iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Primary Results In Arkansas, Nevada And California Will Set Stage For 2010 Election

LIZ SIDOTI   06/ 9/10 10:31 PM ET   AP

Primary Results Election Arkansas Nevada Californi
Bill Halter, running against Blance Lincoln for her Senate seat in Arkansas, is in one of Tuesday's key primary races along with California and Nevada.

WASHINGTON — It's looking like a new "year of the woman" in politics. Eighteen years after a few glass ceilings were broken, hundreds of female candidates have set their sights on Congress, governorships and state legislatures, and a significant number racked up big wins in Tuesday's primaries. Republican women, in particular, served notice to the old boys of the party.

In California, two wealthy businesswomen who had reached the highest ranks of the corporate world, Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina, captured the GOP nomination for governor and Senate. In Nevada, tea party-backed state legislator Sharron Angle seized the GOP Senate nod and will face Democratic Leader Harry Reid. South Carolina State Rep. Nikki Haley brushed aside allegations of infidelity and an ethnic slur to grab the commanding spot in the GOP gubernatorial runoff.

One of the night's biggest winners was two-term Arkansas Sen. Blanche Lincoln, who scored a narrow victory over liberal Democrat Lt. Gov. Bill Halter in a primary runoff. Joining these women were Roxanne Conlin, who won the Democratic Senate nomination in Iowa, and Elizabeth Mitchell, Maine's Democratic nominee for governor.

Mitchell is the first woman in the nation to serve as both state Senate president and state House speaker.

In 1992, voters sent record numbers of women to Congress – 24 to the House and five to the Senate. Women angered by the predominantly male Senate's questioning of Anita Hill, who had accused Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment, decided to make their point by ousting the men.

That same year, Bill Clinton ran as a change candidate and defeated President George H.W. Bush.

Fast forward to 2010.

Despite their strides – 17 women are in the Senate, 75 in the House, including the first female Speaker, Nancy Pelosi – politics remains a man's world. That could benefit this year's female candidates as a frustrated electorate has rejected the establishment and sent a few incumbents packing.

"Many woman are running and taking advantage of this moment," said Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. "When voters are looking for something new and something different, women can really fit that bill because they aren't the status quo, they look different."

Again it's a change election – and women represent change.

Two years ago, Sarah Palin was the first woman on a Republican presidential ticket and Hillary Rodham Clinton came tantalizingly close to winning the Democratic presidential nomination.

Today, two women sit on the Supreme Court and a third, Elena Kagan, is likely to join them.

Across the country, female candidates have legitimate shots of winning Senate races in Connecticut, Colorado, Missouri and New Hampshire, and gubernatorial contests in Arizona, New Mexico, Florida and Oklahoma. Many more are seeking House seats and a place in state legislatures.

As of this month, the Center for American Women and Politics counted 23 female Senate candidates, 216 House contenders and 23 gubernatorial hopefuls. Another 26 were vying for lieutenant governor jobs, and 77 for other statewide offices.

Consider the race for the Democratic nomination for an open Arkansas congressional seat. State Sen. Joyce Elliott, the chamber's Democratic majority leader, beat state House Speaker Robbie Wills in a runoff. She's black in a state with deep-seated racial tensions. But she shrugs of the notion that she can't win.

"This is no normal year. People are more open to my message than they might be closed-minded to my race," Elliott has said.

That may be the case for gender as well.

In some cases, Tuesday's victors have been climbing the political ladder for years and decided to seize the opportunity for higher office as voters crave change.

Whitman, a former chief executive of eBay, faces former Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr., who is seeking a return to the office he left in 1983. Fiorina, a former Hewlett-Packard CEO, faces Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, who was elected to the Senate in the class of 1992.

The Republican women are running as first-time candidates against veteran politicians and casting themselves as outsiders in a year when voters despise insiders.

"Career politicians in Sacramento and Washington, D.C., be warned: You now face your worst nightmare – two businesswomen from the real world who know how to create jobs, balance budgets and get things done," Whitman said.

Nodding to women backers, she added: "This gal is on a mission. And I am all in."

It was the first time the California Republican Party has put a woman – much less two – at the top of its ticket.

Responding to Fiorina's triumph, EMILY's List, which backs female candidates who support abortions rights, launched a website supportive of Boxer, calling her "a fierce advocate for protecting women's freedom and liberty."

In South Carolina, Haley's rise was stunning given the state's poor record of electing women. It ranks 50th in the nation for the percentage of women in the state legislature, and there are no women in South Carolina's Senate, the country's only all-male chamber.

Haley, who is of Indian descent, came from behind in polls to outpace three male rivals but, without a majority of votes, heads into a June 22 runoff.

Her rival, Rep. Gresham Barrett, rolled out a TV ad Wednesday that called him "a Christian family man who won't embarrass us" – a jab at both Haley's Sikh-turned-Methodist religion and the claims of infidelity that she denies.

Palin had endorsed Fiorina and Haley, a lift to their candidacies.

If these women prevail in November, year of the woman will be the oft-repeated phrase. Just don't tell Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md.

"Calling 1992 the Year of the Woman makes it sound like the Year of the Caribou or the Year of the Asparagus. We're not a fad, a fancy, or a year," she once said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — It's looking like a new "year of the woman" in politics. Eighteen years after a few glass ceilings were broken, hundreds of female candidates have set their sights on Congress, gove...
WASHINGTON — It's looking like a new "year of the woman" in politics. Eighteen years after a few glass ceilings were broken, hundreds of female candidates have set their sights on Congress, gove...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 880
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SharonaMonk
01:55 PM on 06/10/2010
We live in a country that has romanticized the life lived prior to the 60's. They want to take us back to that era. Progression moves us forward, so is it a shock that progressives are having a tough time?

PS - Did this article have anything to do with progressives? I read the first couple of paragraphs and felt duped. lol.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
09:08 PM on 06/09/2010
Oh, I did not even noticed Palin endorsed...
Who cares about her endorsement...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ScreenName05
04:34 PM on 06/09/2010
This could be a real disaster for Arkansas. Who does the Dem org. think is going to show up in November, I bet the folks who fought for and voted for Halter are already planning to stay home. And I don't blame them.

Time to realize that you can lose by winning.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow
02:00 PM on 06/09/2010
Well, according to someone from AR, this is not over yet.

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/08/voter-lawsuit-filed-in-arkansas-blanche-lincoln-bill-halter-se/

Arkansas Election Commissioner Tapp has cut down the polling places in Garland County (a Halter stronghold) from 42 to 2!

Call the Garland County Elections Commission- 501-622-3622 – and the Arkansas Elections Commission- (501) 682-1834 or (800) 411-6996 .

If your vote is at risk, call the Department of Justice and tell them what’s going on. Switchboard- 202-514-2000, Voting Section- 202-307-27670

http://mydd.com/2010/6/7/ar-sen-not-enough-polling-places-in-halter-stronghold-2”


And someone commented at 6:41PST/9:41EST : "My brother said places that had heavy turnout for Halter were being closed early with no notice."”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spiegelp
01:58 PM on 06/09/2010
Rich business women willl protect the big businesses from which they come. Period. More dereguation and job outsourcing. all in the name of their profits. California is about to slide into the Pacific.
01:26 PM on 06/09/2010
Politicans should be required to wear logo's like NASCAR... since they do the same thing

www.thePeoplesLink.com
01:18 PM on 06/09/2010
The assumation that the Republicans will win out in Nov. is wrong. First Jerry Brown is the most experienced person for governor remember governor moombeam right. He was so right about the enviorment. He help Oakland when he was mayor there and as Attorney general of this state. Meg Whitman is a business woman that is true but I wouldn't trust as far as I could throw her. I know who and what I am getting with Jerry. Second Carly Frieno is and idot. I love my Boxer that is why I keep voting for her. She is a sweet woman in her private persona also as I have met her a few times in the past. She works hard for this state. As far as Diane Finestin find someone to run againts them and if I'm around I'd vote for them. Don't think the Democrats are down and out for the count they just are not. There are still enough of us nasty liberals out here to make a differance each and every election.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ScreenName05
04:44 PM on 06/09/2010
I agree about California. This states wants another useless Republican about as much as it wants an earthquake. And Carly Frieno is an idiot and Boxer will wipe up the floor with her.

That being said, California's problems are not going to be solved by a Democrat or a Republican. California's people are going to have to solve their problems and they are going to have to make some very hard decisions to fix the problems of this state - those changes cannot be accomplished by politicians - in office or out.

1. California must repeal the 2/3 majority rule for budgets.

2. California must repeal the term limit rule.

3. California must repeal Prop 13.

4. California must either get rid of or severely limit the referendum process, it costs too much and makes very complex legislative decisions into yes and no ballot options - as a result we get the worst possible laws made part of the CA Constitution.

If we keep firing our elected representatives after 6 and 8 years then we are just crazy. If we continue to allow a 33% majority to dictate the budget including raising taxes we will never be financially viable again. If we continue preventing local districts from determining how much they want to spend on education (the actual effect of Prop 13) then our school system will continue to decline from 48th in the nation to 50th in the nation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
09:08 PM on 06/09/2010
California's most recent Republicans got the state into deepest debt in the State's history, it that true?
10:53 AM on 06/09/2010
Hurray for Alvin Greene in South Carolina! That state's Democratic Party committee better wake up and build a campaign around this guy. Alvin Green CAN bring down DeMint and can attract voters disenchanted with ideology and who are looking for someone to SERVE. Alvin Greene's military record and his unemployed status make him a great opposition candidate, the Ultimate Under-dog. Where to I send money?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:45 AM on 06/09/2010
The country's not shrinking, is it?
South Carolina is thousands, not hundreds of miles to the east of California :)
10:30 AM on 06/09/2010
The voters video response to the attempt by huffys, unions,

and other associated fringe socialist groups to foist wacked out

liberal candidate Bill Halter on them:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aJROW6cuEM&feature=related
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ron ray
Justice: Big Bird has a job, Mitt's a 47%er.
10:30 AM on 06/09/2010
So 80 million buys the republican nomination for california senate. maybe the state can sell the governor position and balance the budget.

this is the real tea party -- those who can buy the most tea win.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
10:26 AM on 06/09/2010
It doesn't mean a d_ _ thing except that easily led tea baggers and other idiots were out to vote. Actually more needs to be learned about the candidates who took the votes, and an active campaign season will focus in on their warts and faults. I get pretty sick and tired of the hype that surrounds such primary elections, since those who come out on top haven't been really tested.
photo
LeFlaneur
does nuance.
10:20 AM on 06/09/2010
Given the opportunity, enough information, and a clear choice, Americans will make the wrong decision.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LDF
That's me in the red coat
09:35 AM on 06/09/2010
Most disappointing news of the night: Orly Taitz fails to win GOP nomination for Sec of State in California. I had already popped the popcorn so I could have something to munch while watching the show. drat.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:48 AM on 06/09/2010
I know what you mean.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
graceland9
...and talk in the past and not the present tense.
02:50 PM on 06/09/2010
Hey, mommy! Any news?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
democratsaint
The GOP-The Humpty Dumpty of economics
09:29 AM on 06/09/2010
so where is all the tea party victories,in fact no one is really mentioning them today...maybe they are low on tea?
by the way the BOSTON tea party was for taxation WITHOUT representation,they may not LIKE who represents them,but they are represented by people ELECTED by the majority,so in essence the tea party is for a dictatorship where the minority run the gvt.if you listen to the rhetoric ,they want to change the constitution to suit THEM, they want to take back the gvt ,the gvt was ELECTED by the majority so i guess they want to overthrow it.