iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rand Paul: Maddow Was Fair To Me But Media At Large Was Not (VIDEO)

First Posted: 05/24/10 12:15 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:35 PM ET

Maddow Rand Paul

Prior to canceling an appearance on "Meet the Press" Friday, Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul did sit down for an interview with a local television station in which he complained about being "tortured" by Rachel Maddow but ultimately called her interview "fair."

"I need to be very careful about going on certain networks that seem to have a bias," the Kentucky Republican offered, by way of reflecting on the controversy he caused when he refused to endorse the totality of the Civil Rights Act. "Because it really wasn't the interview so much that was unfair. The interview, I think, was fair. But they went on a whole day repeating something over and over again and it makes me less inclined to go on a network."

The local interview, which up to now has not been commented on, is a remarkable illustration of just how Paul's nascent general election campaign became consumed last week with its press coverage.

The Tea Party darling began the process with an informal conversation with his interviewer, Joe Arnold, in which he freely admonished the treatment he's received by the Fourth Estate.

"Did you see that [interview] this morning with [George] Stephanopoulos," Paul says, in reference to the interview he had granted that morning to ABC's "Good Morning America". "I thought it went OK. I held my own... That was sort of my intention. You see Chris Matthews now has admitted that everything he was saying wasn't true -- it was coming from [Democratic candidate] Jack Conway. They need to be more careful reporting their news because they did it all day long."

Arnold asked Paul why he waited so long to simply affirm that he would have voted for the Civil Rights Act had he been in the Senate -- which he did the night following his appearance on Maddow, during an interview with CNN.

"That was the next interview I had," Paul explained. "It takes a while to get back on a program. We were also on national ABC when you were going to take the feed yesterday. I'm not sure how fair that was. I thought it was a good interview."

"Did you see that interview?" Paul asked, rhetorically. "They didn't put it up... They interview me for five minutes find out all my answers, in order to see... they didn't ask any of those questions again, they wanted to ask a new series of questions. I don't think that was a fair journalistic tactic to do a pre-interview, not use it, and then use it as a set up for another interview. I wasn't really happy with the way that was set up."

Coming hours before Paul's campaign -- at the behest of national Republican leadership -- scaled down his national presence, the interview he gave to WHAS11 is an illuminating window into a candidate in the midst of an acute political crisis. By his rendering, the answers he gave to his various interviewers were either non-controversial or clear. It was the media that spurred the confusion -- though by conceding that Maddow's interview was "fair," Paul has offered a more sympathetic review of the MSNBC host than others (notably Sarah Palin) in the conservative community.

Minutes after the taping, Paul received a call from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. At some point that day, likewise, he talked to strategist Karl Rove. Hours later his aide informed "Meet the Press" that he was canceling his scheduled sit-down.

Producers on the program initially expressed surprise about the decision. But during the sit-down with WHAS11, Paul offered plenty of hints of what was to come.

"Our Senate campaign has become [sic] more the level of attention than a presidential campaign gets. And so you can see how people sort of doggedly grab an issue and won't let it go. I think that kind of stuff can happen sometimes when you get into an issue," said Paul. "It is also why you see politicians... don't talk to reporters very much, don't get interviewed very much, and also have a lot of people protecting them, layers and layers of protection. And I am more frank and open. And I think some people want that in government... so that is kind of where we stand and we learned from past experience."

WATCH THE INTERVIEW HERE:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Prior to canceling an appearance on "Meet the Press" Friday, Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul did sit down for an interview with a local television station in which he complained about being "tortu...
Prior to canceling an appearance on "Meet the Press" Friday, Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul did sit down for an interview with a local television station in which he complained about being "tortu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,596
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (177 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mlm4420
Liberal progressive
09:44 PM on 05/26/2010
Why does he remind me of Sarah Palin?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timhere
11:59 AM on 05/26/2010
Rand Paul opposes the the civil rights act as does his heroes. Ron Paul, Ayn Rand and Barry Goldwater who voted against it. Libertarianism has been a political ideology in this country for a long time. However, their is a reason it has existed on the fringe and has never garnered a political majority. That reason is the more a person learns about it; the more likely they are to oppose it. The thirty second definitions sound good, but the devil is in the details.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lilacluvr
Republicans need to clean up their own damn mess!
11:30 AM on 05/26/2010
Yada, yada and blah, blah, blah. Rand Paul, Sarah Palin and Republicans are trying to use all that down-home country hickisms like - you betcha - and gosh darn - thanks, but no thanks. But what is very telling is when the new kid on the block - Rand Paul - says what what really believes about the Civil Rights Act and then gets his tail caught in the doorway for it - these buffoons still try to push this idea that their brand of plain talking is what Americans really want.

Seriously Rand? Thanks, but no thanks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saltriverat
11:55 PM on 06/01/2010
That, "you bet ya" stuff is phony and lame. I hate to think that such dog shit appeals to her wing-nut followers.
photo
onlyinvegas
trying to tolerate ignorance
11:27 AM on 05/26/2010
What was that old saying... something about heat and a kitchen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FSM57
09:52 AM on 05/26/2010
Jesus Rand....you and Palin are such crybabies always blaming your woes on the liberal media.
Go live in a damn cave.
09:07 AM on 05/26/2010
It alarms me that he is a healthcare provider. I will avoid medical care even more than I do now... I have to wonder whether my doc is a closet wacko.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carolm62
02:54 PM on 05/26/2010
Ever consider that you misunderstand his positions as much as you misunderstand medical science...?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saltriverat
12:01 AM on 06/02/2010
In my town there is a doctor who was--maybe still is--a John Bircher. He went too far when his chicken group went against a politician who was bringing a non-polluted water line into agent orange city. What would old Hippocrates think?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaeBayB
05:21 AM on 05/26/2010
Rand your statements about he Civil Rights Act revealed the sincere beliefs of both you and your Tbagger supporters...now be your "open and frank" self and simply stand by your statement....stop chasing your tail on this issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Teagle03
05:19 AM on 05/26/2010
I like that. cousin palin
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaeBayB
05:15 AM on 05/26/2010
“And I am more frank and open.”
No, Rand you are …frankly an AUTHENTIC BLUE GRASS IDIOT….stop rambling on and on…but not saying anything whatsoever…you are beginning to behave like your cousin Palin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Teagle03
04:44 AM on 05/26/2010
Says alot about the tea baggers.
photo
SmolderingRuin
"All governments lie!" I.F. "Izzy" Stone
03:27 AM on 05/26/2010
Unfair? Oh, boo hoo, widdle wand. The problem is he's dumb as a rock. Were he and palin separated at birth? Not only is he completely historically illiterate, he's brainless, and obviously doesn't have the temperament to run for public office. What a loser.
photo
KickstandCat
Christian, therefore Liberal
02:17 AM on 05/26/2010
Rand! Can't you handle a little media bias? President Obama has to put up with this "media bias" on a minute to minute day to day basis. Don't be a cry baby. Don't be a coward. Looks like you need to MAN UP there son. Haha. Good luck with that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:09 AM on 05/26/2010
Call the WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmbulance !!!!!
photo
onlyinvegas
trying to tolerate ignorance
11:29 AM on 05/26/2010
that i like :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bcasey11
go veg
11:08 PM on 05/25/2010
that interviewer sounds like d-bag
photo
ljmck
Stand Up, Show Up, Speak Up
09:01 PM on 05/25/2010
Boo hoo. Paul complains about clips of his statements being run over and over, but politicians go on tv hoping their statements will be run over and over -- just not the ones they regret and that show who they really are.

He said what he said. Maddow gave him every opportunity to explain himself, but he didn't retract anything, so we can fairly conclude that he meant what he said. He found out too late how badly it plays, especially in a world where incredibly wealthy corporations have worked their magic and caused so many people to lose their homes, their jobs, and their health. Worse for us and for Paul, the corporations were helped by federal regulators who didn't do their jobs. So we had too little government oversight and intervention, rather than too much. And we had too much big business running free.

Paul's positions are indefensible; it wasn't the venue and the repetition that made that so.