Scarlett Johansson's Little Black Dress: Hit Or Miss? (PHOTO, POLL)

Scarlett Johansson attends the 76th Annual Drama League Awards ceremony and luncheon at the Marriot Marquis on May 21, 2010 in New York City. (Photo by Michael Loccisano/Getty Images)

Quick Poll

ScarJo's LBD: hit or miss?

Hit: beautiful!

Miss: borrrrrrring!

Share your vote on Facebook so your friends can take this poll

Comments

[WendyInCA]

02:34 AM on 05/28/2010

Beautiful in a burlap sack, probably.

[LMPE]

08:42 PM on 05/25/2010

Scarlett Johansson is ALWAYS a hit!

[Igor13]

10:07 AM on 05/25/2010

She's always hot!

The dress is a little to matronly, even if it is tight, just the cut of it.

[Skiwee]

02:41 AM on 05/25/2010

Beautiful as always Scarlett.

[Balzac]

01:58 AM on 05/25/2010

Sweet.

[siralfred]

10:32 PM on 05/24/2010

Where's Christina Hendricks?

[webgeek]

09:21 PM on 05/24/2010

Always a hit!

[sngfx]

01:43 PM on 05/24/2010

Hate the tat, but other than that, she can wear anything she wants and I'll love it.

[andyford23]

04:06 PM on 05/24/2010

because for some reason I can't respond on that thread there isn't a reply icon, be that as it may your supposed "butt kicking" is due to you lack of training in an esoteric understanding that is necessary to understand my argument... Lots of people rationalize wrongdoing and crimes that in fact is normal (think people speeding or smoking weed) they rationalize this wrongdoing- that's what normal people do... sociopaths don't "need" to rationalize because they haven't internalized societal norms therefore there isn't any need to rationalize because there concepts of right and wrong do not exist, that is what is distinct about sociopaths and regular people and yes even criminals. This isn't my definition you rube this is standard understanding from DSM (antisocial personality disorder).

[sngfx]

05:29 PM on 05/24/2010

FAIL.

The FIRST of seven "pervasive pattern(s) of disregard for and the rights of others" given in the DSM, of which a person needs to exhibit only three, is … wait for it … LAWLESSNESS!

Quoting DSM-IV-TR, the first possible indicator is a "failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest."

Now that I've won that argument, let's see how many other ways you're wrong:

2. Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure.
3. Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead.
4. Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults.
5. Reckless disregard for safety of self or others.
6. Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations.
7. Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another.

So, you aren't correct about anything. You said committing crimes isn't antisocial, though the very work you cited says it's an indicator. You said rationalizing crime isn't antisocial, yet the DSM literally uses the term to describe an indicator of ASPD.

By the DSM guidelines, I suspect a good portion of humanity could be diagnosed with ASPD. If you smoke weed (1), are impulsive (3), and speed (1 and 5) — all regularly — you have ASPD.

I have mopped the floor with you.

[LeftRightLeftRight]

01:20 PM on 05/24/2010

What is with the tattoo? What a terible place for it. Forearm tattoos are for bikers, sailors, soldiers, and Popeye. Not otherwise beautiful Hollywood starlets.

[Heauxbeaux]

02:36 PM on 05/24/2010

Not only a bad place for it, but it looks like it was done with crayons. Weird.

[mama1974]

12:54 PM on 05/26/2010

That's what I thought, too.

[wackette]

12:21 PM on 05/24/2010

Scarlett is so pretty...but, that dress should be 4" shorter or down to her ankles.

[Heauxbeaux]

02:37 PM on 05/24/2010

That was my first reaction too. It just ends at an odd place for this type of fit.

[RachelMc]

12:19 PM on 05/24/2010

very cute

[Amorak]

12:16 PM on 05/24/2010

It's too old.
It's wrinkled.
It's too long.
It's got puffy sleeves.
Take it off!

[Conk]

01:43 PM on 05/24/2010

Yeah, she'd look better naked for sure.

[gtahfan]

11:46 AM on 05/24/2010

Definitely a hit. Very nice.

[rchsod]

11:30 AM on 05/24/2010

a tad bit to old for her.....

[Just walkin the dog here]

11:09 AM on 05/24/2010

The little black dress rarely fails.