Times Square Bomber INDICTED: Faisal Shahzad Hit With 10 Terrorism, Weapons Charges

LARRY NEUMEISTER   06/17/10 11:11 PM ET   AP

Faisal Shahzad

NEW YORK — Times Square bomb suspect Faisal Shahzad was charged Thursday with 10 terrorism and weapons counts in an indictment that accuses him of receiving explosives training and financial help from the Pakistani Taliban.

The indictment returned by a grand jury in U.S. District Court in Manhattan added five charges to the original case against the 30-year-old Shahzad and also detailed in greater depth his alleged financing, saying Shahzad had received a total of $12,000 from the militant group through cash drop-offs in Massachusetts and Long Island.

Shahzad is accused of plotting to build and detonate a homemade gasoline-and-propane bomb inside a used SUV among thousands of tourists on a busy Saturday night. He was charged with attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction among several terrorism and weapons counts.

"The facts alleged in this indictment show that the Pakistani Taliban facilitated Faisal Shahzad's attempted attack on American soil," Attorney General Eric Holder said in a release. "Our nation averted serious loss of life in this attempted bombing, but it is a reminder that we face an evolving threat that we must continue to fight with every tool available to the government."

Shahzad's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the indictment. Shahzad was scheduled to enter a plea during an appearance in court Monday. The most serious counts against him carry mandatory penalties of life in prison.

The indictment alleged that Shahzad received explosives training in Waziristan, Pakistan, in December 2009 from trainers affiliated with Tehrik-e-Taliban, a Pakistan-based militant extremist group. The affiliation with the group led to financing as well, the indictment alleged.

It said Shahzad received approximately $5,000 in cash in Massachusetts on Feb. 25 from a co-conspirator in Pakistan whom Shahzad understood worked for Tehrik-e-Taliban.

Approximately six weeks later, on April 10, 2010, Shahzad received an $7,000 more in cash in Ronkonkoma, N.Y., which also was sent at the co-conspirator's direction, the indictment said.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said Shahzad conspired with the Pakistani Taliban "to wreak death and destruction in Times Square."

Shahzad was born in Pakistan, moved to the United States when he was 18 and lived most recently in Bridgeport, Conn.

He was accused of abandoning an SUV fitted with a homemade car bomb in Times Square on May 1. A street vendor noticed smoke in the vehicle and alerted police, who immediately evacuated the area. The bomb never ignited and no one was hurt.

Shahzad was arrested May 3 on a Dubai-bound plane at Kennedy International Airport.

After his arrest, Shahzad cooperated with investigators for several weeks, providing what authorities described as details of the attack and information that led to other arrests. Authorities say he almost immediately admitted his role in the attack.

The indictment, reciting the facts dispassionately, said Shahzad bought a semiautomatic 9 mm Kel-Tec rifle in Connecticut on March 15. The weapon was found loaded in his car on the day of his arrest.

It said he contacted the seller of a Nissan Pathfinder in April after seeing an advertisement posted on a website. According to the indictment, Shahzad met the vehicle's seller in a Connecticut supermarket parking lot, where he paid $1,300.

The indictment said he also bought components for the bomb in April.

Authorities have said they believed Shahzad acted alone in carrying out the bomb plot after receiving financial and other help from the Pakistani Taliban. Shahzad had returned in February from a five-month trip to his homeland.

Federal investigators believe money was channeled through an underground money transfer network known as "hawala," but they have said they doubt anyone in the U.S. who provided money knew what it was for.

Pakistan has arrested at least 11 people since the attempted attack. An intelligence official has alleged two of them played a role in the plot. No one has been charged.

Three men in Massachusetts and Maine suspected of supplying money to Shahzad have been detained on immigration charges; one was recently transferred to New York.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

Filed by David Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:08 PM on 06/22/2010
There should be no tolerance against these terrorists. these terrorists are not only enemy of Islam but the whole humanity. everyone should raise their voice against these small terrorists groups, who are using religion for their wicked purposes. One of the bad group is this Jamat I Islami in Pakistan http://bit.ly/aUZSdJ” and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-5jiJsIUy0
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EmmaJ76
Designer, writer, political nerd
08:25 AM on 06/18/2010
Good to see the rule of law being applied. NY are well experienced in "t3rr0r" trials and have successfully prosecuted before - and I see them doing no different here.

Thank you to those who still see that the law applies
01:58 AM on 06/18/2010
American justice without military tribunals, Guantanamo, waterboarding and more fear mongering by the right. American justice is right, the far right is all wrong. "Liberty and Justice for all", even for Republicans.
12:37 AM on 06/18/2010
now we just give him a fair trial and hang him!
11:37 PM on 06/17/2010
Rather than keep this man housed and fed for the rest of his life on tax payer funds- Treason should come with the Death sentence, specially as- they are so eager to meet the 72 virgins, why make them wait?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zbowling
software engineer, geek
12:35 AM on 06/18/2010
You are a religious bigot, and the fact that kind of hate speech is common at this time is what is wrong with this country.
Muslims have sex while they are alive. The 72 virgin bull is an allegory.
There is plenty of treasonous behavior, mostly by the political class with their dual loyalty problem and their prostituting themselves out to lobbyists.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:00 AM on 06/18/2010
"allegory"

Do have any basis for that view other than political correctness? It seems negative/violent/embarrassing passage in religious texts just magically transform to "allegory" whenever someone is making apologies from religious violence or other religious-motivated oppression of huamn rights.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sjcarl
11:18 PM on 06/17/2010
Throw away the key.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zbowling
software engineer, geek
12:36 AM on 06/18/2010
before a trial? The guy has got a right to due process.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sjcarl
01:03 AM on 06/18/2010
I get it. I was just looking forward to the completion of his due process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DocSyracuse
A socially liberal, fiscally conservative surgeon
10:42 PM on 06/17/2010
As they say in Office Space, this guy is going to a Federal pound-me-in-the-a prison for a long, long time.
10:26 PM on 06/17/2010
I'm pretty sure the patriot act or geneva convention has a couple statutes against a uni brow that disturbing...

terror is terror
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zanubiyah
09:34 PM on 06/17/2010
I dont understand something.

If Mr Shahzad confessed that he did (whatever he is accused of), then why does he have to 'plead' something. Isnt it automatically guilty of he confessed?
09:49 PM on 06/17/2010
There is a formal process that requires an indictment and a trial, even if he confessed. The trial can be eliminated IF both the government and the defendant agree to a series of pleas for each count of the indictment. Theoretically, the government and the defendant could agree to a guilty plea or agree to drop charges for each of the counts. The judge would then either agree to the various pleas or require that they be set aside and a trial be pursued. The judge would have to have a clear legal reason to put aside an agreement.

In general, the sequence of arrest, indictment and pleading to the counts as guilty or not guilty, then to a trial, is required.

Separately, many defendants might confess in a session with police, but later re-consider and his or her attorney may then attempt to suppress the confession in a trial. Typical grounds for this revocation or suppression of the confession would be coercion by the police, the lack of being informed of one's right to remain silent (The Miranda Rule), or the denial of legal counsel, once requested by the defendant.
photo
dotherightthingmookie1
Yes We Can!! Yes We Will!! Obama Biden 2012!!
02:12 AM on 06/18/2010
Thank you...you just help me wrap my head around the Law and Order franchise.
photo
dotherightthingmookie1
Yes We Can!! Yes We Will!! Obama Biden 2012!!
02:13 AM on 06/18/2010
Seriously though, that was a nice explanantion. Fav'd
08:50 PM on 06/17/2010
I remember when this story broke everyone was so excited thinking it was going to be a tea bagger, I was so shocked when it turned out to be a member of the religion of peace!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuiltD
09:04 PM on 06/17/2010
I highly doubt someone in the tea party is going to try to bomb busy times square.
photo
Phxflyer
I think, therefore I am not republican
08:50 PM on 06/17/2010
And we didn't have to waterboard him? Wow! That's some good police work!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuiltD
09:05 PM on 06/17/2010
Didn't have to, his dad used to work for the CIA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wolferous
10:50 PM on 06/17/2010
That's actually probably the truth right there, I side with you on this one
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zbowling
software engineer, geek
12:40 AM on 06/18/2010
Where did you read this information. The underwear bombers father was involved in weapons sales with the CIA and the Mossad too. He said that the man that took him to meet Anwar Al Alwaki in Yemen had a State Dept. passport.
Curious and curiouser..
08:19 PM on 06/17/2010
Is that his application photo for 'The Jersey Shore'?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuiltD
08:10 PM on 06/17/2010
Hmmmm and I wonder...who controls the pakistani taliban........hmmm
08:07 PM on 06/17/2010
Why am I suddenly in the mood for a ham sandwich?
08:05 PM on 06/17/2010
good price on the pathfinder, though