More

Elena Kagan Endorsed By 10 Former Solicitors General

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS   06/22/10 05:42 PM ET   AP

Elena Kagan Endorsed

WASHINGTON — Liberal and conservative former solicitors general going back 25 years endorsed Elena Kagan on Tuesday for the Supreme Court, even as Republicans stepped up their criticism of President Barack Obama's nominee.

In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, 10 lawyers named by Republican and Democratic presidents to represent the government before the Supreme Court said Kagan would serve there with distinction. The group included noted conservatives Ted Olson and Ken Starr, the prosecutor who investigated President Bill Clinton while Kagan served in his administration.

A third GOP-named former solicitor general who signed the letter, Paul Clement, joined a conference call organized by the White House to praise Kagan.

"It's hard to imagine a position that would lead to an easier transition to the work of a Supreme Court justice than the work of a solicitor general," said Clement, who served under President George W. Bush. "Elena is going to come to the court as someone who's very familiar with the work of the court, the rhythm of the court, the kind of cases they have to deal with."

The White House has worked to highlight such conservative praise of Kagan, hoping to give cover to Republicans who might be inclined to support her and deprive GOP critics of ammunition to use against her.

Still, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, is stepping up his criticism. The committee will conduct Kagan's confirmation hearings starting next week.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Sessions called Kagan "dangerous" and suggested he was more worried about her becoming a justice than he had been about Sonia Sotomayor, President Barack Obama's first Supreme Court appointment.

"This is a very young nominee, with a very thin legal record, a very strong commitment to politics and liberal causes and an ideology of judging that seems to favor and respect judges who advance the law beyond its plain meaning," Sessions said. "In many ways, I'm feeling this is a more dangerous nominee."

Sessions has complained in recent weeks that documents from Kagan's stints as a Clinton White House lawyer and domestic policy adviser were emerging too slowly and too late to allow senators to thoroughly vet her.

More files emerged Tuesday showing, among other things, that Kagan was a legal point person for Clinton's White House on a type of procedure critics call partial birth abortion. And as domestic policy adviser, she and her boss Bruce Reed appear to have requested that top presidential advisers draft an executive order prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

The documents also show that Kagan was in charge of collecting records subpoenaed by the Republican-led House Government Reform and Oversight Committee for its investigation of firings at the White House travel office in the first months of the Clinton administration.

Seth P. Waxman, who held Kagan's post during the Clinton administration, said her performance as solicitor general shows she'd be able to be an impartial justice.

"She's demonstrated that ability to put aside her personal views pursuant to her professional responsibilities," Waxman said.

Kagan stepped aside from her job as solicitor general last month to focus on winning confirmation.

___

Associated Press writers Gerald Bodlander, Jesse J. Holland, Ann Sanner and Mark Sherman contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Liberal and conservative former solicitors general going back 25 years endorsed Elena Kagan on Tuesday for the Supreme Court, even as Republicans stepped up their criticism of Presi...
WASHINGTON — Liberal and conservative former solicitors general going back 25 years endorsed Elena Kagan on Tuesday for the Supreme Court, even as Republicans stepped up their criticism of Presi...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:08 PM on 06/23/2010
Well, the article doesn't mention it, but Sessions main line of attack has been over banning military recruiters at Harvard Law. She claimed it was because of their discriminatory policy of Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT). However she supported a Sharia Law student group. The Sharia Law group, funded by a Saudi Prince, gives financial aid to students that adhere to Sharia Law. Under Sharia Law, homosexuality is not only forbidden, it's punishable by death in countries where it is the law of the land. He claims that's inconsistent, and shows bad judgment. FWIW
owlbreath
When you seek it, you cannot find it.
03:02 PM on 06/23/2010
Session's hyperbolic rhetoric diminishes any argument he proffers.
photo
Littlewords
My micro bio was outsourced to my nano-bio: I'm me
02:33 PM on 06/23/2010
...and survived a recent borking attempt by failed prior Reagan nominee and right wing anti civil rights SCOTUS nominee, Robert Bork.

So that makes one more thing in the plus column for Kagan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smoovejef
Karma is my God
05:03 PM on 06/23/2010
Bork calls her 'immature", but after all this time, he is still sporting sour grapes over his failed nomination. He is going to have to be committed to a mental institution when she is confirmed, which she will be.

What an a$$clown.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Pennsanic
Be nice to the US or we'll bring you democracy too
10:22 AM on 06/23/2010
Lawrence Lessig (Harvard Law Prof) wrote a good & reasoned essay in support of Kagan.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-lessig/a-case-for-kagan_b_551511.html
09:57 AM on 06/23/2010
Jeff Sessions is just bitter that he didn't get to be a SCOTUS. Grow up, Jeff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HANNIBAL1066
I've written on the Tea Party movement at politica
09:10 AM on 06/23/2010
The fact that conservative Solicitor Generals are supporting her and the White House is touting their support to conservatives in the Senate ought to tell you that she is not a liberal--but a centrist, careerist, corporatist, neo-liberal Democrat.

She will probably be confirmed, barring some unknown disclosure that calls into question her judgment or character.

But, let's not kid ourselves. She is not a liberal. Greenwald and others are correct: she will help tilt the SCOTUS further to the right.
08:42 AM on 06/23/2010
She is not being truthful about herself, if she gets elected, this country is in for a shock.
photo
newtom
eschew obfuscation
11:54 AM on 06/23/2010
Supreme Court Justices are not elected.
photo
deven61
Sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids
05:07 PM on 06/23/2010
I agree....I think she is secretly pro-life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:00 AM on 06/23/2010
She seems a little too radical. Why does this process have to be so ideological? We all know in our hearts what our founders wanted for us. They built the greatest civilization in history. Let's not fix something that ain't broke. Know what I mean?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ckfan
Conduct business honestly; spend money wisely
05:07 AM on 06/23/2010
NO I don't know what you mean. Are you talking about the founding fathers who supported slavery and owned slaves? The ones who included slave ownership as a right in the Constitution. Sorry, but any time a supreme court decides corporations have the same rights as individuals, then that means it IS broken and needs to be fixed.
photo
newtom
eschew obfuscation
11:56 AM on 06/23/2010
Really! Those darned activist judges who change the constitution! How dare they grant equality and voting rights.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Pennsanic
Be nice to the US or we'll bring you democracy too
10:26 AM on 06/23/2010
In what way is she "radical"?

PS: the world has known several great civilizations.

A lot of people here were turned against Kagan by Greenwald's critical essay. I like Greenwald but seriously, there is another POV here. Many progressives do think she'd make a fine justice, who would fight the good fight for progressive causes.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/10/kagan-nomination
12:53 AM on 06/23/2010
Oh the Goldman sachs lady? No thanks
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ckfan
Conduct business honestly; spend money wisely
05:08 AM on 06/23/2010
Part of a consulting panel and paid only $3000. I wouldn't call that being in the pocket of Goldman Sachs. Don't be so flipped and ignorant of the situation.
09:58 AM on 06/23/2010
Yeah, it's kind of like when people say Obama got donations from BP. The donations he got were from people who worked for BP. Big difference.
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
11:54 PM on 06/22/2010
The establishment loves her, which is evidence enough that she's a terrible pick.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ckfan
Conduct business honestly; spend money wisely
05:09 AM on 06/23/2010
Gee, how long did it take you to come up with that insightful response.
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
07:06 PM on 06/23/2010
If that's the most convincing defense you can mount for her, then I rest my case.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:25 PM on 06/22/2010
That Elena Kagan is some sort of human sympathizer . . .

~spits~

Yup . . . very dangerous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotorhead1871
who are you jivin' with that cosmic debris?...
11:06 PM on 06/22/2010
dont know too much about her, but most seem to have a good opinion. I think she will get the job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSWatchdog
citizen
10:50 PM on 06/22/2010
I don't care if she was endorsed by all he Supreme Court Jurist going back to the Revolution. She's never been a judge, we need a SC jurist from other than New York again, and (most importantly) her argument against Roberts in the disastrous Citizens United case was weak and ill prepared. It was an indication of things to come.
01:25 AM on 06/23/2010
It wouldn't have a made a bit of difference what she said. Roberts was primed and ready to dismiss 100 years of precedent. The other conservative justices were more than ready to follow his lead.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ckfan
Conduct business honestly; spend money wisely
05:09 AM on 06/23/2010
We have a history of great Justices who were never judges. It's not a requirement.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krummlaw
10:23 PM on 06/22/2010
If Sen Sessions is afraid of Ms. Kagan, she's the real deal!
photo
HowdyDoody
Freud Woman
11:55 PM on 06/22/2010
Yeah, you could say that, but Sessions is afraid of everybody!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:10 PM on 06/22/2010
only ten?