More

Google AdMob Attacks Apple's New Mobile Ad Rules

MICHAEL LIEDTKE   06/ 9/10 07:15 PM ET   AP

Google Apple

SAN FRANCISCO — Google Inc. thinks its increasingly bitter rival Apple Inc. is trying to muscle it out of the mobile advertising competition on the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

The latest dispute between the Silicon Valley powerhouses centers on a proposed change that could hobble Google's ability to sell and place ads on devices running on Apple's latest mobile operating system, which comes out this month.

Omar Hamoui, the executive in charge of Google's newly acquired mobile ad service, AdMob, attacked Apple's new restrictions in a blog posting Wednesday as a threat to competition. He also warned the change would decrease the ad revenue flowing to the developers of iPhone and iPad applications, a scenario that could drive up the prices that consumers pay for the programs.

Apple didn't immediately return calls seeking comment.

Google paid $750 million to buy AdMob, partly because of AdMob's success selling ads on the iPhone. AdMob, founded in 2006, was so good at it that Apple wanted to buy the company before being trumped by Google last fall.

Apple has since set up own ad service, iAd, fueling Google's suspicion that its rival wants to monopolize the commercial messages shown on the more than 50 million iPhones and iPads that have already been sold.

Under the terms of Apple's latest operating system for those devices, critical information for distributing and analyzing ads won't be shared with services owned by makers of other mobile operating systems.

That threatens to lock out AdMob because Google's Android operating system competes with the iPhone.

That could be a major blow to AdMob, which distributed 30 percent of its ads to iPhones, iPads and iPods in April. Hamoui indicated he still hopes to persuade Apple to scrap the rule change.

On the flip side, Apple's restrictions could be an advantage for smaller, independent ad networks that would still have all the usual data needed to place ads on iPhones and iPads. But that could turn out to be a handicap for mobile advertising services seeking to be bought by a larger company such as Microsoft Corp. that has its own mobile operating system.

It's unclear whether Apple will enforce the restrictions on how the ad data can be shared, said Noah Elkin, an analyst for eMarketer, a research firm.

"I think what we have here is two companies sparring for control of what is potentially a very big advertising market," Elkin said. The U.S. mobile ad market is expected to grow from about $600 million this year to more than $1.5 billion in 2013, according to eMarketer.

Both Google and Apple believe mobile devices eventually will supplant personal computers as the main way people surf the Web. Their dueling ambitions to be shape the direction of the mobile market have transformed the companies from allies to antagonists during the past year.

If Apple's new rules on mobile advertising data were to create a competitive barrier, it would likely attract the attention of antitrust regulators.

After a six-month review, the Federal Trade Commission approved Google's purchase of AdMob largely because the agency believe Apple's entrance into the mobile ad market would foster adequate competition. In its approval of the AdMob deal, the FTC vowed to continue to monitor the mobile ad market for anticompetitive behavior.

The FTC declined to comment Wednesday.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SAN FRANCISCO — Google Inc. thinks its increasingly bitter rival Apple Inc. is trying to muscle it out of the mobile advertising competition on the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. The latest dispu...
SAN FRANCISCO — Google Inc. thinks its increasingly bitter rival Apple Inc. is trying to muscle it out of the mobile advertising competition on the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. The latest dispu...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wickenberg
07:51 AM on 06/11/2010
Let them duke it out, it will bring them both down and consumers will win.
03:23 AM on 06/11/2010
Google seems to be losing it's mojo lately...
03:56 PM on 06/10/2010
Seriously HP does every other tech post have to be apple related? If I wanted fanboi fodder i'd go to engadget.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
blindjester
English and ESL teacher
05:16 PM on 06/10/2010
You don't have to click the button.

You can resist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThaGovna
I walk on water, eat bullets, and poop ice cream.
03:44 PM on 06/10/2010
I sooo hope Google wins this battle. I frakin' hate Apple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
microsoap
04:24 PM on 06/10/2010
Ditto.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
blindjester
English and ESL teacher
05:17 PM on 06/10/2010
That's a rational position.

I bet Steve Jobs kicked your dog, huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThaGovna
I walk on water, eat bullets, and poop ice cream.
06:06 PM on 06/10/2010
Yes. In the nuts. With the plating a knight would wear over his boots. Happy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taxolotl
delta / time
02:01 PM on 06/10/2010
Apple's position ultimately hurts developers, who need to have diverse ways of monetizing their hard work. If it comes to it, there will be a Federal investigation into Apple's practices. In fact, there is an ongoing one right now.
04:20 PM on 06/10/2010
Apple isn't blocking all third party ads. They're blocking the ones that collecting data from a competing OS maker. If Apple never created iAds, it would be Google dominating the mobile ad web space along with the desktop yet no one has a problem with this.

I don't see how this hurts iPhone developers. Apple has already chewed up half of all mobile ad revenues for the second half of this year and iAds hasn't even been released yet. There will be plenty of money to go around for these developers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taxolotl
delta / time
06:11 PM on 06/10/2010
apple's behavior is anti-competative. just ask all the devs that get their apps yanked, sometimes after submitting 3 or more updates. the real success of iphone is the appmarket....the hardware is par at best and the OS is in a cat-&-mouse. not giving those devs the freedom to use the ad revenue generator to their best advantage also hurts them. apple should take a serious look at the respect google has sought to show the real power-factor in this situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
01:28 PM on 06/10/2010
It pains me to say Bill Gates is presently more appealing than Steve Jobs.

Seriously. You have no idea.

Now if you'll excuse, me I'm going to jump in the shower with a gallon of Dawn and see if we can break this up...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tblack
02:38 PM on 06/10/2010
lmao...try the new Dial for men...actually...I'm sorry...that wont work either.
It's amazing because Bill is still not very appealing, ask anyone on X box live paying for Avatar clothing, but Bill at least is aware that people hate him and lays low.

When Steve showed up at that iPad launch in Palo Alto and told a woman waiting for hours in line "Good" after she said she loves the iPad that I realized just how mean Steve really is. "good?" how about thank you for buying my 500 dollar Ipod Touch?
JWoode
yes.. my micro bio is empty
12:01 AM on 06/11/2010
He probably said "good grief you idiot" but they didn't catch it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
microsoap
04:25 PM on 06/10/2010
Bill Gates is a snakeoil salesman. "Raise your hand, raise your hand if you're sure!"
01:02 PM on 06/10/2010
Can FTC just fine Apple please. The flagrantly flaunts antitrust laws its crazy.
JWoode
yes.. my micro bio is empty
12:02 AM on 06/11/2010
They're probably too busy opening the crates of free ipads and watching p0rn to care
02:10 AM on 06/11/2010
haha well played
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DomainDiva
Aviation SaaS Entrepreneur and Technical SME
12:53 PM on 06/10/2010
Maybe there's something wrong with me, but I do not want ad-crap being delivered to me when I am trying to work or do anything else while online. Having an iPhone or iPad already means the user has to do business with the penultimate evil AT&T, now users have to suffer through the junk that internet advertisers throw at us as well? I am sticking with my purple crackberry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
microsoap
12:49 PM on 06/10/2010
If iAds is so good and so pure, you won't mind if I use software to block it, right Stevie???? Whoops!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:46 PM on 06/10/2010
Google- your 15 minutes are over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taxolotl
delta / time
02:02 PM on 06/10/2010
keep dreaming.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tblack
02:38 PM on 06/10/2010
LMAO!...dude you need to read a real tech blog. at least once a week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wespenn56
Conservative does start with "CON"
07:21 AM on 06/11/2010
Or at least ONCE
11:43 AM on 06/10/2010
LET THE GOOGLE/APPLE FIGHT CONTINUE,THE WINNERS WILL DEFINITELY BE THE USERS.RIM./BLACKBERRY ALL THE WAY FOR ME THOUGH,MAYBE A BIT OF GOOGLE/HTC BIAS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
g4dualie
I.Y.A.O.Y.A.S!
11:40 AM on 06/10/2010
Google set the stage for this drama and in their lastest I/O keynote, took cheap shots at Apple.

Imagine, using a world stage like I/O, to heckle the very company you MUST do business with going forward!

Google's VP, Gundrota, has since back-peddled on his attacks, making him look even more foolish.

To the CEO of AdMob I say, you made your choice, so stop whining and get busy bugging us with your monotonous advertising!
02:10 PM on 06/10/2010
I know, and Steve never took digs at Android/Google, saying things like "If you want porn, go to Android" He also called the Adobe DEVELOPERS lazy, as well as saying Google's Dont be evil saying is "Bullshit"

http://www.tribbleagency.com/?p=6749

Yeah i'd say its a two way street, and Google has every right to take digs at Apple in my opinion.
03:59 PM on 06/10/2010
I know, and Eric Schmidt never sat on Apple's board and played with pre-release versions of the iPhone and Google never had prototypes of Android devices that looked like BB and suddenly took the iPhone's design with the G1 sooner than anyone else. Google also didn't snoop on wifi and actually collected that information. Google believes in "Don't Be Evil" and the reason they offered Google search in China initially was to fight the power and not make money. They didn't remove search results in China for "Tiananmen Square". Google doesn't have eternal cookies and doesn't believe that privacy is dead. "Don't Be Evil" is clearly not bullshit.

In this world you get what you give.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deus Angelus
10:29 AM on 06/10/2010
So everyone hates Microsoft and loves to hit Microsoft with Anti-Trust laws yet Apple does the same thing and everyone is quiet? What gives?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
11:04 AM on 06/10/2010
Supposedly the DOJ is taking interest in Apple. I can't imagine this is going to make that interest wane.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
microsoap
12:47 PM on 06/10/2010
Thank you!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwlynch
09:43 AM on 06/10/2010
Apple is engaging in some serious hypocrisy. It just released Safari 5, with the Reader feature. Reader essentially blocks ads on web sites (after the first page of the article loads) and reformats a site's content without the site's permission.

And now it wants to block competition to protect its iAds platform? Amazing.

I doubt very much that Apple will EVER allow an ad blocker on the iPhone or iPad platforms. I guess it's okay for them to screw web publishers but they will never allow somebody else to block Apple's ads.

Hypocrites.

I covered the Safari Reader situation in my column. The last page has thoughts on Google versus Apple.

Safari Reader: Apple’s Weapon of Mass Destruction
http://jimlynch.com/index.php/2010/06/07/safari-reader-apples-weapon-of-mass-destruction/
10:52 AM on 06/10/2010
Have you even used reader? Safari doesn't block any ads. All pages load like normal just like they would in any other browser. All reader does is show the text only version of a page to make it easier to read. Also, you have to activate reader on a per page basis, AFTER the page loads like normal. In other words, it's up to the user to activate reader on a page they want to display as text only.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:34 PM on 06/10/2010
I'm using a flash blocker on my iMac's Safari.
It's improved my web experience immensely.
On the rare occasion I want to see something in Flash I just click on it.
For the most part I'm just missing ads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Chu
03:30 AM on 06/10/2010
Google didn't pay 750 million for Admob because it was so good at serving Ads. It paid that much because Admob has a huge amount of behavioral data on iPhone users.

If you had a business, would you share data on your customers with your competitor? I don't think so.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
blindjester
English and ESL teacher
01:18 PM on 06/10/2010
Interesting. I didn't know that about the data.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taxolotl
delta / time
02:06 PM on 06/10/2010
that certainly sounds like a thorn in Apple's paw, but it doesn't change the fact that it's the developers who are getting sqeezed the hardest. they should have diverse options for making money off their ideas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tblack
02:41 PM on 06/10/2010
They way they yank Devs Apps from the store is pure cow dung.