More

Gulf Oil Spill Burn: BP Plans To Use EverGreen Burner To Dispose Of Oil

Gulf Oil Spill Burn

First Posted: 06/09/10 05:47 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:45 PM ET

NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) -- Now that crews are collecting more and more oil from the sea-bottom spill, the question is where to put it.

How about burning it?

Equipment collecting the oil and bringing it to the surface is believed to be nearing its daily processing capacity. A floating platform could be the solution to process most of the flow, BP said.

To burn it, the British oil giant is preparing to use a device called an EverGreen Burner, officials said. It turns a flow of oil and gas into a vapor that is pushed out its 12 nozzles and burned without creating visible smoke.

Methods for gathering and disposing of the oil collected from the seafloor gusher are becoming clearer. What's not is how much oil is eluding capture.

Scientists on a team analyzing the flow said Tuesday that the amount of crude still spewing into the Gulf of Mexico might be considerably greater than what the government and company have claimed.

Their assertions - combined with BP's rush to build a bigger cap and its apparent difficulty in immediately processing all the oil being collected - have only added to the impression that BP is still floundering in dealing with the catastrophe.
Story continues below

A cap placed on the ruptured well last week to channel much of the billowing oil to a surface ship collected about 620,000 gallons Monday and another 330,000 from midnight to noon Tuesday, BP said.

That would mean the cap is collecting better than half the escaping oil, based on the government's estimate that around 600,000 to 1.2 million gallons a day are leaking from the bottom of the sea.

A team of researchers and government officials and run by the director of the U.S. Geological Survey is studying the flow rate and hopes to present its findings in the coming days on what is already the biggest oil spill in U.S. history.

In an interview with The Associated Press, team member and Purdue University engineering professor Steve Wereley said it was a "reasonable conclusion" but not the team's final one to say that the daily flow rate is, in fact, somewhere between 798,000 gallons and 1.8 million gallons.

Whatever the amount, all that oil has to end up somewhere. The floating production and storage vessel BP plans to bring in could be part of the answer, officials said.

"It's being brought in because it can handle far more oil than this well is producing," said Wine, who did not know where the vessel would come from or when it would arrive.

The burn rig will be moved away from the main leak site so the flames and heat do not endanger other vessels, BP spokesman Max McGahan said.

Depending on which model is used and its settings, it can handle from 10,500 to 630,000 gallons of oil a day, according to promotional materials by Schlumberger Ltd., the company that makes the device and whose website touts it as producing "fallout-free and smokeless combustion."

It's unclear how many times the EverGreen burner has been used, but it has been proposed for at least one offshore rig in the North Sea to get rid of unwanted gases produced during oil processing.

Environmental documents produced as part of that project, an exploration well proposed by Total E&P of Britain, said burning the oil posed "a moderate risk to the environment" that would release sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides, methane and other chemicals.

But Wilma Subra, a chemist with the Louisiana Environmental Action Network, said BP should avoid burning the captured oil - which she said raises new health risks - and instead bring in more processing equipment.

"This is one of those decisions that will have negative impacts," she said. "Even though it's crude dispersed in water, the burning of crude will raise some health issues."

When it sells the oil recovered from the Gulf, BP will use the revenues to create a fund to protect wildlife in the region, the company said.

Attempts to skim the oil from the surface are progressing as well. Boats fanned out across the Gulf on Tuesday, dragging boom in an attempt to corral the oil. But it's an enormous task.

In some spots, the oil is several inches thick and forms a brown taffy-like goo that sticks to everything it touches.

John Young, chairman of Louisiana's Jefferson Parish Council, said additional equipment has been ordered and more dredgers will be moving into the area soon, along with barges that will help block the passes.

"It's nice that BP has put up the money, but they need to ramp up not only the manpower but the equipment out there because we're losing the battle," Young said. "Unfortunately, we're on day 50 and it's too little too late, but I guess it's better late than never."

In the seven weeks since the oil rig explosion that set off the catastrophe, BP has had to improvise at every turn. The most recent government estimates put the total amount of oil lost at 23.7 million to 51.5 million gallons.

When asked why BP did not have containment systems on standby in case of a leak, BP spokesman Robert Wine said there was no reason to think an accident on this scale was likely.

"It's unprecedented," he said. "That's why these caps weren't there before."

President Barack Obama is scheduled to return to the Gulf Coast on Monday and Tuesday for a two-day update on the Gulf oil spill.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) -- Now that crews are collecting more and more oil from the sea-bottom spill, the question is where to put it. How about burning it? Equipment collecting the oil and b...
NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) -- Now that crews are collecting more and more oil from the sea-bottom spill, the question is where to put it. How about burning it? Equipment collecting the oil and b...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:28 PM on 06/10/2010
"evergreen" are you f**king serious.
01:02 AM on 06/10/2010
I think they should use one of Henry's cod pieces to skim the oil. I hear they were huge.
12:36 AM on 06/10/2010
Burning off the oil only allows BP to save money in the process. It also adds powerfully to global warming and definitely would cause a severe air pollution problem with one of the results being formation of sulfuric acid in the air. They are simply trading one form of pollution for another. It saves them a lot of money because they can use the methane from the well as a starter fuel and this saves them big bucks. This does not serve anyone's interests but BP's. I hope Obama is smart enough to see through this smoke and mirrors game. Prabably not however.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
10:42 PM on 06/09/2010
"To burn it, the British oil giant is preparing to use a device called an EverGreen Burner, officials said. It turns a flow of oil and gas into a vapor that is pushed out its 12 nozzles and burned without creating visible smoke."

As if all that oil in the water was not bad enough, now they want to put it in the air too?

Is this the Great and Powerful free-market capitalism at work? I am not impressed.
12:38 AM on 06/10/2010
You can say that again. BP's idea is so lame it reeks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
08:42 PM on 06/09/2010
"When asked why BP did not have containment systems on standby in case of a leak, BP spokesman Robert Wine said there was no reason to think an accident on this scale was likely."

Having emergency equipment on standby would have been an admission that they were doing something risky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Hill
Conflicted
12:32 PM on 06/09/2010
An Ocean of Fire sounds apocalyptic to me.

This is where our preoccupation with capitalism and worship of the wealthy has led us.

Now we need to focus on our interdependence with one another and the planet. There is a lot of healing work to be done for ourselves and all the beings being hurt and destroyed by this mess.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
11:41 AM on 06/09/2010
If a cop pulls me over for speeding and holding a bag of pot, the government will spare no expense to document the empirical evidence. The simple question of how much oil is spewing can not be answered beyond doubt 40 days into the spill. Feck you Government, get the DEA to measure it and calculate the value.
12:39 AM on 06/10/2010
Yeah, I say Feck the government also.
11:24 AM on 06/09/2010
Idiot British Punks! Why not pull Tony Hayward back again from his dreary little British life sipping tea in his English garden laughing all the way to the bank. Let's toss Tony in as a tester then Burn Baby Burn!
11:57 AM on 06/09/2010
Burn Baby Burn! That was funny...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demomntgirl
11:22 AM on 06/09/2010
yeah that's great...
more toxic to marine life that the oil itself!
someone needs to stop these idiots...
and take the control form them.
They might own the oil...
but they don't own the ocean!
11:01 AM on 06/09/2010
Great idea, burn the oil and create another environmental disaster. Get those guys the hell out of there!
photo
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
11:04 AM on 06/09/2010
and replace them with who? Wait I thought the govenment was in charge of this clean up?
11:24 AM on 06/09/2010
British intelligence!
10:59 AM on 06/09/2010
The Irony! Now they've got more oil than they know what do do with
photo
espressobeans
. . . just saying it like it is.
10:47 AM on 06/09/2010
Are there no refineries? No resources to conscript? Declare a national emergency and get it done. I really can't believe no one made anyone draft a blue print for disaster in the event one of these blew out especially if we are to believe there is no way to stop it except to start drilling a second well, a process that takes months.
10:31 AM on 06/09/2010
Pretty blatant admission of what is important to them. And using the oil from this mess for a productive use is not profitable or a priority for them. The fact that the emissions will be invisible doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy. I wonder if they have studied the effects on the atmosphere of this sort of discharge just to minimize the visible mess they have created. I wonder just how far those invisible vapors can travel and how long they will remain in the atmosphere?
10:25 AM on 06/09/2010
"It's unclear how many times the EverGreen burner has been used, but it has been proposed for at least one offshore rig in the North Sea to get rid of unwanted gases produced during oil processing."

So now we are letting BP experiment on the US and the environment. Who exactly is looking out for the interests of this country? The only thing we can find proof of is that the use of this thing was proposed in the past, it's never been used before? What our we making our decisions based on? Protecting the market once again? Not feeling a lot of confidence that this will be any better for US citizens than bailing out Wall St.
09:58 AM on 06/09/2010
Someone had posted a video about an Australian guy, a certain Willie Nelson, who came up with a solution over twenty years ago that seems really viable to me. Basically, you pour paraffin on the gook and the two substances harden together which makes it possible to remove the oil/paraffin in sheets! If this actually works the way he demonstrates in the video, we could have used it before the oil even hit the shores. I assume it must not work, or that we are complete ninnies and would rather ruin our coastlines and wildlife. Check out the video, it's on YouTube.