More

Ex-FBI Specialist Weighs In On Blumenthal Story

JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN   05/23/10 03:13 PM ET   AP

Richard Blumenthal Vietnam

NEW HAVEN, Conn. — U.S. Senate candidate Richard Blumenthal acknowledged he misstated his service in Vietnam, said he made mistakes, regretted them and took responsibility. What he didn't explain was why.

Blumenthal, Connecticut's popular attorney general who insisted he was proud of his domestic military service in the Marine Reserve, became part of a long running phenomenon in which men embellish or outright lie about their military record.

"They all do it for the prestige," said retired FBI agent Thomas Cottone, who used to investigate military impostors for the agency. "They all want to be recognized. They need that ego boost."

Blumenthal's political crisis erupted when The New York Times reported last week that the Democrat had repeatedly distorted his military service, including saying at a 2008 event that he had served in Vietnam. The newspaper said Blumenthal intimated more than once that he was a victim of the abuse heaped on Vietnam veterans upon their return home.

Blumenthal said he meant to say he served "during" Vietnam instead of "in" Vietnam. He said the statements were "totally unintentional" errors that occurred only a few times out of hundreds of public appearances.

A longer version of the video of the 2008 event posted by a Republican opponent shows Blumenthal at the beginning of his speech correctly characterizing his service by saying that he "served in the military, during the Vietnam era."

Blumenthal spent his entire six years of military service in the United States. By mentioning Vietnam, however, he may have been trying to identify with his audience, said Kyle Longley, a history professor at Arizona State University and author of a book on Vietnam veterans.

"A lot of this I think these guys are trying to fit themselves into 'I was part of this generation,'" Longley said. "It seems like he tried to identify with the generation of the warrior."

Former Republican U.S. Rep. Chris Shays said Blumenthal had made it clear to him and others that he did not serve in Vietnam, but he said in the past decade he began to talk in a way that left the impression he served in Vietnam.

Shays said he was not sure why Blumenthal's remarks evolved, but noted that Blumenthal was a strong supporter of veterans.

"When you're with the veterans, you want to link up with them," Shays said. "You want them to know you felt their pain."

Doug Sterner, a military historian, says inflated service records have been a problem since the founding of the country, when George Washington expressed concerns about anyone receiving military honors they did not deserve.

The problem is so common that the POW Network, a watchdog group, lists thousands of names of those it says have made service claims not matched with military records.

Cottone, who retired in 2007, said his caseload of military impostors roughly doubled after the Sept. 11 attacks as reverence for military service intensified.

"Some of it is guilt," he said. "They regretted they didn't serve in Vietnam. They just felt they missed that opportunity to be a warrior."

Christian Appy, a history professor at the University of Massachusetts who has written extensively on the Vietnam War, said many men remain convinced the Vietnam war was unjust and have no regrets about avoiding service.

"But certainly some portion of the Vietnam generation feels they missed out on some primal vital male testing experience," Appy said. "They feel like they missed out on an adventurous exciting heroic moment that would test them."

In Blumenthal's case, Appy said it may simply be he wanted sympathy votes not only for serving in Vietnam but for what he said was the rejection of Vietnam veterans when they returned home.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
henrypapillon
Mitt--free up the last 9 years' taxes
10:52 PM on 05/24/2010
Sounds like somebody is looking to pick a fight/
05:49 PM on 05/24/2010
"They need that ego boost". Scary thought
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
11:14 AM on 05/24/2010
What a tempest in a tea pot.

He was in uniform during Viet Nam.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:25 AM on 05/24/2010
Marines in Nam were getting blown up by land mines -- this guy was wearing the dress uniform and delivering gifts for Toys for Tots......maybe now when he meets real vets in public life he has some guilt over the 5 draft deferments......
08:55 AM on 05/24/2010
Blumenthal is a liar of Republican proportions. He is a cancer to the Democrats and a fair target for the likes of Rove and Gingrich. Connecticut Dems need to find someone else.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnnC0725
09:15 AM on 05/24/2010
I know..it's Bush's fault Blumenthal lied...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
VOTER
Freedom from fear - the philosophy of human rights
08:10 AM on 05/24/2010
Pols should be held accountable for their statements and the MSM should
be held accountable for not checking the veracity of pols statements.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbarnezz
"Round up the usual suspects"
07:37 AM on 05/24/2010
This doesn't have anything to do with missing out on some "primal male vital testing experience" It has everything to do with sounding tough to appeal to the voters who can't tell the difference between substance and reality. It's political illusion of the worst sort and is a key indicator of his lack of integrity that he would obscure the truth and then act hurt when he gets called on it. It's the difference between actually being brave and wanting other people to give you credit for being brave.

Those of us who lived through that era of Vietnam know that there were brave people of conviction on both sides of the debate. This is not one of them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnnC0725
09:19 AM on 05/24/2010
Maybe we should spend (waste) millions of taxpayer dollars on another usless study as to what motivates politicians to lie....quite honestly..it would be better than spending 3 million of our dollars on "if alchohol effects the promiscutity of girls at Syracuse U"...not really.
10:15 PM on 05/24/2010
I have nothing to add. You saved me a long post!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MARYHOBE
At last! Finally!
07:31 AM on 05/24/2010
Certain studies show human beings lie 3 to 6 times a day. The rate for politicians has to be a little higher. Apart from the old adage that people in glass houses...there relative harm that this man perpetrated with his lies seems to be pretty tame. I vaguely remember that men in positions of power were found to be especially deft at lying and there ability to get away with it part of the abilities that we subconsciously look for. Let's stop living in never, never land.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack2011
06:50 AM on 05/24/2010
This is too bad, he had/has a good record up til this. I cant support someone who lies or "fluffs" their service record. I hope more dems denounce him. We already have one party (repubs) that supports liars. They make excuses for their candidates and blame the media for "gotcha" journalism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnnC0725
09:33 AM on 05/24/2010
Ahh..can u say Rob Blagovich..Hillary Clinton..Bill Clinton...Barack Obama....John Edwards...Kerry..Dodd...shall I go on?
craig asia
Not part of upper-most 2%...yet!
06:22 AM on 05/24/2010
Another politician who can't be trusted. Where's the leadership? Where's the leader deserving of our respect? Forget the parties, forget the talking heads, we need men of honor in positions of leadership or we will surely suffer in the end. These days, honesty and integrety are concepts that most of us have never seen. Once again it looks like we must hold our noses and pick the least distasteful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
docbets
04:11 AM on 05/24/2010
"But certainly some portion of the Vietnam generation feels they missed out on some primal vital male testing experience," Appy said.>>

These are some seriously misguided, whacked individuals. No one who has actuallty been in a war would wish for this. I guess that's what they envy? No serious person with a life could actually, oh never mind.

"When you're with the veterans, you want to link up with them," Shays said. "You want them to know you felt their pain.">>

Yes, but you *didn’t* feel their pain. It is a lie. A manipulation. It is a misuse of other people’s feelings. A betrayal. Have I made myself clear?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Proud to be an American
01:46 AM on 05/24/2010
Blumenthal was caught stealing the valor of better men, and this will be accepted and forgiven by the Democrats of Connecticut.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
VOTER
Freedom from fear - the philosophy of human rights
08:14 AM on 05/24/2010
We don't know how CT voters will respond to Bleumenthal's comments.
On the other hand, given the $50 million dollar GOPer running against him,
he may be automatically forgiven.

Keep in MInd - GOPers voted for GW Bush and Reagan and they "misspoke"
about their military history.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charlietuna11
01:48 PM on 05/24/2010
i hope your wrong but unfortunately, your probably not. to have the dems natl. chairman come to his defense was insulting. i have more respect for the g.o.p.chairman than this pandering idiot. whats that old proverb? (you get what you accept.) i do not accept blumenthal or any of his ass kissing apologists.you can't be in a war zone and mistake that place for any other venue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Meek
12:37 AM on 05/24/2010
"Blumenthal said he meant to say he served 'during' Vietnam instead of 'in' Vietnam. He said the statements were 'totally unintentional' errors that occurred only a few times out of hundreds of public appearances."

In other words, he was totally inept, in communication skills. Why the H#%^L would anyone want to vote in someone totally inept?

Oh, wait. They already did, elsewhere: Rand.

Sigh. And I thought WE had the inept crazy ones: Senator Jim ("You Lie!") DeMint, and Governor Mark ("I am 'hiking' in ... my mistress") Sanford.

So, what's this about? Does everyone wants to suddenly be like SC and vote in idiots?
11:08 PM on 05/23/2010
Has this clown diminished the very veterans he claims to support? Of course. Did he do so to their faces? Of course. He is pathetic. But then, what would we expect from a wannabe politician?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
09:19 PM on 05/23/2010
I think it's more about fluffing up the resume for the campaign.