iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Floyd Landis: Lance Armstrong & I Used Performance-Enhancing Drugs

Floyd Landis Lance Armstrong

First Posted: 05/20/10 02:22 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:30 PM ET

UPDATE: Lance Armstrong responds: "He has no proof."

(Tim Reynolds / AP) Disgraced American cyclist Floyd Landis has admitted to systematic use of performance-enhancing drugs and accused seven-time Tour de France champion Lance Armstrong of paying international cycling officials to cover-up a positive test, according to e-mails obtained Thursday by The Associated Press.

Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title for doping but had always denied cheating, sent a series of e-mails to cycling officials and sponsors acknowledging and detailing his long-term use of banned drugs.

Quick Poll

Did Lance Armstrong dope?

Yes, of course he did.

No, Floyd Landis is lying.

The Wall Street Journal first reported the details of the e-mails.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

NEW YORK (AP) – Disgraced American cyclist Floyd Landis has admitted to systematic use of performance-enhancing drugs and accused seven-time Tour de France champion Lance Armstrong of involvement in doping, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title for doping but had always denied cheating, sent a series of e-mails to cycling officials and sponsors acknowledging and detailing his long-term use of banned drugs, the newspaper said.

The report said Landis wrote in the e-mails that he started doping in 2002, his first year racing with the U.S. Postal Service team led by Armstrong. Landis also admitted to doping in an interview with ESPN.com.

Landis also accused American riders Levi Leipheimer and Dave Zabriskie and Armstrong's longtime coach, Johan Bruyneel, of involvement in doping, the Journal reported.

Armstrong is currently competing in the Tour of California and couldn't be reached for comment. Neither could Bruyneel, Leipheimer or Zabriskie.

International Cycling Union (UCI) president Pat McQuaid said Landis' allegations were "scandalous and mischievous."

"These guys coming out now with things like this from the past is only damaging the sport," McQuaid told The Associated Press in a telephone interview Thursday. "If they've any love for the sport they wouldn't do it."

The governing body said it regretted that Landis accused former teammates without allowing U.S. cycling and anti-doping authorities time to investigate.

"An impartial investigation is a fundamental right as Mr. Landis will understand having contested, for two years, the evidence of his breach of the anti-doping rules in 2006," UCI said in a statement.

McQuaid said it was up to U.S.A Cycling and the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency to look into the allegations.

USA Cycling did not respond to calls and e-mails seeking comment.

USADA CEO Travis Tygart released a statement Thursday morning saying he would not comment on "the substance of any doping investigation."

"It is important to re-emphasize USADA's position that all athletes are innocent until and unless proven otherwise through the established legal process," Tygart said. "Attempts to sensationalize or exploit either the process or the athletes are a disservice to fair play, due process, and to those who love clean sport."

WADA president John Fahey said in a statement that "we are very interested in learning more about this matter and we will liaise with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and any other authorities with appropriate jurisdiction to get to the heart of the issues raised."

The Journal said it had seen copies of three e-mails sent by Landis between April 30 and May 6, and that he had copied in seven people on the messages, including officials with USA Cycling and international governing body UCI.

Landis served a two-year ban after testing positive for elevated testosterone levels at the 2006 Tour. He was the first rider stripped of a Tour de France title.

"I want to clear my conscience," Landis told ESPN.com. "I don't want to be part of the problem any more."

He also said he was speaking out now in part because the WADA's eight-year statute of limitations was close to running out.

"If I don't say something now then it's pointless to ever say it," Landis said.

He told ESPN.com that his most difficult phone call was to his mother to tell her the truth for the first time.

Landis' parents did not immediately return a phone message left at their home in Lancaster County, Pa. Paul and Arlene Landis, devout Mennonites, had always defended their son against doping accusations.

McQuaid questioned Landis' credibility and said he would be "a pariah" in the cycling community.

"What's his agenda?" McQuaid said. "The guys is seeking revenge. It's sad, it's sad for cycling. It's obvious he does hold a grudge."

McQuaid said he received copies of the e-mails sent by Landis to the U.S. cycling federation, but declined to comment on their contents. He said Landis' allegations were "nothing new."

"He already made those accusations in the past," McQuaid said. "Armstrong has been accused many times in the past but nothing has been proved against him. And in this case, I have to question the guy's credibility. There is no proof of what he says. We are speaking about a guy who has been condemned for doping before a court."

In the ESPN.com interview, Landis detailed extensive use of the blood-boosting drug EPO, testosterone, human growth hormone and blood transfusions, as well as female hormones and a one-time experiment with insulin. He said the doping occurred during the years he rode for the U.S. Postal Service and Swiss-based Phonak teams.

Phonak owner Andy Rihs issued a statement saying Landis' claims were "lies" and a "last, tragic attempt" to get publicity.

"Floyd Landis personally signed that he would uphold our code and use no illegal practices when he joined our former racing group," Rihs said.

The whole team was convinced that he was upholding this until his doping was revealed at the 2006 Tour.

"Neither I, nor the leadership of the team, knew that Floyd Landis doped," Rihs said.

In one of the e-mails seen by the Wall Street Journal, dated April 30, Landis said he flew to Girona, Spain, in 2003 and had two half-liter units of blood extracted from his body in a three-week interval to be used later during the Tour de France.

According to the newspaper, Landis claimed the blood extractions took place in Armstrong's apartment. He said blood bags belonging to Armstrong and then-teammate George Hincapie were kept in a refrigerator in Armstrong's closet and Landis was asked to check the temperature of the blood daily.

When Armstrong left for a few weeks, he asked Landis to "make sure the electricity didn't go off and ruin the blood," according to the e-mail quoted by the Journal.

___

AP Sports Writers Samuel Petrequin in Paris, Graham Dunbar in Geneva and Associated Press Writer Mike Rubinkam in Allentown, Pa., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SPORTS

UPDATE: Lance Armstrong responds: "He has no proof." (Tim Reynolds / AP) Disgraced American cyclist Floyd Landis has admitted to systematic use of performance-enhancing drugs and accused seven-time T...
UPDATE: Lance Armstrong responds: "He has no proof." (Tim Reynolds / AP) Disgraced American cyclist Floyd Landis has admitted to systematic use of performance-enhancing drugs and accused seven-time T...
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 433
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
07:31 PM on 05/23/2010
One got caught and had his Tour title stripped. The Other won 7 consecutive Tour Championships. Sounds a lot like sour grapes from Landis.
04:45 PM on 06/17/2010
especially considering lance has probably been drug-tested more than any person alive and has never tested positive. even once. sour grapes indeed.
05:44 PM on 05/23/2010
All of them are on something.
11:07 PM on 05/22/2010
You know. I likes Landis. It was stupid of him to use after all the trouble with Lance.
BUT I do not think it approbiate for him to be a tattle-tail Whether its true or not true. He admitted it for himself... and he should not be digging up dirt behind other players. Very small of him.
01:56 AM on 05/23/2010
now that's probably a much more credible criticism of f.landis rather than he's not credible about the dimes he's droppin' on other cyclists including 'teflon" armstrong;]. i wish more folks would just express that he's being a snitch, or that calling out others is a p#nk or b*tcha$$ move on his part, like folks may have felt about kobe(re: infidelity) or conseco or the balco guy. and admit that's what they don't like(rightfully so) and not so much that f.landis(&others) is simply lying about l.armstrong....:o\
12:00 PM on 05/23/2010
LOL
10:47 PM on 05/22/2010
Series of Emails Referenced in Statement Regarding Doping Allegations

http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/news_series-emails-referenced-statement-regarding-doping-allegations
05:44 PM on 05/22/2010
though f.landis' credibility is fairly criticized regarding his accusations of doping by l.armstong, i do believe it's possible to be speaking the truth about him(even if some aren't cool with it). wasn't the Balco guy(victor conte) in the no credibility zone when he began clucking about m.jones?:o\ wasn't j.conseco in the no credibility zone(big time) when he began shared about j.giambi, m.mcgwire, r.palmeiro, etc?:o\ not a sports "fanatic" but i do love sports in general and i highly respect atheletes(pros/college/highsch/wknd warriors). i do, at times, have favorites but none of them, Not One!, will ever be a "Sacred Cow". i may feel a bit of disappointment or sadness about and for them, but i appreciate that we all can falter or just full-on fall flat sometimes. so, as a sports layperson/fan, it's just kind of weird that so many folks can't/WON'T even contemplate in a sport saturated in dope for years, done by, not back of the pack also-rans, but top tier cyclist, that there is NO way l.armstrong partook of any of it!?! very simply, by way of his very pure talent, and his very pure hard work, he beat out other Top Cyclist, that were On Dope, 7 years in a row!.......Riiiight??:o|
11:12 PM on 05/22/2010
I just wish the races can just go on wityhout all that drug stuff being brought up again. There was a time there were no laws regulating all this. Now there are and things will be tight. All the other years I don't care to hear about again. I want Lance to ride for his cancer group. Leave him alone.
09:35 AM on 05/22/2010
And as I responded to Zen's arguments below, this applies as well, for in coming days and weeks it'd be ideal if a dialogue, even amongst the most opposing standpoints, could continue.
The supporters of Lance need to remember: I (we?) don't think those of us who are questioning Armstrong now are "haters" at all -- yes, we are feeling a bit disappointed perhaps, we just want answers. We want the truth. We deserve the truth.
09:25 AM on 05/22/2010
Both Sobeton and ZenPilot continue the dialogue (just below), and more information will be added.
Lance is (still) a great cyclist. No doubt that. However, what I and some others are taking issue with, is how he got there. His achievements are myriad and the stuff of legend and that will always be the case; but that legendary status will perhaps get tarnished, perhaps even considerably, IF what Landis alleges is true.
What is interesting is that it appears there were witnesses; I am no legal expert, but I am guessing the investigators could subpoena alleged witnesses to provide testimony under the condition of immunity. One incident in particular comes to mind, that is of doping while on a bus during one of "The Tours."
10:48 PM on 05/22/2010
"I am no legal expert" you so right about that..
01:15 AM on 05/21/2010
The Facts!
Floyd Landis doping case
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floyd_Landis_doping_case

Lance Armstrong Allegations of drug use addressed in detail at the bottom profile.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Armstrong
12:13 PM on 05/21/2010
More facts. Landis named another rider. George Zabriskie--a cyclist who has never tested positive. What does Zabriskie say? "No comment," then he talks about how he is now riding clean. What does that tell you? To me, it says that Zabriskie is not as comfortable lying as Armstrong about PED usage. They were ALL doing it. http://www.denverpost.com/sports2006/ci_15132746
01:46 PM on 05/21/2010
Denver Post LOL. that tells me nothing.
09:56 PM on 05/20/2010
Truth Always Has Time On Its Side.

And you who are trying to block a clean and clear look at everything, ye shall be judged very harshly. If you can't get with it, get out of the way! This isn't about your ego, McQuaid -- you are a fool and you have really misspoken today. One day you will regret it.
09:36 PM on 05/20/2010
I find it most bizarre, beyond, actually, that folks won't give Landis the chance to make the case and have it investigated. It is so troubling and bizarre that so called leaders in the cycling world want it to "just go away." You guys will get what you deserve! The truth has to come out -- how fair is it, you dopes, to think you could ignore this or not, IF, again IF some wrongdoing (genuinely illegal behavior) occurred, then not even consider what it means for the honest folks who: a) either raced in the TdF (or in other races) against any alleged dopers, for the fans and for the young folks out there who need to know: HONESTY COUNTS.
Get over your pathetic selves and the facade-like edifice you wish to uphold and make it all real.
FOR THE RECORD: I have never, ever liked Floyd Landis; I have greatly admired Lance Armstrong. I have a right, as a fan of the sport, to the truth. SO, if the damn committees are so bothered by this investigation, they need to get their fat arses out of the way so we can clarify the record ONCE AND FOR ALL.
I don't care about you naysayers, -- go ahead, think what you want. I care about the young cyclists, the messages they need to hear loud and clear, and for future generations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
socialiq
09:58 PM on 05/20/2010
I'm not a naysayer...I totally agree with you....

I have always liked Armstrong, other than his penchant for serial celebrity dating, but I have to admit....the article lends an air of credibility to Landis's claims....

The explicit detail he goes into regarding "blood transfusion" and "skin patches", etc. makes me think that there may be some truth to it....

It wouldn't be the first time we find out an all-American hero is actually using performance-enhancing drugs....remember Marion Jones?

And the pressure is so intense I imagine in this arena, that the use of these drugs may almost be a requirement to get any edge at all......but believe me, I DO NOT condone this activity.

I agree with your statement....let's have it investigated and be honest about what really goes on.
10:11 PM on 05/20/2010
thank you so much for your take on this very troubling situation; I'm also, frankly, very grateful you agree as well, as I fear I am speaking against a huge tide of fans who want this to go away. (on a side note, too: the perhaps only aspect of Lance I didn't totally admire or care for at all was the way he comported himself in his dating life -- not really classy, neither w/ the wife, and then all the celebrity stuff. Made him look cheap).

Re: Landis. May I add? I, too, have had an ever increasing sense of "this is just not gonna be good for Lance"-sense since the story broke. As you mention:
1) there is the detail provided about transfusions/patches (which, of course, if it were "just" one factor, it could perhaps be proven to be false, but I'm doubting that now;
2) Landis' publicly naming how he told his mother of his pathetic behavior and copped to all the lies over all the years; only the most cynical (and I don't even want to address those folks, they are not to be reached on any level) would think that is a ploy. Time will prove, it is/was NOT. Just wait and see. That is powerful stuff....
10:12 PM on 05/20/2010
Continued from above:
3) Landis' publicly naming a host of other cyclists -- making him even more vulnerable to the hate-mongering of the Cycling Gestapo -- and believe me, they do exist;
4) what in the eff does he even have to gain by doing ANY of this now? Not fame, not fortune, not attention,... he will get NOTHING but hate for having come forth.
There is more, but I tell ya, Socialiq, it doesn't look good at all (note others: I said it doesnt LOOOK good.... let's let this thing ride out into the future....

Time and Truth are ALWAYS on the same side.
05:08 PM on 05/20/2010
Considering how many of his teammates have now been shown to have used, I find it hard if not impossible to see him NOT using
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
socialiq
09:59 PM on 05/20/2010
Agreed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:04 PM on 05/21/2010
Yeah, and then to suggest that Lance was that much better than the dopers.......
11:15 PM on 05/20/2010
Agreed, and fanned.
03:20 PM on 05/20/2010
Floyd is going to be destroyed by this. His career in the cycling industry is over (never mind the class action lawsuit from people who gave to his legal defense). You don't go against the "lance Factor" ($$$$ for the cycling industry) and get away with it.

You would think the UCI would be interested in doping allegations, instread we get the vitriol spewed out by Pat Mcquaid. This is an industry and lance is the magic carpet ride of cash. look what happen to Greg Lemond and Paul Kimmage.

Just look at the words used by the people Floyd has accused of doping any you will see the truth between the lines.
09:43 PM on 05/20/2010
THANK YOU, Cragusa -- I could NOT agree more on so many levels, although I am less sure of any outcome at all, though, like you, I have an increasingly bad feeling about this. You hit the nail on the head: what is up with these lemmings wanting to 'pull the wool' (not a fitting metaphor here, but you know what I mean) over their own eyes and "make it go away."
For effs sake, folks, SO MUCH is on the line, why wouldn't we want to know, one way or another.

Crag, one concern I have for LA is that it seems unlikely (but not impossible) that FL would provide so many names and let his own name go down in infamy for absolutely no reason at all. I am most compelled also, with the nagging doubts, about how FL related the news of his own doping to his mother. NOT easy stuff, no matter what some beyond-all-hope cynics might say.
I will never let the cynicism win the day; this has to be about getting to the bottom of this, once and for all. Legacies mean NADA, get it?, folks, NOTHING, unless there is genuine substance and honor and honesty behind the achievements.
09:45 PM on 05/20/2010
OOps, and I forgot, may I be the first to fan you? Excellent comment!
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
02:48 PM on 05/20/2010
This is a pretty dopey topic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
socialiq
10:03 PM on 05/20/2010
Ha ha...
09:11 PM on 05/21/2010
-1 for improper pun usage
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
organicconnect
02:39 PM on 05/20/2010
I haven't heard about doping scandals in a sport that makes cycling look like it is for wimps: triathalons. One of the top competitors is also a nutritionist: http://naturalvitalitysports.com/2009/12/ironman-triathlon-performance-and-ph-balance/
02:31 PM on 05/20/2010
In a sport rampant with performance enhancing drugs, I simply don't buy that the most dominant cyclist in the sports premier event didn't use PEDs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogey907
Overfed, long-haired, leaping gnome
03:13 PM on 05/20/2010
Exactly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
socialiq
10:04 PM on 05/20/2010
thank you.