iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Lifetime Costs Of Raising A Child (PHOTOS)

Huffington Post     First Posted: 06/16/10 05:09 PM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 05:50 PM ET

Pregnant mothers and expecting fathers, you may want to sit down for this.

Raising a child is 22 percent more costly than it was back in 1960, according to a study released recently by the USDA. Adjusted for 2009 dollars, middle-income parents in 1960 spent a total of $182,857 to raise one child through the age of 17. Today, parents spend $222,360.

What accounts for the jump? These days, parents spend more of their family's wealth on -- you guessed it -- their child's health care and education. As a percentage of total child-rearing expenditures, today's middle-income families spend approximately twice as much on health care as they did in 1960. And education and child care, which in 1960 accounted for just 2 percent of total child-rearing expenditures, now accounts for 17 percent.

The government's study surveyed 11,800 husband-wife families and 3,350 single-parent households. The average low-income household, researchers found, spends more than twice as much of their income than the average high-income household do. Low-income families (those with a before-tax income of less than $56,670) spend 25% of their income on raising children through age 17. High-income households (those with a before-tax income of more than $98,120) spend twice as much in absolute terms but average just 12% of their income on their children through age 17.

To prepare you for the lifetime costs of child-rearing, we've put together a breakdown of the expenses for raising just one child through the age of 17. (Note: we've taken all the below data from the cost projections for a middle-income husband-wife family with two children.)

Housing - 31% - $68,931
1 of 8
In families across all income groups, housing accounts for the largest child-rearing expense, comprising 31 to 35 percent of the total cost of raising a child. Housing expenses include shelter (mortgage payments, property taxes, etc.) and home furnishings. Principal mortgage payments constitute 15 percent of overall housing expenses.
Total comments: 635 | Post a Comment
1 of 8
Rate This Slide
Projections Are Too Low
Projections Are Too High

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Projections For The Cost Of Raising A Child
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Pregnant mothers and expecting fathers, you may want to sit down for this. Raising a child is 22 percent more costly than it was back in 1960, according to a study released recently by the USDA. Ad...
Pregnant mothers and expecting fathers, you may want to sit down for this. Raising a child is 22 percent more costly than it was back in 1960, according to a study released recently by the USDA. Ad...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 635
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nerdiac
06:24 PM on 06/30/2010
So basically, what they're getting at, is that more kids are sickly nowadays. Yeah, I'll believe that. Good ol' USA has a high infant mortality rate, this is an obvious next step. Don't forget childhood obesity. We feed our kids like cows, and it's expensive to run a farm!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:43 PM on 06/28/2010
All of these projections seem too high, except for health care and maybe child care.
It's not as if we weren't making mortgage and car payments before we had kids.
01:19 PM on 06/22/2010
Like any investment--children,wife,car,house,art--the only time you can tell you have not wasted your time and money is after you have spent it
.I knowseveral men and women who worked very hard together and worked overtime to feed,clothe,educate,and shelter an ungrateful and horrible human being.I guess people forget about Cain and Abel,Jacob and Esau,Joseph and His Brothers.
The children can be a grief to their parents for decades,and yet lay guilt upon the parents for some minor slight where they did not get their own "just desserts."This highly subjective analysis of all children remains a mystery.On the other hand wonderful children,wives,and husbands are often taken for granted despite all evidence to the contrary.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
01:00 AM on 06/20/2010
interesting...
07:19 PM on 06/18/2010
Why have unwanted kids when there are modern contraceptives? Will we control global overpopulation humanely or will wars, famine, disease, crime, pollution, resource depletion, species extinctions, concentration of resources and more of the painful ways nature controls animal populations also control the human animal's? Have we transcended our animal nature or are conservative troglodytes holding us back from evolving into higher conscious beings?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Omnix
Buddhist with an attitude...
01:38 PM on 06/18/2010
Sure, there are more things to spend money on (increased consumerism), but even the basic necessities are much higher. As you can see from this article, when you add in the cost of fuel, the CPI over the last 40+ years went through the roof. Then, add in the fact that worker income has been stagnant or even reduced in some sectors, and it's no surprise that our quality of life is plummeting.

Sure there are more stations on the TV, and cars with wifi, and we can stream live video to our friends and family; but those are luxuries that many can not afford. I know a young couple that wants to have children, but they can barely survive now. They don't qualify for social services because they own a car (base model Chevy) that is less than 5 years old and currently have no children. Also, they can't afford to take time off from their low-income jobs (and erratic schedules) to finish their degrees much less raise a child. What hope do people like this have when they are faced with skyrocketing costs? In most other developed countries they would have some means of going to school, free health care, and they would be able to take time off to raise a child. Why doesn't the US have the same quality of life? We pay close to the same amount in taxes (collectively).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:28 AM on 06/18/2010
Having children is the ultimate narcissism-you think you are so special that you have to attempt to reproduce lest something great is lost to eternity-think again!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Omnix
Buddhist with an attitude...
01:39 PM on 06/18/2010
Good, then don't reproduce. You'll do us all a favor...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RhiannonRings
Childfree and loving it!
07:35 PM on 06/18/2010
You are right, I'm staying out of the gene pool myself. I have alcoholism and mental illness in my family so there's no way I would even think about breeding. Personally, I don't have the financial or emotional fortitude to raise children.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
schaf1
08:15 PM on 06/17/2010
Get a dog or two instead. No college tuition, no son or daughter in law you don't like and dogs won't turn on you when they hit the teen years!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheGripester
bites when poked
04:35 AM on 06/20/2010
...except that vets charge as much as doctors nowadays. And dogs needs constant care, walking, and sitting when you are gone. It's a lot like having a child, take it from someone who has had both.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
07:47 PM on 06/17/2010
Why is it that Americans seem to view everything as and "investment"?
08:10 AM on 06/18/2010
Cash is king.
08:33 PM on 06/18/2010
It's obsessional.
04:29 PM on 06/17/2010
I wonder what it costs to be old and not have any grown kids to help you out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:56 PM on 06/17/2010
. . . said Charlie Manson's mom.

Because, of course, ALL kids always turn out great and have the financial, physical, psychological means to "help you out."

(Sort of the inverse of "Momma may have, Poppa may have, God bless the child who's got his own.")
08:12 AM on 06/18/2010
That was a well placed retort, sir.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RockydaDog
09:33 AM on 06/30/2010
Fannned.
05:04 PM on 06/17/2010
That and if you dont have any kids you can save the $222,360 that you would have spent on the kid.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
05:32 PM on 06/18/2010
No you would have spent most of it anyway. A lot of these stories are pretty much lousy statistical analysis.

You shoehorn kids into the budget. There are a lot of people making minimum wage that never will spend this much per kid. And they have litters. You're having a house and a car anyway.

I'd argue a lot of this cost is borne with property or county level taxes. Schools especially. Which is why there should be no deduction for the crumb catchers.
03:41 PM on 06/17/2010
These numbers are extremely low and I am looking at this from a single parent point of view. Just in the last 4 years (18yrs-22yrs) I have spent $80,000! Which included community college (2 yrs=AA) and 2 yrs. state college (graduated). The figures in this articles still seem more like maybe 1980 dollar amounts. Needs to be done on a more realistic standard.
photo
discouragerofhesitancy
ignore this sentence
07:47 AM on 06/18/2010
I agree, especially when you scroll through the 8-category breakdown. A real lowball estimate for this area (So Fla).
03:13 PM on 06/17/2010
I guess there won't be many liberals out there any more in the future after reading these posts. Seems most people on this site can't stand the thought of having kids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WriterGirl
02:35 PM on 06/17/2010
$222,360? That's news to me. Between healthcare, child care, and school expenses alone, we figured out that we paid more than $70K by the time our child hit first grade. That doesn't include what a child costs in terms of meals, clothing, etc. Or saving for college. And if you have a child with special needs, forget any of this - the costs are astronomical.
02:31 PM on 06/17/2010
In a Nation where most people say they are a "Christian" it is interesting that there is so much unbelief.
To make a long story short, I had a son out of wed lock in 92 and paid support on him until he was 18 yet due to circumstances I did not have any contact with him from 3yrs. to about 16 yrs old and very little contact the last 2 yrs. I had no idea about his current life and no idea about his future, But I Had Faith in God. I knew my son's mom was a little crazy and found out that she had put my son out of the house due to her mental instability about a year ago and that he was staying with another family (Found out later that she had been hospitalized a couple of times due to mental illness), ...But I TRUSTED IN GOD.
After no contact for the last year and a half and no idea what was going on in my sons life. My son came to my house 2 days before his HS graduation to see me then he was able to come with my family on vacation and spend time with us and his grandparents. On top of that he has a FULL scholorship to the University of Tenn. and not by way of athletics. What A GREAT GOD to work MIRACLES in my sons life and because I prayed and BELIEVED GOD I knew HE could.
08:19 AM on 06/18/2010
It sounds like your son did what he had to do in order to make it to where he is today, which is awesome, but god didn't do it your son did. How about giving him the fricken credit instead of belittling your sons accomplishments by saying god did it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Devilslakewoman
Flaming Liberal
07:10 PM on 06/23/2010
Had to fan and fave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kalifornika
12:18 AM on 06/28/2010
You sound like a real saint.
photo
angrymanspokane
Just a regular guy
01:15 PM on 06/17/2010
Hmmmm...

par·a·site   /ˈpærəˌsaɪt/ Show Spelled[par-uh-sahyt]
–noun
1. an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment.
2. a person who receives support, advantage, or the like, from another or others without giving any useful or proper return, as one who lives on the hospitality of others.
3. (in ancient Greece) a person who received free meals in return for amusing or impudent conversation, flattering remarks, etc.
02:09 PM on 06/17/2010
Oh good, so my son is not a parasite by your definition. Because I certainly receive a lot of joy and fun from him in return for supporting him.
Nice try.
04:30 PM on 06/17/2010
Sounds like what you will become when you're old and don't have grown kids to help you wipe your a** and feed you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:01 PM on 06/17/2010
Too many a**umptions in this statement.

Anyway, what makes you so sure the writer's wealth won't allow hiring your kids?
And then what will you do?