iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama, Cameron's BP Oil Spill Phone Call: President Tells Britain No Hard Feelings Over Spill

Obama Cameron Bp Oil Spill

JILL LAWLESS   06/12/10 04:04 PM ET   AP

LONDON — President Barack Obama reassured Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday that his frustration over the mammoth oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is not an attack on Britain as the two leaders tried to soothe trans-Atlantic tensions over the disaster.

Cameron's Downing St. office said the two leaders held a "warm and constructive" telephone conversation for more than 30 minutes.

Obama has recently sharpened his criticism of BP PLC as the company struggles to stop millions of gallons of oil gushing from its ruptured deep-sea well. Cameron is under pressure to get Obama to tone down the rhetoric against of a major British company, fearing it will hurt millions of Britons – as well as many Americans – who hold BP stock in investments and pension plans.

Cameron's office said the prime minister "expressed his sadness at the ongoing human and environmental catastrophe," but stressed BP's economic importance to Britain, the U.S. and other countries.

It said Obama recognized that BP – which he has pointedly referred to in public by its former name, British Petroleum – is a multinational company, "and that frustrations about the oil spill had nothing to do with national identity." Obama said he had no interest in undermining BP's value. The company's stock has lost 40 percent of its value since the oil rig fire on April 20 that unleashed the United States' worst oil spill.

Downing Street said the two men agreed that BP should continue "to work intensively to ensure that all sensible and reasonable steps are taken as rapidly as practicable to deal with the consequences of this catastrophe."

The Obama administration walked a careful line Saturday: trying to show toughness with BP, but also reassuring Britons that the president holds no animosity toward their country and institutions. The strategy could be risky if Obama's political opponents use it to reinforce claims that he has been too gentle and diplomatic in dealing with the oil company.

Before the Obama-Cameron phone call took place, the U.S. government told BP it has until the end of the weekend to speed up efforts to contain the oil spill.

Later, the White House let Cameron's office make the first public remarks about Saturday's phone call. Downing Street used the opportunity to stress that Obama is not attacking Britain and that he recognizes BP as a global firm.

When the White House finally released its official statement, only one of the 10 sentences referred to the oil spill. It said the two men discussed the impact of the spill, "reiterating that BP must do all it can to respond effectively to the situation."

Minutes later, a senior Obama administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity to describe the private conversation, confirmed that the president had told Cameron "that our frustration has nothing to do with national identity" but focuses instead on "ensuring that a large, wealthy company lives up to its obligations."

The official said Obama told Cameron that BP "must meet its obligations to those whose lives have been disrupted," and that the administration "will insist everything be done to cap the well, capture the oil, and pay for the cleanup, the environmental damage done and the tens of thousands of economic claims as a result of this disaster."

BP has been ordered by the U.S. Coast Guard to speed up its efforts to stop oil gushing into the sea off the coast of Louisiana.

U.S. Coast Guard Rear Adm. James A. Watson sent a letter to BP officials on Friday expressing frustration with the overall pace of the effort and ordered the company to identify ways to expedite the process in the next 48 hours.

Downing Street also said Cameron and Obama reaffirmed their belief in "the unique strength of the U.S.-UK relationship." It announced that Cameron will visit Washington July 20, his first trip there since taking office in May.

The warm words come after vocal criticism of BP by Obama, who has said he would have fired BP's top executive, if he were in charge, and has supported the idea that the oil company suspend its quarterly dividend.

In a sign the company feels the pressure, BP said Saturday that its board would meet Monday to discuss deferring its second-quarter dividend and putting the money into escrow until the company's liabilities from the spill are known. BP said no decision had yet been made.

Obama also has reproached BP for spending money on a public relations campaign and occasionally refers to "British Petroleum," although the company years ago began using only its initials and is a far-reaching international corporation with extensive holdings in the United States, including a Texas refinery and a share of the Alaska oil pipeline.

This past week, the usually measured Obama said in a television interview, "I don't sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar; we talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers – so I know whose ass to kick."

The angry words from Washington have produced a backlash in Britain, where BP is a corporate pillar. Millions of British retirees depend on BP dividends since pension funds are heavily invested in the oil company, the world's third-largest.

British officials began taking a more hands-on approach Friday, when Treasury chief George Osborne met BP's chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg, and Cameron spoke to Svanberg by phone.

Svanberg, who has faced criticism for not being more visible in BP's response to the Gulf spill, is to meet with Obama at the White House on Wednesday. Probably joining him will be CEO Tony Hayward and other BP executives. It will be the first time Obama has met with BP officials since the crisis began.

Hayward will testify at a U.S. House of Representatives hearing on Thursday.

___

Associated Press Writers H. Josef Hebert and Charles Babington in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

LONDON — President Barack Obama reassured Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday that his frustration over the mammoth oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is not an attack on Britain as the two le...
LONDON — President Barack Obama reassured Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday that his frustration over the mammoth oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is not an attack on Britain as the two le...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 367
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:00 AM on 06/15/2010
I don't mind Obama saying there's no hard feelings since Britain does not equal BP. However, I would like Cameron to say "no hard feelings" in return if we successfully shut down BP and Brits lose the value of their investments in BP stock.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:48 PM on 06/14/2010
To date I have not heard any comments directed a the Brits per say. Plenty at BP the company.
Why is the British government running to defend a private corporation? I guess their government as does our takes their orders from big business.
09:40 PM on 06/14/2010
I wonder how the British would feel if an American oil company caused millions of gallons to dump in the Thames..
07:38 AM on 06/15/2010
Well...American bankers did recently cause the collapse of the entire world economy. I'm sure the feeling is similar.
12:44 PM on 06/15/2010
True, but I'll bet a review of British newspapers at the time had plenty of anti-American sentiment. In fact, long before the financial collapse, it would have been hard to pick up a British paper and not find SOME anti-American remark (I have lived in Britain on & off, am married to a Brit, and love the U.K.)
11:13 AM on 06/17/2010
Mabil i suggest you undertake some research on Bhopal / Union Carbide.

I wish BP would mention it in passing to Mr Obama, particularly when talking about setting up funds for victims.
06:00 PM on 06/14/2010
I think it is good that Obama has decided to talk to BP, the British and others trying to deal with the oil spill.
03:55 PM on 06/14/2010
The unnecessary war of words between the US and UK over a company Barack Obama inexplicably refers to as British Petroleum (it hasn't been called that for over a decade) is wonderfully distilled in typical English manner in the article quoted below - link follows:

".......we did not burn US executives in effigy after Occidental's Piper Alpha rig exploded, killing 167 men, in 1988. And Union Carbide's shamefully evasive performance before, during and since the Bhopal disaster in 1984 was highlighted in an Indian court again only last week. That killed 3,000 people directly, and many more since.

Exxon in Alaska and countless others, both at home – let's not forget the domestic US – and abroad; the record of corporate America bears some very large stains alongside all the good it does......"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2010/jun/14/obama-britain-bp-michael-white
03:47 PM on 06/14/2010
For a start this trans-Atlantic "argument" is a concoction of the right-wing media, mostly Murdoch's newspapers. There have been a few comments that could be spun into being anti-British and that's exactly what some newspapers have done. On the other side folks worried about their pensions are also being played by the press in the same way - to create an argument it sells news and gets the hit counter up on newspaper sites who sell advertising.

Why any of us, on either side of the pond are taking this seriously I don't know, but as usual we let the press manipulate the public into firing off xenophobic comments.

Also, for those saying Britain hasn't offered any help/whinging etc. That's not true, the press by and large didn't report this, I saw it on the Guardian website though:

UK PM David Cameron:

"First of all this is an environmental catastrophe. We need to be clear about that. We need to be clear that BP needs to do everything it can to deal with the situation and the UK government stands ready to help. We have made offers of help and stand by to do more."

So if the British government is offering help with the clean up, why aren't we taking it? The Dutch also offered help and we haven't accepted that either?
We need to clean up the damn oil not worrying about what the Tea-baggers and Caribou barbies and running their mouths over.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:56 PM on 06/14/2010
Why can't all the ultra religious people pray to god to plug the leak. Wouldnt that solve it?
12:26 PM on 06/14/2010
B.P. share ownership data: 39 % American, 40% British, 21% other. Americans own as much of the company as do the British and are therefore equally responsible.

Let's solve the problem first before assigning blame. Let's see what the final investigation finds. There is responsibility here - spread amongst all 4 companies, shareholders, and Government inspection and regulatatory bodies who are ultimately responsible for ensuring the the publics best interests and safety. This is a regulatory failure!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seachange525
All will be well...I just don't know how yet :)
12:08 PM on 06/14/2010
How disgusting. Obama placates while a huge body of water and its inhabitants are destroyed. Do you mean nations don't have a legal way to hold companies--whatever their origin and purpose--accountable for environmental damage? Is that what we're really learning here?
11:22 AM on 06/14/2010
Obama should not spend one minute stroking British egos and their hurt feelings. If British people feel that they need to push back rather than lend a helping hand, that shows what kind of people they really are. Message to narcissitc Britts: the people of the Gulf want their lives back and couldn't care less about your hurt feelings or your lousy pensions. Good day.
10:56 AM on 06/14/2010
PM Cameron, former P.R. man and Conservative aristocrat needs to be "reassured" and wants the American rhetoric toned down so not to insult the British people?

What have you done "as the British people" to help us "country to country" as our Gulf has been turned into the largest Toxic Site in the history of the Earth? Where are your British tankers, volunteers, and experts? No, all you’re sending is your condescending criticism.
10:58 AM on 06/14/2010
Iraq and Afghanistan to name just two.
11:19 AM on 06/14/2010
Remember WWII?
I was talking in terms of the Oil spill.
12:46 PM on 06/15/2010
The U.S. has refused foreign offers of help.
10:30 AM on 06/14/2010
A little note to the British industries and politicians who reportedly have been offended by Obama's strong language about BP's handling of this epic catastrophe...11 men died, the Gulf is dying, and your British CEO Tony Hayward "wants’ his life back" . If anything, you should be ashamed that this self centered, arrogant, corporate brat was born on your soil.
08:47 AM on 06/14/2010
Speak for yourself, Mr. O.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babyboomerorig
Finally, it's spring!
08:24 AM on 06/14/2010
Why would we have "hard feelings" toward the UK? They didn't create this mess....BP did and that just happens to be based in the UK.

I'm not mad at the Brits for this catastrophe....if anything, I'm mad at the former administration and the past 30 years of cowtowing to the oil industry by Congress. Even now, some Republicans are calling for the government to spend the money to clean up this mess, all the while refusing to back COBRA funding for unemployeed.

Ronald Reagan and Dick Cheney need to be partially blamed for this mess....maybe a good share of it.
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
07:18 AM on 06/14/2010
Awwww, he's such a nice guy.

I'm tired of Obama the nice guy. He's ineffective and takes no initiative.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seachange525
All will be well...I just don't know how yet :)
12:02 PM on 06/14/2010
Absolutely right. I'd take effective over nice any day.
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
07:01 PM on 06/14/2010
fanned... for being like me.
ha ha