More

Government Revises 1Q GDP Down - Blame Consumer Spending

JEANNINE AVERSA   05/27/10 05:40 PM ET   AP

Economic Rebound Slowed

WASHINGTON — High unemployment isn't going away.

The slow pace of economic growth shows the recovery is too weak to generate enough jobs for 15.3 million unemployed people. Layoffs are contributing to the problem. That's evident from an elevated number of weekly claims for jobless aid.

Two government reports Thursday offered new evidence on all of those fronts.

For many Americans, it doesn't feel much like a recovery.

The unemployed face fierce competition for job openings. Those with jobs are watching their paychecks shrink. A growing number of people are at risk of falling into foreclosure. And only people with the most stellar credit are likely to get a new loan.

"We're out of recession, but the recovery is not going to bring a whole lot of smiles," said Joel Naroff, of Naroff Economic Advisors.

The economy grew at a 3 percent annual rate from January to March, according to a new estimate released by the Commerce Department Thursday. The new reading, based on more complete information, was slightly weaker than an initial estimate of 3.2 percent a month ago.

Consumers spent less than first estimated. Same goes for business spending on equipment and software. And the nation's trade deficit was a bigger drag on economic activity. Those factors led to slower growth last quarter than first estimated.

In a separate report, the Labor Department said the number of newly laid off workers filings claims for unemployment benefits fell to 460,000 last week. But the latest level of claims is actually higher than it was at the start of the year.

By this point in the recovery, economists had hoped claims would be in the 400,000 to 425,000 range. That would signal more robust job growth was on the way.

The economy did add a net 290,000 jobs in April, the most in four years. But much stronger job growth is needed to drive down the 9.9 percent unemployment rate.

Wall Street looked past the disappointing U.S. economic reports and focused on China. Stocks surged after China reassured investors it doesn't plan to sell any of the European debt it holds. The Dow Jones industrial average was up nearly 200 points in afternoon trading.

During normal times, expansion in the 3 percent range would be considered healthy for the U.S. economy. But the country is coming out the worst recession since the Great Depression. So growth needs to be stronger – two or three times the current pace_ to make a dent in the jobless rate.

Economists say it takes about 3 percent growth to create enough jobs just to keep up with the population increase. It would have to be about 5 percent for a full year just to drive the unemployment rate down 1 percentage point.

After the last severe recession in the early 1980s, GDP grew at rates of 7 to 9 percent for five straight quarters and the unemployment rate dropped from 10.8 to 7.2 percent in 18 months.

Economists don't see that happening this year. In fact, expansion in the first quarter was slower than the 5.6 percent rate in the final quarter of 2009. But economists had predicted that growth spurt would fade.

GDP measures the values of all goods and services – from machines to manicures – produced within the United States. It is the best measure of the country's economic health.

The National Association for Business Economics predicts moderate economic quarterly growth in the 3 percent range through the rest of this year.

The outlook means employers won't feel comfortable about bulking up their work forces.

Employers would need more confidence that sales will rise enough for them to ramp up hiring and raise workers' pay, analysts say. Shoppers need to be able and willing to borrow more. And Americans need to rebuild more of their household wealth, especially equity lost from home values that tanked during the recession.

Businesses are now faced with new worries about how Europe's debt crisis will affect their sales. Exporters, for example, are expecting to see slower sales from Europe, which could constrain hiring. Wall Street turmoil in response to Europe's woes could make those who have retirement savings invested in the stock market spend less.

Housing and commercial real-estate are major weak spots for the economy. Builders cut spending in each by double digits in the first quarter.

Christina Romer, head of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said in Paris Thursday that it would be a mistake for the U.S. to rapidly wind down stimulus measures.

Her comments come as federal lawmakers are at odds over a long-term extension of unemployment benefits. Democrats would like to pass the emergency spending measure before they go on vacation next week. But Republicans and conservative Democrats are pushing back over the price tag.

House leaders hope to vote Thursday on the bill. The Senate would follow.

If Congress doesn't act, thousands of people would begin to lose jobless benefits when an extension of unemployment insurance expires next week. A 65 percent subsidy for health insurance benefits for the unemployed under the COBRA program also expires.

Even with the federal relief, economists don't expect the economy to snap back.

"Recovery will be a long, drawn-out slog," said Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — High unemployment isn't going away. The slow pace of economic growth shows the recovery is too weak to generate enough jobs for 15.3 million unemployed people. Layoffs are contribu...
WASHINGTON — High unemployment isn't going away. The slow pace of economic growth shows the recovery is too weak to generate enough jobs for 15.3 million unemployed people. Layoffs are contribu...
Filed by Nate C. Hindman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:28 PM on 05/27/2010
The reason wall st ignored the data is because they were glad that there was a sucker left to buy the BS and toxic assets-- much like a casino is happy to see their high roller come back again.

By the way, there is no such thing as a jobless recovery and solvency risk doesn't disappear because some officials say there is no concern. Like a drugdealer saying this next batch is good-- an whether an addict believes the drugdealer or not-- the fix is what that addict is looking for. But what happens when the addict is close to dying from too much drug use?
03:50 PM on 05/27/2010
Well. At least they admit it *now*. Everyone that i know has been shaking their heads for months because the reports from the ANALYSTs ( so called) make no sense in relationship to what they experience, see and witness among friends, family, colleagues. I'd venture that the " average American" could have well informed them a few months back that they needed to re-look at their data. I think that this discrepancy is part of what is contributing to all the populist rage/frustration /despair that swirls around us. Can DC afford to be so wrong about unemployment? Can if afford not to listen to the agnst / reports of Americans ? The numbers have not been reliable for awhile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Klarsonent
Semi-retired landlady, small business entrepreneur
11:35 PM on 05/27/2010
"kirkland" They're feeding us BS because they think we are going to swallow it. But Americans know better.
11:40 AM on 05/28/2010
yup, Klarsonent , I could not agree w/ your point more. The *sheep* are out of the barn.
( i hope) ;-.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
avg american
It's about jobs, jobs, jobs...
03:02 PM on 05/27/2010
Tax Corporate America to pay for indefinite unemployment.
Politicians can call it the "Corporate America is going to finish cleaning up the mess that they created with our economy by paying unemployment benefits for all of the displaced unemployed Americans until unemployment is at 5%, tax."


Just because we bailed out Corporate America, and no one went to jail, doesn't mean that they are off of the hook. They need to pay for the damages that they caused in the form of indefinite unemployment benefits.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
03:26 PM on 05/27/2010
Again. Corporations do NOT pay taxes, they collect them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
01:13 PM on 05/27/2010
Unleash the power of the private sector.
We've had a move toward protectionism and over regulation for the past 50 years. These two things act as an anchor on wealth production.
Domestic protectionism means laws and regulations that protect existing industries and professions from competition. It's always done in the name of consumer protection. It stifles innovation and creates an unequal balance in the way compensation is determined.
Rather than having compensation determined by supply and demand, compensation is heavily influenced by legislation that directly or indirectly grants protective status to special interest groups.
Allowing compensation to be determined by the market would lower costs for business and allow innovative products and services to enter the market.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
03:28 PM on 05/27/2010
Finally! Some else who gets it
03:14 AM on 05/28/2010
To 007
the Chinese are protectionist and control their currency and banks
And they've won,taking complete advantage of duffouses that esouse this Milton freedman globalist $
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:10 AM on 05/28/2010
I was talking about domestic protectionism not international trade protectionism.
The Chinese moved from state controlled communism to free market capitalism.
That is why they are booming. They will be entering a new stage and the must adapt to new realities just like the US had to 50 years ago.
photo
FoonTheElder
Always choosing between the lesser of two evils
01:08 PM on 05/27/2010
Until the domination by the financial elite is overturned along with our one sided trade policies, there won't be any huge boost in employment. The financial elite are gaining wealth and power, while most everyone else is losing it.

"Although most of the Economic Elite live and operate inside the US, they are not concerned for our future. To them, the entire world is theirs and they work intimately with other elites throughout the world against the interests of the US public. Ever since the days of Henry Ford, the Economic Elite have needed a thriving US middle class to increase growth and profits, but now, in the global economy, they view the US middle class as obsolete. They increasingly look globally for profits and they would rather pay cheap labor in countries like China and India. On top of the millions of jobs they have already shipped overseas to increase profits at our expense, they are planning to ship an additional 25% of current US jobs overseas as well."

http://ampedstatus.com/full-report-the-economic-elite-vs-the-people-of-the-united-states-of-america
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
01:01 PM on 05/27/2010
WOW ..what a surprise, revelation an EYE OPENER.. imagine that... 10% unemployment holding back economic growth... AMAZING DEDUCTION... and these wizards.. they make how much money??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
09:08 AM on 06/06/2010
I love how they blame the lack of consumer spending.....HELLO...consumers have no money these days due to being unemployed...
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
11:26 AM on 05/27/2010
What a joke, we need 3% GDP just to not increase unemployment. For those that are snowed by the artiles GDP definition, I write to equation below:

GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports)

So where are we going to get the 20% GDP to get unemployment back to 5%?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
03:30 PM on 05/27/2010
That's nothing, we need 8% GDP, that does NOT include govt spending, to outpace average debt growth over the last 30 years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
03:32 PM on 05/27/2010
8% GDP growth..that is.

Unfortunately, growth with consumption as a lynchpin, will not continue indefinitely.