More

Insurgents Attack NATO's Kandahar Base

HEIDI VOGT   05/22/10 11:16 PM ET   AP

Kandahar Attack

KABUL, Afghanistan — The Taliban claimed responsibility Sunday for a nighttime assault on NATO's biggest base in southern Afghanistan. Insurgents firing rockets, mortars and automatic weapons tried to storm Kandahar Air Field – the second such attack on a major military installation this week.

Several coalition troops and civilian employees were wounded in the assault Saturday night, but there were no reports of deaths, officials said.

A Canadian Press news agency report from Kandahar said artillery and machine gun fire reverberated through the base, about 300 miles (500 kilometers) southwest of Kabul, several hours after the attack began. Militants unleashed rockets and mortars about 8 p.m. (15:30 GMT) and then tried unsuccessfully to storm the northern perimeter, officials said.

Taliban spokesman Qari Yousef Ahmadi told the Associated Press that its fighters attacked the base from two sides and fired more than 15 rockets.

It was the third major attack on NATO forces in Afghanistan in six days.

The attacks follow a Taliban announcement of a spring offensive against NATO forces and Afghan government troops – their response to a promise by the Obama administration to squeeze the Taliban out of their strongholds in the southern province of Kandahar.

On Tuesday, a Taliban suicide bomber attacked a NATO convoy in the capital, killing 18 people including six NATO service members including five Americans and a Canadian. The next day, dozens of Taliban militants attacked the main U.S. military base – Bagram Air Field – killing an American contractor in fighting that lasted more than eight hours.

On Saturday night, at least five rockets struck the Kandahar base in the initial attack, said Navy Cmdr. Amanda Peterseim, a spokeswoman for NATO forces at the base. Witnesses said explosions continued through much of the night. There were no reports of deaths and Peterseim did not have the precise number of wounded.

"The alarm has been sounding for several hours, but no insurgents have penetrated the base perimeter," NATO said in a statement. It said "a number" of military and civilian personnel were wounded "and are receiving medical treatment. There are no confirmed fatalities."

NATO said troops and civilians were told to remain in bunkers as a precaution.

Peterseim did not know how many insurgents launched the attack but said they did not appear to be wearing suicide vests, as had many of those who stormed the Bagram Air Field north of Kabul on Wednesday. In addition to the U.S. contractor's death, 16 militants were killed and five attackers were captured in the Bagram assault.

Rocket attacks against the Kandahar base, located about 10 miles (16 kilometers) south of Kandahar city, are not uncommon. But ground assaults against such large facilities as Kandahar and Bagram are rare. Two attacks in the same week show that the militants are capable of complex operations despite NATO military pressure.

Kandahar Air Field is the launching pad for thousands of additional U.S. forces pouring into the country for a summer surge against the Taliban.

Attacks in the south earlier Saturday killed three NATO service members – one American, one French and one Dutch – and an Afghan interpreter. That brought to 997 the number of U.S. service members who have died since the war began in October 2001, according to an Associated Press count. The Dutch death toll in Afghanistan now is 24 and the French toll is 42.

A loudspeaker announcement at the Kandahar base said the ground attack was coming from the north, said Maura Axelrod, a reporter with HDNet who was inside the base. She said she could hear heavy outgoing fire and that commanders had come into the bunker where she had taken cover to order all Marines with weapons to help in establishing a security perimeter.

An Afghan named Najibullah who works with a private security company on the base said that he heard rockets hitting for about half an hour. He only gave one name.

NATO's current push is aimed at winning over the population in Taliban-friendly areas by establishing security and bolstering the local government. However, each military strike has created potential for backlash amid arguments about who is truly an insurgent.

In the latest such incident, at least a dozen people were killed south of the capital Saturday after U.S. troops spotted two insurgents trying to plant bombs, an Afghan official said.

The two were shot dead in Paktia province, district chief Gulab Shah said. Troops saw comrades drag the two bodies away and called in a helicopter gunship which killed 10 more people, whom U.S. officials said were all militants, Shah said.

Shah said Afghan authorities will investigate to make sure the dead were all insurgents.

Civilian deaths are a flash-point issue in Afghanistan, where President Hamid Karzai has urged NATO to take all necessary measures to protect civilian lives.

More than eight years into the war in Afghanistan, international support is also weakening.

The defense minister of Britain's new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government met with Karzai in Kabul on Saturday and said he hopes to speed the withdrawal of British troops.

Defense Secretary Liam Fox is quoted in Saturday's edition of The Times newspaper he "would like the forces to come back as soon as possible," and wants to see if it is possible to speed the training of Afghan troops.

___

Associated Press Writers Mirwais Khan in Kandahar, Robert H. Reid in Kabul and Mike Corder in The Hague, Netherlands, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

KABUL, Afghanistan — The Taliban claimed responsibility Sunday for a nighttime assault on NATO's biggest base in southern Afghanistan. Insurgents firing rockets, mortars and automatic weapons tr...
KABUL, Afghanistan — The Taliban claimed responsibility Sunday for a nighttime assault on NATO's biggest base in southern Afghanistan. Insurgents firing rockets, mortars and automatic weapons tr...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,533
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
  1 of 7  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
bubbuh 12:29 PM on 05/23/2010
poco767a

Come on, no one has given me a serious answer.

What would victory in Afghanistan look like? If we stay, what is a win?
_____________________________________________

There is no serious answer, I'm afraid.

We missed the boat. Perhaps, we had a shot in the aftermath of 9/11 because at that time we had the vast bulk of the Afghan  Read More...
01:06 PM on 05/24/2010
It's a hard cold fact: Afghanistan is the graveyard of the empires..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:52 AM on 05/24/2010
The USA's number one money making venture is war - it always has been.

I wouldn't worry too much about the "Islamic fanatics" coming to get you - you have your own Christian loonies who will bring you down fast enough.
06:34 AM on 05/24/2010
Last week, as Congress prepared to pass yet another “emergency” spending bill to cover America’s costly operations in Iraq and Afghanistan -- to the tune of $159 billion this time around -- Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Florida, introduced a bill that would force the Pentagon to pick up the tab out of its ample regular budget.

The War Is Making You Poor Act is elegant in its simplicity. Instead of financing these longstanding conflicts outside of the regular budgeting process, where they’re not factored into deficit projections, Grayson’s bill would make the DoD work within its means, and the money would instead be used for an across-the-board tax cut that would make the first $35,000 each American earns tax-free.

http://current.com/shows/upstream/92450619_rep-alan-grayson-introduces-the-war-is-making-you-poor-act-alternet.htm
06:29 AM on 05/24/2010
And when you're face down on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains,
And die like a good British soldier.
Tennyson...

If ididn't have a couple friends in the 10th Mountain Division
I could almost enjoy watching history rhyme.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
12:17 PM on 05/24/2010
I am against this stupid war, but pray that every soldier makes it back safely, NOW.
03:30 AM on 05/24/2010
Nixon had his B52's, Obama has his drones.

You cant win a war from 35,000 feet.

This is such a waste and will ultimately bankrupt America the same way the Soviets were bankrupted.
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
02:14 AM on 05/24/2010
We can't keep down the freedom fighters. They will always fight the invaders into their countries. Have we run out of money, yet?
02:07 AM on 05/24/2010
Someone please remind me why we are there again.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
kjstjohn
10:13 AM on 05/24/2010
This helps to explain it. Top military brass wants us there and cornered Obama.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/238092
01:34 AM on 05/24/2010
If the troops come home and they're sent to the Gulf of Mexico to deal with the oil spooge they might say "send me back."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peta51
Humane Rights Advocate
12:29 AM on 05/24/2010
Let us work on our domestic problems here, meet the basic survival needs of the American people and not get involved in unjust foreign wars.

U.S. citizens should study the history of Afghan (abbreviation because it will be used so many times) and learn that Afghan is the graveyard of Empires, in this case the Amerikan Empire. We have no right to be there, the people do not want us there and as the American people themselves wake up more they too will be opposed to this losing war. According to an Associated Press: the dead count number of U.S. service members who have died since the war began in October 2001 is 997.
c/s
12:37 AM on 05/24/2010
Are you the least bit offended by the conduct of the Taliban. Particularly when they blow up schools who dare to educate women, or are you offended when they stone women to death because they are suspected of sexual misconduct. I understand the brainless retort that we can do nothing to change Afghanistan, but could you at least admit you don't give a damn either, about those who are killed and brutalized by these loving, God fearing, lun itics. Please, don't lecture the world about rights, especially when you could care less about human rights.
01:21 AM on 05/24/2010
America may fly a flag of "human rights" but it doesn't mean much when we kill more civilians than Talibs with our drone and reaper strikes, night raids, et al.
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
02:19 AM on 05/24/2010
"offended by the conduct of the Taliban"?? - I'm more offended by the conduct of Bush and Cheney creating this false war. All the money lost and civilian deaths we've caused can not be hidden behind "human rights".
photo
GravitonX
10^300 bosons could care less.
11:54 PM on 05/23/2010
Imagine if these guys got the help of some modern weaponry like US gave the Mujahideen, especially against the Russian helicopters and other aircraft. Ugly!
11:57 PM on 05/23/2010
Keep playing your video games, or, join-up and play for real.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
02:04 AM on 05/24/2010
Why would one want to do that?
photo
GravitonX
10^300 bosons could care less.
09:17 AM on 05/24/2010
Sounds like the US military is desperate for new recruits. I don't blame them. Didn't they design some kind of video game to get fresh cannon fodder?
01:22 AM on 05/24/2010
They are getting help with shaped-charge IEDs which penetrate our armor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
General Armchair
What, me worry?
08:13 AM on 05/24/2010
I haven't heard this, do you remember where you've heard that (links)?

Shaped-charge or explosively-formed projectiles, supposedly provided by Iran, were used against US forces in Iraq during the 06-07 period. At least according to US sources. So far, also according to US forces, in this war we haven't seen much of that (to my knowledge). To date there doesn't seem to be much Iranian help or influence with the Taliban. Since Iran is primarily Shia and Taliban is, I guess, Sunni or Wahabi, that probably explains why Iran isn't a big factor, yet. The strategic value to Iran of alliance or influence with Taliban is obvious. One unintended consequence of success against Afghan Taliban base/sanctuary in Pakistan could be an opening for Iran to provide weapons/training/base for Taliban in Western Afghanistan.

But as I said at the start, I haven't seen much (or really any) evidence of Iranian help, or shaped charges, so if you have seen anything, what is it?
11:45 PM on 05/23/2010
Tovarich.
Omar has gotten very brave lately; has he spotted a weakness ?
What a painfull sight.

Boris
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
Send the kids off to die, bleed their country dry.
11:09 PM on 05/23/2010
Afghanistan Coalition Military Fatalities By Year
Year US UK Other Total
2001 12 0 0 12
2002 49 3 17 69
2003 48 0 9 57
2004 52 1 7 60
2005 99 1 31 131
2006 98 39 54 191
2007 117 42 73 232
2008 155 51 89 295
2009 316 108 96 520
2010 135 41 40 216
Total 1081 286 416 1783
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
Send the kids off to die, bleed their country dry.
11:10 PM on 05/23/2010
Iraq Coalition Military Fatalities By Year
Year US UK Other Total
2003 486 53 41 580
2004 849 22 35 906
2005 846 23 28 897
2006 822 29 21 872
2007 904 47 10 961
2008 314 4 4 322
2009 149 1 0 150
2010 29 0 0 29
Total 4399 179 139 4717
11:42 PM on 05/23/2010
What a terrible waste......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peta51
Humane Rights Advocate
12:32 AM on 05/24/2010
I appreciate these figures, believe they must be accurate, but I just wonder where you source of information is. ~Che Peta ~Sacramento, California
10:59 PM on 05/23/2010
These guys are totally surrounded. Get out now.
10:30 PM on 05/23/2010
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific/view/1058373/1/.html

Good news .. the Brits are pulling out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
10:19 PM on 05/23/2010
Refresh my memory; when was the last time an empire defeated a guerilla army?
The British abandoned Kenya, Malaysia and Palestine, the French Vietnam and Algeria, the US Vietnam, and one day, when the last GI leaves Iraq and Afghanistan, will you all say it was worth it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Poetikpariah
11:00 PM on 05/23/2010
They don't defeat a guerilla army, that's the point.

Think about how the Soviets were beaten back in Afghanistan back in the 80s. We're falling into the same trap. Its much cheaper to equip a soldier with an outdated weapon and have him fight in terrain he is used to then to ship troops, supplies, and high tech equipment thousands of miles. Ultimately it comes down to a matter of logistics and morale.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
11:25 AM on 05/24/2010
And feeding the War Machine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
11:01 PM on 05/23/2010
You're right.....yes whenever the last troops leaves Iraq and Afghanistan it will seen like a bad dream. To answer your question ....NO it wasn't worth it...not one drop of American blood.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
02:36 AM on 05/24/2010
We wil leave Iraq, but not until the last drop of oil has been sucked up.