More

Peanut Ban On Airplanes? FAA Considers Nut Ban For Airlines Because Of Allergy

Peanut Ban Airplanes

RUSS BYNUM   06/12/10 01:05 AM ET   AP

SAVANNAH, Ga. — Federal regulators are considering a snack attack on the nation's airlines that would restrict or even completely ban serving peanuts on commercial flights.

Advocates say the move would ease fears and potential harm to an estimated 1.8 million Americans who suffer from peanut allergies. Peanut farmers and food packagers, however, see it as overreaching and unfair to their legume.

"The peanut is such a great snack and such an American snack," says Martin Kanan, CEO of the King Nut Companies, an Ohio company that packages the peanuts served by most U.S. airlines. "What's next? Is it banning peanuts in ballparks?"

Twelve years after Congress ordered it to back off peanuts, the U.S. Transportation Department gave notice last week that it's gathering feedback from allergy sufferers, medical experts, the food industry and the public on whether to ban or restrict in-flight peanuts.

The peanut proposals were listed in an 84-page document including several other proposed consumer protections for air travelers. Three options were given: banning serving of peanuts on all planes; prohibiting peanuts only when an allergic passenger requests it in advance; or requiring an undefined "peanut-free zone" flight when a passenger asks for one.

While those options only pertain to peanuts served by flight crews, the document also states "we are particularly interested in hearing views on how peanuts and peanut products brought on board aircraft by passengers should be handled."

Spokesman Bill Mosely said the department is responding to concerns from travelers who either suffer from peanut allergies or have allergic children, "some of whom do not fly" because they're afraid of exposure.

"We're just asking for comment on whether we should do any of these three things," Mosely said. "We may not do any of them."

Peanut allergy can cause life-threatening reactions in people ingesting even trace amounts. Just breathing peanut dust in the air can cause problems – though usually minor ones – such as itching, sneezing and coughing.

A few limited studies on airline passengers with peanut allergies found a number of people reporting symptoms while flying, but few were severe or life-threatening, said Dr. Scott Sicherer, who studies food allergies at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York.

"But there's discomfort," Sicherer said. "It's sort of like if you were allergic to dogs and all of a sudden they brought 50 dogs onto the plane."

Why worry about peanuts on airplanes, as opposed to other public spaces?

Advocates with the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network say the answer's simple: planes are confined spaces where the air and dust particles get re-circulated. And there's no way to stop and get off during a severe reaction during flight.

"It's a different environment when you're basically 30,000 feet in the air," said Chris Weiss, the group's vice president of advocacy and government relations. "If you're sitting around a bunch of people and all of a sudden they're all handed packages of peanuts, that could release enough peanut dust into the air to trigger a reaction."

The Transportation Department previously weighed imposing peanut-free zones on airliners in 1998. The agency retreated after getting a hostile response from Congress, which threatened to cut its budget.

Several airlines such as Continental, United, US Airways and JetBlue have voluntarily stopped serving packaged peanuts as mile-high grub. Delta and Southwest still hand out goobers as in-flight snacks. American Airlines doesn't serve packaged peanuts, but it does offer trail mix and other snacks that can contain peanut ingredients.

Not surprisingly, government regulation of peanuts on planes is a woefully unpopular idea in Georgia – the nation's top peanut producing state and home to former President Jimmy Carter, who grew up on a peanut farm.

"The peanut industry feels like we're being picked on," said Armond Morris, who grows peanuts on about 270 acres in rural Irwinville and serves as chairman of the Georgia Peanut Commission. "If we're going to go targeting food products, maybe we just need to ban all food" on planes.

Arlene de Armas of Miami sees things differently as she makes plans for her family to fly to Pennsylvania for a summer vacation. Her 7-year-old son, Leandro, is allergic to peanuts.

She's already planning on what precautions to take – calling the airline ahead to request no peanuts are served on her son's row, bringing sanitary wipes to clean the folding table in front of his seat and packing epinephrine – or adrenaline – to administer if he suffers a severe reaction.

"It's the added stress of knowing, God forbid, you could have a situation where he has a reaction and you have no way of getting to a hospital," de Armas said. "Peanut allergies are severe enough and common enough. Why not serve fruit?"

___

Online:

U.S. Department of Transportation rule proposal, http://www.dot.gov/affairs/2010/dot11010.html

Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network, http://www.foodallergy.org

Georgia Peanut Commission, http://www.gapeanuts.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

SAVANNAH, Ga. — Federal regulators are considering a snack attack on the nation's airlines that would restrict or even completely ban serving peanuts on commercial flights. Advocates say the move...
SAVANNAH, Ga. — Federal regulators are considering a snack attack on the nation's airlines that would restrict or even completely ban serving peanuts on commercial flights. Advocates say the move...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,277
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
01:58 PM on 07/22/2010
Require a physician's signed statement on his or her letterhead that such person is so allergic to peanuts that no peanuts should be served, or otherwise consumed,on a flight with the allergic person. This rule (or policy) would be posted in flight boarding areas, and publicised in the media and otherwise for the general public. Such a requirement should keep some people, and they do exist, eg. my late brother, from using their allergy, real or presumed, to help get them what they want and/or what they don't want, and to get control over others for perverse or even sadistic pleasure.
03:48 AM on 06/17/2010
The world has officially turned upside-down.
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
08:07 PM on 06/15/2010
This is just plain cruel. Not so long ago, airlines served lunches and dinners. Now if you are on a very long flight they might hand you a teeny, tiny bag of peanuts. Might.

It's all we had left...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jbarelli
I don't belong to an organized political party.
12:13 PM on 06/15/2010
There's an interesting debate going on about peanuts on airplanes, but more bluster than information. I will admit to leaning in the "no ban" direction, but I'd be interested in seeing more data.

What I can find says that a bit more than one half of one percent of the US population has some form of peanut allergy. The reactions range from a rash if peanuts are eaten to severe, life-threatening reactions to even tiny amounts.

The data that I haven't found is the number who have severe reactions to those tiny amounts, because that is the only number that matters when considering a ban. (The airline won't make you eat the peanuts.) This information is so difficult to find that I must assume that it's a very tiny number. If it were large numbers, the folks supporting the ban would be trumpeting them.

I've also observed something here that seems to happen at school board meetings when considering banning peanut products in schools. Peanut-free tables are no longer sufficient. Anyone disagreeing is called names and shouted down. It only takes a small group of supporters to do that. There are now upwards of 30,000 schools that will not allow you to send a PB&J in your kid's lunch, or a granola bar for a snack.

So, I'd like to see data. Name-calling pushes me the other direction. How many people have severe reactions to the odor of peanuts?
07:24 PM on 06/15/2010
Jbarelli - There is no way I can explain how deathly ill the smell makes me - will it kill me, no, unless there are particles in the air, or direct fumes such as would be from frying in peanut oil, or boiling of peanuts, does smelling it make me so very sick, yes. Do I react if I touch something, yes. Like I said in my posting, I choose not to fly, but the one thing I definitely don't understand is why anyone would care if peanuts are not served any longer. Yes, people can still bring them on, but at least everyone won't be opening at the same time. Please someone, and I'm serious when I ask as I want to understand - why would you care, if there is a chance someone would get ill, or have a severe reaction. Why would it affect anyone by the airlines not serving peanuts? When you have a reaction or see a loved one (especially your child) have a reaction, you do everything possible to not be, or have that person exposed, ever. So one last time, why would you care if no peanuts are served on a plane?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jbarelli
I don't belong to an organized political party.
01:27 PM on 06/16/2010
Understood. But you are one person, and the proposed rules impact (albeit in a small way) millions of people. While I'm sympathetic, I couldn't support a regulation impacting millions just so that you, an individual, could use commercial airlines, especially as some airlines have voluntarily chosen not to serve peanuts.

So, how many people are in your situation? A dozen? Sorry, still no. Again, nobody is saying that you must risk your life, just that flying on certain airlines isn't an option for you because of your health issues.

But, is it only a dozen folks with such severe reactions? Is it a thousand? A thousand folks that cannot use some commercial airlines. Certainly an issue, but enough to require a regulation? Worth considering, but I'd still probably fall on the "no" side.

Is it only a thousand? Are there fifty thousand people in your situation? That's a lot of folks being inconvenienced by having to carefully plan routes and often pick airports further from their destinations, or miss important events or business meetings, just because of a snack. Maybe we do need some regulation.

Or, does this issue come on without warning? Do otherwise healthy folks suddenly develop a life-threatening allergy? That would be a major factor.

If we need regulations, how do we deal with the diabetic, or the mom with kids? Do we need to have the screeners confiscate peanut butter cookies, or can that small amount be dealt with?

That's why we need data.
09:21 PM on 06/14/2010
I've been allergic to peanuts my entire 51yrs. My sister remembers me as a toddler, blue and not breathing. I became deathly ill from smelling peanut butter cookies cooking in grade school. I've left ball games due to my throat swelling. I've been rushed to the hospital from accidental ingestion - I cannot explain the sheer terror, throat swelling, and blood pressure dropping, which is also the way people die.

Years ago, at Mom's, my nephew weeks earlier had eaten peanut butter. I ended up in the ER. We found a minute amount on something I touched. I decided then to no longer fly. I fly free (work for airline). It take 24 hours on Amtrak to headquarters vs, 2 hrs on plane. I've flown once since due to a family emergency. Three kids behind me ate peanut butter cookies they brought on. I became ill from the smell. If I sat in those seats, I could have a severe reaction.

I can see all sides, except those unwilling to understand the severity. I agree that even if restricted, people may still will bring on peanuts, but hundreds won't open bags at once. I still won't fly unless a total restriction, as the lesser restrictions leave open the possibility of a severe reaction.

Even if we "choose" not to fly, there are emergencies, and I would be very grateful if a restriction was in place so I don't worry about a reaction at 30,000ft and my EpiPen only gives me
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:57 PM on 06/15/2010
Faved and saved, DJPorter. Great comment! I'm sorry you have to be challenged with this allergy.
07:47 PM on 06/14/2010
"The FAA is considering banning peanuts on commercial flights due to the concern of millions of Americans who are severely allergic to small portions."

TheWeekinRebuke.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
01:20 AM on 06/15/2010
The article says less than 2 million are allergic - it doesn't say how many are effected by peanut dust released by opening tiny bags of peanuts in an airplane.
10:21 AM on 06/15/2010
which is why they are asking the question.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Haun
the first 359 fans were the hardest
05:21 PM on 06/14/2010
I ask a simple question. What good would this regulation do, if I am able to bring my own peanuts on the plane? The alergic reaction would be the same, no?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:31 PM on 06/14/2010
Isn't the bigger question WHY you would bring them on a plane if you knew you weren't supposed to?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Haun
the first 359 fans were the hardest
05:37 PM on 06/14/2010
What do you mean by: if you knew you weren't supposed to?

The question is simple: will this reg stop peanuts from being onboard? I posit that the answer is 'NO.' So why waste a bunch of time and effort to accomplish nothing?
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
05:35 PM on 06/14/2010
I didn't see your question and I'm getting ready to leave for a time. Here's the answer: when airlines dole out peanuts to a couple hundred passengers, what percentage of those passengers open them immediately? 90? So that would put maybe 180x the allergen material into the cabin that 1 person who might board with peanuts as opposed to gum or lifesavers would.
05:44 PM on 06/14/2010
How many people have ever died on airplanes due to peanut allergies?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Haun
the first 359 fans were the hardest
05:45 PM on 06/14/2010
I don't agree with your estimations, but at least that was a straight answer for a straight question. Ever think that more people than just 1 might buy a bag of nut before boarding? Maybe lots, if they stop handing them out. I just don't think this is the answer, but have fun with your blustering. I'm out
03:45 PM on 06/14/2010
I am guessing that most everyone on this post is a nice person. I am also guessing that the “just shake it off/ overprotective parent” comments just come from ignorance. Some of the arguments here remind me of when smoking was first banned on planes. The second hand smoke argument against airline smoking was thought to be the work of hypochondriacs as well. For the record, we make changes to almost everything these days to help make products and foods safer for kids.

There are plenty of substances that have been removed from the market for issues involving fewer people than the number who have peanut allergies. Seldane D, Vioox and children’s cold medication were removed from the market based on life-threatening developments reported in as few as 15 kids. Why is it that when the food and drug administration removed those products there was no public outcry, but an attempt to curtail peanuts in very restricted circumstances causes such ire?

ALL peanut allergies are potentially life threatening - period. Most people do not realize how many people suffer from peanut allergies. It is the most common childhood (non-infant) allergy and effects around 1% of the childhood population of North America (see http://allergies.about.com
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
04:14 PM on 06/14/2010
I agree. Most ridicule the contemplation of the new regulation because they don't understand the scope of the problem. What shocks me are the very few who, after being given the facts, don't seem to give a tinker's damn about anybody else who might interfere with their peanut snack
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jbarelli
I don't belong to an organized political party.
04:43 PM on 06/14/2010
There is no doubt that some folks have a severe allergy, but if a person's allergy is so bad that simply asking the people immediately around him or her to forgo peanuts is not sufficient, then I would have to say that this person should not fly.

It isn't that the idea of changing snacks is a bad one, the problem is that your remedy would be ineffective. That mom with two kids three rows back giving them PB&J's will still be there, as will that spot of peanut satay that I didn't notice on my shirt, along with the smell of peanuts on my breath.

Certainly, if I'm told that the person next to me, or even in front of me or in back of me has a severe allergy, I'll go with the pretzels, or just skip the snack. No problem.

But if the mere smell of peanuts is enough to set off a life threatening event, then flying is simply not an option for you.
03:28 PM on 06/14/2010
Food allergies are overblown. Nearly every cause of death you can think of is more likely than a death from a food allergy. No one ever has, or likely ever will, die from being in the presence of airline peanuts.
04:01 PM on 06/14/2010
No one dies from an allergy. You die when the allergy prevents you from breathing.
07:56 PM on 06/14/2010
Yes, that is true. And food-related anaphylaxes affects less than 100 people in the US each year. It's as rare as a cause of death gets.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
seehowtheyrun
I have a dog and I vote.
03:12 PM on 06/14/2010
The DOT says passengers with severe peanut allergies qualify as disabled because the condition limits a major life activity -- in this case, flying. It says it is considering peanut measures "to provide greater access to air travel for individuals with severe peanut allergies in light of the significant number of children diagnosed with peanut allergies, some of whom do not fly because of health concerns related to peanut service on aircraft."

I think this is a good preventative measure. Peanut allergies are on the rise and I would much rather have a ban on peanuts now, rather than wait for someone to die on a plane from it first. The peanut industry doesn't like it. Too bad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:34 PM on 06/14/2010
Amazing! Censorship at HP has just reached the lowest low (I didn't think that was possible).

Yes, take note that comments -- which ridicule and make a joke about this allergy on this thread -- remain on the board, while comments that point out the seriousness of this situation, get deleted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Haun
the first 359 fans were the hardest
03:05 PM on 06/14/2010
Don't fret, some of mine which were full of ridicule and jokes (mostly bad) were also censored.
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
04:18 PM on 06/14/2010
Not enough of them were censored.
10:30 AM on 06/15/2010
yep, after all making fun of people being put at risk for no good reason is just ever so funny...show me in the Constitution where peanut's are a protected food
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:22 PM on 06/15/2010
Wow! That went right over your head. I was NOT talking about the Constitution protecting peanuts.

I was, merely, pointing out the fact that if one has followed this article for a couple of pages, (perhaps you haven't seen some of the other comments that have been deleted by Mods), it is disturbing to watch posters, who were posting comments regarding the "awareness level" of this unfortunate allergy --- GET DELETED --- while most of the sarcastic twisted humor, remains on the board.

There's nothing "funny" about an allergy that can cause death.

Obviously, the Mods who deleted the informative posts regarding immune systems disorders, have NO clue (or are extremely biased), about the seriousness of this allergy.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jbarelli
I don't belong to an organized political party.
01:15 PM on 06/14/2010
Wow. I wonder how many of these issues could be solved with simple, common courtesy, along with people being willing to simply state their problem to the people immediately around them?

Anyone with such a severe allergy that just being on the plane with peanuts just shouldn't fly. There's no way to positively eliminate all possible contact with peanuts.

If someone had a severe enough allergy that just being next to me while I munch on my snickers bar is life threatening, simply letting me know in advance would solve the problem. But you'll need to tell me as I enter, in case I had just finished lunch at Thai Hut, and if a seat change is needed, you should be the person volunteering to change seats first. (Although I will if you can't for some reason.)

Oh, and for those that simply cannot eat peanuts. Deal with it. Bring your own snack or go without. If the airline is nice enough to provide an alternative, thank them and remember that for next time.

But seriously folks. Banning any particular item because a very small number of people are so severely allergic that having that product in the same airplane is dangerous to them? What would be next? Wheat? Milk? Plastic?
photo
newtom
eschew obfuscation
03:17 PM on 06/14/2010
To your point: Will passengers be permitted to carry on their own peanuts?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jbarelli
I don't belong to an organized political party.
03:44 PM on 06/14/2010
To my point? I'm not suggesting that the airlines shouldn't supply peanuts. Just that people with allergies tell the folks sitting nearby, and folks sitting nearby should be considerate to folks with health issues.

There may be someone somewhere that would insist on eating peanuts next to someone extremely allergic, but I wouldn't want to sit next to that person, and I like peanuts.

And the argument about someone so sensitive that they cannot even be on the plane with someone eating peanuts seems absurd. If someone is that fragile, then they shouldn't be flying.

But if the person next to me had an allergy that could be triggered by the mere touch of a speck of peanut, I'd choose a different snack. Just let me know. And, tell me before I sit down. I like the food at Thai Hut, and I'd hate to have someone get sick because I missed a spot of peanut satay on my shirt.

I look good in anything I eat! '-)
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
04:21 PM on 06/14/2010
If it were possible to address this problem with "courtesy" there'd be no problem. It isn't possible. Peanut allergies are so severe that for many, just smelling peanuts or breathing the air in a closed-cabin environment can trigger symptoms. There is only one remedy - stop doling out free peanuts to the passengers.
01:13 PM on 06/14/2010
"What's next? Is it banning peanuts in ballparks?"

WTH? Ballparks generally aren't tiny enclosed spaces with limited air circulation. What an idiot.

I was on a plane recently where a woman specifically requested a "peanut free" flight and the airline agreed, yet proceeded to serve peanuts anyway mid-flight. The girl was nearly hyperventilating, for if she even smelled a nut she could have gone in shock right then and there. The staff was so rude, too, and refused to withhold the nuts even if it meant having an emergency situation in flight... too often is the airline concerned with how the situation would legally affect them. All they cared about was whether or not they were liable. My family ended up buying every bag of peanuts (no cheap feat) they had and stuffing in them in our bag just so nobody else would eat them.

There needs to be a policy in place so that airlines don't have the right to put someone in danger... I think its a sacrifice we can make.
01:18 PM on 06/14/2010
I don't know if a ban is necessary, but the least we can do is honor specific requests made by a passenger worried about their health.
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
04:29 PM on 06/14/2010
This isn't a sop to "worried" passengers. The FAA is tasked with flight and passenger safety and peanut reactions can be extremely serious and disrupt flight operations. Getting a plane into the air and onto the ground is the riskiest part of a flight as well as very expensive - about like burning up four fully-stocked gasoline stations. If this one thing eliminates the need to land a stricken passenger, is that so bad? Given the issues, I think most mature adults can live without their free snacky for a couple hours.
02:48 PM on 06/14/2010
Thanks from a peanut mom. Most people don't realize, kids could die from just breathing the smell. Airborne particles can enter a kids' body just as easily as if he ingested it. It's great to say, "Just don't fly." As a general rule, we don't. But there are times when there is no way to avoid it. We just don't fly SW and most airlines accommodate us.

There are lots of substances that are deadly to only a handful of people. In most instances, those substances are removed from public sale without any issues. For some reason, nuts are sort of sacred and no one will acknowledge how deadly they can be to a percentage of our population. (Not a small segment either. In elementary schools, most classes have at least one peanut allergy child).
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
04:32 PM on 06/14/2010
Even if it doesn't kill a passenger, severe symptoms will force an emergency landing. The FAA evaluates safety and getting a plane landed and up again doubles the risk ofthe riskiest part of a flight. It's also expensive for the airline, and polluting. The fuel burn of takeoff and landing is about equal to setting a match to four fully-stocked gasoline stations.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
IndyStacey
When I do good, I feel good.
01:07 PM on 06/14/2010
We can't make the world safe for every child, everywhere. My understanding is that most peanut allergies are more annoying than life threatening. According to the CDC, deaths from any type of food allergies are extremely rare.

I think demanding a ban is going too far. However, when a person who has a SEVERE nut allergy flies, it doesn't seem unreasonable to ask that an alternative snack be given out on that flight and surrounding passengers made aware so that they do not accidentally trigger a potentially fatal reaction.

Peanuts are a healthy, protein packed snack that are also a good source of fiber. They are more filling than pretzels or chips or cookies, Which is why airlines began serving them in the first place.
03:43 PM on 06/14/2010
I just found an article in allergy.com that noted the following regarding CDC:

"Food allergy deaths are not reportable events according to the CDC. They are captured in standard mortality data using ICD-10 codes, just like any other cause of death"
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
04:33 PM on 06/14/2010
People can live a couple hours without their snackies. Even if there's not a fatality from a peanut reaction, there can be extremely severe symptoms. The FAA evaluates safety and getting a plane landed and up again doubles the risk ofthe riskiest part of a flight. It's also expensive for the airline, and polluting. The fuel burn of takeoff and landing is about equal to setting a match to four fully-stocked gasoline stations.
11:50 PM on 06/14/2010
Not necessarily - try telling a brittle diabetic to "live without their snackies." They far more likely to have a severe reaction to that than someone allergic to peanuts (and that's from someone who has had a severe anaphylactic reaction - me). I understand the issue; however, I also have different food allergies which limit the snacks/food I can bring on a plane. I tolerate nuts very well, but I can't have anything with milk of any kind, so granola bars are a great snack for me, at least some of them. However, they often contain a variety of nuts, and peanut allergies often involve allergies to other nuts. So, my carry-on snack may end up causing problems for someone with the type of peanut allergy you are talking about, and I won't necessarily know about it before the flight to carry a different snack.

I'm also severely allergic to perfume, but nobody has suggested banning perfume on a plane. Won't kill me, but I will want to die from the migraine. Yes, peanut allergies are more serious, but not for everyone - most get a cough, not anaphylaxis. I have to live with the perfumes, unless I can convince someone to let me move. I suggest that if you have life-threatening allergies you should let the airline know and your seatmates know. Nobody wants someone to suffer a bad reaction 30,000 feet in the air.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlaltecuhtli
12:52 PM on 06/14/2010
Is this the new sign of "fine breeding"? If you have ever seen anyone who has the real deal react to having eaten things peanut, you will know that 99.44% of this flapdoodle is vaporings of those in the throes of a "look at me, I'm special" hissy fit. Real peanut allergic reaction is terrifying and life threatening ... immediately upon contact.
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
04:34 PM on 06/14/2010
Exactly. And in a closed cabin there's nothing else to breathe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlaltecuhtli
05:31 PM on 06/14/2010
Which is why there have been soooooo many peanut allergy attacks prior to the last 6-9 months on airliners????