More

Tobacco Loophole In Child Health Law Will Cost Government $250 Million

MATT APUZZO   06/ 2/10 04:04 AM ET   AP

Tobacco Loophole Health Care Hcr
A tobacco loophole in a child health insurance law will cost the government $250 million.

WASHINGTON — A tobacco tax loophole in President Barack Obama's children's health insurance program cost the government more than $250 million in its first year, public health officials say.

The loophole allowed companies to avoid huge tax increases on loose rolling tobacco by relabeling their product as pipe tobacco. The simple marketing twist lets companies pay $2.83 per pound, rather than the $24.78 per pound levied on rolling tobacco.

That proved an expensive technicality in the way the government pays for health insurance for poor children. Almost immediately, tobacco companies ramped up production of pipe tobacco to record levels and curtailed production of roll-your-own tobacco.

Daniel Morris, who tracks tobacco production data at the Oregon Department of Health, first identified the loophole late last year. In November, The Associated Press highlighted the millions being lost, but it was unclear at the time whether that represented a short-term change in production or a long-term trend.

The trend has not changed. In March, the one-year anniversary of the tax change, companies produced more than 2 million pounds of pipe tobacco. It was a record month for an industry that steadily produced about 270,000 pounds a month before the tax changed.

In a memo to colleagues last week, Morris estimated the U.S. lost more than $250 million in tax revenue in the first year of the law. States are losing money, too, because many base their taxes for roll-your-own and pipe tobacco on the wholesale price, which includes federal taxes.

"The magnitude was larger than I initially expected," Morris said. "I was expecting that once the loophole was identified, there'd be action to fix it."

Such action has stalled. The Obama administration said last year it would release new rules for differentiating roll-your-own tobacco from pipe tobacco, but it has yet to do so.

"We're still studying, from a technical standpoint, how to distinguish between the two products," said Arthur Resnick, a spokesman for the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.

And on Capitol Hill, a bill to raise taxes on pipe tobacco to the same level as loose tobacco has yet to be debated.

"With the money we're losing, the deficits we have and the priority this administration and Congress have put on health care, to not find that revenue is just wrong," said Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., who wrote the bill to close the loophole.

Pipe tobacco is normally too coarse and moist to roll into a cigarette, but nothing says it has to be. The administration says the only distinction between pipe tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco is how it's labeled.

Norman Sharp of the Washington-based Pipe Tobacco Council said the small, legitimate pipe industry supports regulations distinguishing between traditional pipe tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco, which he said is being mislabeled.

"It's not really a loophole. It's fraud," Sharp said.

Morris said pipe tobacco production, and the lost revenues that go with it, could climb even higher because of a similar technicality in another law. In trying to crack down on tobacco smuggling, lawmakers prohibited shipping cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco through the mail.

But the law didn't say anything about shipping pipe tobacco.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — A tobacco tax loophole in President Barack Obama's children's health insurance program cost the government more than $250 million in its first year, public health officials say. Th...
WASHINGTON — A tobacco tax loophole in President Barack Obama's children's health insurance program cost the government more than $250 million in its first year, public health officials say. Th...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 368
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
09:43 AM on 06/18/2010
if you wish to give up smoking in easiest way check a look at: http://www.tutuneson.com
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
xlntcat
01:01 PM on 06/07/2010
Did Boehner give out bribes on the House Floor to get this one in like he has done in the past? Loopholes aren't life time committments. All it takes is an Amendment to the bill to close a loophole. Of course, getting anything through the U S Senate is a feat.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
FGDinVA
E pluribus unum
06:12 PM on 06/03/2010
Tobacco companies know that if they can get you smoking at a very young age, they have you for life. They are allowed to sell an addictive drug legally. The very first thing a low-income individual should do is QUIT SMOKING! It costs nothing to quit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:05 AM on 06/03/2010
It's like when I was teaching high school. I went over the classroom rules the first day and later a guy went over to the 3rd floor open window,cleared his throat, and let one fly. My jaw dropped as he said to to me, "You didn't say we couldn't spit out the window."

Hard to write rules where there are no loopholes or misinterpretations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forestnfama
I was born at a very early age....
07:40 AM on 06/03/2010
Studying the difference between the two products. BS anyone can tell if you are smoking pipe tobacco or cigarette tobacco...... the difference is like night and day. All tobacco needs to be highly taxed. All ready the tobacco companies have created a tax on the health of people.......
If I were the emperor, I would ban tobacco and legalize pot. Time to reverse the tables.
11:02 PM on 06/02/2010
I personally think its really weird that people want to legalize pot and pretty much ban tobacco smoking. How do the majority of Democrats, and I'm Democrat, keep those two conflicting opinions in their heads. Pots not better for you. Really, like really. If you think is, its because its an addictive drug, and that's what happens when you take drugs: denial.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:32 AM on 06/03/2010
Not everyone smokes pot. If you go to a club, you can buy brownies, gingerbread, etc. Some people use that fancy machine (I don't know what it's called) that vaporizes the stuff and you only ingest the THC.

Pot is not physically addictive. Some people may feel they need it, but they don't go through withdrawals. Nicotine and other cigarette additives ARE physically addictive. People who have smoked for long periods DO go through withdrawals.

The only real similarity is that when smoked, they both are bad for the lungs. That's it.

Cigarettes are filled with chemicals that stay on your clothing and body after you're finished. It can cause an asthma flare-up in an asthmatic. Pot is pot. I don't think pot is manipulated the same way tobacco is.

I have yet to encounter pot smokers who smell disgustingly like cigarette after-smoke smell, to which I am allergic. If I'm waiting for an elevator and a smoker is already a passenger, I have to wait for another one. If I'm on the elevator and a smoker gets on, I have to get off. I've never had that happen with someone who smokes pot.

There are differences.
02:23 PM on 06/03/2010
Eating pot will only hurt your brain and cause sexual disfunction. Yes, there are differences. Smoking pot is possibly more likely to be worse for the lungs, since its has more tar and pollutants in the smoke than tobacco. We don't know, because it hasn't been studied, you know, because its been illegal. But, it won't give you a heart attack. Safe there.
12:48 AM on 06/04/2010
And seriously. Pot smells every bit as bad as tobacco smoke. I had a 4/20 party at my house one time and no one smoked. We only cooked stuff. My house reeked for a month. I had to wash the walls in the kitchen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forestnfama
I was born at a very early age....
08:11 AM on 06/03/2010
My guess is you don't really know what the f#@k you are talking about. Marijuana has un-believable medicinal qualities that you sir have no idea. To state that pot is no better for you than tobacco is such an ignorant thing to say. How many people die each year from smoking pot. Zero...... How many people die from smoking tobacco............?????? millions. If there are death associated with pot it is usually due to the laws against it. Your hypocrisy is based in the indoctrination of the Anslinger, Dupont and Hearst unholy conspiracy.
02:16 PM on 06/03/2010
I love it!
Tobacco has medicinal qualities. I am loosely connected to people working on an anti-depressant that works in the brain in the same way nicotine does. It's a pharma company, BTW. It has nothing to do with Big Tobacco or some "conspiracy."
Nicotine can be helpful for Parkinson's, has appetite sepressant qualities and may treat IBD.
But smoking is addictive and BAD for you!!!

Oh, and cocaine can treat cluster headaches and ectasy can treat chronic pain and migraine conditions.

And alcohol can prevent heart disease.

But when its about tobacco its a conspiracy....very logical.

Get a grip people. Smoking too much pot is bad for you.
09:59 PM on 06/02/2010
people should be allowed to smoke....it would be an economic stimulus....

tobacco revenue and health care costs are not a 1:1 ratio...if you let the tobacco industry run rampant and the health care industry clean-up after it, tobacco revenue would generate more money than sum of health care costs.
11:06 PM on 06/02/2010
That's true...but not all things in life are economic calculations. My life should be valued as more than widget.
11:17 PM on 06/02/2010
Well, let me add, I think people should be allowed to smoke. The taxes should be lower. We've already passed the point where taxes will lower the smoking rate. It's been the same since the 1990s. Trying to get hard-core addicts to quit by banning them from bars, as if it is killing people, is a dumb scare tactic-I've never met a 60 year old with a heart condition hanging out at bar and if I did, I'm sure he would have had bigger health problems than second-hand smoke. Raising taxes this high only creates black markets and makes the government reliant on these taxes to fund important programs, if they need more funding they won't be able to raise the tax since its already at peak level. It's bad public policy basically.
But I think funding research into addiction would be worth it and DARE programs are good.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:40 AM on 06/03/2010
Taxes alone don't stop people from smoking. I live in CA, and our cigarette taxes go to cessation education. We have the second lowest smoking rate in the nation. In order for people to quit, you need education along with taxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forestnfama
I was born at a very early age....
08:18 AM on 06/03/2010
Man, You give Steppen Wolf a bad name........ what planet are you living on. Taxes a peak levels and DARE as an effective program...... flagged for having no original ideas....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Peete
Proud to be Progressive!
05:23 PM on 06/02/2010
It should be Alcohol Tobacco, Marijuana, Tax and Trade Bureau. As I read about this, I realized that MJ is a hybrid of Alcohol and Tobacco as far as its effects go.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:59 PM on 06/02/2010
Why not tax all tobacco products?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:15 PM on 06/02/2010
They are. Just not equally. Cigarette tobacco is taxed higher then cigar or pipe tobacco.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:38 AM on 06/03/2010
They should tax them all at the same rate. Chew, too. I'd prefer the highest tax possible.

I live in California, and we have a cigarette tax, although it's not the highest in the nation. The cigarette tax money was used for tobacco cessation education, and it's been very effective. We have the second lowest tobacco use rate in the nation. I live in the Bay Area, and it is probably lower here than the rest of the state.

My mom was a lifelong smoker and died of lung cancer. It's an ugly way to die.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
booker52
avid reader
03:07 PM on 06/02/2010
In a word stupid for the gov not correcting this loop hole. Greedy on the part of growers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ATLBravesFan
02:52 PM on 06/02/2010
Considering the financial problems this nation is having, I think it would be best to just tax EVERYTHING tobacco. Wouldn't that solve the problem while TRYING to put a dent in our debt?
02:18 PM on 06/02/2010
Obama is just as much of a supporter of corporations being unregulated as the Republicans he criticizes for the same thing.

He is unabashed in his lying about it though. It seems that both parties do the bidding of the corporations and stick the bill to the taxpayers. That is what government seems to be these days.

It just that the Democrats use helping the little guy as their reason and Republicans use raising profits for corporations which are then shared with the society as their reason

But really it is the bankers (the 4th branch of the government) and the corporations who always profit while the taxpayers assume all the debt and the risk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forestnfama
I was born at a very early age....
08:21 AM on 06/03/2010
This guy deserves some fans people.................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StopCensoringMe
Aghast at the stupidity and bigotry
02:10 PM on 06/02/2010
"We're still studying, from a technical standpoint, how to distinguish between the two products," said Arthur Resnick, a spokesman for the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.

Stop studying and simply tax it all.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
01:25 PM on 06/02/2010
Perhaps the Democrats should ask the tobacco industry for assistance in write the next bill?
12:57 PM on 06/02/2010
Tobacco is tobacco pipe or what ever, tax them the same.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we gro
12:59 PM on 06/02/2010
Agree! Fan #1