More

Obama Not Above Political Manipulation After All

CALVIN WOODWARD   06/ 5/10 06:59 PM ET   AP

Obama

WASHINGTON — Barack Obama, being from Chicago, knows there are two basic ways to play foul in politics.

One is to break the law.

The other is to keep it legal, if shadily close to the line. It may not stink to high heaven, but it smells a little.

In the 2008 campaign and after, Obama said he'd tolerate neither as president, and he set the bar high.

How's he doing now?

Well, it's not all smelling like roses on the political front.

In a couple of known cases, his operatives tried to game the system ahead of Democratic congressional primaries, dangling job possibilities in front of challengers in hopes they would get out of the way of Obama's preferred incumbents. (They didn't.)

This appears to be mild stuff in the canon of political manipulation, the kind of puppeteering that leaders in both parties have done for generations.

For truly conniving, ego-driven, potty-mouthed machinations from the belly of the Chicago Democratic machine, tune in to the corruption trial just under way of Rod Blagojevich, the former Illinois governor accused of scheming to profit from his ability to fill Obama's old Senate seat.

Even so, dispensing favors for political ends was a specialty of the old ward bosses, not to mention some bare-knuckled presidents. Obama presented himself as above that sort of thing.

He staked a claim to purity on that front, said primaries belong to the people not the pols and decried even the subtle back-room tactics "that are within the lines of legality but still don't fulfill the spirit of service."

Such was Obama's response a month before taking office, when Blagojevich's troubles spilled into the open. Obama was fresh from a campaign whose most remarkable chapter came early on when he defeated Hillary Rodham Clinton for the Democratic nomination.

Back then, Obama was the Rep. Joe Sestak of the day, making things messy for the party establishment by challenging a respected and powerful figure favored for the nomination.

Now, though, Obama's at the pinnacle of the established order and wants to keep things orderly as Democrats pick candidates for the fall elections, hoping to avoid the populist brush fires consuming the careers of some veteran Republicans.

To that end, the Obama White House sought to protect two senators against upstart Democratic challengers who were powered, like Obama once was against Clinton, by the audacity of hope.

In a Pennsylvania Senate primary contest, the White House dispatched former President Bill Clinton to try to get Sestak to stand down against longtime Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican turned Democrat. Sestak's prize: an unpaid presidential advisory position while keeping his seat in the House.

Sestak said he rejected the overture in less than a minute. He went on to defeat Specter.

Then late last week, it emerged that White House deputy chief of staff Jim Messina had contacted former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff about possible administration jobs in hopes that Romanoff wouldn't challenge Sen. Michael Bennet in the state's Aug. 10 Senate primary.

Messina described three federal international development jobs that might be available to Romanoff if he got out of Bennet's way. Like Sestak, Romanoff decided to stay in the race.

Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs said Obama was "not aware of the individual circumstances" of these attempts to protect the president's preferred candidates. Gibbs said presidents "have long had an interest in ensuring that supporters didn't run against each other in contested elections."

Indeed they have, but this wasn't supposed to be politics as usual.

During the campaign, Obama cited his Chicago political cred when he needed to prove his toughness against Clinton in their Democratic primary slog. Despite an iffy association or two, though, Obama never fell in with that crowd as an Illinois lawmaker and then U.S. senator.

His chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel – a former congressman who says he wants to be Chicago mayor someday – was singled out by the national Republican Party chairman, Michael Steele, in the GOP's weekly radio and Internet address Saturday.

If Emanual "has been offering government goodies to inconvenient politicians threatening Democratic incumbents, then it's time for him to resign," Steele said.

A Republican campaign ad that said Obama was "born of the corrupt Chicago political machine" rang hollow because he made his own way without the taint or nurturing of that storied apparatus.

In the Blagojevich case, so far so good for Obama. Federal wiretaps revealed a foul-mouthed Blagojevich complaining that Obama's associates would not deal with him on the Senate selection. They were "not willing to give me anything except appreciation," he steamed.

But much more light is bound to be shed on contacts between the former governor and Obama's aides, through wiretaps and probably with the president's associates dragged in as witnesses.

Democrats face the prospect of embarrassments trickling out as private conversations and usually hidden maneuverings become public from the courtroom.

On several fronts, then, it remains to be seen whether Obama can meet the promise to make politics and government a new model of propriety, where "you can get elected by playing it straight, you can get elected by doing the right thing," and begone with the back door.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Barack Obama, being from Chicago, knows there are two basic ways to play foul in politics. One is to break the law.
WASHINGTON — Barack Obama, being from Chicago, knows there are two basic ways to play foul in politics. One is to break the law.
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,727
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
  1 of 14  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Marcospinelli 07:57 PM on 06/06/2010
The People get to participate little enough in this democratic republic (the Constitution only guarantees our right to vote, and NOT to even have those votes counted), without a president of the US, his chief of staff, and a former president interfering with our right to decide who we want to represent us in our government.

I'm an old liberal Democrat, and Obama's deal with Specter p!ssed me  Read More...
07:44 PM on 06/08/2010
Everyone knows that Obama is just as dirty as all the other politicians. Look at the trumped up accusations he used to win the SC primary here:

http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/wilentz-blows-lid-off-obama-race-baiting-campaign/

The author basically shows how Obama took comments made by the Clinton campaign out of context and made them seem racist in order to win the primary. Thats how low this guy was willing to stoop to get elected, i.e. making a false claim that someone else is a racist.

If he was willing to lie to get elected then why would anyone be surprised that he pulls dirty tricks like the ones described above when he is President?
05:42 PM on 06/07/2010
He is head of the party. Look at what happened in Hawaii leading to a Republican win ? Sometimes he just has to intervene to get the candidates in line for the good of the party. Go Obama !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:08 PM on 06/07/2010
Ahh, Calvin Woodward, Mr. Propaganda Piece Writer, adds to his legacy.
12:50 PM on 06/07/2010
Nice hit piece by the AP, typical for them.
12:07 PM on 06/07/2010
During the primary campaign, the Obama regime issued a very vociferous denial that Sestak was offered anything to drop out. This is squarely contradicted by their most recent response. A long three months after the initial allegations were made the administration released a memo outlining an alleged conversation that Sestak had with former President Bill Clinton. According to the memo, Clinton was to determine if Sestak was serious about making a run for the Senate and talked to him about taking a non-paying position on a presidential commission instead.(if anyone believes this and are shopping for a bridge...call me!) This most recent response begs the question: Was the regime lying then? Or is it lying now? .....inquiring minds want to know.
11:37 AM on 06/07/2010
Bring back Liz "Sprinkles" Sidoti!
10:49 AM on 06/07/2010
Obama is just as crooked as all the rest.
10:24 AM on 06/07/2010
In retrospect we need to ask ourselves what we expected. I mean Obummer did accuse Bill Clinton of being a racist to win a primary. Did anybody really think after that, that this guy was who he said he was?

Clearly Obummer is a serious hypocrit, but thats not as worrying as the mindless incompetence.
11:26 AM on 06/07/2010
When did Obama call Clinton a racist? When you make comments like this you should add the facts along with it.
12:14 PM on 06/07/2010
During the SC primary.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:10 PM on 06/07/2010
Obama never said any such thing. Typical lies from your type, DC.
02:47 AM on 06/08/2010
Oh BS, The Obama campaign twisted itself into a tizzy taking Bill Clintons comments out of context to stoke the flames of racial disharmony. Obama lacks any sort of morals or ethics and frankly I wish I would have just abstained from voting in 2008. It would have been easier to stomach than helping to put this phony in the white house.

By the way I get it, Obama is black, you are black, therefore you support Obama no matter what he does.
photo
Blufftonian
FORWARD! he cried from the rear
07:47 AM on 06/07/2010
This isn't news to many of us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
brahdog
hello walls
02:59 AM on 06/07/2010
obummer. yeah i said it.
10:22 AM on 06/07/2010
lol I love it, pretty much sums up my views on Obummer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FGW
Republicans, You Don't Speak For Me, So Stop Lying
04:09 PM on 06/07/2010
What ever
05:43 PM on 06/07/2010
why dont you all go to your Republican site. Oh wait.............Republicans are not smart enough to set up a site like this...............LOL
02:24 AM on 06/07/2010
We do not have to look any further than the presence of Rahm Emanuel as his Chief of staff. Every hope we had for "good governance" from the Obama administration is gone.As John Dean said many years ago, "There is a cancer growing on the Presidency" Emanual is the best evidence. During the last month, Obama flew to California for fundraisers FOUR TIMES while "The greatest natural disaster in our history+ was getting worse.
12:14 AM on 06/07/2010
Republicans are allowed to torture, wiretap, invade sovereign nations based on lies about non-existant WMDs and nuclear threats, give trillions of dollars to their special top 2% friends...

Democrats aren't allowed to offer a job to a politician.

See? It all makes sense doesn't it?
photo
DrBlunt
Telling it like it is....
12:34 AM on 06/07/2010
I totally agree!

However, when the dems DO have the power and authority to take on the Rethugs; wheta do they do? They tuck their tail under their @sses and run.

They are truly afraid to take on the Rethugs. If they weren't, we'd be observing a war crimes trial for DICK-n-BUSH!
photo
DrBlunt
Telling it like it is....
12:36 AM on 06/07/2010
"Republicans are allowed to torture, wiretap, invade sovereign nations based on lies about non-existant WMDs and nuclear threats, give trillions of dollars to their special top 2% friends..."

So my question to you is:

--------- > Why aren't they dems doing ANYTHING about this?
08:18 AM on 06/07/2010
Because they believed there were WMDs too. Remember Clinton said so too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bllnsinchnge
peace, markets, freedom
09:58 AM on 06/07/2010
Why are we still occupying sovereign nations into 2011? It isn't a republican or democrat issue, it is an issue with government as a whole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chucky Sly
Radical lefty socialist
11:48 PM on 06/06/2010
You don't become president without a massive collections of skeleton's in the closet. You certainly don't remain president or hold any hope of being effective without adding more during your term. This wasn't a news story as much as it was a conversation starter.
11:09 PM on 06/06/2010
Why is this news? Politics is about manipulating and calculating, well if you want to stay a politician
08:20 AM on 06/07/2010
This is news b/c we expect ethical behavior from Dems and they are the same as Repubs. Get rid of all of them and vote for honesty and integrity next time.
photo
mypov123
It is what it is
01:15 AM on 06/08/2010
True lol
10:14 PM on 06/06/2010
In the last month, we have received evidence that our President is unethical and incompetent. What next?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FGW
Republicans, You Don't Speak For Me, So Stop Lying
12:06 AM on 06/07/2010
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Time-to-send-John-Boehner-packing/114282768585969

Republican Party and their supporters control the media. Their supporters control the school curriculum. Their power base own everthing of value. The power base daily reminds their previleged followers that they are exceptional, as they follow blindly a decadent directive doctrine.
The Republicans can afford to be arrogant. They control their jurisdictions. They control the sources of information. They control the agenda. They run a one party governance system.
The Republicans have been provided the illegal authority by their constituents to do anything including sabotaging the American people governance system. Their politics provides broken and dysfunctional government for the nation and concentrated wealth and power for the few. Republicans have proved over and over again that they don’t care about Americans just power
08:52 AM on 06/07/2010
Really? The Republicans control the media?
I guess you are right - the Republicans are at fault even though
the Democrats hold the majority in the House, Senate and hold
the White House.

Wow.
01:31 PM on 06/07/2010
Wow. You might want to take off the tin foil hat, although you seem to wear it well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carhac66
01:04 PM on 06/07/2010
incompetent? health care passed -- SCHIP passed -- Equal Pay passed -- DADT soon to be done etc..,

when Republicans are watching the "shiny objects" Democrats get things passed. this is just another "shiny object" - nothing illegal or unethical.