iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Robert Gibbs Defends White House On Oil Spill Response

Robert Gibbs

First Posted: 05/23/10 12:12 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:35 PM ET

With criticism mounting over a lax presidential response to the oil spill in the gulf, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs took to the Sunday show circuit to beat back talk that the episode had become the administration's Katrina.

"I think if you look back at what happened in Katrina, the government wasn't there to respond to what was happening," Gibbs told CBS's "Face the Nation." "That quite frankly was the problem. Even tracking the hurricane for days and knowing fairly precisely where it was going to hit, I think the difference in this case is we were there immediately. We have been there ever since. [Admiral] Thad Allen is directing our response as the national incident commander. There are people on the ground. There are thousands of people working even as we speak...to figure out a way to plug this hole and to deal with the spread of this oil."

In recent days, a host of voices (Republican and Democratic alike) began speaking out more forcefully with concern that the administration had taken a seemingly "lackadaisical" approach towards containing and cleaning up the Gulf spill.

"I think they actually believe that BP has some kind of a good motivation here," said Democratic strategist and New Orleans resident James Carville. "They're naive!"

"The oil is gushing and we're being lied to by how much oil is gushing...and the administration has now named a commission," another Louisianan, Cokie Roberts, said on ABC's "This Week." "Now this is what you do when you really don't have anything else to do: you name a commission," she said. "That's not going to stop the oil."

"One of the problems I have with the [Obama] administration is that they're not tough enough," added Donna Brazile, yet another Louisianan on ABC's "This Week." "They are waiting for BP to say, 'oh we have a new plan to stop the oil leak.' They need to stop it, contain it, clean it up and try and help us conserve our coastal wetlands," Brazile said.

The tensions peaked during the daily press briefing at the White House on Friday when Gibbs was repeatedly questioned as to what, exactly, the administration was doing to help with the catastrophic spill. The line of inquiry grew so contentious that Gibbs ended up calling reporters after the briefing finished to ask them about their tone.

"My frustration was one of questioners said in the premise of his question was why is the government standing around doing nothing and hoping for the best?" Gibbs explained on CBS. "There's a lot of criticisms that one can have certainly for BP and even for the government in how we got to this. But I don't think anybody could credibly say, even as frustrated as they are and as frustrated as we are, that the government has stood around, done nothing and hoped for the best. We were activated the moment that this oil rig exploded. This has been on the president's agenda ever since that happened and we have mobilized every aspect that we possibly can in our government. There have been calls to every sector of our government to ask for help. That's what we've done. My frustration was with the notion and the premise that we had sat by and done nothing which I think is certainly not true."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
With criticism mounting over a lax presidential response to the oil spill in the gulf, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs took to the Sunday show circuit to beat back talk that the episode had b...
With criticism mounting over a lax presidential response to the oil spill in the gulf, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs took to the Sunday show circuit to beat back talk that the episode had b...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,658
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (65 total)
06:57 PM on 05/25/2010
A real day 1 response would have put in motion the following:

All 24 BP super Tankers should have been put in motion to unload the current oil and steam immediately to the Gulf. Once their they would have each placed their huge vacuum hoses down near the gush thus grabbing the oil as it emerged. That would have bought them time to implement a predesigned well sealing operation. Minimal amounts (relatively) of oil would have been spilled. We didn't do this because we can't tell big old strong BP what to do and BP might not have a good sealing plan.
But a similar spill occurred in Saudi Arabia a few years ago and the above response is exactly what happened and major destruction was minimized. You see when Saudi Arabia says JUMP. BP says "How High"
Sounds kind of like regulation doesn't it. Why don't we have good regulation? Well that would be called Dick Cheney & his thug friends at Halliburton.

Remember Jindal, You don't want that Gumment on your back.
Remember Barbour, You don't want that Gummint on your back.
Remember Sender Shebby, You don't want that Gummint on your back.

And Guvna Rick "The Hair" Perry move along with that Secession, cause were getting tired of you needing us on your back.
06:47 PM on 05/25/2010
He almost makes Dana Perrino seem credible.
09:19 AM on 05/25/2010
President Obama and BP are in bed together and the result is the disaster in the Gulf. How inept to put ties with the oil company above the interests of people in the Gulf region. Coupled with his complete mis-handling of the Arizona situation in order to garner votes this President has shown he is in NO WAY A LEADER!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:55 PM on 05/25/2010
Uh, how did you come to the conclusion that the Pres and BP are in bed together? I'm not saying you're wrong, but I haven't seen that conclusion before. Do you mean because he opened up off shore oil leases? If so, I think you're being too extreme.

As for Arizona, do you really think the ARIZONA LEGISLATURE would listen to the President? He's both a Democrat and he's black and he's not from Arizona. I really don't see what he could have (or should have) done differently. Of course, that's also wayyyy off topic.
photo
notsostimulated
A view right from the middle
08:34 AM on 05/25/2010
On Saturday it was James Carville on CNN issuing the critique that the administration must have found most cutting, and galling, of all.
"They are risking everything by this 'go along with BP' strategy they have, and it seems like lackadaisical on this," said Carville, a Democratic Party icon and New Orleans resident.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:56 PM on 05/25/2010
Yes, it probably was most cutting. And good. I *need* the administration to be pushy, and independent, and work on the best way to deal with this horrible disaster.
photo
notsostimulated
A view right from the middle
08:22 AM on 05/25/2010
From DAY ONE we all knew this would turn into an ecological disaster. The Federal Government should have been coordinating cleanup from DAY ONE. Media should have been asking questions about cleanup efforts from DAY ONE.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:58 PM on 05/25/2010
Question #1 for me: Where were the supplies in case of disaster? Did Katrina wipe them out? Was it assumed (or mandated) that BP would have them?

FWIW, stimulated, plugging the leak has to take priority over cleanup.
10:43 PM on 05/24/2010
Obama and Gibbs. Go ahead. Hold your heads up high. You have done nothing wrong. Just keep on keeping on. Go Dems !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:20 PM on 05/24/2010
Quit putting the blame game on Obama! What would you do? This diaster is something never heard of before...how do they stop this oil spill. Are people so immersed with putting the blame on Obama? You are all sounding like Sarah Palin and Fox News. People here here are not helping their party at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alumtrix
10:29 PM on 05/24/2010
Oh poor you. How many times has New Orleans been submerged under water? One, that's your answer.But you didn't hesitate to blame Bush for Katrina did you?
When you have 12 different people come out 2 weeks after the fact all stating the same line "we were there on day one", then you've become defensive about your response to the spill. If you've become defensive, you probably did something wrong.

The bottom line is that Obama doesn't want to be interrupted by these sorts of things. They are a distraction to his sports commentaries, weekend parties, and visiting with the various union leaders. He's a great cheerleader but lacks the ability to lead.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:00 PM on 05/25/2010
Perhaps he doesn't want to be interrupted, but such interruptions have become a mainstay of the Presidency so far: Haiti, Chile, Burma, Tennessee, and now the whole Gulf of Mexico.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:50 PM on 05/24/2010
You are hilarious. "Quit putting the blame on Obama". Poor baby. He might have to step up and take charge and say the buck stops here?
09:51 PM on 05/24/2010
I'll go with the Sierra club's comment days after the spill. "our government has failed us again".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
limcy76
09:18 PM on 05/24/2010
Do not blame BP or yourself.

Do not defend yourself.

Do your job of fixing the problem!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
08:19 PM on 05/24/2010
"In Saudi Arabia in 1994, they had a 700 million gallon spill. They brought in tankers from all over the world and they sucked it (the oil) up out of the bays, treated it and they cleaned up 85% of it." -Mike Papantonio on Hardball talking about what Obama has to do (there's much more) -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tj1bAQvTRWg
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:01 PM on 05/25/2010
Give that minister a visa and a nice hotel room, and an appointment to meet with EVERYONE!!!
08:03 PM on 05/24/2010
Ironic that 1 1/2 years under a supposedly environmentally friendly President we have the largest federal government in history standing by watching one of the greatest environmental disasters the world has ever seen (rivaling Chernobyl). Yet all of the hardcore Democrat sycophants on this site will defend the actions of this government while proclaiming that this government needs more power (to effectively do nothing). I can't wait to watch these clowns start managing healthcare ....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:03 PM on 05/25/2010
"Standing by" is more than a little extreme. The fundamental problem is that we're doing this on the fly, with obviously inadequate consideration for what to do if this were to happen.
07:23 PM on 05/24/2010
Complete lack of response by the Obama administration on the oil spill and now we find out BP can't stop leak? While oil is leaking into the Gulf, President Obama partied with his Mexican Presidential puppet who was denouncing state of Arizona while denying any culpability. The 3am call came and our President wasn't able to handle the call.
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
07:16 PM on 05/24/2010
the most damning evidence that the government isn't/hasn't done enough? the fact that robert gibbs has to defend the administration. PERIOD!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:04 PM on 05/25/2010
Um, that isn't evidence; that's his basic job. Press Secretary takes challenging questions from contrarian reporters playing devil's advocate and all that?
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
07:07 PM on 05/25/2010
if the government were doing a good job on this then the only question would be, "can we get an update?" the fact that he has to spin it and reassure everyone that they're doing everything they can even - though no one sees or believes they're doing it - is proof that the ball has been dropped.
07:03 PM on 05/24/2010
with Obama, nothing is within his responsiblity. imagine this were a nucular power plant run by a private company. would the govt. stand by & wait for that company to resolve the problem?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deezworld83
Free thinker
06:20 PM on 05/24/2010
It's funny how conservatives and republicans are always talking about keeping the federal government out of states business, but he minute a disaster like this happens and they all want the President to come help. We have never had a disaster such as this and no one knows what to do or how to do it. This is totally uncharted territory for this country and most other nations in the entire world. We don't have the equipment to deal with it or the expertise to know how to go down that far in the ocean. We know we need to do something, but the problem is no one knows just what to do!
07:36 PM on 05/24/2010
B S

National defense and major disaster mitigation are definitely in the federal gov't portfolio.

Anyone who parrots the argument that conservatives do not want the government to respond to national threats is lying or obtuse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talmageb
Shameless liberal
07:53 PM on 05/24/2010
Government is not the solution, Government is the problem
---Ronald Reagan

Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.
Ronald Reagan

Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidise it.
Reagan (again)

Ronald Reagan is by far the most popular and iconic modern conservative leader.Hes constantly and consistently parroted by EVERY modern conservative. From Paul to Boehner to Cantor to Bachmann to Palin and Gingrich. They all cry for the dissolution of the federal government. Limiting their ability to tax, regulate and in their view "impede business.". This is a cornerstone of the new republican ideology. To pretend that republicans want the federal government to function in any meaningful way is to either lie or be obtuse. Cheers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deezworld83
Free thinker
08:31 PM on 05/24/2010
I agree with that but, when you take shots at the government for not stepping up to do something about this, when you can't come up with something to help solve the problem, you really aren't doing your side any favors. It's always easy to set back and say why aren't they doing this or why aren't they doing that, when you have no idea what you're talking about. We don't have subs that go down that far in the Navy or in private industry in this country, we need help from around the world from countries like China, Russia, France or anyone else who can help and if you really think that the administration hasn't done all they can to find someone who can help, than you are the one who is lying or obtuse.