iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arizona Graduation Speech Criticizing Immigration Laws Elicits Boos, Jeers

Arizona Graduation Speech

First Posted: 05/24/10 10:15 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:35 PM ET

University of Arizona associate professor Sandra Soto has come under intense criticism for talking about Arizona immigration laws in her graduation speech last week.

In her address to the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences (video and full text below), she called up on the class of 2010 to use their critical thinking skills to solve the state's problems and openly voiced her disapproval for Arizona's newly passed immigration laws. Her reasoning, she said, was in part because her field of scholarship, Chicano studies, was "under attack in [the] legislation."

The audience reaction was split -- along with jeers came applause -- but many in the blogosphere were roiled that Soto politicized her speech. As one commenter wrote on a KVOA article about the incident: "Using a commencement address to espouse your political point of view to a captive audience is just plain rude."

But there's support for Soto as well. Inside Higher Ed points to a blog post by NYU Ph.D. student Marisol LeBron, who wrote that those irked by Soto's speech are "advancing the idea that universities and institutions of higher education should be depoliticized places where one goes to learn objective truths."

Soto told Inside Higher Ed that she has "no regrets" about her speech, despite the threatening e-mails she's received in the aftermath:

"My work is in Chicana cultural studies, so it's my obligation, if I am going to be up on a stage, I feel it is my absolute responsibility to address these issues."


She said that no one who knows her could have doubted that she would speak out, and that she was prepared for some booing, but was surprised by "how vitriolic" the e-mail messages have been since the talk. She said that she will turn over to authorities those that might be threatening, such as an e-mail suggesting that the sender "hopes you don't look both ways" while crossing the street.

What's your take? Was Soto's speech inappropriate, or was the audience out of line? Weigh in below.

WATCH:


FULL TEXT:

It is my great pleasure and honor to be among the first to congratulate you on completing your studies at the University of Arizona, the flagship institution of our state, and -- I can say with utmost confidence -- the university with the most Facebook fans in the state.

Congratulations as well to those family members and friends who have supported and encouraged our students through the process. Graduates, I applaud you for showing up day after day, semester after semester, for opening your hearts and minds to multiple ways of seeing, representing, and analyzing the world. For some of you, a Bachelor's degree has turned out to be not enough schooling and so you are headed off to graduate school, medical school and law school. A handful of you are here today because you have finally reached the terrific milestone of completing a doctorate. But most of you are here to celebrate the momentous conclusion of your undergraduate studies.

If you entered college immediately after finishing high school, you have been a student for at least the last 17 consecutive years. 17 years. Now you will try your hand at making a life outside of the context of classes, teachers, required reading, libraries, flip-flops, office hours, deadlines, and all-nighters. That you are about to undergo a major and exciting life transition may not have fully sunk in yet. I'm guessing that you have been too busy attending to the details and whirlwind of the end of your last semester: your examinations and essay writing, your celebrating and packing. But in the upcoming months you are likely to experience a range of emotions from euphoria over what you might perceive as newfound freedom to a great sense of loss as you realize that college life simply cannot be replicated.

When finding yourself nostalgic for this stage of your life, can you remember that though you are no longer a student, you are taking your college experiences with you everywhere you go. Whichever route you take from here, it is absolutely essential that you honor and not take for granted your diplomas. Too many people in this country will never in their lifetime have the "privilege" to set foot on a research-one campus, much less hang a framed diploma on their wall. You may not have always appreciated those five-page essay assignments in which you were required to analyze and interpret a social problem or a poem or a political speech. But I hope that among the dozen or so of those essays you wrote for us, the process of brainstorming, outlining, discussing, writing, and revising at least one or two essays made you feel alive, interested, engaged, heard, smart, maybe even brilliant. Now that you won't be receiving grades and regular feedback from professors, it is crucial that you own your knowledge, that you deeply believe in yourselves as thinkers, and that you continue to hone your critical skills by being avid and sharp readers, by discussing social issues with your friends, co-workers, and family. The United Negro College Fund created a spot-on slogan when 40 years ago they said simply "A Mind is a Terrible Thing to Waste."

Take your powers of reasoning, evaluating, analyzing, arguing, critiquing everywhere:
from the grocery store to the voting booth; from the next episode of reality TV you watch to the controversial state bills you read; from the way you handle a painful situation in which you suspect you are being treated unfairly, to the way you respond to a situation in which you bear witness to someone else (possibly even a stranger) being treated unfairly ... whether because of the color of her skin, the accent he might have, or her country of origin.

One of my favorite classroom experiences is when a student raises her hand to say, "Professor Soto, this discussion reminds me of a book we are reading in one of my other classes." In that unique moment, this student is not only fully invested in and driving knowledge production but she wants to share her insights with me and her fellow students, asking us to consider an issue or a problem through a fresh angle, one enabled by innovative and interdisciplinary thinking.

We are counting on you to continue to make and share those inventive connections between issues that might seem separate from one another. In fact, we are dependent on you -- the next generation of leaders, teachers, journalists, and lawyers -- you will have to confront and solve such a difficult and challenging set of problems. I know that it will sound cliche for a convocation speaker to state that this particular group of graduates -- the class of fill-in-the-blank -- is at a crossroads. However, if the recent past has been any indication of what is to come, you -- the CLASS of 2010 -- will need to muster all of the tools of your education in order to negotiate and help solve a range of social problems and vexing issues that those who came before you have not managed to disentangle, from immigration reform to our ongoing war, through the economic recession. We have only to turn on the TV to see one of the wealthiest and most technologically sophisticated corporations in the world unable to stop an oil leak threatening natural and human devastation.

Who would have thought that an environmental disaster of that magnitude would be competing for national headline space with ... Arizona?

The whole nation is watching Arizona right now.

We went so quickly from a fairly typical state situation in which we were concentrating our efforts on how best to dig ourselves out of this economic hole we have been in for the last several years without compromising our public services and our public education to a crisis situation in which our public policy and social relations are incredibly strained, in which racial discord is being provoked not solved by the recent legislation that is horrifying so many of us in and outside of Arizona. Certainly, we will not all agree on how best to reform immigration. But it is our civic responsibility to have educated, well-informed, and non-hysterical debate,
and to develop solutions that are fundamentally respectful of human and civil rights.

What we so desperately need -- and yes this does put the class of 2010 at a particular crossroads -- is for you to bring every critical thinking skill at your disposal, and then some more, to bring all of the substantive knowledge of history, diverse cultures and societies, ethics and politics -- bring all of these to the table.

The new Arizona law generally known as SB 1070 is considered the strictest anti-immigrant legislation in the country and is explicitly intended to drive undocumented immigrants out of the state. One reason it has instigated a boycott is because to a whole lot of people, myself included, it appears to not only invite but require the police to engage in racial profiling. Before we had a chance to fully get our heads around the implications of either 1070 or of the subsequent boycott, our governor signed HB 2281, which is intended to eliminate any Ethnic Studies classes from public and charter schools in Arizona.

As I held hands with Middle and High School students who formed a human chain around TUSD headquarters this past Wednesday to protest this law, the children tirelessly chanted:
"Our education is under attack, what do we do? Fight Back."

As a professor, someone who has committed her life to teaching, I was moved beyond words to see those children peacefully -- in fact, beautifully -- asking only for a chance to see themselves reflected in the lessons they are taught, the lectures that they hear, the textbooks that they read.

I was there with those children for two reasons:

First, Chicano studies, the field under attack in this legislation, is my own field of research and teaching. The law suggests that it is knowledge about marginalized histories and cultures that will divide us. That is, this law tries to shoot the messenger. As the young students told reporters repeatedly Wednesday, they have a right to learn about all sorts of diverse histories and cultural expressions. The second reason I stood with those children is because their education, like your education, matters to me. If I have been saying anything to you so far, it is that education has a public value. That is, your education will not only bring you a bigger paycheck. It will enable you to be a better fellow citizen, more productive, better able to participate in solving the challenges I and my peers have not been able to conquer. So the ongoing cutbacks in public funding of education, as well as the recent devastating cuts to our own university among others, are deeply worrying to me in that they strike at both the quantity and quality of education that this state provides to its people. I do hope that you will, like the youth I stood with on Wednesday, fight for public education. Now that you have completed your own education, please remember to leave the door open behind you so that other students may enter.

On behalf of the faculty of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, and of the Department of Gender and Women's Studies, I wish you the very best.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

University of Arizona associate professor Sandra Soto has come under intense criticism for talking about Arizona immigration laws in her graduation speech last week. In her address to the College ...
University of Arizona associate professor Sandra Soto has come under intense criticism for talking about Arizona immigration laws in her graduation speech last week. In her address to the College ...
Filed by Leah Finnegan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,373
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (75 total)
photo
Max is Back
Caiu na roda, ou acorda ou vai rodar!
08:54 AM on 07/21/2010
Why do T-baggers h@te freedom of speech?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malby Lewis
11:23 PM on 07/15/2010
"explicitly intended to drive undocumented immigrants out of the state"--oh no! How horrible!
09:05 PM on 06/14/2010
i am a republican and a fiscal conservative. i am appalled by this law. the big problem with this law is the enforecement part. how is the law enforcement going to kno if one is legal or not? will they use racial profiling as a tool to subject the minorities to endless search? if my party is against government intrusion in our lives then how can it pass/support such an openly racist unjust law?

this may help republicans locally in the short run but in the long run when the hispanic children (who will b eligible to vote) will not forget the injustices/racism subjected to their parents. i dont know why my party is bent on sitting in the opposition benches?

illegal immigration is a problem but not a serious one. the studies consistently show the drop in crime rates. yet we bully on the unfortunate in the society. most of them come here to escape the poverty and becaz of the opportunites in this great nation. they dont come here to commit crime. ppl who have no idea of poverty love to use big words that seldom brings relief to the suffering.

i plead my party to take a softer approach on this issue. we believe in family values and it will be hypocritical of us to break the families. lets practice compassionate conservatism.
photo
Max is Back
Caiu na roda, ou acorda ou vai rodar!
08:57 AM on 07/21/2010
Good luck with that one.

The GOP has no ideas this election cycle so they have resorted to beating up on the weakest sapegoat they could find- the immigrant in general and the sans papiers in particular.

Jan Brewer teamed up with white supremacist Russell Pearce to scare up some votes in exchange for dooming the GOP in AZ for the next 40 years. Looks like 20 other red states have made the same political calculation. Pretty sad...
03:32 PM on 06/13/2010
The problem with those academic professionals, like this Associate Professor of Chicano Studies at the U of A...is that her Ivory Tower speech is full of ideals but without any practical or pragmatic realities that is affecting the majority of middle-class Arizonians of their health and safety and welfare economics of their families in 2010...she is definitely out of touch with an immigration problem that is not enforced by our federal government...and that even Mexico's immigration policies that are enforced against their own illegal immigrants, would not tolerate!
03:23 AM on 06/01/2010
I think she's wonderful, and I think in the end most everyone but the most reactionary had respect for her.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:43 AM on 05/28/2010
I wouldn't have been there to be subjected to HER views about it either .

The BOOS were deserved .
02:22 PM on 05/30/2010
That's right. Anyone who was so offended by her words should have walked out, the adult thing to do. Booing, is for baseball games, not college graduations. Booing is not an argument, it just shows you have no other way to express your opinion.
photo
Max is Back
Caiu na roda, ou acorda ou vai rodar!
08:59 AM on 07/21/2010
Why do T-baggers h@te freedom of speech?
06:22 AM on 05/27/2010
remember folks

your tax dollars going to higher ed are helping pay these sorts of teachers

and remember, we need to give more money to these universities

they are struggling to get by
01:08 PM on 05/27/2010
your tax dollars going to higher ed are helping pay these sorts of teachers

____________That's exactly where they should be going, instead of to repressive cops to enforce white bigot conservative laws.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ADVOCATE4ZPG
02:18 AM on 05/29/2010
That should be "white, BIGOTTED, conservative....."; this time a solecism. No comma required after "going." For someone so consumed with his/her notion of TOLERANCE, you certainly spend an inordinate amount of time dashing here and there PRESCRIBING this and PROSCRIBING that..... Power-seeking....?

Give it over, and join the 60% of Arizonans who support the enforcement that S.B. 1070 will DELIVER after July 29? After a visit or two to police headquarters, you'll find it a more convenient alternative to produce convincing(!) evidence of citizenship/residency.....especially in that searing heat...?!??!
10:48 AM on 05/26/2010
This really was not the time for her to express her view of the law. Graduation commencement should be focused on the students who have worked hard to get their degrees and should be honored during the ceremony. It is not a time to talk about political views. I think if she were anywhere and at any school, she would have been booed. I think she was trying to spread her message at the wrong time. That is what we have newspapers, blogs and the internet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kilgore2Trout
12:38 PM on 05/26/2010
Her remarks were fully appropriate. Political views are often expressed at graduation ceremonies, although perhaps as gently and eloquently as Professor Soto did.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ADVOCATE4ZPG
09:05 PM on 05/26/2010
YOU would be outraged had she spoken on the NEED to effect law(s) eliminating the legal existance of "anchor babies," non e vero?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
qaan
Cake or Death!!!
03:16 PM on 05/26/2010
I agree that she improperly hijacked a graduation speech. I just think she pushed the issue too far in her speech and needed to broaden her topics. However, since this was a graduation speech, no one in the audience should have booed unless they were students in the graduating class. Their booing also dishonors the students.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ADVOCATE4ZPG
02:23 AM on 05/29/2010
Except for the kerfuffle(sp?) here and in the newspapers, neither the speech nor the response would be remembered past nightfall. SIC TRANSIT GLORIA MUNDI and well as sour grapes political thought....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerard Johnson
12:33 AM on 05/26/2010
Shameful :T
03:03 AM on 05/26/2010
You're right. The bigot conservatives in the audience certainly are shameful. I wonder why they even showed up, since they think public education is of the devil.
holyghostie
Spiritus est qui vivificat
07:32 AM on 05/26/2010
Is it shameful when Chicano comedians use the term BEANER to describe fellow Mexicans?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerard Johnson
12:33 PM on 05/26/2010
That does make me scratch my head. I thought that a majority of the conservative base was against public education. Weird O.o
06:28 PM on 05/25/2010
What an idiot professor!!!!
08:32 PM on 05/25/2010
What a dumb conservative post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FHTB
01:20 AM on 05/26/2010
Idiot? Look in the mirror.
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
06:21 PM on 05/25/2010
B. FOR ANY LAWFUL STOP, DETENTION OR ARREST MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANY OTHER LAW OR ORDINANCE OF A COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN OR THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN AND IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON, EXCEPT IF THE DETERMINATION MAY HINDER OR OBSTRUCT AN INVESTIGATION. ANY PERSON WHO IS ARRESTED SHALL HAVE THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS DETERMINED BEFORE THE PERSON IS RELEASED. THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).
A PERSON IS PRESUMED TO NOT BE AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES IF THE PERSON PROVIDES TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR AGENCY ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. A VALID ARIZONA DRIVER LICENSE.
2. A VALID ARIZONA NONOPERATING IDENTIFICATION LICENSE.
3. A VALID TRIBAL ENROLLMENT CARD OR OTHER FORM OF TRIBAL IDENTIFICATION.
L. THIS SECTION SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL LAWS REGULATING IMMIGRATION, PROTECTING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF ALL PERSONS AND RESPECTING THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS.

For any lawful stop, detention or arrest.
06:22 PM on 05/25/2010
Stop yelling, pls.
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
06:22 PM on 05/25/2010
ooops, cut and paste, sorry!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:23 PM on 05/25/2010
Shouting is unnecessary & ignorant...as is racial profiling.
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
06:27 PM on 05/25/2010
Yes, racial profiling is a bad thing. However, stopping a person for a crime and then asking to see identification is very reasonable. That's what the AZ law does. Even better what it does it put the spotlight on the lack of Federal enforcement of immigration laws, which has forced Obama's hand so that he is putting 1200 troops on the border.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
champions1
Champion
05:46 PM on 05/25/2010
This is one tough and smart girl......no fear ...i love her for doing what is right...God says to love all your brothers and sisters......
07:30 PM on 05/25/2010
What does that have to do with illegal immigration?
08:35 PM on 05/25/2010
Did you listen to the speech at all, or did you just write that based on what you read at VDARE.com?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
04:24 PM on 05/25/2010
And the College Associations weigh in, mightily!

"The question surfaced about our association hosting an event in any other state or country that could potentially create an atmosphere of exclusion, harassment, or an unwelcome environment for an ACPA member. This is problematic and goes against our fundamental values of inclusion."

So, AZ lost another lucrative convention. And other educational groups will follow, since education is one of the most 'melty' vocations there is -- and the members will not want to take the chance of being harassed or jailed.

The "majority" seems to be getting smaller all the time, doesn't it?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
murphthesurf3
Progressive: Like Ike and Clinton!
04:01 PM on 05/25/2010
Are the booers and jeerers in that audience that afraid of Dr. Soto's ideas that they felt the need to shout her down?

Listen to the comments made by those near the camera: "This is America....America First.....American for Americans." That speech is equally frightening to me.

The College of Social and Behavioral Science includes majors for whom sensitivity to issues of gender, ethnicity and race would seem to be "givens" . I hope the angry calls were from relatives and friends and not an enlightened student body. I hope.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:54 PM on 05/25/2010
Having just seen it, the Boos appeared to have originated to close to the stage to have been made by guests. Pathetic. Americans should believe in obeying & following the law. Not in racism & racists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kilgore2Trout
05:33 PM on 05/25/2010
there are other recordings in which the boos are drowned out by the cheers. Be careful about drawing conclusions from a single recording made by a conservative blogger.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
murphthesurf3
Progressive: Like Ike and Clinton!
10:43 PM on 05/25/2010
The technical discussion between yourself and another poster illustrates the problem: I would really like to talk why those who were booing were doing so. Frankly, a moderate, polite boo during the applause pauses would be fine with me. It is the efforts to shout the speaker down that are of greatest concern.
07:37 PM on 05/25/2010
So because we're sensitive to issues of gender, race and ethnicity, we shouldn't be able to distinguish between those who are citizens and legal residents, and those who are here illegally?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
murphthesurf3
Progressive: Like Ike and Clinton!
10:40 PM on 05/25/2010
Not the point I was making. I was suggesting that in an academic environment an openness to a variety of perspectives on difficult issues should be considered and debated. Whether the speaker was right or wrong is not my issue. What is my concern is that there was an attempt to shout down a speaker whose thoughts, even her initial thoughts, were rejected by some audience members. This is Tea Party Town Hall nonsense. Disagree with the position. Refuse to applaud. Write a letter of concern. And yes, when applause break out at appropriate points, even boo, but then shush so the speech can be completed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
03:59 PM on 05/25/2010
AZ has lost, so far, over $100,000,000 in business. The universities have just reported that a significant percentage of out-of-state students have withdrawn from summer and next winter's programs. The latino organizations, business and social, are still firm in their support for a continued boycott -- the latino citizens are willing to trade short-term income for long-term safety.

I'm very proud of the people that have stood up against the harassment and unconstitutional treatment of our latino communities.
04:05 PM on 05/25/2010
The best way to send a message is to pull your money from support.

There is one color that speaks louder than Black, White, Yellow, or Brown.

It's Green!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
04:08 PM on 05/25/2010
Exactly. Then leave the big property owners to snarl at the politicians behind the scenes -- as they did on the MLK holiday issue. Citizens can jump up & down all they like -- both sides will be ignored by everyone but the press, who just uses everyone. But the movers & shakers WILL listen to the p*ssed-off big-money boys!

I imagine that's going on as we speak.
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
04:41 PM on 05/25/2010
But ... what are we comparing that $100 million figure to? How much does illegal immigration cost the state of AZ? It's safe to say that the majority of people coming illegally into AZ from Mexico aren't coming with a college education, correct? They are not going to be high wage earners, they are more likely to be looking for a job. Yes, many will earn degrees over time, but I think it's fair to say they will be needing more in services than they provide in taxes for many years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:03 PM on 05/25/2010
So, enact legal & Constitutionally appropriate laws & solve the problem. Do you have a problem following the Constitution? Punish those who employ illegals harshly enough that they stop providing jobs. The illegals will go home & both the law & the Constitution will be followed. Do you think it is better to solve or continue the problem? I prefer to solve problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
05:05 PM on 05/25/2010
I'm not comparing the loss, it simply exists as reported cancellations and subsidiary estimates.

And there are dozens of long-term studies, all over the world, including federal studies, that indicate the long-term advantages of migration -- which includes ALL forms of immigration -- are an increased GPA, an invigorated society and a more prosperous economy and social system.

In other words, you've been lied to, you believed the lie, and while the information is available on the internet for you to inform yourself, it is highly doubtful you will. Since it is far easier to simply marinate in the opinion that suits your mindset.

And yes, I do watch FOX, and read conservative POVs. And if conservatives ever actually move to practice what conservatism actually could provide, I'll be happy to stand behind more than half of those programs.