine if you buy cigarettes online.
photo
cintirich
Don't believe your hype...
03:48 PM on 05/20/2010
Interestin­g that the author used the word "shirk" to describe Chicagoans behavior in avoiding the cigarette tax -- as if it's their civic duty to pay unfair and unreasonab­le taxes, just because smokers are an easy target.

Just goes to show you that when taxes get out of hand, people can and do modify their behavior to avoid the tax. If they cut the tax by 2/3, people would actually buy their smokes in Chicago and Chicago would realize MORE tax income than with the higher tax.
12:12 PM on 05/21/2010
Good point!! I like it!
02:52 PM on 05/20/2010
The only thing surprising is that someone actually paid to study this. All you have to do is stand on a border street and look at the stores on one side and the vacancies on the other and see where the traffic goes. By the way, think this has anything to do with so many of our jobs being offshored?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:27 PM on 05/20/2010
By all means, tax the nicotine drug addicts. In fact, legalize all drugs so you can tax them and your state coffers will runneth over.
01:38 PM on 05/20/2010
When you tax something, you drive consumptio­n to alternativ­es. We need to be very careful about how we transition to the new taxes next year and in FinReg - there's no reason to give a huge stimulus package to Hong Kong and Frankfurt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ALRIGHTALREADY
01:10 PM on 05/20/2010
BUT BUT BUT ,,,,,libs all say TAXES are good
03:58 PM on 05/20/2010
Yep, when they are fair taxes across the board and not relying on a single demographi­c or portion of society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
topkatnc
Give a stray cat or dog a chance .
09:00 AM on 05/21/2010
right on ....