iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Immigration Detention Facilities To Become Less Like Prisons, Officials Say

MICHELLE ROBERTS   06/16/10 04:40 PM ET   AP

Immigration Detention

SAN ANTONIO — In an agreement U.S. immigration officials hope will begin to reshape the entire 30,000-bed detention system, some asylum-seekers and immigrants awaiting deportation proceedings could soon be held in facilities where they can wear their own clothes, participate in movie and bingo nights, eat continental breakfasts and celebrate holidays with visiting family members.

It could end confinement in prison-like facilities – complete with razor wire, jail-style uniforms, armed guards and partitions that prevent physical contact with loved ones – for those who have never been convicted of a crime and are not considered a threat.

Corrections Corporation of America, the largest contractor for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has reached a preliminary agreement to soften confinement, free of charge, at nine immigrant facilities covering more than 7,100 beds – a deal that ICE officials see as a precursor to changes elsewhere.

Overall, the facilities are expected to be less prison-like, offering freer movement for detainees, fewer pat downs and better access to legal resources. The agreement calls for fresh vegetables and access to self-serve beverages along with cooking and exercise classes, according to a list released by ICE.

CCA will soften "the look for the facility with hanging plants, flower baskets, new paint colors, different bedding and furniture" and allow lengthy visits from friends and family who can provide outside packages or food for special celebrations under changes to be made over the next six months.

ICE Director John Morton announced last year that the agency would make detention facilities less prison-like because immigrant detainees are being held on civil immigration charges, not criminal offenses, though it was unclear at the time what changes would be made. The agency has long maintained that detention is not a punishment and that it ensures the immigrants show up for hearings. Nonetheless, it has relied heavily on contract facilities built to house criminals.

Negotiations continue with the remainder of the nearly 300 facilities under contract with ICE, mostly facilities owned by state and local governments, but "it's our goal to provide these types of reforms with all the facilities that ICE contracts with," said ICE spokesman Brian Hale.

ICE wants to create a less restrictive environment for those who are low-risk and not criminals, but those with criminal histories or who are otherwise a danger will remain in prison-like settings, he said.

New systemwide detention standards are still being drafted, but the agreement with CCA signals the less-restrictive modifications the agency wants for many detainees.

Union leaders representing guards object to the new plans, saying they're dangerous.

"It's absolutely insane, the changes they're making," said Chris Crane, president of AFGE Council 118/ICE, the union that represents 7,000 ICE officers but not the contractors. "It just makes for an absolutely unsafe environment, not only for the detainees, but for the officers."

He contends that many detainees could be drug dealers or gang members – even if they haven't been convicted.

A 2009 review by The Associated Press of everyone in custody nationwide on a single night found that nearly three-fifths of detainees had no criminal convictions, even for minor offenses such as trespassing. Many are held only a few nights before being deported, while others – particularly those seeking asylum from persecution in their home countries – can stay in custody for months or years while their cases are decided by an overburdened immigration court system.

Nearly 10,200 foreigners were granted asylum after going through immigration courts in fiscal year 2009.

But Crane said that doesn't mean detainees aren't criminals or gang members since local prosecutors, lacking resources, sometimes just dump "criminal aliens" into ICE custody.

"Does that mean you can't treat people humanely? Absolutely not," he said. "But we need to talk about the circumstances that these detainees were put in custody."

Ira Mehlman, spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which advocates tougher immigration enforcement, said plans to soften the look of facilities, particularly those that house families, are appropriate. But he's concerned the changes, like cooking and exercise classes, go too far.

"From this memo, it sounds like they're turning them into Club Med," Mehlman said.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised similar concerns in a letter to ICE officials last week, saying softening the facilities – even for low-risk detainees – creates a "moral hazard."

Immigrant advocates object to the plans, too, but for another reason: they don't go far enough.

"They're really coming up with very minimal changes," said Andrea Black of the Detention Watch Network.

Most of the low-risk detainees who might get softened facilities shouldn't be detained at all, especially when less expensive electronic monitoring is available, she said.

"We're still talking about people being in detention for years on end," said Black. "This is their response? To offer fresh carrots and bingo nights?"

___

Associated Press Writer Suzanne Gamboa in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
SAN ANTONIO — In an agreement U.S. immigration officials hope will begin to reshape the entire 30,000-bed detention system, some asylum-seekers and immigrants awaiting deportation proceedings co...
SAN ANTONIO — In an agreement U.S. immigration officials hope will begin to reshape the entire 30,000-bed detention system, some asylum-seekers and immigrants awaiting deportation proceedings co...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 157
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugly american
"I drank what?"- Last words of Socrates
09:31 AM on 06/19/2010
This country has a long history of "innocent until proven guilty" but the people who are put in these centers are guilty of breaking our immigration laws, if no other. Unfortunately, among them there are a number of violent criminals and gang members who have not been separated out. This is evidenced by the man on methamphetamine who died after being tazered a couple of weeks ago.
These places are not "group homes" largely because of this and the facilities should not be made as such. Changes such as have been proposed may make the situation infinitely more dangerous for everyone.
What should be concentrated on is providing faster repatriation to their home nations rather than trying to make them all as comfortable as they can be. If they are indeed from very squalid conditions in their own countries, making them too comfortable here even in our detention centers may be more of an invitation to stay than to return home.
Some humanitarian changes to help families held for deportation are good, but we should limit how far we go with that. Exercise classes? Really? Cooking facilities and new furniture perhaps, but many of these things are not provided in homeless shelters for our own citizens. Should we not take care of our own first before we worry too much about making foriegners who disrespect our laws happy?
09:04 PM on 06/17/2010
As per any and all threads pertaining to illegal immigration:
I agree with all of TggerJen's posts in the past, now, and in the future concerning all aspects of Illegal Immigration (opinions on any other thoughts I will consider when they arrive).
My reasons are as follows:
1. He backs up every one of his posts with facts and links. I would too except I do not know how to do all that cyber research, so I rely on him and others.
2. As far as the new Arizona law goes, he is actually an Arizonan. For me, that means that he is actually a "horse's mouth" and not a "braying donkey" from elsewhere.
3. He is unfailing civil and more or less polite as one can be on this site. If I were him, I would have lost my civility many, many times.
4. He is patient and takes time to explain simple facts to the intellectually challenged that show up constantly to give him a hard time.
5. He is a constant thorn in the side of the American Citizen haters on this site. I get a nice warm fuzzy feeling whenever he does a particularly bloody job of driving them from the verbal battlefield.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:44 PM on 06/17/2010
It seems obvious to me that if you don't want to be 'treated like a criminal', (which means a better life than many non-criminal citizens of this country) you shouldn't break the law. This pity party for those who dig their own hole, is beyond me. Once you break the law, the consequences should be on you and not those that are able to muster some sort of self control and civil behavior. If you think you are committing 'civil disobedience', that's a fine tradition, as is suffering the consequences.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Takebackourmoney
04:02 PM on 06/17/2010
I know Pearce/Brewer et al have an ICE prison countract, Maybe they several.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TggerJen
Protect at snowleopard.org
06:37 PM on 06/17/2010
Link to that info from a reliable source, please.
02:04 PM on 06/17/2010
This is liberal america people are more worried about the housing of people than the safety of the officers. liberals view anyone with the word officer in the title as thugs anyway why would liberals care about them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thirdparty123
02:23 PM on 06/17/2010
It does seem kind of hypocritical that many here want more government and more laws and regulations, but are not supportive of the ones that enforce those laws and regulations.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
phoenixdoglover
My dog loves my progressive treats agenda
01:39 PM on 06/17/2010
I read a research report a few months back that examined the operations of Federal/ICE detention centers. The average length of stay for detainees is about 90 days. As the article points out, many of the detainees have not been charged with a crime. If you were detained by the police, and then put in jail without charges, you would most likely be freed the next day while the police continued their investigation. I am not arguing against the ICE detention centers, but we are not being soft on the detainees. Considering that the capacity of the system is 30,000 beds, and about 10,000 detainees per year are eventually given asylum, there are truly a bunch of innocent people processed through this system. For them, a few amenities and freedoms within the facility seems humane and just.
photo
Soule23
Anti-micro-biol
12:55 PM on 06/17/2010
The ArizoNazis will not be pleased.
holyghostie
Spiritus est qui vivificat
12:42 PM on 06/17/2010
The same people who advocate for more humane treatment of illegals imprisoned are the same ones who protest and legally challenge when localities and prisons decide to run ICE checks on those caught and detained commiting a crime or incarcerated.

To them its Bad Gov't when the Gov't is actually doing one of their Constitutionally required jobs and thats PROTECT citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thor Larson
12:12 PM on 06/17/2010
They will live better than many LEGAL folk... and I get to pay for it. What a nutty country.
photo
esblofeld
A magical pansexual non-threatening spokesthing!
12:15 PM on 06/17/2010
The contractor is doing it within the existing contract, so you're not paying a cent more. Read the article please.
photo
Soule23
Anti-micro-biol
12:51 PM on 06/17/2010
Locking up taxpaying illegal workers is a patently absurd policy. We do it only to appease the nativists who swallow the Beckian pablum about illegals failing to pay taxes and draining the welfare state.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TggerJen
Protect at snowleopard.org
04:33 PM on 06/17/2010
Illegal aliens are a huge net drain on us when total costs are considered. They drive up unemployment and drive down wages (which damages the tax base also) and overload our schools and hospital ERs.

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8711/12-6-Immigration.pdf
"The tax revenues that unauthorized immigrants generate for state and local governments do not offset the total cost of services provided to those immigrants.
Most of the estimates found that even though unauthorized immigrants pay taxes and other fees to state and local jurisdictions, the resulting revenues offset only a portion of the costs incurred by those jurisdictions for providing services related to education, health care, and law enforcement."
and
"A related effect is that lower-paying jobs also result in unauthorized immigrants’ having less disposable income to spend on purchases subject to sales or use taxes. State and local governments typically rely more heavily on revenues from those and other sources (such as property taxes) than revenues generated by taxes on income.10"
and
"In terms of public education, unauthorized immigrants who are minors increase the overall number of students attending public schools, and they may also require more educational services than do native-born children because of a lack of proficiency in English. Analyses from several states indicate that the costs of educating students who did not speak English fluently were 20 percent to 40 percent higher than the costs incurred for native-born students.6, 7"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thor Larson
05:49 PM on 06/17/2010
Not only don't they pay federal taxes, but FIFTY PERCENT of real Americans don't pay any federal taxes. We need to stop ALL of that welfare behavior NOW!

And I do watch Glenn Beck daily.,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cordyc
11:54 AM on 06/17/2010
Cancel the contracts and fix the immigration laws. Then we won't need to waste taxpayer money on these contracts with the private prison system.

Bush is gone and so should his investment in jails be allowed to fail.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
wyldthings
as a young man I said I'd never get old an didn'
11:59 AM on 06/17/2010
Grow up!
Union leaders representing guards object to the new plans, saying they're dangerous.
"It's absolutely insane, the changes they're making," said Chris Crane, president of AFGE Council 118/ICE, the union that represents 7,000 ICE officers but not the contractors. "It just makes for an absolutely unsafe environment, not only for the detainees, but for the officers."
What does Bush have to do with this. This is Obama and his work.
photo
esblofeld
A magical pansexual non-threatening spokesthing!
11:31 AM on 06/17/2010
Corrections Corporation of America, the largest contractor for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has reached a preliminary agreement to soften confinement, *****free of charge*****, at nine immigrant facilities covering more than 7,100 beds – a deal that ICE officials see as a precursor to changes elsewhere.

Read the article before you complain about taxes, people. This is being done by the contractor, not the government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thirdparty123
11:37 AM on 06/17/2010
And who do you think is paying that contractor? Not to mention if you read the article you would have noticed these new conditions are part of a deal with ICE officials.
photo
esblofeld
A magical pansexual non-threatening spokesthing!
11:47 AM on 06/17/2010
It's non-contractual, Thirdparty123. The ICE is already paying a set amount because CCA has a longstanding contract with the ICE and this is within that existing agreement. Now it's certainly legitimate to wonder whether or not, if this works better, that future contracts will be more lucrative for this and other contractors, but this deal itself imposes no new burden on the taxpayer.
11:22 AM on 06/17/2010
Just look at their feet. If these facilities allow the people being detained to wear shoes with laces and not slippers or stocking feet then you know it's not a prison. If they take their shoes, then it's a prison. This is a common technique for all prison facilities. It's to keep the person under control and to not allow them to hurt themselves or someone else, but it means they are behind bars.
10:46 AM on 06/17/2010
And we, citizens, get to pat for this... Ugh!
10:36 AM on 06/17/2010
I hope there's a brave film producer who can do a documentary highlighting detention centers where they have children and guards doing unspeakable things to women who can't complain because 'they don't have rights'
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
posttime2010
10:42 AM on 06/17/2010
A crew is in Mexico filming that as we speak, and I knowof one in Iran, Afghanastan, India, Tibet...I need to get my list out....SORRY, but I do not think the men & women in our prison systems or detention systems need to be compared to the gaurds at a Peruvian jail....lol

But, then, maybe not hving a hairdryer and false eyelashes is a unspeakable crime to you..

I hope they do a film abt the people who cram their kids into unspeakable conditions, hot, thirsty, hungery as they cross a desert so they can buy a video game...read abt all the kids of illegal immigrants in foster care....MOST of these people are NOT the hispanic version of Ozzie & Harriett.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
posttime2010
10:33 AM on 06/17/2010
SO, our Federal Government is saying its safer to visit a Detention Camp full of illegal entry foreign nationals then it is to enter a Federal National Park...YES, the FED's closed off part of OUR National Park, funded and operated by OUR taxes because they say its too dangerous because of illegal aliens....NOW, is thisthe same government that said, there was no dangers...

Which is it, danger...no danger...we all KNOW the real answer to that. Our Federal government is RUNNING from the crimes being committed on our border...they are RUNING, giving up a piece of USA soil....yet we are fighting for Kanahar....Am I the only one who see's the STUPIDITY.....We are giving away a peice of American land because we can't stop a bunch of people from walking across it....well.....FEDERAL GOVRNMENT what can you do....OH, buy hanging plants....lol
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
phoenixdoglover
My dog loves my progressive treats agenda
01:28 PM on 06/17/2010
Well, the place you speak of is not a National Park, but a "National Wildlife Refuge" in southern AZ, west of Tucson. That area is a hot spot for border crossings, both for immigrants seeking work, and for the drug trade. In the best of times, it is not visited by many people. Despite its name, it is mostly a desert wasteland. Various areas in southern AZ have been closed before. It is temporary.

As for the Feds "running" from the problems, you are not well informed. Over Memorial Day weekend, we traveled around southern AZ and camped in the Chiricahua Mountains. US Border Patrol agents were everywhere, clearly positioned to stop the flow of illegal immigrants. It is a vast inhospitable area, with canyons, steep mountains, and many challenges for law enforcement. But "running"? No way.