More

Daisy Cuevas, Peruvian Child, Becomes 'Voice' Of US Illegal Immigrants (VIDEO)


First Posted: 06/01/10 01:07 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:40 PM ET

(AP) LIMA, Peru - Seven-year-old Daisy Cuevas, thrilled to see herself on television with U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama, didn't quite understand the predicament in which she had innocently placed her undocumented Peruvian parents.

"She laughed, she jumped up and down. She was excited" after the encounter at Daisy's suburban Washington, D.C., elementary school, the girl's maternal grandfather, Genaro Juica, told The Associated Press.

The TV appearance made the pigtailed second grader a voice of the estimated 12 million immigrants living in the United States illegally -- and a source of pride for Peru's president, who visits Washington on Tuesday.

"My mom says that Barack Obama is taking away everybody that doesn't have papers," Daisy told the U.S. first lady on May 19 at the New Hampshire Estates Elementary School in Silver Spring, Maryland.

"Well, that's something that we have to work on, right, to make sure that people can be here with the right kind of papers," Michelle Obama replied.

"But my mom doesn't have papers," said Daisy, a U.S. citizen by virtue of her birth.


The color immediately drained from her mother's face. She ran crying to call her parents in Lima, then went into hiding, fearful of being deported.

These are tense times for people like Daisy's mother, a maid who arrived in the United States with her carpenter husband when she was two months pregnant with Daisy.

Daisy's parents are fearful of U.S. anti-immigrant sentiment, which for many Latin Americans is epitomized by an Arizona law taking effect in July that gives police the right to demand ID papers of anyone suspected of being in the country illegally.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has said it is not pursuing Daisy's parents. Immigration investigations, it said in a statement, "are based on making sure the law is followed and not on a question-and-answer discussion in a classroom."

Nonetheless, Daisy's mother asked the AP after the May 19 incident not to name her or her husband.

And Juica, heeding an attorney's advice, asked the news agency not to take photographs of him or other relatives in Peru.

Daisy, meanwhile, has become a celebrity in Peru.

"I'm really proud that a young girl of Peruvian origin is highlighting the enormous problem with Latin American immigration in the United States," President Alan Garcia told reporters last week.

He said it would be scandalous if her parents were deported.

"Do you know how much President Obama and Mrs. Michelle Obama would stand to lose?" he said. Garcia called the Arizona law a "completely irrational response" to the illegal-immigration question, and said he would express his thoughts on the matter to President Obama during his visit to Washington.

An estimated 1.5 million Peruvians currently live in the U.S. Of those, three in five are either undocumented or in the process of legalizing their status, said Peru's consul-general in Washington, Cesar Augusto Jordan.

Peruvian Foreign Minister Jose Antonio Belaunde said in a Radioprogramas radio interview that he considers Daisy a "successful ambassador" for compatriots in similar predicaments.
While Daisy has automatic U.S. citizenship and lives full time with her parents, her 9-year-old sister, July, has not been so lucky. July was left behind with her grandparents when her parents moved to the United States to escape poverty.

The two sisters met for the first time last year when Daisy spent a month visiting her grandparents in the working-class San Juan de Lurigancho district of Lima.

But July misses her parents, who are unlikely to visit Peru because of their illegal status in the U.S.

July has only seen them in photographs and in video chats with a webcam.

"She cries," Juica said

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

(AP) LIMA, Peru - Seven-year-old Daisy Cuevas, thrilled to see herself on television with U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama, didn't quite understand the predicament in which she had innocently placed her...
(AP) LIMA, Peru - Seven-year-old Daisy Cuevas, thrilled to see herself on television with U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama, didn't quite understand the predicament in which she had innocently placed her...
Filed by Curtis M. Wong  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 508
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
02:28 PM on 06/02/2010
Here's an interesting fact-In Mexico,if you want to open a telephone account first you have to prove that you legally reside there.
Can someone please verify this info tidbit-heard from a hispanic co-worker.
photo
quoveritas
Surgeon General warns: too much truth can cause...
04:49 AM on 06/04/2010
deal in facts not myths

haven't you heard about cell-phones? They exist in Mexico too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hard2kill
10:57 AM on 06/02/2010
Well, I am in US and not an American either but I think the best thing to do is to make a law legalizing all illegals and then close all borders so that no more illegals could come...
02:24 PM on 06/02/2010
A sensible suggestion but our glorious politicians have other priorities...
photo
quoveritas
Surgeon General warns: too much truth can cause...
04:46 AM on 06/04/2010
So, it's ok to keep others out, but when it comes to you we need to keep out doors open?
Nice double-standard pinoy....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hard2kill
06:58 AM on 06/04/2010
First, I never set foot in US soil so your assumption is failed. You deport all illegals and human right activists is your enemy. I think my suggestion is fair to all... legalizing these people can also add tax to US treasury...

I am living here but working in a American company.. I never dreamed of coming to US unless my job force me to do so....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ginny1920
08:35 AM on 06/02/2010
You know what? I think fighting "illegal immigration" is alot like fighting illegal prostitution. You have a group of people who are desperate to make money, who for the most part, wouldn't be doing what they are doing if they had better legal options. They are trying to survive. They only are able to do what they are doing because there are people willing to hire and pay them. But, our laws do not go after and expose these "enablers" who are doing the hiring and paying with the same aggressiveness as they go after the people who are desperate for a job! Why? I think we all know why! Because the ones doing the hiring and paying have more power and are able to keep the laws from coming after them.
Bottom line: if we went after employers breaking the law (and we don't need new laws, we just need to enforce the ones we have for the most part!), then people who are desperate would not see "illegal immigration" as the solution to their problems anymore!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Denni
07:47 AM on 06/02/2010
[[[[ JulieDole replied on Jun 01, 2010 at 16:51:40
“Here's unethical: *deciding* to move here illegally, with a pregnant wife in tow. Peru's s fine place to live. I've been there (with my legal passport, as they require.) There's nothing unethical about enforcing legal immigration.” ]]]]

I think it's even MORE immoral/unethical to take advantage of undocumented workers when they arrive - no matter why or how they get here. The reality is that their work has helped our economy. We'll let them serve the armed services and risk dying, but not live as citizens? We'll let them be exploited and accept their exploitation, but then demonize them when we need to for political reasons? (see con party)

JulieDole, my guess is that your trip to Peru wasn't based on your survival. My guess, and you can correct me, is that you weren't going their to make a better life because you were hungry, you weren't going because you were living in abject poverty, you weren't going because you didn't see any other way to make a better life for yourself or your children. Your reasons for going to Peru were probably far different than the reasons the individuals in Peru have for coming here and working hard (cleaning houses, taking care of other people's children, working hard labor, as described above and many more like this family.)
photo
FairProgressive
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a
07:31 AM on 06/02/2010
wait till we change the anchor baby loophole. stupidest idea/concept ever. Right up there with ACLU and move-on
photo
MNKen
Eschew Obfuscation
09:20 AM on 06/02/2010
That "loophole" is the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
photo
HeadlessHessian
Contra el prejuicio.
10:07 AM on 06/02/2010
Bingo!
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside"
photo
HeadlessHessian
Contra el prejuicio.
09:59 AM on 06/02/2010
complete ignorance of the constitution. typical right wing response.
02:34 AM on 06/02/2010
Deport.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
02:09 AM on 06/02/2010
So what happened to the mom ....?
12:54 AM on 06/02/2010
My friend who was born and raised in the U.S. and had to wait almost 2 years to get his Peruvian wife and infant son here. They had met and married in Peru. His wife got a job working in law enforcement and became a U.S. citizen. It took her 9 years to get her parents to immigrate legally to the U.S. She was unable to get her little brothers here due to the lengthy and complicated process.
So, I don't understand why we should allow those that broke are laws and entered illegally to stay. How is that fair to the millions of immigrants that came here legally? If we continue to allow this, why have any immigration laws at all. Should we just allow anyone from anywhere to come here and stay?
Also, how long can we continue to export more jobs and import more workers? There are many good reasons to regulate immigration.
peowlemeow
Democrat,non-military,undereducated,overworked
10:59 PM on 06/01/2010
Even if illegals numbered 30 million that's ten percent or less of the US population.Going draconian or even crazy vigilant won't solve anything.There has to be more self governance among illegals that are on a path to citizenship.A climate of fear just puts the most feared in charge.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
damilitantone
Fed up with politicians
10:10 PM on 06/01/2010
Peru? Folks from Peru are running U.S. immigration laws? This is one time that conservatives have it right. Despite their penchant for racist and bigoted rhetoric on many fronts, on this subject conservatives are on firm ground. The attitude of many illegal immigrants seems to be that U.S. immigration laws are not to be respected and neither are U.S. citizens. Yet they want to be treated with a level of respect that they fail to give us and our country's sovereignity. Talk about nerve.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Macnos
09:53 PM on 06/01/2010
I don't support amnesty simply because at its very core it is saying, :you broke this country's laws to get here but it's ok, you can stay". What motivation will there be for coming here legally if illegal immigrants are granted citizenship?
09:36 AM on 06/02/2010
So, you are against "illegals" because they broke the law, but you are against the law that grants citizenship to all people born in the United States.

If you were really a person who believed in the law you would also support the laws that say all children born in the US are citizens, that "illegals" receive ER care and K-12 education. But you don't. You only support the law that goes against Latinos.

So, it's not really about the law, is it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:37 PM on 06/02/2010
That's not a sensible argument.

You can be against law-breaking, but not support every law that passes. You can totally oppose a law that passes as long as you obey that law.

For example: Person A disagrees with a tax that has been imposed on soda. He can disagree with the law all he wants, as long as he pays said tax. And he can also condemn people who cheat that tax, even though he didn't agree with its passage.

In this case, the poster condemns the law-breaking done against the immigration laws of the US. He disagrees with the provision in US law that grants citizens to so-called "anchor babies". However, as long as he obeys that law, he's not a law breaker. But he is certainly free to lobby for reform of said law.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Macnos
06:44 PM on 06/02/2010
I am against illegals or their children attaining citizenship. IMO the moment someone decides to BREAK the law to get into this country they have forfeited not only their chance of becoming a citizen but that of their children. There is absolutely no credible reason for justifying entering this country illegally, no matter what you think.

I never mentioned Latinos in my previous comment yet you took a colossal as well as foolish step in assuming that because i am against illegal immigration i am also against Latinos. Nothing disgusts me more than when people like you try to equate an anti-illegal immigration stance to racism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Macnos
09:41 PM on 06/01/2010
This is completely different from the Republic of Ireland. If illegal immigrants have children the country they are not considered citizens on account of their parent's illegal status. I'm surprised Americans haven't closed this loophole.
12:40 AM on 06/02/2010
Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

It's not a loophole, it's a part of the Constitution.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Macnos
01:39 AM on 06/02/2010
It is a loophole on account of the fact that it can be easily exploited. Take for an example a woman who has just entered the US while 3 months pregnant. All she has to do is to evade detection by the authorities for 6 months (quite easy), give birth and she is unlikely to be deported because her child is now a citizen. It might be written in the constitution but it is still a loophole, the constitution's not perfect.
02:38 AM on 06/02/2010
Daisy chaining the whole extended family into the US isn't in the Constitution.

You can fix a whole lot of the massive abuse just by plugging the holes, without trashing the Constitution.
09:22 AM on 06/02/2010
If they did you wouldn't be considered a citizen.
09:30 PM on 06/01/2010
Please like the secret service hadn't thoroughly checked out everything about the kids that would be appearing on tv with the presidents wife! how gullible can you people be believing this wasn't a staged event
09:21 PM on 06/01/2010
Thank you for identifying your family for deportation proceedings.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
08:26 AM on 06/02/2010
IIRC BCIS already said they weren't going to pursue it. Wonder why? Surely the fact the kid fessed up to the First Lady didn't have anything to do with it....lol
09:24 AM on 06/02/2010
Sorry, not gonna happen.

Keep wishin' though...
09:02 PM on 06/01/2010
I am sure her Mom clinched her butts cheeks super tight as she stared at the televisioin in dazed disbelief over her daugther's comment to the 1st Lady before getting up and grabing her suitcase to head back to her homeland.