More

Andrew Romanoff White House Job Offer: Colorado Democrat Allegedly Offered Position To Drop Senate Bid

PHILIP ELLIOTT   06/ 2/10 11:57 PM ET   AP

Andrew Romanoff

WASHINGTON — One of President Barack Obama's top advisers suggested to a Colorado Democrat that he forgo a primary challenge to Sen. Michael Bennet and instead apply for one of three international development jobs.

The disclosure came just days after the White House admitted orchestrating a job offer in the Pennsylvania Senate race with the similar goal of avoiding a messy or divisive Democratic primary.

The back-room deals – former President Bill Clinton led the Pennsylvania effort and White House deputy chief of staff Jim Messina worked with former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff – called into question Obama's repeated promises to run an open government.

Romanoff said in a statement Wednesday night that he was contacted by Messina last fall and told that the White House would support Bennet in the primary. When he said he would seek the nomination anyway, Messina "suggested three positions that might be available to me were I not pursuing the Senate race," Romanoff said. "He added that he could not guarantee my appointment to any of these positions."

Romanoff added: "At no time was I promised a job, nor did I request Mr. Messina's assistance in obtaining one."

Earlier Wednesday, a White House official insisted nothing inappropriate or illegal took place but didn't provide the details Romanoff offered in his statement and a copy of an e-mail he had received from Messina.

"Mr. Romanoff was recommended to the White House from Democrats in Colorado for a position in the administration," White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton said. "There were some initial conversations with him, but no job was ever offered."

Yet even the appearance of trading taxpayer-funded jobs to ease an ally's political path left questions for an administration that was the most transparent in history.

Messina, a tough-minded veteran of Senate politics and one of the president's best fixers, spoke with Romanoff on Sept. 11, 2009, and suggested that Romanoff might better use his time at the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Messina sent Romanoff job descriptions for three positions: an administrator for Latin America and Caribbean; the chief of the Office of Democracy and Governance; and the director of the U.S. Trade and Development Agency.

Romanoff said he later left a message on Messina's voice mail saying he would continue his Senate campaign.

The Colorado episode follows a similar controversy in Pennsylvania. An embarrassed White House admitted last Friday that it turned to Clinton last year to approach Rep. Joe Sestak about backing out of the primary in favor of an unpaid position on a federal advisory board.

Sestak declined the offer and defeated Sen. Arlen Specter late last month for the Democratic nomination after disclosing the job discussions. His supporters highlighted it as evidence of Sestak's antiestablishment political credentials. He said last week he rejected Clinton's feeler in less than a minute.

In a two-page report on the Sestak case, the White House counsel said the administration did nothing illegal or unethical.

Republicans have strongly criticized the offer to Sestak and challenged the White House's ethics.

"Just how deep does the Obama White House's effort to invoke Chicago-style politics for the purpose of manipulating elections really go?" said Rep. Darrell Issa, a California Republican who unsuccessfully sought a Justice Department investigation into Sestak and showed no sign of slowing.

"Clearly, Joe Sestak and Andrew Romanoff aren't isolated incidents and are indicative of a culture that embraces the politics-as-usual mentality that the American people are sick and tired of. Whatever the Obama brand use to stand for has been irrevocably shattered by the activities going on inside Barack Obama's White House," Issa said.

Unlike Sestak, Romanoff had ducked questions on the subject until issuing his statement Wednesday night. Also unlike Sestak, Romanoff was out of office and looking for his next act after being forced from his job because of term limits.

Romanoff had sought appointment to the Senate seat that eventually went to Bennet, publicly griped he had been passed over and then discussed possible appointment possibilities inside the administration, one of the officials said.

After being passed over for the Senate appointment, the out-of-power Romanoff made little secret of shopping for a political job. Romanoff also applied to be Colorado secretary of state, a job that came open when Republican Mike Coffman was elected to Congress. Gov. Bill Ritter again appointed a replacement, and again passed over Romanoff.

Next, according to several Colorado Democrats speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal negotiations, Romanoff also approached Ritter about being Ritter's running mate for Ritter's re-election bid. It was only after that attempt failed, the Colorado Democrats said, that Romanoff joined the Senate contest.

Romanoff still wasn't settled on the Senate race. When Ritter announced in January that he wouldn't seek a second term after all, Romanoff publicly talked about leaving the Senate race to seek the governor's office, though he ended up staying in the Senate contest.

Bennet has outpaced Romanoff in fundraising and support from Washington, although party activists attending the state party assembly last month favored the challenger by a margin of 60 percent to 40 percent. The primary is Aug. 10.

Bennet was appointed by Ritter to fill out the final two years of the term of Ken Salazar, who resigned to become interior secretary.

___

Associated Press writer Kristen Wyatt in Denver contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — One of President Barack Obama's top advisers suggested to a Colorado Democrat that he forgo a primary challenge to Sen. Michael Bennet and instead apply for one of three internation...
WASHINGTON — One of President Barack Obama's top advisers suggested to a Colorado Democrat that he forgo a primary challenge to Sen. Michael Bennet and instead apply for one of three internation...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,961
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (43 total)
  1 of 12  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
SirRealDeal 09:31 PM on 06/02/2010
I posted this a few minutes ago but it never showed up. Let;s try this again.

I was in college during the hearings on Nixon and his resignation. I did not like Nixon but was saddened by the affair. Most people I knew also didn’t like Nixon but were equally saddened by what had transpired. We saw it as a stain on the history of this great nation and an odious situation that was truly a  Read More...
03:49 AM on 06/05/2010
"Yet even the appearance of trading taxpayer-funded jobs to ease an ally's political path left questions for an administration that was the most transparent in history."

Translation: Your enemies will raise the bar until Heebie Jeebus Himself couldn't rise above it, and the media will devote vast amounts of attention because conflict sells clicks.

Even when it's an army of rotting undead zombies attacking a dental hygienist for having a cavity.
photo
Heartlight3
Every act is an act of self-definition.
10:32 PM on 06/03/2010
I'll bet it would be pretty interesting should anyone decide to investigate the methods that were used during the Bush administration in order to get their way about everything. Have we forgotten all the US Attorneys that were fired because they didn't do what Rove wanted them to? I have always been amused when people yell and scream and stamp their feet hurling accusations, all the while they are doing the exact same thing they are accusing someone else of doing. Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton come to mind.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yurdelite51
08:17 PM on 06/03/2010
From an April 19, 2001, Minneapolis Star Tribune article (emphasis added, accessed via Nexis) :

Minnesota House Majority Leader Tim Pawlenty said Wednesday that he won't run for the U.S. Senate in 2002, but only because Vice President Dick Cheney called him on his cell phone earlier in the morning and urged him not to challenge St. Paul Mayor Norm Coleman for the Republican nomination.

Pawlenty's dramatic last-minute decision is the latest development in an extraordinary intervention by the White House and President Bush on behalf of Coleman, who was chairman of the Bush presidential campaign in the state.

The White House's intense interest in the race is a reflection of the 50-50 split between Democrats and Republicans in the Senate.

It may also signal a keen interest by Bush for Republicans to win the seat held by Democratic Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., who has been among the president's most severe critics.

On Tuesday night, White House political strategist Karl Rove called Pawlenty and urged him not to run. Pawlenty said he was still intending to begin an exploratory candidacy after the Rove call.
08:35 PM on 06/03/2010
If Cheney did it it must be OK
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SPacific
Get a clue, then get a life
03:07 AM on 06/04/2010
Its just "different" when a republican does it.........................
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yurdelite51
08:15 PM on 06/03/2010
From an April 19, 2001, Minneapolis Star Tribune article (emphasis added, accessed via Nexis) :
Minnesota House Majority Leader Tim Pawlenty said Wednesday that he won't run for the U.S. Senate in 2002, but only because Vice President Dick Cheney called him on his cell phone earlier in the morning and urged him not to challenge St. Paul Mayor Norm Coleman for the Republican nomination.

Pawlenty's dramatic last-minute decision is the latest development in an extraordinary intervention by the White House and President Bush on behalf of Coleman, who was chairman of the Bush presidential campaign in the state.

The White House's intense interest in the race is a reflection of the 50-50 split between Democrats and Republicans in the Senate.

It may also signal a keen interest by Bush for Republicans to win the seat held by Democratic Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., who has been among the president's most severe critics.

On Tuesday night, White House political strategist Karl Rove called Pawlenty and urged him not to run. Pawlenty said he was still intending to begin an exploratory candidacy after the Rove call.
09:54 AM on 06/04/2010
Ok, so Bush White House urges Governor not to run is EXACTLY the same as Obama White House OFFERS JOBS...just wanted to be clear
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yurdelite51
11:03 AM on 06/04/2010
Just another trumped up bogus claim by republicans who have zip to offer. No ideas, no solutions, and no help. If republicans want to fight about something, we have PLENTY of their despicable actions. The point of this is that it is BOGUS and PETTY because republicans HAVE GOT NOTHING--ZERO, ZIP. By any means necessary is how they plan to take the country back to their tax cuts and tax breaks for the wealthiest and corporations. Keep defending this bogus cr.ap.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patman77
08:13 PM on 06/03/2010
good joe blow can hype this instead of even mentioning W admitted a war crime on morning joe friday am.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
tssent
The facts, ma'am, just the facts
07:54 PM on 06/03/2010
Because the way some of us are reared -- maybe a little
too much "rearing"? -- hitting back becomes the only solution
we're able to understand after a point. We're unable to turn
back from that idea.

Bush was such a person. So was Cheney. In fact, the Bush
administration was the perfect storm that wanted to hit back
so bad they willingly blinded one another for the excuse --
invasion of a soverign nation -- to do just that.

100,000 innocent Iraqis died because of it.
6,000 American children have died

to "get even" for the lost of 4,000 American innocents who
were lost by the henious attack on the Twin Towers.

What did we accomplish in trying to get even?

+ We've painted ourself into a corner and can't win in Iraq.
That will never change until the government switches from
a thocracy to a democracy.

All the evidence in the intelligence world "proving" Iraq had
WMD would have been meaningless. What you cannot negotiate
in words you cannot impose by war. Utlimately, a paper is signed.
That and only that is what stops wars in a modern world.

That's why Vietnam was lost.
That's why Iraq is unchanged
That's why Afghanistan will probably be added to the same list.

It was time to stop spending money on death and to spend it
on living.

That many not make corporate America happy, but it'll keep
terr.orists at bay more efficiently.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
tssent
The facts, ma'am, just the facts
07:55 PM on 06/03/2010
My apologies. Posted to wrong thread.
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
07:16 PM on 06/03/2010
"mr. republican senator/congressman, i may have $100,000 cash in this brown paper bag which you can have should you decide not to run in the republican primary. i can't promise you that the money is in there, but....."

imagine if that were in an email from dick cheney or condeleeza rice. i'm glad the MSM is at least running with these stories.

what's funny is how all the people who voted for hope and change are now defending the actions of this administration by saying, "it's politics as usual."
photo
Daphydd
Lets play some music
07:27 PM on 06/03/2010
No bag, no money. Nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sagmann
Dies Irae
07:53 PM on 06/03/2010
Because, of course, YOU read this email, Mr Climbing Panda. There is only one word to describe your pack of lies: GARBAGE.
photo
Phxflyer
I think, therefore I am not republican
05:40 PM on 06/03/2010
And . . . .????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Javan Hamilton
04:52 PM on 06/03/2010
Here we go with this garbage again. Here's what people are *selectively* "forgetting:"

1) This conveniently leaves out the fact that he applied for a USAID job before all of this.

2) Keeping #1 in mind, this guy already had a dispute with the White House (I heard it on the news yesterday) and he's clearly doing this out of spite.

3) Like with Sestak, this was BEFORE the Senate race. However...

4) Joe Sestak was offered the advisory position in March 2009, but didn't actually enter the race until May. Not only that, but it wasn't the White House that directly made the offer, but someone who has no place in the administration (Clinton in June and July, although AFTER the entry to the race, the WH never approached him).

You have one guy who has is own differences with the White House and playing into the Sestak story out of spite, and another guy who's creating a story for his campaign, but playing dumb. Why out yourself in a situation, then refuse to give details?

This is "business as usual," finding loopholes, but I don't see how this is illegal unless you block out all of the details I listed above.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
04:57 PM on 06/03/2010
Which conservatives will, and the press does....Conflict makes for better ratings, and scandal always sells....

The facts do not matter to the media at large anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Javan Hamilton
05:11 PM on 06/03/2010
What's fascinating is that all people have to do is READ, and they'll put the pieces together on their own. Don't sit there and praise Jan Brewer for her little Reading Frog commercial, only to ignore her advice, you know?
10:00 AM on 06/04/2010
Right, Clinton offered him an advisory position.............hahahhahahahhahaha....that's why Obama addressed the question at the press confrence bc Obama is SO transparent...cmon, he couldn't answer the question...LAIR, nice CHANGE MAN....NICE.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yurdelite51
11:09 AM on 06/04/2010
Another drive by poster. There has been more transparency in this administration than any other. How's that transparency working for the republican cabal who did not want the financial reform meeting aired? You know those meetings where they love to support the big corporations and Wall Street in private so they can then get in front of the American people and LIE?

Give me a break with the transparency bs. Just more republican doublespeak. Pathetic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
walkaway
12:09 PM on 06/07/2010
Republicans = Teabagger nuts!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bungerman
Sarcasm is my middle name.
03:39 PM on 06/03/2010
how can anyone from the right side even pretend this doesn't constantly happen as a part of our body politic?

Non story.
04:39 PM on 06/03/2010
How can anyone from the left pretend they wouldn't care if it was a republican WH and republican politicians?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Javan Hamilton
04:54 PM on 06/03/2010
Knowing all the facts, I wouldn't care.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
StillAmused
Some mayo on that troll, please...
05:18 PM on 06/03/2010
Enlightened observers didn't have to "pretend" during the previous eight years... we just rolled our eyes and groaned.

How many of them there Praise-Jeebus pod lawyers from Jerry Falwell's Liberty U. School of The Right Wing Law are still infesting DOJ? They were pumped into Justice like a toxin by BushCo.

'Member Monica Goodling?

Grim ignorance.
08:14 PM on 06/03/2010
So your defense to comitting a crime would be, "well everyone else does it!"?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yurdelite51
11:11 AM on 06/04/2010
It wasn't a crime no matter how much you republicans try to make it out to be YA GOT NOTHING.
03:15 PM on 06/03/2010
The GOP would be stupid to make an issue of this. Their own Presidential nominee, McCain obviously got a similar favor.

1. Napolitano was running ten points ahead of McCain in polls for the AZ Senate Race.

2. McCain was constantly attacking Obama after he lost the race.

3. Obama and McCain have a private meeting with no press.

4. Napolitano is offered a job in the administration and leaves AZ. so no chance of her running against McCain.

5. McCain stops attacking Obama for the next year.

So again, if the GOP start complaining about this they are hypocrites.
03:48 PM on 06/03/2010
Come on, pick a better example. The right doesn't want to defend McCain.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FGW
Republicans, You Don't Speak For Me, So Stop Lying
03:14 PM on 06/03/2010
Why can't we get an independent counsel or republicans to tell BP how to stop the dam oil spill and clean it up, or fix the dam economy and why they are at it, how about giving the Middle Class back their DAM MONEY that was stolen.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
05:01 PM on 06/03/2010
I'd like to see an independent counsel investigate Bush's recent confession of war crimes!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Beauchamp
blogger and activist
02:42 PM on 06/03/2010
I'm so tired of wasted news coverage of this kind of political move. Believe me, if I thought the Obama Admin was worthy of criticism over this, I would be criticizing them. My beef with Obama is they aren't keeping their promises to THEIR BASE! I could care less that they are offering jobs to politicians for political purposes.
03:49 PM on 06/03/2010
But isn't it illegal?

18 USC 600
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
05:07 PM on 06/03/2010
Does not apply to the code.
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/29/600
photo
Phxflyer
I think, therefore I am not republican
05:45 PM on 06/03/2010
Then let's dig up Ronnie Reagans corps and toss it into the hoosegow for doing the same thing.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yurdelite51
11:14 AM on 06/04/2010
The BASE DID NOT ELECT OBAMA alone so get over it. He cannot run the country based on what the base wants UNLESS the BASE gives him a congress to work with. Geez...
02:41 PM on 06/03/2010
Offering a job the way Obama and his administration did is a felony according to United States Code. Keep in mind that Bill Clinton and Rahm said on tape a job WAS offered. Here is the excerpt:

18 U.S.C. § 600 -- Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity

Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FGW
Republicans, You Don't Speak For Me, So Stop Lying
03:00 PM on 06/03/2010
A lot of copying and pasteing going on here today.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FGW
Republicans, You Don't Speak For Me, So Stop Lying
03:15 PM on 06/03/2010
Oh yea and JOBS
03:25 PM on 06/03/2010
Its a great feature! It allows me to prove my argument by quoting United States Code of Law.
photo
Phxflyer
I think, therefore I am not republican
05:46 PM on 06/03/2010
As someone who actually knows the law, I can assure you that you're wrong.

And I'm also betting you weren't this passionate about the subject in 2000, 2004 or while Ronnie Reagan was doing the same thing.
06:46 PM on 06/03/2010
As someone who has a Harvard Law degree and a family that has been practicing for 55 years, I can assure you, in fact, are wrong. Attempting to bring up Mr. Reagan to justify Obama's administration of breaking the law proves how little you know about the laws of this land.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
02:33 PM on 06/03/2010
So let me get this straight, Darrell Issa is just mad that the White House is doing politics as usual, instead of not. He clearly has no clue what Pres. Obama is or stands for, so now he has to throw mud against the wall to see what sticks, or maybe he wants to outdo Rep. Dan Burton trying to trump up charges against another Democratic President? There is no story here...except for the Republicans showing their hypocrisy yet again!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denverdavidr
04:17 PM on 06/03/2010
Correct me if I'm wrong "lucie"....

But isn't that what Obama ran as?

A "New Breed!" of politician?

Huh... so I guess lieing like that is ok too.

Just because that's the norm, it's acceptable?

Sorry can't fathom your logic here...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
05:13 PM on 06/03/2010
You are parsing words here. Obama can indeed be a new breed of politician, unfortunately, the political mechanics remain the same.

You should ask Issa who he bribed to make his insurance fraud charges disappear.....