iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gulf Oil Spill: Feds Halt New Drilling In Gulf

MATTHEW DALY   06/ 4/10 12:57 AM ET   AP

Gulf Oil Spill

WASHINGTON — The federal government slapped BP with a $69 million bill Thursday to cover initial costs of responding to the largest oil spill in U.S. history. An angry President Barack Obama said he was convinced that BP has not moved quickly enough to stop the flow of oil and clean up the mess.

Obama, who on Friday planned to make his second visit in a week to the battered Gulf Coast, used his strongest language to date in assailing BP.

"I am furious at this entire situation because this is an example where somebody didn't think through the consequences of their actions," Obama told CNN's Larry King. "This is imperiling an entire way of life and an entire region for potentially years."

Obama said BP has felt his anger, but added that "venting and yelling at people" won't solve the problem. His remarks aired Thursday night.

Obama had not previously voiced such sweeping criticisms of BP. But he said Thursday he had not seen the kind of "rapid response" from the British company that he'd like.

The $69 million bill being sent to BP is the first of what are likely to be many bills sent to the oil company to cover expenses incurred by the government in responding to the spill, which has dumped at least 21 million gallons of oil into the Gulf, according to government estimates. A White House official said BP has until July 1 to pay the bill.

Meanwhile, the Minerals Management Service stopped issuing permits for new oil and gas drilling in the Gulf, even as an administration official denied a formal freeze had been decreed on drilling in shallow water.

"There is no moratorium on shallow water drilling," said Kendra Barkoff, a spokeswoman for Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. "Shallow-water drilling may continue as long as oil and gas operations satisfy the environmental and safety requirements Secretary Salazar outlined in his report to the president and have exploration plans that meet those requirements."

Barkoff's comments appeared to contradict an e-mail sent out earlier in the day by a top official in the Gulf Coast office of the Minerals Management Service, the federal agency that oversees offshore drilling.

Michael J. Saucier, regional supervisor of field operations for the MMS Gulf of Mexico region, told a company seeking a permit that "until further notice" no new drilling is being allowed in the Gulf, no matter the water depth. A copy of the e-mail was obtained by The Associated Press.

The e-mail came a day after the minerals agency granted a new drilling permit sought by Bandon Oil and Gas for a site about 50 miles off the Louisiana coast and 115 feet below the ocean surface. Environmental groups accused the administration of misleading the public by allowing work to resume in waters up to 500 feet deep while maintaining a moratorium on deepwater drilling

Obama announced the moratorium last week as part of the administration's response to the April 20 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, which triggered the massive oil spill that is gushing millions of gallons in the Gulf.

The contradictory messages frustrated drilling critics and supporters alike.

"Every single MMS reform and moratorium announcement since the explosion has gone through this same process of announcement, confusion, seeming violations, reinterpretation and reconfiguration," said Kieran Suckling, executive director of Arizona-based Center for Biological Diversity and an outspoken drilling opponent. "I've never seen such a confused, uncertain response to crisis."

A group of Louisiana lawmakers said the drilling bans could further devastate the state's economy, which is struggling with job losses and business shutdowns tied to the oil spill.

"Katrina hurt us temporarily, but this will wipe us out altogether," said state Rep. Nita Hutter, a Republican who represents a district that was wrecked by Hurricane Katrina.

Republican Rep. Gordon Dove said it was unfair to penalize Exxon, Chevron and other oil companies "if BP did something that was careless." He said the shutdown of offshore drilling could force thousands of people out of work.

While details of the president's trip were still being worked out, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Obama will likely meet with governors of the affected states, local business leaders and Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, who is overseeing the government's response. Obama traveled to the Gulf twice last month, including a visit on May 28.

With the administration warning that the spill could continue through the summer, Gibbs said Obama plans to travel to the region "as often as the situation dictates."

Gibbs deflected criticism that Obama hasn't expressed enough anger or frustration over the failed attempts to stop the leak, insisting that the president would ultimately be judged on the effectiveness of the response, not his emotions.

"Pounding on a podium isn't going to fix a hole in the ocean," Gibbs said.

The $69 million tab being sent to BP is the first of what are likely to be many bills sent to the oil company to cover expenses incurred by the government in responding to the spill. A White House official said BP has until July 1 to pay the bill.

Confusion over shallow-water drilling appeared to stem from new restrictions on offshore drilling announced Wednesday night.

Bob Abbey, the acting director of the Minerals Management Service, said operators will be required to submit additional information about potential risks and safety considerations before being allowed to drill. The rule applies even to those plans that have already been approved or received a waiver exempting them from detailed environmental scrutiny, Abbey said.

The new information must be submitted before any drilling of new wells begins, Abbey said, adding that the rule should tighten safety standards and improve consideration of risks in drilling plans.

Jim Noe, senior vice president at Hercules Offshore Inc., a leading Gulf Coast oil rig company, said it's unclear what the Interior Department wants before allowing shallow-water drilling to continue – or how long the approval process will take.

"What we do know is that we've been told that additional safety information will be required in order for us to commence drilling," Noe said. "We're hoping it's something that can be done quickly."

___

Associated Press writers Ben Evans and Julie Pace in Washington and Melinda Deslatte in Baton Rouge, La., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — The federal government slapped BP with a $69 million bill Thursday to cover initial costs of responding to the largest oil spill in U.S. history. An angry President Barack Obama sai...
WASHINGTON — The federal government slapped BP with a $69 million bill Thursday to cover initial costs of responding to the largest oil spill in U.S. history. An angry President Barack Obama sai...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 551
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexandra Mandelis
Occupy.
07:00 PM on 06/06/2010
The need for this article (and accompanying headline) is a perfect illustration of how crazy our priorities are. Ceasing driling in the Gulf (or anywhere else for that matter) is the only common-sense approach to mitigating the risks posed by rigs like at Deepwater Horizon.
07:34 AM on 06/06/2010
Based on the comment by Hayward that the accident "was brought about by the failure of a number of processes, systems and equipment", the US has no choice - everything must be stopped until the causes are identified and every oil rig is inspected against the findings.
04:59 AM on 06/05/2010
Fine them until they are out of business - the other oil companies will buy the wells and supply the gas, no increase in unemployment, no loss in productivity, no rise in gas prices, a win, win, win situation!
08:20 PM on 06/04/2010
Ms. Palin, when you were running for vice-president you were known for your catch-phrase "Drill baby, drill!" Your republican supporters rallied around you and chanted your slogan. In fact, the issue of unrestricted drilling versus environmental protection has been drawn across the party lines, with your conservative republican comrades deeply entrenched with the big energy companies. Take a look at this: http://pltcldscsn.blogspot.com/2010/05/senator-lisa-murkowski-in-favor-of.html
04:10 PM on 06/04/2010
Well as it turns out I have a friend who knows Bill and Hillary Clinton personally and knows how to contact them direct (this is NOT a joke). I told him about my Letter to the President and he was intrigued and thought it was a good idea. He asked me to forward it to him, which I did last night, and he would get it to Hillary Clinton to make sure President Obama sees it.

That's one way of getting the President's attention. Otherwise I fear my letter just gets buried in all the noise and hype out here. If any of you feel inclined to leave a comment on the letter just know that it will most likely be seen by President Obama.

(Text of the letter is in the video description if you don't want to watch the video):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_NjPcDmktk
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
03:31 PM on 06/06/2010
Sounds good, but, main flaw is that it represents a commonsense approach. Odds of doing this is pretty much zero.... At this point BP is in control and will not release control of their well .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patman77
12:42 PM on 06/04/2010
Good. Of course pres obama will be chirped on for hurting louisiana econonmy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Left on Red
Micro Bio 201 T-Th 1 - 2:30 Lab W 1-5 Dr. Price
11:34 AM on 06/04/2010
Are the same corrupt bureaucrats going to be in charge of the new drilling? These toxic time bombs in the regulatory agencies must go.

Imagine, the permit process for new wells. Will it be any different that the old process. The feds don't move with anything other than glacial speed.

Who will review the applications? The same people that OKed the Deepwater Horizon application which stated that BP had all systems in place to contain any damage. (HA)

Who is kidding who. Stop all Drilling NOW! None of the OIL COMPANIES can be trusted to do anything other than to try to buy their way out of any kind of liability.
11:12 AM on 06/04/2010
I would like to know why (bleeping) BP is not using oil-eating microbes to clean up this mess. They have been used BEFORE multiple times in the Gulf with 100% success! The Gulf would be clean and safe in a few months - But BP doesn't want to use them because they want to recover the oil - Even now, BP is more interested in their bottom line than human and animal life. UNBELIEVABLE! Here is a video about this - it is a bit slow at the beginning, but is worth watching: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VfypUzx1tI
12:12 PM on 06/04/2010
Totally in agreement. Here's hoping BP will go bankrupt after having to clean up the gulf and all the creatures that call it home. Oh and for all the other British companies that own businesses over here...............go back to England if you have an attitude like BP. We don't want you.
11:02 AM on 06/04/2010
the biggest catastrophe in history followed closely by the largest cover-up in history. we are being lied to every day.
11:32 AM on 06/04/2010
Wow, the hyperbole is stunning.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Archivist1000
Informed World Citizen
11:58 AM on 06/04/2010
In the 80s, a leak from the Union Carbide plant in Bhopal India killed about 4,000 people immediately, with 1000s more dying later of the effect of the gas.

The environmental damage to the lake and soil are still felt, 25 yrs later.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeaderofMen
Bilingual former US Marine.
10:42 AM on 06/04/2010
I'm still not convinced that BP won't be exonerated. I'm still not convinced that ultimately, we will pay the tab on this disaster. I'm still convinced that far too many Congressmen will figure out a way to let BP off the hook.

And I'm still convinced that this disaster happened on Bobby Jindal's watch.
11:33 AM on 06/04/2010
The governor of Louisiana has no control on what happens in federal waters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeaderofMen
Bilingual former US Marine.
04:31 PM on 06/04/2010
The oil-soaked waters of LA occurred during Bobby Jindal's watch.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SSaffer
10:23 AM on 06/04/2010
It disturbs me when I hear people say things like, "Katrina was just a temporary disaster" that went away after a short time. This is NOT true. For those involved - along the same coastline and inland as well -- it was as personal as this oil disaster. Just ask the thousands of people who lost loved ones because they died in hot dark attics trying to escape the filty deadly water! Just ask all of those who lost their HOMES as well as their way of earning a living! Just ask the federal, state, and local governments what it cost to even begin to clean up after such a hurricane.

While I know most people who say this think they are attacking the horror of THISs disaster, it's thoughtless to make such a comparison. It's a bit like BP's CEO saying "...I'd like my life back." You don't have to minimize one to make a point about the other. This is particularly distasteful for those who say it to take advantage of the situation for political reasons!

So STOP!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CindyinAtl
09:54 AM on 06/04/2010
I will be angry if the Feds HAVEN'T suspended all new drilling permits in the Gulf. I light of what has happened, drilling that is in progress should be halted and examined.
11:35 AM on 06/04/2010
The Feds can only halt drilling in federal waters.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:46 AM on 06/04/2010
"Kieran Suckling. . ."I've never seen such a confused, uncertain response to crisis."

Now I have to agree with someone named Suckling? This just got so much worse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:44 AM on 06/04/2010
I don't really care if this isn't "fair" to other oil companies. The fact that apparently none of them knows what to do when/if this happens next time is unfair to all of us and unfair to the planet we live on.
05:51 AM on 06/04/2010
Not fair to Exxon, Chevron, or other oil companies?! Now that brings a tear to my eye! Seriously, some may have better safety records than others, but it seems that the industry standard is that regard for environmental safety is secondary to profit, so as a ban would most likely be temporary, it might be a good time to establish stricter standards, perhaps such as requiring relief wells be drilled in advance. The fact that other oil companies didn't offer any technical advice that could have succeeded in stopping this gusher tells me that no company has any plans to deal with such an accident. If some companies have stricter standards for safety procedures than BP, than they can be commended for that, but I don't doubt that every company needs to tighten up their act.