More

Kagan Files From Clinton Era Headed To Senate

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS   06/ 5/10 12:59 AM ET   AP

Kagan Clinton Files Supreme Court
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan meets with Sen. George LeMieux, R-Fla., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 27, 2010. (AP Photo/Drew Angerer)

WASHINGTON — Newly released documents from her days as an aide to former President Bill Clinton portray Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan as a person of strong opinions and sometimes overtly liberal views, but above all a pragmatist who pursued middle-ground solutions on issues ranging from abortion to taking on Big Tobacco.

There's little in the papers that suggests Kagan, President Barack Obama's choice to succeed Justice John Paul Stevens, would stray far from Stevens' perch on the left of the political spectrum.

In 46,500 pages of notes and memos from her time as a domestic policy adviser to Clinton, Kagan argues in favor of a veto of a late-term abortion ban, for strong gun control measures, against a federal law prohibiting assisted suicide and endorses a legal argument for affirmative action.

But she tempers much of her advice with strong notes of political and legal practicality, often opting for a middle course likely to produce results without unduly angering opponents.

The William J. Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, Ark., released the documents Friday, responding to a request from the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is scheduled to hold Kagan's confirmation hearings starting June 28. They were the first installment in a 160,000 trove that senators have been eager to peruse for clues about what kind of justice Kagan might be.

In 1998, Kagan defended her boss' veto of a measure that would have banned late-term abortions unless the life of the mother was in danger. She helped Clinton explain to a Catholic cardinal that he'd only support such a bill if it exempted cases where the mother's health was at risk.

"I support an exception that takes effect only when a woman faces real, serious health consequences," Kagan handwrote on the draft of a letter Clinton was writing.

Not long after, though, Kagan was advocating that Clinton embrace stricter limits on federal funding of abortion than pro-abortion rights groups wanted. She said the restrictions should apply to all Medicare-funded abortions.

That course, an internal memo noted, "stands the best chance of avoiding a high-profile legislative battle ... that we are unlikely to win."

Kagan wrote Clinton in 1997 advising him to submit legislation banning reproductive cloning but permitting cloning of embryos. In a memo she co-wrote with presidential science adviser Jack Gibbons, Kagan notes that the "right-to-life community" objects to embryo cloning, but says "there is no moral rationale" for treating them differently from embryos developed other ways when they're being used only for research.

Kagan also personally counseled in unusually stark terms on the idea of a new federal law banning assisted suicide, which she wrote in 1998 would be "a fairly terrible idea." Her handwritten note was part of an internal administration debate over whether doctors in Oregon should be allowed to prescribe fatal drugs to help terminally ill patients commit suicide.

The White House cautioned against reading the files as an indication of Kagan's views.

"The documents reflect Elena Kagan's efforts to advance President Clinton's well-established policy agenda, and they should not be interpreted as an outline of her personal positions on specific policy issues," said Ben LaBolt, a White House spokesman.

Conservatives said the papers sharpen their concerns about whether Kagan could be impartial.

"The documents show a politically savvy Kagan, and bring to the fore the question of whether she would be able to set aside her deeply ingrained political instincts to evenhandedly apply the law," said Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network.

And Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said the documents were emerging too slowly to allow senators a fair chance to fully evaluate Kagan.

"With each day that passes, I become more concerned that we will not receive documents in time for a proper review, or that they will be incomplete," he said in a statement.

Still, the records were already filling out Kagan's so-far thin public paper trail.

She endorsed a narrow legal argument to try to prevent a Supreme Court ruling that could effectively end affirmative action policies, calling it "exactly the right position" legally and politically.

And on guns, Kagan and her supervisor in 1999 promised Clinton a memo "outlining an aggressive strategy ... to press for quick passage of our gun control proposals."

In a memo, Kagan and Domestic Policy Council Director Bruce Reed praised a news story noting that the White House wanted to move on the initiative before Republicans and the National Rifle Association could mobilize against it, writing that the article had "perfectly conveyed our intended message."

The papers also detail Kagan's deep involvement in tough negotiations between liberal and conservative lawmakers on an ambitious – and ultimately unsuccessful – anti-smoking initiative.

She warned that slapping tough marketing restrictions on the tobacco industry as part of the measure might be unconstitutional.

"I'm not sure I buy the argument" by other administration officials that First Amendment concerns aren't a serious issue, she jotted in the margin of a draft letter to a GOP senator on the subject. "We should enable the companies to agree on this."

Friday's release was from Kagan's time as deputy director of the Domestic Policy Council, where she served from 1997-99. All but about 200 pages of the material were made public. Clinton asked to keep the rest secret, so they were handed over to the panel on a "committee confidential" basis that bars public access, a White House official said.

Kagan also served as a counsel to Clinton from 1995-96. She stepped aside last month from her post as Obama's solicitor general to focus on winning confirmation.

___

Associated Press writers Jim Abrams, Matt Apuzzo, Jessica Gresko, Jesse J. Holland, Mark Sherman, Sharon Theimer, Hope Yen and Pete Yost in Washington and Jill Zeman-Bleed in Little Rock contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Newly released documents from her days as an aide to former President Bill Clinton portray Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan as a person of strong opinions and sometimes overtly lib...
WASHINGTON — Newly released documents from her days as an aide to former President Bill Clinton portray Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan as a person of strong opinions and sometimes overtly lib...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:04 PM on 06/13/2010
Here's a timeline of Elena Kagan's life that I pulled together (http://timelines.com/topics/elena-kagan). It will be interesting to see if she is confirmed by senate...
01:01 AM on 06/05/2010
"Senate Judiciary ranking member Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) called the number of documents released inadequate and reiterated his concern that the committee will not have enough time to pore over the information before Kagan’s hearings."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with Senator Sessions; 60,000 pages is totally inadequate
to get a feel for her views,
but (ironically) it would still be impossible to read them
adequately before the hearings.

More slick trickery by the democrats.

Therefore, to prevent the democrats
from getting away with this trickery, I think the hearings should be
cancelled until after the new congress is
sworn in next January.

Then if we have added a few more GOP Senators
we can filibuster anybody obama nominates for any position!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RE Law
05:18 PM on 06/04/2010
Anyone else think Justice Kagan looks like the 'lovechild' of Ellen Degeneres and Jon Lovitz?
01:07 AM on 06/05/2010
"Anyone else think Justice Kagan looks like the 'lovechild' of Ellen Degeneres and Jon Lovitz? "
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am thinking Andy Borowitz and Rosie O'Donnell. She's got Andy's nose and Rosie's, er...beauty...

make them confess.
03:58 PM on 06/04/2010
". . . some in the public health community . . . ." Like doctors and nurses who know that inhaling fire, nicotine and tar into your lungs is a BAD IDEA? I love legal jargon.

That said, how DARE Kagan not claim to telepathically communicate with the framers of our constitution who died approximately 150 years ago! She MUST be a judicial activist.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
03:58 PM on 06/04/2010
As long as we dont get another sick puppy like we had with the likes of conservative Chief Justice Rehnquist..


http://abovethelaw.com/2007/01/breaking-was-chief-justice-rehnquist-addicted-to-painkillers/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/04/AR2007010400140.html

http://www.slate.com/id/2125906
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EbonBear
opinionated hairy man
02:27 PM on 06/04/2010
Cheeses, 160,000 pages? It's going to be a l-o-n-g weekend.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
03:52 PM on 06/04/2010
They wanted months to read the 1400 page health care bill. How long will they want for this?
01:28 AM on 06/05/2010
They wanted months to read the 1400 page health care bill. How long will they want for this?
----------------------------------------------------
just until the new congress and *senate* is sworn in
next january. fair is fair...it's harder to read documents whne they are *inadequate*
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sherzie
Former Republican
01:59 PM on 06/04/2010
Power is everything to Sessions and his cohorts. They can't stand that someone who has a philosophy that is different than their own has been nominated. Sessions continually demonstrates animosity to any Dem nominee, probably because of his owned failed judicial confirmation process.

I think that Kagan is more self assured than Sotomayor. It will be fascinating to watch how Kagan handles the Rethugs attempts to cast aspersions.
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
01:09 PM on 06/04/2010
[ 160,000-page trove of records ]

Oh my. Using the standard established by the Health Care debate, it will take the GOP approximately 100 years to get through half of it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
12:25 PM on 06/04/2010
Trying to get out ahead of the story. Her nomination isn't likely to be stopped, but this will afford for more bloviating.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:56 AM on 06/04/2010
I'm not implying (at least not consciously) that it's in any way a nefarious plan, but...
I think it's interesting that the Kagan story flared up for 2 or 3 days after the nomination, and then poof, it was gone. There is little to no coverage of the continuing process of getting this, or any, new SC Justice.

I guess my greater point is that for as tragic, lasting, and outrageous as the BP/Gulf story is, there are other things happening in the country, and the world, but our media (admittedly broadcast more so than print) is only capable of covering one thing at a time. But they do cover it and cover it well from every conceivable angle -- so long as it perpetuates the political narrative their particular news philosophy espouses.

We're capable of hearing about multiple topics, why are they capable of reporting them?
photo
speakingtruth2power
Not motivated by fear & loathing
11:26 AM on 06/04/2010
Why not just say F U like D^rth did to the Senate?

Who stole our money and ruined the economy?

Dick Armey, deregulation and the Faux-con movement.

Who let BP ruin the Gulf of Mexico for generations?

Dick Cheney and his secret energy meetings.

What is the connection between these two Dicks?

The Bush Crime Family and their three generations long

pursuit of fascism using oil and drugs to fund their cabal.

ST2P
12:42 PM on 06/04/2010
My goodness. I kept waiting for the part where this would have something to do with the article its commenting on.
photo
speakingtruth2power
Not motivated by fear & loathing
01:01 PM on 06/04/2010
Line one refenced the hypocrisy over the GOP demanding everything

from the Democrats while BushCo refused to give up anything at all.

The rest is about the big picture but if you don't see this, oh well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Super Mitt
11:21 AM on 06/04/2010
Is Kagan envisioning an International Governance Law for the U.S. ? While Dean of Harvard Law School Kagan did not require students to study the U.S. Constitution Law at all . Instead , Kagan required that they study Foreign and International Law .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Super Mitt
10:54 AM on 06/04/2010
Is the husband of Anita Dunn and lawyer of Obama , Robert Bauer , theatening the use of the executive privilege inorder to hide information concerning Elena Kagan ? Why ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soup McGee
Paying attention one wooden nickel at a time.
11:56 AM on 06/04/2010
Soup McGee wonders if Mitt Romney is a creepy alien who sings "Don't Think Twice" in nasally falsetto to impress his creepy alien friends? Why?

Love,

Soup
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Super Mitt
01:14 PM on 06/04/2010
Could you hum a few bars ? What's that got to do with Kagan ? Are you a Romney fan ?

Your friend ,

S M
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:52 AM on 06/04/2010
Another East Coast establishment choice for the Supreme Court.

When will someone from a University West of the Mississippi get elevated to the Supreme Court?

After the recent economic crisis does anyone still think Harvard=competent?
11:11 AM on 06/04/2010
LOL, seems like never.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:48 AM on 06/04/2010
Is Harvard that much better than Cal or Stanford?
photo
DonJM
The narrower the mind, the broader the statement.
10:46 AM on 06/04/2010
Kagan is imminently qualified to be a Supreme Court justice. You may not agree with her interpretation of the Constitution, just as many don't agree with Scalia's interpretation, but to say that she is not qualified is ludicrous.
11:12 AM on 06/04/2010
okay barry, we hear you. I just watched the Cspan reruns of the robert bork confirmation hearings yesterday and can only hope this woman is treated the same way with the same results.
photo
DonJM
The narrower the mind, the broader the statement.
01:55 PM on 06/04/2010
You're going back and watching Bork confirmation hearings from years ago? How sad; don't you have anything better to do? You have a problem comparing Kagan to Bork though; I don't think she's perceived as a racist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:46 PM on 06/04/2010
What could yo possibly know about her yet? You are saying this simply because Obama nominated her. Think for yourself for christ sake.